• No results found

Measurement of the production of high-pT electrons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=2.76 TeV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Measurement of the production of high-pT electrons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=2.76 TeV"

Copied!
15
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

.ALICE Collaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received24October2016

Receivedinrevisedform12April2017 Accepted24May2017

Availableonline29May2017 Editor:L.Rolandi

Electronsfromheavy-flavourhadrondecays(charmandbeauty)weremeasuredwiththeALICEdetector in Pb–Pb collisions at acentre-of-mass of energy √s

NN=2.76 TeV. The transverse momentum(pT) differentialproductionyieldsatmid-rapiditywereusedtocalculatethenuclearmodificationfactorRAA intheinterval3<pT<18 GeV/c.The RAA showsastrong suppressioncomparedtobinaryscalingof ppcollisionsatthesameenergy(uptoafactorof4)inthe10%mostcentralPb–Pb collisions.Thereis acentralitytrendofsuppression,andaweaker suppression(downtoafactorof2)insemi-peripheral (50–80%)collisionsisobserved.ThesuppressionofelectronsinthisbroadpTintervalindicatesthatboth charmandbeautyquarksloseenergywhentheytraversethehotmediumformedinPb–Pbcollisionsat LHC.

©2017TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

High-energyheavy-ioncollisions providea uniqueopportunity tostudy theproperties ofthe hot anddense strongly-interacting systemcomposed ofdeconfined quarks andgluons – the quark- gluonplasma(QGP).TheformationofaQGPispredictedbylattice QCDcalculations[1–4].Acrossovertransitionfromhadronicmat- teratzerobaryochemical potentialisexpectedtotakeplaceonce thesystemtemperaturereachesvaluesaboveT155MeVand/or theenergy densityabove

ε

≈ 0.5 GeV/fm3 [5,6].To characterise thephysical propertiesof thisshort-lived QGP(lifetime of about 10 fm/c [7])experimentalstudiesuseauto-generatedprobes,such as high-energy partons created early in the collision, thermally emittedphotons, andparticle correlationssensitiveto the collec- tiveexpansionandthedynamicsofthesystem.

Inparticular,the interactionofhigh-pT partonswiththe QGP, leadingto modifications oftheinternal jet structure (jetquench- ing),wasfirstproposedin[8]andisstudiedasasensitiveprobeof themediumproperties[9].Jetquenchingwasfirstobservedexper- imentallyviathestrongsuppressionofhightransversemomentum particleproductioninheavy-ioncollisionsattheRelativisticHeavy IonCollider(RHIC) [10–13].Similar observationshave sincebeen reportedby the Large HadronCollider (LHC) experiments atcol- lision energies larger by one order of magnitude with hadrons [14–16]andextendedtofullyreconstructedjets[17–19].

Heavyflavours(charmandbeauty)aresensitivetoolsforstud- ies of the in-medium parton energy loss, providing qualitatively

E-mailaddress:[email protected].

different sensitivity to the medium properties as compared to gluonorlight-quarkinducedjets[20,21].Theproductionofheavy quarksiswellunderstoodintermsoftheperturbativeQCD(pQCD) formalism. Good agreement between the theoretical calculations and measurements of various heavy-flavour particle production cross sections in hadronic collisions is established over a wide rangeofcentre-of-mass energies fromRHIC [22–24],through the Tevatron[25–27]totheLHC[28–32].

Interactions between partons and the medium can occur via both inelastic (radiative parton energy loss) [33–35] and elastic (collisionalenergyloss)[36–39]processesthatdependonthepar- tontype andthepropertiesofthemedium. Theinteractionswith the medium modify the radiation pattern of the shower by in- ducing longitudinal drag (and associated longitudinal diffusion), transversediffusion,andenhancedsplittingofthepropagatingpar- tons.Onaverage,foragivenpartonenergy,gluonsareexpectedto losemoreenergythanquarksduetothedifferenceintheCasimir colour factor[40] controllingthe strength of thecoupling to the coloured medium. Moreover, the energy loss is predicted to de- pend onthe mass ofthe quark [41–45]. Inparticular, forquarks withenergies comparableto their massthe radiativeenergy loss isexpectedto besmaller thanformorehighly-energetic partons.

Consequentlytherelativeroleofelasticprocessesforheavyquarks is enhanced andthe heavy quarks of moderate energies are ex- pected to be moresensitive, ascompared to light quarks, to the longitudinal drag and diffusion coefficients[39] that are propor- tional to the inverse of the mass of the parton. Moreover, as a result of multiple elastic collisions and possible in-medium res- onant interactions within the hot matter, low-momentum heavy quarkscouldreachthermalisationinthemedium[46].

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.060

0370-2693/©2017TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(2)

The predicted hierarchy of energy loss Eg > Elight-q >

Echarm> Ebeauty [41] motivated experimental studies of the suppression patterns of heavy-flavour hadrons and their decay products.Uptonowthein-mediumenergylossofheavy flavours at the LHC has been studied via open charm measurements of prompt D mesons [47,48], heavy-flavour decay muon measure- ments at forward rapidity [31], non-prompt J, and measure- ments ofb-jet production[49].At RHIC the nuclearmodification of heavy-flavour production has been studied via its semilep- tonic decays [50,51] and via measurements of D mesons [52].

The measurement that we report covers the electron (electron andpositron) pT interval 3–18 GeV/c,probing athigh pT the in- medium interaction of b quarks with momentum of a few tens of GeV/c.

The modifications of particle yields are quantified using the nuclear modificationfactor RAA. It isconstructed by dividingthe pT-differentialyieldinnucleus–nucleus(AA)collisions,dNAA/dpT, by thecrosssection inpp collisions, d

σ

pp/dpT, scaledby theav- erage of the nuclear overlap function TAA for the considered centralityclass[53]

RAA

=

dNAA

/

dpT

TAA

d

σ

pp

/

dpT

.

(1) Byconstruction, RAA isunitywhennonucleareffectsarepresent.

RAA values consistent withunity havebeen measured forcolour neutralparticles (direct photons, W and Z bosons) inPb–Pb col- lisions at √

sNN=2.76 TeV [54–58] as well as for charged par- ticlesand heavy-flavourproductionin p–Pb collisionsat √

sNN= 5.02 TeV[59–61].

This paper reports on the suppression (RAA<1) of electrons fromsemi-leptonicdecaysofcharmandbeautyhadronsmeasured at high-transverse momentum (pT >3 GeV/c) at mid-rapidity (|y|<0.6) inPb–Pb collisions at √

sNN=2.76 TeV using the AL- ICEdetector.Thesuppressionismeasuredasafunctionofcollision centralityandpT intheinterval3<pT<18 GeV/c.Thenexttwo sectionsofthepaperdefinetheexperimentalsetupandtheanaly- sisdetailstogetherwiththediscussionofsystematicuncertainties on the measured electron spectra. The electron yields measured in bins of centrality defined as fractions of the total hadronic cross-section of Pb–Pb collisions are then presented. Finally the pT-differentialRAAinthe0–10%,10–20%,20–30%,30–40%,40–50%

and50–80%centralityclassesarepresentedandcomparedtothe measurementof muonsfromheavy-flavour hadrondecaysatfor- wardrapidities[31]aswellastocalculationsofin-mediumenergy lossofheavyquarks.

2. Apparatus,datasampleandanalysis 2.1. Detectorsetup

The measurements were carriedout using theALICE detector at the LHC [62] with Pb-ion beams at a centre-of-mass energy of √

sNN=2.76 TeV. A complete description of the experimen- tal setup and theperformance ofdetectors can be found in[63, 64]. Particle track reconstruction and particle identification were performedbased on informationfromthe Inner Tracking System (ITS), the Time Projection Chamber (TPC), and the Electromag- neticCalorimeter(EMCal),locatedinsideasolenoidmagnet,which generates a 0.5 T field parallel to the beamdirection. The event centrality determination was based on the signals from the V0 detector, which is a set of scintillator arrays. Moreover, the V0 detectortogether withtheneutronZero-DegreeCalorimeters(ZN) wasusedfortriggeringandbeambackgroundrejection.

TheITSiscomposedofsixcylindricallayers:twoSiliconPixel Detectors(SPD),twoSiliconDriftDetectors(SDD),andtwoSilicon

StripDetectors(SSD).TheSPDbarrelconsistsofstavesdistributed intwolayersaroundthebeampipeatradiusof3.9cmand7.6 cm, covering a length of 28.2 cm in the z direction. The outermost layeroftheITS(SSD)islocated43cmfromthebeamaxis.

The TPC witha radial extent of 85–247 cm, enables charged particletrackingbeyondtheITSandparticleidentificationviathe measurementoftheparticlespecific ionisationenergylosswithin theNe–CO2 gasmixture.TheTPCprovidesupto159independent spacepointsperparticletrack.

ChargedparticletracksarereconstructedintheTPCfrom pT≈ 0.15 GeV/c,|

η

|<0.9 andfullazimuth.UsingtheITSandTPCspace points the particlemomentum is determinedfromthe combined trackfitwitharesolutionofabout1%at1 GeV/candabout3%at 10 GeV/c[64].

The front face of the EMCal is positioned at about 450 cm fromthebeamaxisintheradial directionandthedetectorisap- proximately 110 cmdeep.The detectorisalayeredPb-scintillator samplingcalorimetercovering107degreesinazimuthandapseu- dorapidityregion|

η

|<0.7.Thecalorimeterdesignincorporateson average a moderateactive volume densitythat results ina com- pactdetectorofabout20radiationlengths.

The V0 detectorconsists of two arrays of 32 scintillator tiles placedatdistances z=3.4 m(V0-A)andz= −0.9 m(V0-C)from the nominalinteraction point. V0-A and V0-C cover the full az- imuth, andpseudorapidity intervalsof 2.8<

η

<5.1 and−3.7<

η

<1.7, respectively. The detector was used for triggering and eventcentralitydetermination.

TheZNaretwoidenticalsetsofforwardhadroniccalorimeters whicharelocatedonbothsidesrelativetotheinteractionpointat z114 m.

2.2. Eventsampleandtrigger

The data sample used forthis analysiswas collected in 2011 anditconsistsof14·106 mostcentralcollisions(0–10%)and13· 106 semi-central collisions (10–50%) recorded witha minimum- bias trigger, and 3.106 collisions (0–90%) triggered with the EMCal. The minimum-bias trigger was a coincidence of signals from the V0-A and V0-C detectors. The timing resolution of the V0systemisbetterthan1nsanditprovidesanefficientdiscrim- ination ofthe beam–beamcollisions fromthe backgroundevents produced upstream of the experiment. Additional suppression of thebackgroundwasprovidedbytiminginformationfromtheZDC.

The minimum-bias triggerincluded two trigger classesformost- centralandsemi-centralcollisions, whichwere selectedonlineby applyingthresholdsontheV0signalamplitudes.

TheEMCalprovidestwohierarchically-configuredtriggerlevels (Level-0andLevel-1).Forthisanalysisthedatawererecordedwith the L1 trigger in coincidence withthe V0 minimum-bias trigger.

ThetriggerlogicoftheLevel-1triggeremployedaslidingwindow algorithm of 4×4 towers with a sliding step of 2 towers along either of the surface axes. An event was rejected unlessthe en- ergy summed within atleast one set of the 16 adjacent towers was greater than a threshold.Additionally, the trigger logic was configured to adjust the online threshold accordingto the event centralityestimatedfromtheanaloguesumoftheV0detectorsig- nals. Thethresholdwas adjustedsuch thatthe rejectionratewas approximately constant asa function ofthe eventcentrality. The thresholdsvariedfrom7 GeVin10%mostcentraleventsto2 GeV inthemostperipheralevents.

Theofflineselectionretainedonlyeventswherethecoordinate of thereconstructed vertexalong the beamdirectionwas within

±10 cm around the nominal interaction point. The eventvertex reconstructionisfullyefficientfortheeventcentralitiesconsidered inthisanalysis.

(3)

Fig. 1.Triggerturn-oncurves:theratioofinclusiveelectronsinEMCaltriggeredeventstominimum-biaseventsasafunctionofassociatedtrackpTincentralitybinsbetween 0%and50%.ThelowerrightpanelshowsasimilarratioobtainedwithEMCalclustersforcentrality50–80%.ThepTfromwhichthespectrafromtheminimum-biastrigger totheEMCaltriggerareusedareindicatedwithblackdashedlines.Thescalingfactorswhichwereobtainedbyfits(redlines)aresummarised inTable 1.(Forinterpretation ofthereferencestocolourinthisfigure,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.)

Collisions were classified into different centrality classes in termsofpercentilesofthehadronicPb–Pb crosssectionusingthe signalamplitudesintheV0detector.Theeventcentralitywasre- latedtothenuclearoverlapfunctionTAAviaaGlaubermodel[65].

Detailsonthecentralitydeterminationcanbefoundin[53].

Toobtaintheinclusiveelectronspectrautilising minimumbias and EMCal triggers, in each centrality class, the per-event yield ofelectrons from the EMCal triggered sample was scaled to the minimum-bias yield by normalisation factors determined with a data-drivenmethod.Fig. 1showstheratioofpT-differentialyields oftheelectroncandidatetracksfromtheEMCaltriggered sample totheminimum-biastriggersampleasafunctionofthetrackpT. Theelectroncandidateswereselectedbasedontheionisationen- ergy loss in the TPC gas and the ratio of the EMCal cluster en- ergyandthemomentum oftheparticle track(detailsofelectron identificationare givenin the next section). Because of the lim- itedelectronyieldinthesemi-peripheraleventclass(50–80%)the correction for the trigger enhancement in that interval was ob- tained asthe ratio of the energy distributions of EMCal clusters forthetwotriggertypes(showninpanel (f)ofFig. 1).Theinclu- sive pT spectrumofelectronsisformed bytheelectronspectrum fromminimum-biaseventsbelowthetriggerplateau(indicatedby dashedlinesinFig. 1)andthespectrum measuredwithonlythe EMCal trigger inthe plateauregion. The difference in the shape ofthecurvesinFig. 1for pT belowtheplateauisaconsequence oftheparticlemixturecontributingtotheEMCalclustersandre- sponseof theEMCal to chargedhadrons. The scaling factors and the transition from the minimum-bias sample to the triggered sample were determined by fits with a constant to the high-pT plateauregions.Thescalingfactorsforallcentralityclassesaswell as the pT at which the switch from the minimum-bias to the EMCaltriggerspectraoccursaresummarised inTable 1.Theuncer- taintyonthefactors(also reportedinTable 1)wasobtainedfrom theindividual fitsandthereforeit isdriven bythe statisticalun- certaintyofthemeasuredspectra.Thescalingfactorswithin cen- tralities0–50% were extractedusing theelectron tracks, whereas for centralities larger than 50% the spectrum of EMCal clusters is used. The relative difference in the scaling factors depending on whether electrons or clusters were selected was studied and shownto bebelow8.5%.Thisdifferencewas includedinthesys-

Table 1

SummaryforcentralitydependenceoftheEMCaltriggerscalingfactor.Middlecol- umn:trigger scaling factors(togetherwith their absolutestatisticaluncertainty) extractedfromtheratioofelectrons(orEMCalcluster) pTspectrainEMCaltrig- geredandminimum-biasevents.Rightcolumn:particle pTatwhichthespectrum measuredinminimum-biaseventsandEMCaltriggeredeventsareswitchedtoform theinclusiveelectronpTspectrum.Seetextfordetails.

Centrality Scaling factor PlateauabovepT

(GeV/c)

0–10% 38±2.2 9

10–20% 32±3.5 9

20–30% 35±2.9 8

30–40% 34±2.5 6

40–50% 41±5.2 6

50–80% 89±3.5 6

tematicuncertaintyof themeasurement forall centralityclasses.

Table 1correspondstoFig. 1.

2.3. Electronreconstruction

Forthereconstructionofelectronsinthisanalysistrackswitha minimum of 100out of 159possible TPC space points were re- tained. In addition, tracks were selected using their distance of closestapproach(DCA)totheprimaryvertex.Acceptedtrackswere within |DCAxy|<2.4 cm in the transverse plane and |DCAz|<

3.2 cm along the beam axis. Furthermore, the tracks were se- lected within a fiducial pseudorapidity acceptance of |

η

|<0.6.

Each track was required to contain at least one point measured in theSPDandat leastthree hitsout ofthe maximumof sixin theITS.Moreover,theelectroncandidateswereselectedbyapply- ingacutonthespecificionisationenergyloss(dE/dx)withinthe TPC. ThemeasureddE/dxwas requiredtobe between−1 to3

σ

, where

σ

isdE/dx resolution, fromthe expectedmean of dE/dx forelectrons.Thisselectionishereafterindicatedas−1<nTPCσ <3.

ThetracksextrapolatedtothesensitivevolumeoftheEMCalwere matchedwithaclusterifthecluster-trackresidualinazimuthand pseudorapidity was within awindow of|

ϕ

|<0.05 and |

η

|<

0.05.Suchmatching criteriacorresponds to aneffectiveradius of about6 timeslarger thanthe effectiveMoliere radius forEMCal, thusitisfullyefficientforelectrontrackswithpT>2 GeV/c.

(4)

Fig. 2.Left:TheratioofE/pasafunctionofnTPCσ in10%mostcentralPb–Pbevents(pT>3 GeV/c),wherepisthechargedparticlemomentum,EisthematchedEMCal clusterenergy,andσTPCistheresolutionontheenergylossintheTPCgasexpectedforelectrons.Right:E/pforelectronsintwotransversemomentumranges.Theblue opensymbolsshowsthehadroncontaminationanE/pdistributionforparticles3.5σ awayfromthemeanofthetrueelectronTPC-dE/dxdistributionnormalised to theelectronE/patsmallvaluesoftheratio(awayfromtheelectronsignal).(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolourinthisfigure,thereaderisreferredtotheweb versionofthisarticle.)

Additionalhadronrejectionusedthecombinationoftheenergy depositedwithinEMCalandacut ontheelectromagneticshower shape[64,66].Sincetheshowerfromanelectronisfullycontained andaccuratelymeasuredbytheEMCal,theratiooftheenergy(E) measuredbytheEMCalandthemomentum(p)forelectrontracks isapproximatelyunity(E/p1).The E/pdistribution isqualita- tivelydifferentinthecaseofhadrons.TheE/pasafunctionofthe nTPCσ forchargedparticles matchedwithan EMCal cluster in10%

mostcentral eventsis shown in Fig. 2.From the primary tracks matchedtoanEMCalclustertheelectroncandidateswereselected usinga momentumindependent cutof 0.9<E/p<1.3.Further- more,theshapesofthemeasured showersinthecalorimetercan be characterised by the two eigenvalues (λ0 and λ1) of the co- variancematrixbuiltfromthetowercoordinatesweightedbythe logarithms ofthetower energies.Theseeigenvalues maybeused todifferentiatebetweenincidentparticlespecies[64].Aselection ofλ21<0.3,correspondingtotheshorter-axisoftheshowershape projectedonto theEMCal surface,was applied,because thechar- acteristicelectromagneticshowerofanelectronispeakedatλ21 of about0.25independentoftheclusterenergy.

Theremaining hadron backgroundinthe electronsample was estimatedwithadata-drivenapproachandstatisticallysubtracted from the sample. The shape of the residual hadron background in E/p at the position of the electron peak was reconstructed using the E/p distribution for hadron-dominated tracks selected withnTPCσ <3.5.The E/p distributionof the hadronswas then normalised tomatchthe distributionoftheelectroncandidatein 0.4<E/p<0.7 (away fromthe trueelectron peak). An example ofthe E/p distributionstogether withtheestimatedhadron con- taminationfortwotransversemomentumintervalsisshowninthe rightpanelofFig. 2.Thehadroncontamination islessthan5% at pT<10 GeV/c inallcentralityclasses.AthighpT,itislargerthan 10%withamaximumofabout15%atpT =18 GeV/c.

Theefficienciesrelatedtothecutsontheionisationenergyloss inthe TPCwere estimatedwithdata-driven techniques[64].The EMCalefficiencies were calculatedusing MonteCarlosimulations of proton-proton (PYTHIA [67]) and heavy-ion collisions (HIJING [68]) with complete detectorresponse modelled byGEANT [69].

Theproductofdetectoracceptanceandreconstructionefficiencies forinclusiveelectronsforthe10%mostcentralcollisionsisshown intheleftpanelofFig. 3.Theefficiencieswereestimatedforeach

centralityclass separately.Avariation ofabout2.5–3% wasfound betweenthemostcentral(0–10%)andperipheral(50–80%)events.

2.4. Backgroundelectronsubtraction

Themainsourcesofelectronscontributingtotheinclusiveelec- tron sample in this analysis are: a) heavy-flavour hadron decay electrons;b)electronsfromleptonicdecaysofquarkonia(Jand ϒ mesons); c) electrons from W and Z/

γ

decays; d) the so- calledphotonicelectrons,originatingfromphotonconversionsand Dalitz decays ofneutralmesons (mainly

π

0 and

η

);ande)neu- tralkaondecays;however,thecontributionfromthenon-photonic electrons created in vector meson and Ke3 decays is negligible (<0.1%) [30] in the momentum range considered in thisanaly- sis.

Thecontributionofthephotonicelectronstotheinclusiveelec- tron sample was measured by the invariant mass method. The invariant massdistributionwas determinedbypairingeveryelec- tron trackfrom the inclusivesample with an oppositely-charged trackselectedwith−3<nTPCσ <3toincreasethechanceforfind- ingthepairs.Pairssatisfyingelectronidentificationselectionsand pairs satisfyingacut on theinvariant massofminv<0.1 GeV/c2 wereselectedforfurtheranalysis.Theseselectedunlike-signpairs, however,containnot onlytruephotonicelectronsbutalsoacon- tribution from random pairs. This combinatorial background to photonicelectrons was estimatedusingtheinvariant massdistri- butionofthelike-signelectrons(NeL S),anditwassubtractedfrom thatofunlike-signpairs(NeU L S)toobtainthenumberofrawpho- tonicelectrons:Nraweγ =NeU L SNeL S.

The efficiency for the identification of the photonicelectrons by the invariant mass method (

ε

eγ) was estimated from Monte Carlosimulationswithfulldetectorresponseandwasfoundtobe centralityindependent.Theefficiency,shownintherightpanelof Fig. 3,isabout30%atpeT=4 GeV/candrisingto55%at18 GeV/c.

The number of photonic electrons present within the inclu- sive electron sample was calculated as the raw photonic elec- tron yield corrected for the reconstruction efficiency such that:

Neγ =Nraweγ /

ε

eγ.Thefractionofphotonicelectrons withinthein- clusiveelectronsample inthe10%mostcentralcollisionsisabout 30% at pT=3 GeV/c,dropsto25% at12 GeV/c andremains ap- proximatelyconstantathigherpT consideredinthisanalysis.

(5)

Fig. 3.Left:ProductofdetectoracceptanceandreconstructionefficiencyforinclusiveelectronsasafunctionoftheelectronpT.Thestatisticaluncertaintyissmallerthanthe sizeofthepoints.Right:Photonicelectronreconstructionefficiencyviainvariantmass(εeγ)asafunctionofpToftheelectron.

The contribution to the inclusive electrons from J decays was estimated using a phenomenological interpolation at √

s = 2.76 TeVofthe pT-differentialcrosssectionsmeasuredinpp colli- sionsatvariouscentre-of-massenergies[70] andscalingwiththe nuclearmodificationfactorRJAA (pT)measuredattheLHC[71,72].

In 3<pT<4 GeV/c, the contribution is 5.5% in the most cen- tralcollisions anddecreasesathigh-pT.The contributionfromϒ statesestimatedfromthe crosssectionmeasured inpp collisions [73]wasfoundtobenegligible.

The contributionof electrons from W-boson andZ/

γ

decays wasestimatedusingthecrosssectionobtainedfromthePOWHEG eventgenerator[74]forpp collisionsandscaledwithTAAassum- ingRAA=1.ThecontributionispTdependentandforW-bosonsit increasesfrom1%at10 GeV/c toabout6%at17 GeV/c whereas thecontribution from Z/

γ

isbelow 1% for pT<10 GeV/c and increasesto2.4%at17 GeV/c.

Theheavy-flavourdecayelectronyieldwasreconstructed from theinclusiveelectronyieldby firstsubtractingthephotonicelec- tron yield, then correcting the result of the subtraction for the efficiency,andfinally,bysubtractingthefeed-downelectronsfrom J andW,Z/

γ

decays.

3. Systematicuncertainties

The sources of systematic uncertainty on the reconstructed heavy-flavour decay electron pT spectrum can be grouped into threecategories:

– eventselection(theeventnormalisation,includingthescaling oftheEMCaltriggereventsandtheeventcentralityselection);

– electronsignal extraction (uncertaintiesoriginatingfromcor- rectionsrelatedtotrackingandparticleidentification);

– non-heavy-flavourbackgrounddetermination.

AnoverviewofthesystematicuncertaintiesispresentedinTa- ble 2.Forsourcesthat dependoncentrality(allbut“tracking/ma- terial”fromTable 2)theuncertaintieswereevaluatedseparatelyin eacheventclass.Inevery casea weakcentralitydependencewas found(deviations oflessthan 3%).Inthe figuresofSection 4the systematicuncertainties are represented as shaded boxes around thedatapoints.

Eventnormalisation.Acomparisonoftheeventnormalisation obtainedwiththe EMCalclustersandthenormalisationobtained fromtheinclusiveelectronsshowedamaximumdeviationof8.5%.

This deviation, independent of centrality and pT, is included as theuncertaintyontheyieldobtainedwiththetriggereddata.The

Table 2

Summaryofsystematicuncertaintiesontheheavy-flavourelectronyieldsgrouped accordingtotheirsources.Whereapplicabletheuncertaintywasestimatedfortwo pTvalues,3and10GeV/c(forthelatternumbersareshowninparentheses).For detailsontheextractionoftheuncertaintiesseetext.

Source pTdependence (GeV/c) Uncertainty (%)

EMCal trigger correction only high-pT 8.5

Centrality estimation n/a <0.1–3

Tracking/material weak within 3–14 5

E/p 3 (10) 3 (3)

nTPCσ 3 (10) 3 (7)

Photonic background 3 (10) 5 (5)

Jelectron background 3 (10) 1 (<1)

Welectron background 3 (10) 0 (<1)

Zelectron backgrounds 3 (10) <1 (<2)

contributiontothesystematicuncertaintyduetothe1.1% relative uncertainty onthe fractionofhadronic crosssection used inthe Glauberfittodeterminethecentralityislessthan0.1% inthecen- tral eventclass (0–10%) and3% in the semi-peripheral centrality class(50–80%)[47,75].

Electronidentification. The systematic uncertainties on the corrections for track reconstruction, track selection and electron identificationwereassessedviamultiplevariationsoftheanalysis selections.Foreachsetofcutstheanalysiswasrepeatedandcom- pared tothe results obtainedwith the defaultset ofcuts. These variationsincludedchangesintrackqualitycuts,suchasthemin- imumnumberofthe spacepointsin theTPCandassociatedhits intheITS.Theuncertaintieswereestimatedasafunctionoftrack pT andfor each centrality class separately.In addition, the elec- tron identificationcuts inthe TPC (nTPCσ ) andEMCal(E/p range) werevariedaroundtheirnominalvalues.Theuncertaintyoriginat- ingfromtheknowledgeofthematerialbudgetwas estimatedvia completedetectorsimulationswiththeradiationlengthvariedby

±7%[76].

Subtractionofphotonicbackground. The uncertainty on the subtracted background electrons from photon conversions and Dalitz decayswas obtained by varyingthe invariant masscut on theelectronpairswithin0.07<minv<0.15 GeV/c2andthemini- mum pTofthetrackspairedwithelectroncandidatesbetween0.3 and0.6GeV/c.

SubtractionofelectronsfromJ.Theuncertaintyonthesub- tractedbackgroundelectronsfromJ decayswasestimatedfrom the experimental uncertainties on measured production yields in heavy-ioncollisions[71,77].

ElectronsfromWandZ/

γ

.TheyieldofelectronsfromW de- cayswasvariedby±15%onthebasisofthecomparisonoftheW productioncrosssectionasgivenbythePOWHEGeventgenerator

(6)

Fig. 4.Differentialyieldsofelectronsfromsemi-leptonicdecays ofheavy-flavour hadronsinclassesofcentralityofPb–Pb collisionsat

sNN=2.76 TeV.

andthe existing measurements in pp collisions at the LHC [78].

ThecontributionfromZ/

γ

di-electrondecaysanditsuncertainty wasestimatedusingthePOWHEGeventgeneratorandconsidered together with the uncertainties on the process production cross section measured inpp collisions [79]. Giventhesmall contribu- tionof theelectrons from Z/

γ

decays tothe electronspectrum ofthisanalysisthederiveduncertaintywasfoundbelow1%atthe highestmomentumconsidered.

4. Results

The pT-differentialinvariantyieldsofheavy-flavourdecayelec- tronscorrectedforacceptanceandefficiencyinthe0–10%,10–20%, 30–40%,40–50%and50–80%centralityclassesinPb–Pb collisions at√

sNN =2.76TeVareshowninFig. 4.OnlytheEMCaltriggered data are shown for the 50–80% centrality class due to a lack of statisticsintheminimumbiasdatasample.

The production cross section of heavy-flavourdecay electrons inpp collisionsat√

s=2.76 TeV,neededtocomputethenuclear modificationfactorRAA(Eq.(1)),wasobtainedfrommeasurements

andFONLLpQCDcalculations[80,81].ForpT<12 GeV/cthemea- surementat√

s=2.76 TeV wasused[30].ForpT>12 GeV/cthere isnomeasurementatthisenergy.Thus,anextrapolatedcrosssec- tionwasconstructedfromthemeasurementat√

s=7 TeV bythe ATLAS Collaboration[82,83] andthe ratioofcrosssectionsatthe twocollisionenergiesobtainedfromFONLL[84].Theuncertainties ofthe pp referencesareabout20% for pT<12 GeV/c andabout 15%for pT>12 GeV/c,includingtheuncertaintyfromthescaling with√

s,whichwas estimatedbyconsistently varyingtheFONLL calculationparametersatthetwoenergies[84].

Fig. 5showstheresultingRAA ofheavy-flavourdecayelectrons for all centralityclasses. The uncertainty on the average nuclear overlap function TAAfor each centrality selection was takenas determined in [53]. It varies from 4% in the 10% most central events to 7% in the 50–80% centrality class, and it is shown as a box at RAA = 1 in the figure.In all cases,taking intoaccount the pT trend of the RAA and the statistical uncertainties of the measurement athigh-pT, theelectron productionyields aresup- pressedrelativetoanincoherentsuperpositionofpp collisions.In the 10% most central events the RAA reaches values below 0.4, while for the more peripheral events the suppression is weaker.

This centrality dependenceof the suppression patternis qualita- tivelyconsistentwithin-mediumenergylossofheavyquarksdue to a decrease of medium’sinitial energy densityandthe system sizefromcentraltoperipheralcollisions.

Inproton–leadcollisions, whereformationofa hot,denseand long lived QGPis not expected, the suppression is not observed.

The nuclearmodificationfactor RpPb measuredforelectronsfrom heavy-flavour hadron decays is consistent with unity [61]. This control measurement inp–Pb collisions confirms that the strong suppression in Pb–Pb collisions is a result of final state effects.

The left panel of Fig. 6shows the comparisonbetween RpPb for minimum-bias p–Pb collisions at √

sNN=5.02 TeV and RAA for the10%mostcentralPb–Pb collisions.Theresultreportedherefor electrons at mid-rapidity is consistent withthe measurement of the suppressionpatternformuonsfromthesemi-leptonicdecays of heavy-flavour hadrons at forward rapidity [31], in both, most centralandsemi-peripheralcollisions(seeFig. 6).Theleptonmea-

Fig. 5.RPbPbofelectronsfromheavy-flavourhadrondecaysincentralitybinsofPb–Pb collisionsats

NN=2.76 TeV.ThesolidbandatRPbPb=1 bracketstheuncertainty ontheaveragenuclearoverlapfunction(TAA).

(7)

Fig. 6.Left:RPbPbofelectronsandmuons[31]fromheavy-flavourhadrondecaysin10%mostcentralPb–Pb collisionsshowntogetherwithRpPbofelectronsfromminimum biasproton–leadcollisionsat

sNN=5.02 TeV[61].Right:RPbPbofelectronsinsemi-peripheralPb–Pb collisions(50–80%selectionforelectronsand40–80%formuons.

Fig. 7.RPbPbofelectronsfromheavy-flavourhadrondecaysmeasuredin10%most centralPb–Pb collisionsats

NN=2.76 TeV comparedtovarioustheoreticalcalcu- lations[86–98].

surementsshow remarkablesimilarityin thesuppression pattern that,within the uncertainties, doesnot exhibit a rapidity depen- dence.

The pT spectrum of electrons is sensitive to both charm and beauty quark energy loss. From the decay kinematics and the pT-differential cross sections of parent hadrons with charm and beauty,it followsthat electrons of pT below5 GeV/c are mostly sensitive to charm energy loss. On the other hand, in pp col- lisions a large fraction (more than 60%) of the electrons with pT>10 GeV/c originate fromb-quarks[82,66,30,85,81].Theelec- tronyieldathigh-pT isthereforeexpectedtocontainasignificant contributionfromBmesonswithpTupto30 GeV/c.Consequently, thestrongsuppressionofelectronsforpT>10 GeV/cisconsistent within-mediumenergylossofb-quarks.

5. Comparisonwithmodels

The RAA ofelectrons fromheavy-flavourhadron decaysinthe mostcentral Pb–Pb collisions is compared to theoretical models thatinclude heavyquark interactions withthe medium inFig. 7.

Mostofthesemodelswere previouslycompared tothe RAA ofD mesons in most central Pb–Pb collisions [75,48] as well as the positive ellipticflow ofthe Dmesons andelectrons fromheavy- flavour hadron decays in semi-central Pb–Pb collisions [99,100].

We note that thesemodelsdiffer inthetheoretical realisation of the medium properties, and of its dynamics, and also in imple- mentationsofthehadronisationandofhadron–hadroninteractions inthelatestagesoftheheavy-ioncollision.Alsotheheavy-quark cross-section usedasinput tothe calculationmaydifferbetween themodels(PYTHIA,FONLLandPOWHEG).

Djordjevic. The calculation by Djordjevic et al. [86] at pT >

5 GeV/c isconsistentwiththemeasurementwithintheuncertain- tiesincludingtheslowincreaseoftheRAAasafunctionofelectron pT. The model takes into account both radiative and collisional contributions toparton energyloss.Specifically, theradiative en- ergy loss calculationsare an extension of theDGLV [101] model towardsafinitesizedynamicalmedium,finitemagneticmass,and runningcoupling.Themodeldoesequallywellinreproducingthe magnitudeandpT dependenceoftheDmesonsRAA[48].

Vitev.ThecalculationsbyVitevetal.[90]alsocapturethemag- nitude of the suppression and reproduce the pT dependence of theelectronsseeninthedata.Thein-mediummodificationofthe heavy quark distribution anddecayprobabilities are evaluated in aco-movingplasma.Thepredictionsforheavy-flavourdecayelec- tronsuppressionareobtainedwithanimprovedperturbativeQCD descriptionofheavyflavourdynamicsinathermalmediumwhere theformation anddissociationofheavy-flavourmesonsare com- bined withparton-level charmandbeautyquarkradiative energy loss.Themodelincludingthedissociationofheavy-flavourhadrons capturesalsothesuppressionofDmesons.

WHDG. The band corresponding tothe WHDG modelcalcula- tions [87–89]isconsistent withthemeasurementwithin theun- certainties; however, it systematically underpredicts thesuppres- sionbelow12GeV/c.Interestingly,thesamecalculationcompared to the Dmesons RAA reproduced the datavery well. The model includes elastic aswell as inelastic energy loss of heavy-quarks, andthepath length (geometric)fluctuationswithin astaticther- malcoloured mediumwithitsdensityastheonlyfreeparameter determined via a statistical comparison of the model with the chargedparticleproductioninheavy-ioncollisions.

TAMU. The RAA obtained within the TAMU model of heavy quark transport within a strongly coupled thermal medium in- cluding theelastic scatterings withthe medium (resonance scat- teringandcoalescence processes)[91]underpredicts thesuppres- sion at low-pT while it captures the magnitude of the data for pT>12 GeV/c. We note that TAMU also underpredicts the D mesonsRAAanditssuccessfortheelectronsathigh-pTmaybere- latedtotheb-quarkenergylossforwhichthefractionfromelastic processesisincreasedascomparedtocharmquarks.Ontheother

(8)

hand,TAMUreproduces the measured v2 of Dmesonsand elec- tronsfromheavy-flavourhadrondecaysaccurately[99,100].

BAMPS. The BAMPS [96–98] calculation, which is a partonic transport modelusingtheBoltzmann equation,is shownfortwo scenarios. The BAMPScoll. calculation considering only the colli- sional energyloss in an expandingquark-gluon plasma overesti- matesthemagnitudeofthesuppressionwithintheregioncovered by the measurement. The calculation obtained within the same framework where both the elastic and radiative processes were considered(BAMPScoll.+rad.)describesthedataratherwell.Asim- ilarconclusioncanbedrawnfromthecomparisontotheD-meson RAA. On the other hand,the BAMPScoll. reproduces qualitatively the v2 ofDmesonsandelectrons fromheavy-flavourhadron de- cays,buttheBAMPScoll.+rad.underestimatestheDmesonv2[99, 100].

MC@sHQ+EPOS2. The results of the Monte Carlo model in- cludinga hydrodynamic calculation of themedium coupled with collisional and radiative parton energy loss MC@sHQ+EPOS2 [93]

areconsistentwiththemeasurementwithintheuncertainties.The modelbestdescribesthe dataat pT>12 GeV/c.Thismodel also worksbetterfortheDmesons RAAatpT>10 GeV/cascompared tolower momentum(meson pT below10 GeV/c). Theauthors of themodelemphasise thatthescatteringinthehadronicphaseis notpresentintheircalculationandcanhavesubstantialeffecton the low-pT suppressionand ellipticflow calculationsthat under- predictsthemeasurement[99,100].

Cao, Qin, Bass. The calculation by Cao,Qin,andBass [92] re- produces the measured RAA at high-pT (above 12 GeV/c) while itunderpredicts thesuppression forlow-pT.The modelevaluates thedynamicsofenergylossandflowofheavy quarkswithinthe frameworkofaLangevinequationcoupledtoa(2+1)-dimensional viscoushydrodynamicmodelthatsimulatesthespace–timeevolu- tionof theproduced hot anddense QCD matter. Thiscalculation reproduced thesuppression ofDmesonsvery accurately,bothin strengthandthe pT-dependence.

POWLANG.The resultoftheheavy-quarktransportcalculation usingtherelativisticLangevinequationwithcollisionalenergyloss, POWLANG[94,95],isshownfortwochoicesofheavy-flavourtrans- port coefficientswithin thequark-gluon plasma.In thePOWLANG HTL [94] the coefficients are evaluated by matching the weak- couplingcalculationswithhard-thermal-loop(HTL) resultforsoft collisionswithaperturbativeQCDcalculationforhardscatterings.

ThisHTLvariantpredicts a fallingtrend with pT of theelectrons that isincompatible withthe dataand overpredictsthesuppres- sionathighmomentum.Conversely,thecalculation thatincludes the transport coefficients obtained fromthe Lattice QCD simula- tions[95]predictstherising RAA.However,itreportslargervalues thanthemeasuredonesanditisincompatiblewiththemeasured magnitude of the suppression. The width of the theory curves envelopes thespread inthe resultsof thecalculation that is ob- tained when considering two different decoupling temperatures Tdec (155 MeV and 170 MeV) from the hydrodynamic evolution ofthefireball.Therelatively smallwidthofthebandssuggestsa weaksensitivityofthesuppressiontotheTdec.Similartotheelec- tron case,POWLANG HTL capturesthe suppressionforDmesons below 5 GeV/c predicting much lower RAA at high-pT than ob- servedinthedata.Interestingly,asinthecaseoftheTAMUmodel, thePOWLANGHTLcalculationsprovideafairdescriptionoftheD mesonsv2 measuredattheLHC.

Giventhelevelofagreementofthetheoreticalmodelswiththe dataonv2 and RAAofpromptDmesons[75,48,99]andelectrons fromheavy-flavourdecays,thefollowinggeneralconclusionsarise:

– models incorporating the complete dynamical and thermal evolutionofthemediumarefavouredbythedata;

– the measurementindicates the needforboth, collisionaland radiative,energylossofheavy quarkstobeconsideredtoex- plain themagnitude andthe pT dependence ofthe suppres- sion.

6. Summary

The pT-differential yields of electrons fromsemi-leptonic de- cays of charm and beauty hadrons were measured at 3<pT<

18 GeV/cinseveralcentralityclassesofPb–Pb collisionsat√ sNN= 2.76 TeV atmid-rapidity. Thenuclear modificationfactor RAA for the 10% mostcentral eventsshowsa strong suppression ofelec- trons fromheavy-flavour hadron decays. Consistent withthe ex- pectationofadecreaseofthemedium’sinitialenergydensityand a decreasingsystemsizefromcentraltoperipheralcollisions, the suppression issignificantly weakerin moreperipheralevents.No significant suppressionisobservedinp–Pbcollisions,indicating a strong in-medium energyloss of both charm andbeauty quarks in Pb–Pb collisions. Inparticular, the strongsuppression athigh- momentum indicates that b-quarks lose a substantial fraction of their energy. The suppression of electrons is quantitatively con- sistent with measurements of RAA of muonsfrom semi-leptonic heavy-flavourdecaysin2.5<y<4,disfavouringa strongdepen- denceofenergylossonrapidity intherange|y|< 4.Theoretical calculations that include collisional and radiative in-medium en- ergylossforbothcharmandbeautyquarksreproducetheexperi- mentalfindings.Inparticular,modelsincorporatingthedynamical evolutionofthemediumarepreferredbythedata.

Acknowledgements

The ALICECollaboration would like to thank all its engineers andtechniciansfortheirinvaluablecontributionstotheconstruc- tion of the experiment and the CERN accelerator teams for the outstanding performance of the LHC complex. The ALICE Collab- oration gratefully acknowledges the resources and support pro- videdbyallGridcentresandtheWorldwideLHCComputingGrid (WLCG) collaboration. The ALICE Collaboration acknowledges the following fundingagenciesfortheir supportin buildingandrun- ning the ALICE detector: A.I. Alikhanyan National Science Labo- ratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL), State Com- mittee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Ar- menia; Austrian Academy of Sciences and Nationalstiftung für Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung, Austria; Conselho Na- cionalde DesenvolvimentoCientíficoe Tecnológico(CNPq), Finan- ciadora de Estudose Projetos(Finep) andFundaçãode Amparoà PesquisadoEstadodeSãoPaulo(FAPESP),Brazil;MinistryofEdu- cationofChina (MOEofChina),MinistryofScience&Technology of China (MOST of China) and National Natural Science Founda- tion of China (NSFC), China; Ministry of Science, Education and Sports andCroatian ScienceFoundation,Croatia; CentrodeInves- tigacionesEnergéticas,MedioambientalesyTecnológicas(CIEMAT), Cuba;MinistryofEducation,YouthandSportsoftheCzechRepub- lic,Czech Republic;Danish NationalResearchFoundation (DNRF), TheCarlsbergFoundationandTheDanishCouncilforIndependent Research–Natural Sciences,Denmark; Helsinki Institute ofPhysics (HIP),Finland;Commissariatàl’EnergieAtomique(CEA)andInsti- tut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3) andCentre Nationalde la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France; Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie(BMBF)andGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schweri- onenforschung GmbH, Germany; Ministry of Education, Research andReligiousAffairs,Greece;NationalResearch,Developmentand Innovation Office, Hungary; Department of Atomic Energy, Gov- ernment of India (DAE), India; Indonesian Institute of Science,

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

The ALICE collaboration also measured two-particle correlations between heavy-flavour hadron decay electrons (e HF ) and charged particles in p–Pb and Pb–Pb collisions at √.. s

The ALICE collaboration measured the production of open heavy-flavour hadrons via their semi-leptonic decays to electrons at mid-rapidity and to muons at forward rapidity

The measured elliptic flow of inclusive electrons is shown in figure 3 in the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20% and 20–40% as a function of p T using the event plane (black

At low transverse momentum ( p T &lt; 2 GeV =c ) additional information from the TOF detector was required to improve the rejection of hadronic background. Electron

This paper reports the measurement of the production cross section in pp collisions, the invariant yields and the nuclear modification factor, R AA , in Pb–Pb collisions as a

Hungarian Orszagos Tudomanyos Kutatasi Alappgrammok (OTKA) and National Office for Research and Technology (NKTH); Depart- ment of Atomic Energy and Department of Science

(Colour online) Total cc and bb cross sections extracted from a fit of the measured dielectron yield from heavy-flavour hadron decays in ( m ee , p T,ee ) and in DCA ee

the Indonesian Institute of Science, Indonesia; Centro Fermi—Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare