5. FROM FORMAL TO INFORMAL CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
5.2. K UDUMBASHREE - P ROSPERITY OF THE F AMILY
5.2. Kudumbashree Prosperity of the Family
Kudumbashree means “prosperity of the family”, empowerment of women is a way to bring empowerment to the whole family. The members of the Kudumbashree are proud to be a member, and they acknowledge that is an important step in empowering themselves and their family, both socially and politically. The Kudumbashree is absolutely one of the success stories on how empowerment can contribute to increase participation. However, the role of the Kudumbashree in civil society in the rural areas slightly differs from the urban areas. In rural areas they are a bigger part of the political sphere, citizens (especially Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Casted) expressed a relatively higher trust in the Kudumbashree than the politicians, the politicians also seemed to make use of the Kudumbashree to reach
out to these marginalized groups (Olsen et.al. 2011). In urban areas they do not seem to play the same political role. In urban areas the Kudumbashree focuses on a greater extent on the purpose it was meant to have for the members, to bring women together to help enhance their economic security.
5.2.1. More passive in urban areas than in rural areas
Already at an early stage of the field study, it became evident that the Kudumbashree in Kochi does not have the same influence when it comes to citizens’
participation compared to the Kudumbashree in Wayanad. In Wayanad, the politicians, and the Kudumbashree members themselves, saw it as their responsibility to get the ordinary citizen to participate in the local meetings and elections by informing them about the meetings, and the importance of participating. The Kudumbashree members that I talked to in Kochi did not necessarily have any strong affinity to any political party, for them it was important that the job was done. They saw their role as to identify the needs of their family, and being a member of the Kudumbashree enabled them to get jobs and attend different programs reserved for them as women.
They all stressed the importance of the presence of women in politics, praising the 50 per cent reservation for women in Panchayats and other local bodies. However, when asked about their thoughts on the importance of democracy, and citizen’s participation to any of them, they became uncertain and just shook their heads. In some cases I believe that the lack of language skills could have played a part. Nevertheless, they did not shake their heads until after the interpreter had finished translating.
I had hoped that the Kudumbashree would play a bigger role in empowering women and local communities when it came to citizen participation in Kochi.
However, the challenges that these women meet in the urban context of Kochi are greater than in rural Wayanad. It seems that in urban areas the Kudumbashree focuses on a greater extent on the purpose it was meant to have for its members, to bring women together to help enhance their economic security. And where the
Kudumbashree in Wayanad may have been an initiative taker for citizen participation and enlightenment about social and political issues, the Kudumbashree in Kochi seemed not to have the resources necessary to engage in these matters. However, the challenge is to make sure that the lack of further engagement and involvement is not a result of lack of knowledge and insight into how the democratic institutions work.
5.2.2. Meaning of the vote
The women may not have any strong opinions when it comes to democracy and political issues beyond the matters that have a direct impact on their own lives, however, several of them expressed strong opinions when asked about their electoral participation.
I find it interesting how these women felt so strongly regarding their right to vote. Compared to my other informants, the Kudumbashree members talked about voting in a different manner. For them voting was more of a right and a privilege rather than a duty. This is also compatible with studies of voting behaviour in India have pointed out that socio‐economic status is not related to voting, and it turns out that citizens with a lower socio‐economic status have a higher participation rate compared to those of high socio‐economic status (Yadav 1996; Yadav and Palshikar 2003). The studies show that people from different social class vote for different reasons. All my informants were asked weather or not they voted at the last elections, many answered no. In comparison, all my informants that were members of the Kudumbashree told me that they had voted, some even seemed slightly offended by the question.
“Of course I did, to vote is an important part of democracy. If you do not vote, you do not care”.
Kali
Studies of voting behavior in India have pointed out that socio‐economic status is not related to voting, and it turns out that citizens with a lower socio‐economic status have a higher participation rate compared to those of high socio‐economic
status (Yadav 1996; Yadav and Palshikar 2003). The studies shows that people from different social class votes for different reasons. For poor people the vote is considered as a right and a privileged, while for the middle class it is seen as a duty of citizenship.
Being active in a civil organization can also have a positive impact on the individual member’s trust in governmental institutions and its officials. In his survey of citizen participation in Italy, Putnam (1993) shows that association members tend to exhibit more social trust and citizen participation than non‐members.