• No results found

Climatic forcing of terrestrial methane escape through permafrost in Svalbard

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Climatic forcing of terrestrial methane escape through permafrost in Svalbard"

Copied!
11
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Climatic forcing of terrestrial methane escape through permafrost in

Svalbard

Andrew Hodson & Lise Øvreås

Introduction for NFR: 2019

(2)

Ten years ago:

• Soil carbon stocks in Arctic permafrost known to be vast and vulnerable: perhaps 1700 Pg (Tarnocai et al, 2009) Today’s view:

• 1,030 +150 Pg (0-3 m):

one third of Earth’s soil carbon in 15% of its

global soil area (Schuur et al, 2015: right)

• Distribution of deeper

“soil” carbon better understood, but

uncertainty persists

Bolin Centre for Climate Research, 2017

(3)

Landscape change in Svalbard

• 11 k.a.: ice sheets in retreat, high sea level

• Sediment in-filling of

fjords and sea floor uplift

• Today: sediments freeze - continuous permafrost and lots of methane

trapped beneath

(4)

Methane emission from uplifted pockmarks:

• Ongoing sea level change means some pockmarks are above

current sea level

• We discovered they are still active hotspots of methane emission:

• Annual fluxes:

Pingo: ~ 100 gC m

-2

a

-1

Chambers: 1 – 2 gC m

-2

a

-1

(Pirk et al, 2017, median values)

Pirk et al (2017) Adventdalen

0 50 100 150 200

0 10 20 30

CH4Flux

Lake level and EC

Weeks since July 13th

Level (cm) EC (mS/cm) FCH4 (mg/m2/h)

Lagoon Pingo

(5)

Methane emission from pingos:

• Partially frozen

groundwater springs form small hills

• Many have springs

bringing high methane concentrations from beneath permafrost

• Many pingos might in fact

be former pockmarks

(6)

Pingo Distribution in

Central Spitsbergen

(7)

Methane emission from glaciers:

• Today, methane hydrates remain stable in mountains

• Glacier retreat means

stability of these hydrates is at risk

• We have also discovered methane in ground water springs that flow

beneath the retreating glaciers

(8)

Adventdalen pingos and landscape

Figure 1. Adventdalen and its open system pingos. Active springs exist at Lagoon Pingo, Førstehytte Pingo, Innerhytte Pingo and River Bed Pingo (LP, FHP, IHP and RP respectively). Map develop online at www.svalbardkartet.npolar.no

LP PMs

IHP

Longyearbyen Adventfjord

Adventdalen

CO2Lab No outflow

No outflow

RP

No outflow

PG

PG FHP

447m

790m 960m

1060m 1079m

957m

382m

942m 926m

2 km

Pock Marks Pingos

Geologic Fault Polythermal Glacier Ground water Flow

CO2Lab Core Site

N

10o 20o 30o

80o

78o

76o

Adventdalen

Svalbard

(9)

About the project

• Adventdalen’s pingos, permafrost and glaciers are a perfect laboratory for studying the origin, movement and fate of permafrost trapped beneath permafrost

• The primary goal for CLIMAGAS will therefore be to develop a

predictive understanding of climate-sensitive methane release to the atmosphere through permafrost in Svalbard.

Obj. 1: Characterise the active terrestrial methane seeps in Central Svalbard, quantify the flux of gas typically released through them and assess their representativeness for other glaciated Arctic environments,

Obj. 2: Understand the origin and fate of the methane through geochemical and microbiological investigations at known methane seepage sites,

Obj. 3. Develop a predictive framework for the future using an integrated modelling approach that links climate forcing, changes in sub-permafrost groundwater

recharge/discharge dynamics and biogeochemical processes.

(10)

Approach

1. Mine the rich data resources to develop a solid platform for predictive modelling and system conceptualisation

2. Measure the outflow characteristics to enable inverse deduction and therefore better understand the system

3. Establish sources and sinks of methane discharging from ground surface 4. Use 2) to calibrate model for predictive purposes over next 100 years

• Linked to 1): Senger, Christiansen (UNIS)

• Linked to 2): Hodson (UNIS); Yde and Gillespie (HVL); Jessen (U.Cop); Turchyn (U. Cambs.)

• Linked to 3) Øvreås (UiB); Tveit (UiT); Redeker (U. York)

• Linked to 4) Bense (U. Wag.); Frampton (U. Stock) and Hodson (UNIS)

(11)

Thank you

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

On the map in Fig. This locality in Bockfjorden is well known for its warm springs and will be dealt with later in this paper. There are also some pingo-like features

(2007) observed substantial differences in SOM biodegradability between mineral and organic horizons within the active layer. In the peats of Neiden, the N1 permafrost

In addition to frenulates from the pingo and crater sites, samples from a few other sites in the Arctic and the Norwegian Sea were included in our DNA analysis of host

Below the GHPs, our high-resolution seismic data reveal vertical, focused fluid flow structures - gas chimneys- piercing through the thin (35-150 m) section of

We fi nd that permafrost was widespread across the deglaciated areas of western, northern and eastern Iceland after the LGM, and that up to 20% of Iceland’s terrestrial area

These heat fl ux would have caused a thawing and dissociation of the permafrost and GHSZ at water depths of ~40 m, an area where PLFs exist today (Figure 2a).. PLF 1 does not indicate

~20 Ka, has caused a temperature increase on the upper boundary of former terrestrial permafrost (e.g. It resulted in a gradual leveling of the intra-permafrost

Our study objectives are to (1) analyse the spatial distribution of 2D InSAR results documenting thaw subsidence and creep at the landscape scale, and study the variability of