• No results found

Endometrial carcinoma; can biomarkers aid in the prediction of aggressive disease? A study with focus on preoperative tumour markers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Endometrial carcinoma; can biomarkers aid in the prediction of aggressive disease? A study with focus on preoperative tumour markers"

Copied!
5
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Appendices

Copy of registration forms used in the MoMaTEC trials;

#4 Inclusion form

#5 Follow-up form

#4 Inclusion form revised after introduction of FIGO 2009 classification

#5 Follow-up form revised after introduction of FIGO 2009 classification

(2)

Study of prognostic markers in endometrial cancer curettage

Registration– clinical data at primary treatment

Parity (no. of births): Patients date of birth month year Menopausal status:

pre- (1) peri- (2) postmenopausal(3)

Primary treatment

date for primary surgery:

hyst. with salpingoophorectomi (1) palliative tumour reduction (2) curettage only (3) Lymphadenectomy: yes(1) no (2) no. of lymph nodes removed

Additional treatment as a part of primary treatment:

no (0)

external radiation(1) internal radiation(2) chemotherapy(3) hormonal treatment (4) chemotherapy +radiation(5) other(9) Supplementary information:________________________________________

Surgical FIGO stage (1988 criterias including histopathologic evaluation)

: FIGO I (10) FIGO IA (11) FIGO IB (12) FIGO IC (13)

FIGO II (20) FIGO IIA (21) FIGO IIB (22)

FIGO III (30) FIGO IIIA (31) FIGO IIIB (32) FIGO IIIC (33) FIGO IV (40) FIGO IVA (41) FIGO IVB (42)

Histopathologic results:

Histologic subtype:

endometrioid(1) adenosq.(2) clear cell(3) serous pap.(4) other(6) hyperplasia(5) Histologic grade:

high (grade 1, well differentiated)(1) medium (grade 2) (2) low (grade 3, poorly diff.) (3) Lymph node metastases, histologically verified:

yes(1) no (2) Number of positive lymph nodes

__________________________ __________________________ _________________________

# 4

(3)

in endometrialcancer curettage

Contact info: Professor Helga B Salvesen, e-post: [email protected]

Avdelingsingeniør Britt Edvardsen, e-post: [email protected]

Registration– clinical follow-up

Recurrence:

Yes (1) no (2)

Date of recurrence

:

Location of recurrence: pelvic (1) distant metastases (2), where?_________________

Treatment of recurrence

No (0)

external radiation (1) internal radiation (2) chemotherapy (3) Hormonal treatment (4) chemotherapy +radiation (5) other (9)

Additional

information:_____________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Status at last follow-up:

Date for last follow-up information:

Alive and well (1)

Alive with active disease (2) Dead from other causes (3)

Dead with but not due to active disease (4) Dead from disease (5)

__________________________

Place, date

__________________________

Signature physician

_________________________

Name physician in print

# 5

(4)

Study of prognostic markers in endometrial cancer curettage

Registration – clinical data at primary treatment

Parity (no. of births): Patient’s date of birth month year Menopausal status:

pre- (1) peri- (2) postmenopausal(3)

Curettings histology:

low risk (1)* high risk (2)**

*low risk: benign, hyperplasia, endometrioid grade 1-2.

**High risk: serous-papillary, clear cell, carcinocarcoma,endometrioid grade 3, undifferentiated

Primary treatment

date of primary surgery:

hyst. with salpingoophorectomi (1) palliative tumour reduction (2) curettage only (3) Lymphadenectomy: pelvic(1) paraaortic (2) not performed (3) no.nodes removed

Additional treatment as a part of primary treatment

:

none (0) external radiation (+/- internal)(1) internal radiation(2) chemotherapy(3) hormonal treatment (4) chemotherapy +radiation(5) other(9)

Supplementary information/ type of chemotherapy:___________________________

Surgical FIGO stage (2009 criteria including histopathologic evaluation)

: FIGO I (10) FIGO IA (11) FIGO IB (12) FIGO IC (13) FIGO II (20)

FIGO III (30) FIGO IIIA (31) FIGO IIIB (32) FIGO IIIC1 (33) FIGO IIIC2 (34) FIGO IV (40) FIGO IVA (41) FIGO IVB (42)

Histopathologic results:

Depth of myometrial infiltration:

<50% (1) >50% (2)

Histologic subtype:

endometrioid(1) adenosq.(2) clear cell(3) serous pap.(4) carcinosarcoma(6) hyperplasia(5) undifferentiated/other (7)

Histologic grade:

grade 1, well differentiated(1) grade 2 (2) grade 3, poorly diff.(3)

Lymph node metastases histologically verified:

yes(1) no (2) not applicable (0) Number of positive lymph nodes

__________________________ __________________________ _________________________

# 4

(5)

in endometrial cancer curettings

Contact info: Professor Helga B Salvesen, e-post: [email protected]

Avdelingsingeniør Britt Edvardsen, e-post: [email protected]

month/year Study ID Initials of birth

Registration– clinical follow-up Latest follow-up

Recurrence:

yes (1) no (2) progression/ non radically operated (3) Date of recurrence/progression:

Localisation: vaginal vault (3) other pelvic (4) distant metastases (2) If distant; where?__________________________________

Confirmation by histology:

yes (1) no (2)

Treatment of recurrence/ progression:

None (0)

external radiation (+/- internal) (1) internal radiation (2) chemotherapy (3) Hormonal treatment (4)

chemotherapy + radiation (5) other (9) Additional information/type of chemotherapy:

_______________________________________________________________________________

Status at latest follow-up:

Date of latest follow-up:

alive, without recurrence of endometrial cancer (1) alive, with known recurrence of endometrial cancer (2) dead from other causes than endometrial cancer (3) dead with, but not due to, endometrial cancer (4) dead from endometrial cancer (5)

__________________________

Place, date

__________________________

Signature physician

_________________________

Name physician in print

# 5

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

and potential explanatory variables were (1) breeding success in the previous year (2009), (2) date of depar- ture from the vicinity of the colony, (3) date of arrival at

A retrospective study of prognostic factors and treatment outcome of osteosarcoma (OS) during modern chemotherapy era with focus on patients with primary metastatic

Patients with metastatic disease at time of diagnosis were in need for a complete surgical remission for both primary tumour and lung metastases in order to be classified as

The primary aim of our study was to investigate clinicopathologi- cal factors associated with tumour-specific mutation detection in plasma of patients with RAS-mutated

This study presents one of the very few datasets of biochemical biomarkers measured in hagfish, and the first one performed on individuals captured from a known CWA munition

WS-Discovery defines a multicast protocol using SOAP over UDP to locate services, a WSDL providing an interface for service discovery, and XML schemas for discovery messages.. It

We wanted to investigate if BMI is related to clinico-pathological characteristics, hormone receptor status in primary tumour, and disease outcome in endometrial cancer.. PATIENTS

Assembled information on adjuvant treatment following surgery of primary tumor, treatment of metastatic disease prior to biopsy, ER/PgR status, as well as localization of