• No results found

23

China, India and Vietnam have achieved impressive results in poverty reduction and there are numerous reasons for this achievement. All three countries have achieved rapid economic growth, and the implementation of so-called track I reforms have been vital for poverty reduction. China and Vietnam have nonetheless managed to reduce poverty more rapidly than India. Legacies of socialist-oriented educational and health policies appear to have played an

important role here, but also China and Vietnam’s orientation towards agricultural modernisation and agriculture-led growth has been crucial for improving rural livelihoods.

While poverty reduction has indeed been impressive, all three countries continue to face considerable developmental challenges. We identified and discussed at least two overarching frontiers of research and policymaking on poverty in emerging Asia. The first relates to the fact that rapid economic growth witnessed in China, India and Vietnam has been achieved at the cost of significant environmental consequences. Urban air pollution and rural water and soil

pollution are only some of the major challenges emerging Asia is currently facing.

While such challenges pose a major threat to continued economic progress, they are most importantly a direct threat to the health and livelihoods of the poor, both in urban and rural areas. Thus all three countries must ensure that policies aimed at promoting economic welfare are not undertaken at the cost of the environment.

The impact of climate change is already becoming visible in all three countries, and natural disasters and declining crop yields will pose difficult questions to the political and administrative leadership as they continue to develop economically and struggle to feed their burgeoning populations.

The second frontier of poverty in emerging Asia relates to uneven

development and growing levels of inequality. The differences between the urban and rural poor and the middle and upper classes in all three countries are stark reminders of the challenges ahead. The nature of politics and public policies often determine how successfully economic growth can improve the wellbeing of the poor. Attempts to accelerate economic development and reduce poverty are

fundamentally political issues which often run into political obstacles, and it will be interesting to follow how India, China and Vietnam address growing inequalities

24

within their societies in the near future. More specifically, we have discussed the phenomenon of ‘transitional poverty’, which refers to multi-dimensional poverty produced during the rapid social and economic transformation processes. While this is most visible in China, the phenomenon is also of potential relevance for India and Vietnam. With agriculture diminishing in importance as driver of growth in all three countries, and industries being centred mainly in and around urban areas, there are considerable challenges in ensuring that the rural poor are not left behind. Thus, poverty reduction may prove even harder in the near future than in the immediate past, as the effects of track I reforms may be wearing off which will in turn necessitate anti-poverty policies that place even greater emphasis on issues of redistribution than is currently the case. There is a need for greater attention on the plight of minorities and other vulnerable households in emerging Asia, and combating various forms of discrimination, stigmatisation and marginalisation.

Many minority groups live in areas where economic development has been less visible. Finding ways to reduce the marginalisation of minority groups while also respecting different cultures and lifestyles currently represents the primary challenge for future poverty reduction in all three countries.

Another set of challenges we have discussed in this essay relates to the problem of hunger. While this is particularly challenging for India, many groups in the population in China and Vietnam also suffer from undernutrition, particularly in rural areas. And although democracy ensures that famines and large (and visible) crises are successfully prevented in India, the country remains home to one third of the world’s undernourished children. Furthermore, every third

woman in the country is undernourished, and more than half of Indian women are anaemic. Any country with aspirations of becoming a major world power must make combating hunger a high policy priority.

25 REFERENCES

Banik, D., 2007, Starvation and India’s Democracy, London: Routledge.

Banik, D., 2011, ‘Growth and Hunger in India', Journal of Democracy, 22(3): 90-104.

Banik, D., 2013, ‘China and Poverty Reduction in Africa’, in Guanghua Yu (ed.), Rethinking Law and Development: The Chinese Experience, London: Routledge.

Baulch, B., Chuyen, TTK, Haughton, D. and Haughton, J. (2007), ‘Ethnic minority development in Vietnam’, Journal of Development Studies 43 (7): 1151-1176.

Beresford, M., 2008, ‘Doi Moi in Review: The Challenges of Building Market Socialism in Vietnam’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (2): 221-243.

Bhagwati, J. and A. Panagariya, 2013, Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries, New York: Public Affairs.

Breslin, S., 2011, ‘The “China Model” and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Model of Governance?’ International Affairs, Vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1323-1343.

Chen, J. and A. Barrientos, 2006, ‘Extending Social Assistance in China: Lessons from the Minimum Living Standard Scheme’, CPRC Working Paper 67, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester.

Chen, S. and M. Ravallion, 2008, ‘The Developing World is Poorer Than We Thought, but No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty”, Available

at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/JAPANINJAPANESEEXT/Resources/51549 7-1201490097949/080827_The_Developing_World_is_Poorer_than_we_Thought.pdf (Accessed: 10 April 2013).

Drèze, J. and A. Sen, 1989, Hunger and Public Action, Oxford: Clarendon.

Fan, S., J. Brzeska and G. Shields, 2007, Investment Priorities for Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: 2020 Focus Brief on the World’s Poor and Hungry People, Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

FAO (2014), State of Food Insecurity in the World, Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.

Gabriele, A., 2006, ‘Social Services Policies in a Developing Market Economy Oriented Towards Socialism: The Case of Health System Reforms in Vietnam’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 258-289.

Gainsborough, M., 2010, Vietnam: Rethinking the State, London: Zed Books.

Gereffi, G., 2009, ‘Development Models and Industrial Upgrading in China and Mexico’, European Sociological Review, Vol., 25, No. 1, pp. 37-51.

Griffin, K., 1998, ‘Restructuring and Economic Reforms’, in Keith Griffin (ed.), Economic Reform in Vietnam, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

Gumbine, E. E., 2013, ‘China at Crossroads: Balancing the Economy and Environment’, Yale Environment 360, 14 November 2013.

GSO – General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 2012, ‘Household Living Standard Survey 2012’, Hanoi: Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Hansen, A., 2015, ‘The Best of Both Worlds? The Power and Pitfalls of Vietnam's Development Model’, in Arve Hansen and Ulrikke Wethal (eds.), Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London and New York: Routledge.

Hansen, A (in press) ‘Driving development? The problems and promises of the car in Vietnam’, Journal of Contemporary Asia

Hansen, A. and U. Wethal, 2015a, ‘Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability’, in Arve Hansen and Ulrikke Wethal (eds.), Emerging Economies and Challenges to

26

Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London and New York:

Routledge.

Hansen, A. and U. Wethal, 2015b, ‘Global Sustainability and the Rise of the South:

Development Patterns and Emerging Challenges’, in Arve Hansen and Ulrikke Wethal (eds.), Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London and New York: Routledge.

Hoang, T. X., C. S. Pham and M. A. Ulubasoglu, 2014, ‘Non-Farm Activity, Household Expenditure, and Poverty Reduction in Rural Vietnam: 2002-2008’, World Development, Vol 64, pp. 554-568.

JDPR - Joint Donor Partner Report, 2012, Vietnam Development Report 2012: Market Economy for a Middle-Income Vietnam, Hanoi: World Bank.

Juwei, Z., 2010, ‘Social Protection in China: Current Status and Challenges’, Institute of Population and Labour Economics, China Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing.

Kaplinsky, R. and D.Messner, 2008, ‘Introduction: The Impact of Asian Drivers on the Developing World’, World Development, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 197-209.

Kjellberg, F. and D. Banik, 2000, ‘The Paradox of Pollution Control: Regulations and Administration in a South Indian State’, Research Report No. 2/2000, Department of Political science, University of Oslo.

Kohli, A., 2004, State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knutsen, H. M. and Xiaoxi Ou, 2015, ‘Ecological Modernisation and Dilemmas of Sustainable Development in China’, in Arve Hansen and Ulrikke Wethal (eds.), Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London and New York: Routledge.

Le Hong Hiep, 2012, ‘Performance-Based Legitimacy: The Case of the Communist Party of Vietnam and Doi Moi’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 145-172.

Li, X. and D. Banik, 2013, ‘The Pursuit of Inclusive Development in China: From Developmental to Rights-Based Social Protection’, Indian Journal of Human Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 205-221.

London, J., 2014, ‘Toward a New Politics?’, in Jonathan London (ed.), Politics in

Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Malesky, E., R. Abrami and Y. Zheng, 2011, ‘Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China’, Comparative Politics, Vol.

43, No. 4, pp. 401-419.

Masina, P., 2015, ‘Miracles or Uneven Development? Asia in the Contemporary World Economy’, in Arve Hansen and Ulrikke Wethal (eds.), Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London and New York: Routledge.

Masina, P., 2006, Vietnam's Development Strategies, Oxon UK; New York: Routledge.

MFA/UN, 2015, ‘Report on China’s Implementation of the Millennium Development Goals (1990-2015), Internet

access: http://www.cn.undp.org/content/dam/china/docs/Publications/UNDP-CH-SSC-MDG2015_English.pdf. Date: 24.08.2015.

MoNRE - Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 2010, National State of Environment 2010, Hanoi.

Montalvo, J. G. and M. Ravallion, 2010, ‘The Pattern of Growth and Poverty Reduction in China’, Journal of Compararive Economics, Vol. 38, pp 2-16.

Piao, Shilong, Ciais, Philippe, Huang, Yao et al., 2010, ‘The Impacts of Climate Change on Water Resources and Agriculture in China’, Nature, Vol. 467, No. 2, pp. 43-51.

Ravallion, M. and S. Chen, 2007, ‘China’s (Uneven) Progress against Poverty’, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 82, pp. 1-42.

27

Ravallion, M., 2009, ‘A Comparative Perspective on Poverty Reduction in Brazil, China and India’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 5080, World Bank.

Ruan, L. Y., 2015, ‘Why China Can’t Fix Its Environment’, The Diplomat, 16 March 2015.

Sen, A., 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Szirmai, A., 2013, ‘Manufacturing and Economic Development’, in A. Szirmai, W. Naudé and L. Alcorta, (eds.), Pathways to Industrialization in the Twenty-first Century, Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Taylor, Philip 2007, ‘Poor Policies, Wealthy Peasants: Alternative Trajectories of Rural Development in Vietnam’, Journal of Vietnamese Studies, Vol. 2 (2), 3-56.

Taylor, P., 2004, ‘Introduction: Social Inequality in a Socialist State’, in Taylor, P (ed.):

Social Inequality in Vietnam and the Challenges to Reform, Singapore: ISEAS.

Taylor, J. G. and X. Li, 2012, ‘China’s Changing Poverty: A Middle Income Country Case Study’, Journal of International Development, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp 696-713.

Thaker, J. and A. Leiserowitz, 2014, ‘Shifting Discourses of Climate Change in India’, Climate Change Vol. 123: 107-119.

UNDP/IPRCC, 2011, China’s Poverty Reduction Policies during the Process of Urban–Rural Integration, Sub-report Three of the Policy Study on Challenges and Responses to Poverty Reduction in China’s New Stage, United Nations Development

Programme/International Poverty Reduction Centre in China, Beijing.

UNDP, 2014, ‘2014 Human Development Trends by Indicator’, Internet access: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data. Date: 16.03.2015.

UNFPA, 2013, State of World Population 2013: Motherhood in Childhood, UNFPA.

Van Arkadie, B. and R. Mallon, 2003, Viet Nam: A Transition Tiger? The Australian National University: Asia Pacific Press.

Wells-Dang, A., 2014, ‘The Political Influence of Civil Society in Vietnam’, in Jonathan London (ed.), Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wells-Dang, Andrew (2012) Ethnic Minority Development in Vietnam: What Leads to Success?Background Paper prepared for the 2012 World Bank Poverty Assessment, available at http://www.ngocentre.org.vn/webfm_send/4084.

World Bank, 2002, Vietnam Development Report 2003: Vietnam Delivering on Its Promise, Hanoi: World Bank, 2002.

World Bank, 2009, From Poor Areas to Poor People: China’s Evolving Poverty Reduction Agenda, Washington, DC: World Bank, East Asia and Pacific Region.

World Bank 2009, Country Social Analysis: Ethnicity and Development in Vietnam.

Washington.

World Bank, 2010, ‘Vietnam: Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change’, Washington DC:

World Bank.

World Bank, 2011, Poverty and Social Exclusion in India, World Bank, New Delhi.

World Bank, 2012, Well Begun, Not yet Done: Vietnam’s Remarkable Progress on Poverty Reduction and the Emerging Challenges, Hanoi: World Bank.

World Bank, 2014a, ‘Vietnam Overview’, Internet

access: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/vietnam/overview, Date:

16.03.2015.

World Bank, 2014b, World Development Indicators, Internet

access: http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.9. Date: 06.03.2015.

World Bank 2014c, World Development Indicators. Internet

access: http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.8. Date: 18.08.2015

Zhang, K., J. A. Dearing T. P. Dawson et al., 2015, ‘Poverty Alleviation Strategies in Eastern China Lead to Critical Ecological Dynamics’, Science of The Total Environment, Vol.

506-507, pp 164-181.

28 NOTES

1 Although the terms ‘emerging economy’ or ‘emerging country’ are ill-defined concepts, they are frequently used as umbrella terms for countries experiencing rapid growth and integration in the global economy (see Hansen and Wethal 2015a&b). Many of these countries are also playing increasingly important roles in international politics. There are, however, disagreements on whether the ‘emerging’ tag is appropriate (as some consider India, China and Brazil to have already

‘emerged’) and whether it makes sense to group countries using arbitrary criteria when they do not appear to have much in common other than rapid economic growth rates.

2 See: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/table-2-human-development-index-trends-1980-2013

3The only goals that the country has not achieved as of July 2015 relate to Target 7B: ‘Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss’ and Target 7D:

‘Achieve, by 2020, a significant improvement in the living conditions of around 100 million slum dwellers’ (MFA/UN, 2015 pp. 9-10).

4 See: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-quality/en/

5 ‘Full text of PM's speech at the release of the HUNGaMA Report’, NDTV, 10 January 2012, http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/full-text-of-pm-s-speech-at-the-release-of-the-hungama-report-165450 (Accessed: 26 March 2015).

6 See: http://www.thehindu.com/multimedia/archive/01404/National_Food_Secu_1404268a.pdf (Accessed: 26 March 2015).

7 Although there are significant varieties in poverty among ethnic minority groups (see Baulch et al.

2007).

8 Baulch et al. (2007) indeed find that the minority groups that have assimilated most with the Kinh society are the ones that have improved living standards the most.

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER