• No results found

Seals-BarentsSea.pdf (264.5Kb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Seals-BarentsSea.pdf (264.5Kb)"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

The 10th Norwegian-Russian Symposium on Management Strategies for Commercial Marine Species in Northern Ecosystems

Bergen-Norway, 27-29 August 2003

SEALS IN THE BARENTS SEA

Tore Haug

1

& Vladislav Svetochev

2

1

Institute of Marine Research, Tromsø Branch, PO Box 6404, N-9294 Tromsø, Norway

2

SevPINRO, Uritskogo 17, RU-163002 Archangelsk, Russia

(2)
(3)

Locations of North Atlantic harp seal stocks. Green spots mark the whelping and moulting areas for the Barents Sea / White Sea (also called the East Ice) stock (the White Sea), the Greenland Sea or West Ice stock (West Ice), and the northwest Atlantic stock (Front and Gulf areas). Dark blue marks the entire distributional areas.

(4)

The Joint ICES/NAFO Working Group on Harp and Hooded Seals (WGHARP) met in the ICES headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2-6 October 2000 to assess the current status of the stock of Barents Sea / White Sea harp seals by modelling:

Pup production: 314 000 (283 000 – 346 000) 1+ population: 1 676 300 (1 500 000 – 1 850 000) Important input parameteres:

Result from aerial surveys of pup production, 1998, 2000.

Current advice (sustainable catches):

53 000 1+ animals (or an equivalent no. of pups, where 2.5

pups equals one 1+ animal)

(5)

Calculated annual consumption by East Ice harp seals in the Barents Sea in the early

1990s. Scenarios with and without capelin are exhibited, and comparison is also made with the annual consumption by minke whales and cod, and with total fishery removals in 1995.

(6)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Age in years

Proportion mature

1:1962-64 2:1963-72 3:1976-85 4:1988 5:1990-93

Ecosystem changes and desity dependency

Changing age at sexual maturity in East Ice harp seals. An increase in mean age seems to have prevailed from 5.6 years in the two first periods (1962-64 and 1963-72) to 8.2 years in the last (1990-93) period.

(7)

HARP SEAL CATCHES - EAST ICE

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000

1946 1949 1952 1955 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000

YEARS

NO. OF SEALS

total

1 year and older pups

Annual catches of East Ice harp seals after World War II (1946-2002). Whenever

possible, the total catches are split in pups of the year and animals one year old and older.

(8)

HARP SEALS - MANAGEMENT HISTORY IN THE ICES SYSTEM

1984-1988: WG on Harp and Hooded Seals in the Greenland Sea

Copenhagen 1985 and 1987: Too little data, no advice.

1988-1989: WG on Harp and Hooded Seals

Bergen 1989: Too much uncertainty, no advice

1989 →Present: Joint ICES/NAFO Working Group on Harp and Hooded Seals (WGHARP)

First WGHARP meeting – Copenhagen 1991. Increased data availability, advice for Greenland Sea harp seals.

Workshop on methodology used in aerial surveys – Archangelsk 1992.

WGHARP 1993 in Copenhagen: new advice given on Greenland Sea harp seals.

WGHARP in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, 1995: assessments of the northwest Atlantic stocks.

WGHARP in Copenhagen 1997: new data but no new advice.

WGHARP , at last in Tromsø, Norway in 1998: new advice on all northeast Atlantic stocks.

WGHARP in Copenhagen 2000: only northwest Atlantic hooded seals not updated Next meeting: Archangelsk, Russia, September 2003.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

To provide data on the feeding habits of hooded (Cystophora cristata) seals in the Greenland Sea, seals were collected for scientific purposes on expeditions with R/V”Jan Mayen”,

Estimates of pup production, age at first parturition and natural mortality for hooded seals in the West Ice. A deterministic population model for females

Adult NW Atlantic hooded seals exhibit a change in diving activity in areas where they spend .20 h by increasing maximum dive depth, dive duration and surface duration, indicating

b) evaluate, in a joint session with WGMMPD, the populations of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus), harbour seals (Phoca vitulina), ringed seals (Phoca hispida botnica) and

Sculpin Salmon White Hake Lumpfish Smelt Other Fish Shrimp Amphipod Euphausiid Mysid Squid Other Invert Bird.

Based on a request from NAMMCO in May 1995, and on questions that arose from its 1993 meeting, WGHARP met in August/September 1997 to provide assessment advice on harp seals in

in Baltic ringed seals (Phoca hispida) and East Greenland 2 harp (Pagophilus groenlandicus) and hooded (Cystophora cristata) seals3. 4 Christian Sonne 1,* , Emilie Andersen-Ranberg

Figure 5: Relative prey biomass (%) of the six prey categories (squid, amphipods, krill, other crustaceans, polar cod and other fish) in the gastrointestinal