• No results found

2.2 Antennas

2.2.1 Fundamental parameters of antennas

An antenna radiation pattern or antenna pattern is a characterization of the electromagnetic field generated by an antenna and can be expressed as a mathematical function or as a graphical representation. The radiation property of most interest is often the two- or three- dimensional spatial dis-tribution of radiated energy as a function of a path or surface of constant radius. A coordinate system with the antenna placed in the origo is shown in Fig. 2.6.

Figure 2.6: Coordinate system for antenna analysis [48].

The received electric or magnetic field at a constant radius is called the amplitudefield pattern. A graph of the spatial variation of the power density at a constant radius is called an amplitude power pattern. These patterns are often normalized with respect to their maximum value. The radiation patterns consist of different parts, often referred to as lobes. These lobes are further divided into the major or main lobe where most of the energy is concentrated and the minor lobes which contains the least energy. A special case of a minor lobe is the back lobe that points in the opposite direction of the main lobe.

Associated with the antenna pattern is a parameter called beamwidth.

The beamwidth of a pattern is the angular separation between two identical points located on opposite side of the pattern maximum. The most used beamwidth is the Half-Power Beamwidth (HPBW) that refers to the points

where the pattern achieves its half-power, relative to the maximum value.

These half-power values are found by setting the value of the field pattern at 0.707 of its maximum and the power pattern at -3 dB (0.5 in a linear scale) value of its maximum.

The space surrounding an antenna is divided into three regions: the reac-tive near-field, the radiating near-field (Fresnel) and the far-field (Fraunhofer) as seen on Fig. 2.7. The boundaries between these regions are not unique, however, some commonly used criterions exist.

Figure 2.7: The field regions of an antenna [49].

The reactive near-field is defined as

”That portion of the near-field region immediately surrounding the antenna, wherein the reactive field predominates” [50].

The reactive power is associated with the non-propagating, quasi-static field components which dominate in this region. The reactive component de-creases rapidly with the distance from the antenna, and soon it is insignificant compared to the radiating component. The outer boundary of this region is located at a distance R1 = 0.62p

D3/λ, where D is the largest dimension of the aperture and λ is the wavelength.

2.2. ANTENNAS 21 The radiating near-field (Fresnel) region is defined as

”That portion of the near-field region of an antenna between the farfield and the reactive portion of the near-field region, wherein the angular field distribution is dependent upon distance from the antenna. If the antenna has a maximum overall dimension that is not large compared to the wavelength, this field region may not exist” [50].

In this region the field pattern is a function of the radial distance and the radial field component can dominate. The outer boundary for the radiating near-field region is taken to be the distance R2 = 2Dλ2.

The far-field (Fraunhofer) region is defined as

”That region of the field of an antenna where the angular field distribution is essentially independent of the distance from a point in the antenna region” [50].

The field components are mainly transverse (TEM) in this region. There is no outer boundary for the far-field region.

When describing the power associated with an electromagnetic wave, we use the Poynting vector defined as

W=E×H, (2.2.1)

where

W=instantaneous Poynting vector (W/m2).

E=instantaneous electric-field intensity (V /m).

H=instantaneous magnetic-field intensity (A/m).

The total power crossing a closed surface is given by P=

I

s

I

W·ds= I

s

I

W·bnds, (2.2.2) where

P= instantaneous total power (W).

b

n= unit vector normal to the surface.

da= infinitesimal area of the closed surface (m2).

Assume time variation on the form ejωt, where j = √

−1 and ω = 2πf. We can then define the complex electric and magnetic fieldsE andH, which can be related to their instantaneous counterparts Eand H by the following equations

E(x, y, z;t) = Re[E(x, y, z)ejωt], (2.2.3)

H(x, y, z;t) = Re[H(x, y, z)ejωt]. (2.2.4) By using Eqs. (2.2.3) and (2.2.4), and the identityRe[Eejωt] = 12[Eejωt+ Eejωt] where (*) denotes the complex conjugate, the Poynting vector in Eq. (2.2.1) can be written as

W=E×H= 1

2Re[E×H] + 1

2Re[E×Hj2ωt]. (2.2.5) This gives us the time average Poynting vector or average power density

Wav(x, y, z) = [W(x, y, z;t)]av = 1

2Re[E×H]. (2.2.6) Based on Eq. (2.2.6), the average power radiated by an antenna can be written as

Prad = I

s

I

Wrad·ds= I

s

I

Wav·ndab = 1 2

I

s

I

Re(E×H)·ds. (2.2.7) Typically, antennas tend to radiate more power in certain directions. This is referred to as the antennas directivity, D, and is defined as follows

”The ratio of the radiation intensity in a given direction from the antenna to the radiation intensity averaged over all directions.

The average radiation intensity is equal to the total power radi-ated by the antenna divided by 4π” [50].

In mathematical form

D= U

U0 = 4πU

Prad, (2.2.8)

where

D= directivity (dimensionless).

U =r2Wrad= radiation intensity (W/unit solid angle).

U0= radiation intensity of isotropic source (W/unit solid angle).

Prad= total radiated power (W). Directivity is often expressed in decibels (dB), and the formula for converting the dimensionless quantity to decibels is

D(dB) = 10log10[D(dimensionless)] (2.2.9) All antennas suffer from losses caused by reflections due to mismatch be-tween the transmission line and the antenna or from losses in the conducting and dielectric materials. With that in mind, the antenna efficiency can be written as

e0 =ereced (2.2.10)

2.2. ANTENNAS 23 where

e0= total efficiency (dimensionless).

er=1− |Γ|2= reflection (mismatch) efficiency (dimensionless).

ec= conduction efficiency (dimensionless).

ed= dielectric efficiency (dimensionless).

|Γ|= reflection coefficient.

It’s difficult to calculate ec and ed, and Eq. (2.2.10) is therefore often written on the form

e0 =erecd =ecd(1− |Γ|2), (2.2.11) whereecd =eced is the antenna radiation efficiency, which, as seen later, can be used to relate the gain and the directivity.

Closely related to the directivity, and an often used measure of the an-tenna performance, is the gain. The anan-tenna gain is defined by IEEE as

”The ratio of the radiation intensity, in a given direction, to the radiation intensity that would be obtained if the power accepted by the antenna were radiated isotropically. The radiation inten-sity corresponding to the isotropically radiated power is equal to the power accepted by the antenna divided by 4π” [50].

In mathematical form this is expressed as G= 4πU(θ, φ)

Pin

, (2.2.12)

where

G= gain (dimensionless).

U= radiation intensity (W/unit solid angle).

Pin= power accepted by the antenna (W).

The radiated power can be expressed asPrad =ecdPin. Inserting this into Eq. (2.2.12) yields

G(θ, φ) = ecd

4πU(θ, φ) Prad

. (2.2.13)

Comparing the right hand side of Eq. (2.2.13) to the directivity given in Eq.

(2.2.8), we obtain the following relation between gain and directivity [48]

G(θ, φ) = ecdD(θ, φ). (2.2.14) The phase center of an antenna is the point from which radiation is said to be emitted. This is therefore the spatial reference point of the antenna.

To determine the antenna’s phase center as a function of observation angle, the far-field phase properties are considered. The far-field component of the radiated E-vector can be written as

E =E(θ, φ)F(θ, φ) (2.2.15) where E(θ, φ) represents the (θ, φ) variations of the amplitude and F(θ, φ) represents the (θ, φ) variations of the phase.

However, this only holds under the assumption that E(θ, φ) and F(θ, φ) has a expj(ωt− βr)/r dependence. If there exists a point in space that reduces the phase function F(θ, φ) to a constant, then this point is said to be the phase center of the antenna. The localization of the phase center may also be calculated by finding the point of intersection of successive rays emitted from the antenna, as seen in Fig. 2.8 [51].

Phase center with coordinates (Xa,Ya).

Xa

Ya

Rays emitted from the antenna.

Figure 2.8: The localization of the phase center determined by intersection of rays.

The bandwidth of an antenna is the range of frequencies, on either side of the center frequency, where some antenna characteristics (such as pattern, beamwidth, radiation efficiency and gain) are within an acceptable value

2.2. ANTENNAS 25 compared to the characteristics of the center frequency. For so-called nar-rowband antennas, the the bandwidth is expressed as a percentage of the frequency difference over the center frequency. For broadband antennas, the bandwidth is expressed as a ratio of the upper-to-lower frequencies of accept-able operation.

Antennas often have an inherent interpropagation time, or a time bias.

This means that the signal travels along the antenna before being radiated from some aperture. The time which the signal travels, is referred to as the antenna bias, and can be found by determining the difference between the measured and the theoretical time for the signal to reach a target of known localization.

The initial polarization of a wave is determined by the antenna transmit-ting the wave. The desired polarization is therefore a factor when designing the antenna. Sometimes, a particular polarization is preferable, in other cases it makes little or no difference. There are three different polarizations;

linear, circular and elliptical. A wave is linearly polarized if the electric-or magnetic-field vectelectric-or is always electric-oriented along the same straight line at a given point in space, as shown in Fig. 2.9. The wave is circularly polarized if the same field vector traces a circle as a function of time. The circular motion can be either clockwise or counterclockwise, seen as the wave travels away from the observer. This also holds for the elliptically polarized wave, where the tip of the field vector traces an elliptical orbit in space [48].

Figure 2.9: The polarization of an electromagnetic wave [52].