• No results found

Chapter 6: Conclusions

6.2 Change of higher education conditions in the western region after

6.2.2 Local (provincial) picture

Esta revisão narrativa permitiu concluir que os dentes mais frequentemente ausentes por agenésia, após os terceiros molares, são os incisivos laterais superiores e segundos pré- molares. Nos estudos mais recentes verifica-se uma maior prevalência do segundo pré-molar inferior.

Os autores concordam que a agenésia manifesta-se, maioritariamente, com a ausência de um ou dois dentes. No caso de ausências múltiplas, é mais frequente a agenésia bilateral, comparativamente à agenésia unilateral. Deste modo, é possível verificar frequentes associações entre a ausência dos segundos pré-molares inferiores com os segundos pré- molares superiores, segundos pré-molares inferiores com os incisivos laterais superiores e, todos estes dentes em simultâneo.

No que diz respeito à prevalência da agenésia entre homens e mulheres, ainda não existe consenso entre os vários autores relativamente ao género mais afetado.

Apesar dos vários estudos, de um modo geral não se verificaram diferenças significativas relativamente ao maxilar mais frequentemente afetado, tanto do lado esquerdo como do lado direito.

Todos os autores concordam que o diagnóstico precoce é crucial para a obtenção dos melhores resultados terapêuticos. Defendem ainda que as crianças devem ser monitorizadas desde os 6 anos, através da observação clínica e radiográfica. Relativamente ao tratamento, é quase unânime que este pode ser simples ou complexo, dependendo do número de dentes afetados, devendo o paciente ser sujeito aos cuidados de uma equipa multidisciplinar, incluindo odontopediatras, ortodontistas e cirurgiões orais.

São necessários mais estudos para verificar, não só qual o segundo dente mais afetado, mas também para esclarecer se existe alguma diferença entre os géneros e os maxilares. Os autores defendem que estes estudos deverão incluir crianças de idade superior a 12 anos.

24

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

Al-Abdallah M, Alhadidi A, Hammad M, Al-Ahmad H, Saleh R. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies: A comparison between maxillary and mandibular tooth agenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. American Association of Orthodontists; 2015;148(5):793–798.

Andersson EMM, Axelsson S, Austeng ME, Overland B, Valen IE, Jensen TA, et al. Bilateral hypodontia is more common than unilateral hypodontia in children with Down syndrome: A prospective population-based study. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36(4):414–8.

Antonarakis GS, Suri S. Prevalence and patterns of permanent tooth agenesis in patients with nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(4):452– 60.

Awadh W, Kiukkonen A, Nieminen P, Arte S, Hurmerinta K, Rice DP. Blepharocheilodontic (BCD) syndrome: New insights on craniofacial and dental features. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173(4):905–13.

Badrov J, Gašpar G, Tadin A, Galić T, Govorko DK, Gavić L, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of congenitally missing permanent teeth among orthodontic patients in Southern Croatia. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2017;51(4):290–299.

Bonczek O, Balcar VJ, Šerý O. PAX9 gene mutations and tooth agenesis: A review. Clin Genet. 2017;92(5):467–476.

Bozga A, Stanciu RP, Mănuc D. A study of prevalence and distribution of tooth agenesis. J Med Life. 2014;7(4):551–554.

Cantekin K, Dane A, Miloglu O, Kazanci F, Bayrakdar S, Celikoglu M. Prevalence and intra-oral distribution of agenesis of permanent teeth among eastern turkish children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(1):53–6.

Carvalho S, Mesquita P, Afonso A. Prevalência das anomalias de número numa população portuguesa. Estudo radiográfico. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent e Cir Maxilofac. 2011;52(1):7–12.

Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Nur M. Patterns of third-molar agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. American Association of Orthodontists; 2011;140(6):856–860.

Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):3–7.

Choi SJ, Lee JW, Song JH. Dental anomaly patterns associated with tooth agenesis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(3):161–5.

de Smalen A, van Nunen DPF, Hermus RR, Ongkosuwito EM, van Wijk AJ, Griot JPWD, et al. Permanent tooth agenesis in non-syndromic Robin sequence and cleft palate: prevalence and patterns. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2273–81.

Dinckan N, Du R, Akdemir ZC, Bayram Y, Jhangiani SN, Doddapaneni H, et al. A biallelic ANTXR1 variant expands the anthrax toxin receptor associated phenotype to tooth agenesis. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2018;176(4):1015–22.

Dreesen K, Swinnen S, Devriendt K, Carels C. Tooth agenesis patterns and phenotype variation in a cohort of Belgian patients with hypodontia and oligodontia clustered in 79 families with their pedigrees. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36(1):99–106.

Endo S, Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Abe R, Endo T. Association between third molar agenesis patterns and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology. 2015;103(1):89–96.

Fauzi NH, Ardini YD, Zainuddin Z, Lestari W. A review on non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with PAX9 mutations. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. Japanese Association for Dental Science; 2018;54(1):30–36.

Fournier BP, Bruneau MH, Toupenay S, Kerner S, Berdal A, Coudert AE, et al. Patterns of Dental Agenesis Highlight the Nature of the Causative Mutated Genes. 2018;

Galluccio G, Pilotto A. Genetics of dental agenesis: anterior and posterior area of the arch. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(1):41—45.

26 Gkantidis N, Katib H, Oeschger E, Karamolegkou M, Topouzelis N, Kanavakis G. Patterns of non-syndromic permanent tooth agenesis in a large orthodontic population. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;79:42–7.

González-Allo A, Campoy MD, Moreira J, Ustrell J, Pinho T. Les agénésies dentaires dans la population portugaise. Int Orthod. 2012;10(2):198–210.

Goya HA, Tanaka S, Maeda T, Akimoto Y. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. J Oral Sci. 2008;50(2):143–150.

Goyal S, Verma P, Sunder Raj S. Radiographic evaluation of the status of third molars in Sriganganagar population – A digital panoramic study. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2016;23(6):103–12.

Hermus RR, Van Wijk AJ, Tan SPK, Kramer GJC, Ongkosuwito EM. Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with orofacial clefts. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(4):328–32.

Kenrad JB, Christensen IJ, Kjær I. Gender differences in patterns of second premolar agenesis observed in 4,756 individuals. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(6):397–403.

Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E, Macfarlane T V. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod. 2014;41(4):299–316.

Liang J, Von Den Hoff J, Lange J, Ren Y, Bian Z, Carels CEL. MSX1 mutations and associated disease phenotypes: Genotype-phenotype relations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(12):1663–70.

Machida J, Nishiyama T, Kishino H, Yamaguchi S, Kimura M, Shibata A, et al. Genetic epidemiology of tooth agenesis in Japan: A population- and family-based study. Clin Genet. 2015;88(2):167–71.

Medina AC, Pozo R Del, de Cedres LB. Radiographic Assessment of Dental Maturation in Children With Dental Agenesis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(3):227–234.

Mehrotra D. Genomic expression in non syndromic cleft lip and palate patients: A review. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res. 2015;5(2):86–91.

Mishima S, Yamaguchi T, Watanabe T, Komatani T, Nakao K, Takahashi K, et al. Maxillary hypoplasia with congenital oligodontia treated by maxillary distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):e411–4.

Moran A, Tippett H, Manoharan A, Cobourne MT. Alteration of palatine ruga pattern in subjects with oligodontia: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;150(2):295– 302.

Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970;81(1):101–107.

O’Sullivan M, O’Connell BC. Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hypodontia. Med J Armed Forces India. 2011;6(September):67–69.

Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van Der Linden FPGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta- analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(3):217–226.

Rakhshan V, Rakhshan H. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the number of non- syndromic congenitally missing permanent teeth per affected individual and its influencing factors. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(2):170–177.

Rølling S, Poulsen S. Agenesis of permanent teeth in 8138 Danish schoolchildren: prevalence and intra-oral distribution according to gender. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19:172–5

Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Endo S, Tanaka S, Endo T, et al. Patterns of bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars and agenesis of other teeth. Odontology. 2016;104(1):98– 104.

Schnabl D, Gerhard S, Biedermann R, Crismani A, Rasse M, Zauza K, et al. Dental Management and Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Patients Suffering from Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia: A Report of Two Case Histories. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;1–6.

Seabra M, Macho V, Pinto A, Soares D, Andrade C. A Importância das Anomalias Dentárias de Desenvolvimento. Acta Pediátrica Portuguesa, 2008, 195-200.

Sejdini M, Çerkezi S. Dental Number Anomalies and Their Prevalence According To Gender and Jaw in School Children 7 To 14 Years. 2018;6(5):867–873.

Sharma G, Johal AS, Liversidge HM. Predicting agenesis of the mandibular second premolar from adjacent teeth. PLoS One. 2015;10(12).

28 Shimizu T, Maeda T. Prevalence and genetic basis of tooth agenesis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. Japanese Association for Dental Science; 2009;45(1):52–58.

Silva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13(2):112–116.

Souza-Silva BN, Vieira W de A, Bernardino Í de M, Batista MJ, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns and their association with other dental anomalies: A retrospective study. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;96:26–32.

Tallón-Walton V, Manzanares-Céspedes MC, Carvalho-Lobato P, Valdivia-Gandur I, Arte S, Nieminen P. Exclusion of PAX9 and MSX1 mutation in six families affected by tooth agenesis. A genetic study and literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(3).

Vieira AR. Oral clefts and syndromic forms of tooth agenesis as models for genetics of isolated tooth agenesis. J Dent Res. 2003;82(3):162–5.

Wilberg P, Kanellopoulos A, Ruud E, Hjermstad MJ, Fosså SD, Herlofson BB. Dental abnormalities after chemotherapy in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 7–40 years after diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(4):1497–506.

Yemitan TA, Adediran VE, Ajisafe OA e Ogunbanjo BO. A Radiographic Study of Non-Syndromic Congenitally Missing Teeth in Permanent Dentition of Nigerian Dental Patients. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2016;3(5):258–263.