cited
withoutprior reference to the author
---e---
-
International Councbl for the Exp%oration of the Sea
STOCK SIZE OF NORTH-EAST ARCTIC COB 8i&4io,t~/ke&
ESTINTED FROM
ACO'USTICSURVEY
DATA198%
ARVID HYLEN AND ODD MAICKEM Institute of Marine Researeh
Postboks 1878 5011 Bergen, Norway
ABS'E'MCT
Assessments of the total s t ~ c k and spawning stock of North East Arctic cod were carried
o u ton the basis of Norwegian suuvey data and comerebal landångs. The total stsck, i,e. fish which was 3 years old and older at
%January 1982, was estimated to
580millzon speeimens; the corresponding sgawning stsck amoun- ted to apprornimately
1 9 0sraillioar specåmens. The estimates for the total stock were
i ngood agreement wåth those ueported by the Working Group on Arctic Fisheries, with exseptfon
ofthe 6 year old fåsh (the 1976 yearelass) for whlch the present esti-mate Es w c h 1ower tkan the one reported by the Wsrkång Group. The estimated sgawnång stock såze was considerably larger than the Working Group estimate, because of the contri- butåons to tkis ctoek eomponent by fish whlch was less than 8 years old;
the1975 yeaxclass (7 year old fish) contributed more thari % O per cent,
The Workipng Group on Arctic Fisheries and ACFM have several
times recsmnended to make use
0%fishery independent
datain
stock assessment. The recoimendation was based on the faet tkat fishery dependent data has during later years been less reli- able as compared wåth earlier years. This is mainly caused by changes in fiskery regirnes, introductfon of quota schemes and changes in fish distribution patterns due to kydrographical variations. In order to meet this recomendation an intensive survey activity on North-East Arctic cod and haddock has been introduced. The present work is an atterript to estimate the total
stockand the spawning stock of North East Arctic cod at the begisining
of I 9 8 2on the basis of the results from these surveys
IMATERIAL
%n the assessment we have used the results from a series of four surveys:
1. The Barents Sea acoustic curvey,
26January- 5 March
1982(DALEN et al.
1 9 8 2 ) .2 .
The LofotenIVesterålen acoustic survey,
29January-27
February 1982 (GOD@ et al.
1 9 8 2 ) .3. The Mare acoustic survey, P6 March-7 April
1 9 8 2(GODØ
etal.
1 9 8 2 ) .4. The Svalbard groundfish/trawl survey, September-October
1 9 8 1(RANDA and SmBSTAD
1 9 8 2 ) .Details of each survey åre given in the reportc referred to. In Fig.
1are indieated the approximate areas covered by the acoustic surveys.
In additiom to survey data, preliminary commercial landing
statistics, including landings from foreign vessels, for the
period from P January to the date of the surveys in the respec-
tive areas were used. Biological data from Norwegian landings
in February as well
asfro1111 the surveys were also taken into
account .
ASSESSMENT OF
TOTALL STOCRThe nu1~1be-s of fLsk
byage
a t 1January
1882were
a r r i v e dat, by addilag together the 4982-comercia1 catches pris- to the acaustic
survegsand the results from each
ofthe surveys, The natural mortality between 1 January and the dates
o fthe surveys were
not aecsur1tedfor. Be1aw
isgiven a br%e%
deserLg-tåsn
ofeach
ofthe cananlpanents in
t%reassessment.
Up to the 2% F'ebliwary the
totallandings
o f codnorth of the Lofoten islands
w e r e absut86 000
tons(Tab1.e
I n ) .South
ofLofoten the landlngs were
abcsut 18000
t o n sup to the end
ofMarch. These quantitfes
represeneed Entotal about 27 millbion
6Esh ( T a b i e M ) .In landings from the most northern areas (West and East-Finmark) the
1975and
1 9 7 6year classes were repre-
sefatedby aboant the same number. Further south the importance of the 1976 year class
wacreduced, In total, the Eandings were predaminated by the
P975year class. Very
smallquantities were
l a n d e dfrom the Svalbard region between the survey which ended
t h e 7Bctober
1981anad 1 January
1982.These landå.ngs were
t h e r e f o r eneglested.
The Barents Se
The estimates arrived
atduring the different surveys, are given
%n'Fable
113.The Barerits Sea coxnponent was estl.mated to 408 mi.ll&an
f i a h(DALEN
et al, 1 9 0 2 ) ,and the
1 9 7 5 -and 4976- year classes were represeated by 74 and 73 million fish respec-
t i v e l y .
The Vester&lan
----p -.
An area
( V e s t e r å l e n ) btaeweegithe area covered by the Barents
Sea
survegand the Lofoten survey was not worked later %kan the
end of
Januar7(GOD@
e eal.
1 9 8 2 ) .At this time ccgd was record-
ed in
4 2 r e c % a n g l e s with an caveragenumbesl of
0 , 6rnillisn fbsh
p e r rectangke.Assumirag
thesame abundance and geographica1
distribution on the 20 February as in leate Janrrary the stock in the area was estimated to 25 million
f % s h .In lack of represen- tative age dfstsibutions from research vessels, an age distri- bution from long
linelandings from the region in Pebruary was accepted to be approprfate for the stock ila the miådle of February (Table 1B). This age distribution was predominated by the 1975 year class.
The E..ofote
The st6c.k
%nthe Vestfjord and outside the Lofoten islands was estimated to about 80 million fåsh in the period 17-20 February (GOD@ et al. 1982). Only
alimited number of length measure- ments and age readings existed from research vessels catches.
iMore
datawas available from comnercåal landings by gillnet,
long line, hand line and Danish seine. However, ROELEFSEN (1956) found that purse seine catches would give more represen- tative age distributians of the stack than the gears mentioned.
Age-distributions from purse seine catehes were available from March, and they were assmed to be representative for the stock at the appropråate time. These data showed a clear predominance of the 1975 year class. The 1976 year class was less abundant than in midwater traw1 catches taken by the research vessel
(GOD0 et a%. 1982).
The Helgeland region, fu-rther south, was not covered by sur- veys. This area has usually a low density
offish, indicated by small landings. In the first quarter of
1 9 8 2 ,a total catch of 3000 tons was recorded which was only
115of the catches taken in the same period in the most southern survey area, Mare. The stock in the Helgeland region was therefore acsumed to be
115of the estimated stock at
Mare orequal to 2,3 million fish.
The age distributionn was assumed to be the same as at M@re
The More
The s"iick o f f M@re was e s t i n i a t e d t o a b s u t Il_ m i l l i o n f i a h a t t h e end a f March
(GOD0
e t a l , 1 9 8 2 ) , and t h e 1975 y e a r c l a s s w a s predaminant i n t h e s t o c k (Table 1B1,The Svalbard r e ~ å o n
%n P e b 7 ~ 1 ~ a ~ y t h e ~1b71ature p a r % , of the Svalbard s t o c k c o q o n e n t wou1.d $12 a3.0-ig the Nomegå.an c o a s t and aarcounted f o r by t h e
starveys i n February-Marc%4, bu% t h e i m a t u r e f i s h w i . l l s t a y i n , t h e r e g i o n , T h i s coal~onent was accounted f o r by d a t a c s % & e c t e d d u r i n g %tie grouindfksh saxrvey i n Septeen%ser-Qctobe~ 198% ( M N D A
\ cmd
SMEDSTAD
1982). By I-her swepl: axycua ~ n e t h o d the s t o c k was e s t i m a t e d t a about 40 i - n i 1 l i c . m £:i.st~ whlck wac redaaced by n a t u r a l . m o r t a l i t y (M-O,b?O) t o 36 -raai.ll%srl fic"raC1
January 1 9 8 2 . When e x c l u d i n g t h e mature f i s k by applyfng a. d - i s t r i b ~ ~ t i o n f o r t h e r a t e of matiaration sfmiLar t o t h e r e s t o f t h e s t o c k ( s e e l a t e r ) , an estf.mate o f 28 m i l l i o n kmatuire f i s h a t t h e begin- nkng of 1982 was a r r i v e d a t , This compswent was predominated by t h e 1979 y e a r e l a s s (Table % B ) which was r e e o r d e d a s one of zihe most abundant y e a r s.1-asses i n t h e r e g i o n s i n c e t h e 1 9 7 0 y e a r c % a s s (RANDA, 1982 and p e r s o n a l caam1~nicati.0113.T o t a l stocla estinnate
-
\ The sum o f starvey e s t i m a t e s arid l a a ~ d i n g s made up t h e t o t a l s t o c k s i z e i n t h e beglnning of 1982 (Table % B ) . It should be observed t h a t no c s r r e c t i o n was made f o r t h e n a t u r a l m o r t a l i t y in t h e p e r i o d p r i o r t o t h e s u r v e y s . The s t o c k s i z e of 3 y e a r o l d and o l d e r f i s k was a s s e s s e d t o a b s u t 1580 rniilllon. f i s h whieh conripares t o
630
m i l l i o n a r r i v e d a t by t h e A r c t i c F f s h e r % e s Working Group(ANON,
1 9 8 2 ) . Good agreement was found f o r a l lage groups exeept f o r t h e 6 y e a r o l d s , t h e 1976 y e a r c l a s s . The e s t i m a t e of t h i s y e a r e l a s s was onby 57% of t h e Worki-ng group e s t i m a t e 9 whish wac based on t h e a c o u s t f c survey in 1981, However, t h e survey e s t i m a t e f o r 1981 was n o t i n conforznity w i t h t h e e s t å m a t e s f o r this y e a r c l a s s %n e a r l i e r surveys (DALEN 15t a l , 1482). I n 1981 ssnie d i f f i c u l t f e s i.11 d i s e r i m i n a t -
i n g between 5 and 4 y e a r olbds migkt have o c c t ~ r r e d and t h e
9976
y e a r c l a s s might t h u s kave been o v e r e s t i m a t e d i n t h e 198%survey.
Further
studåes ofthis
problem a r e needed.ASSESSMENT OF SPAWMENG
STQCK
The spawning s t o c k was eseimated on t h e b a s i s of t h e same d a t a a s
the
t o t a l s t o c k , B i o l s g i c a l samples from t h e a r e a s V e s t e r å l e n - MØre showed t h a t n e a r l y a l % f i s h b o t h i n t h e c o m e r e % a $ land-åazgs and I.n t h e r e s e å r c h vesse'b c a t c h e s was mature f i s h and hence t h e t o t a l s t o c k w i t h i n t h e s e a r e a s was assumed t o be spawners ('rable
1
and 2 ) . The n e x t s t e - was t o exclude t h e immature f i s h from t h e Iandångs i n F i n m a r k and from t h e s t o c k e s t i m a t e of t h e Barents Sea and Svalbard coinponents. The s t o c k s i z e by bength f o r t h e B a r e n t s Sea component was s p l i t t e d i n m a t u r e ' s and % m a t u r e s s f o r each of t h e 4 a r e a s used i n a s s e s -s i n g t h e s t o e k s å z e (DALEN e t a l . 1982). The age composition of mature f i s h was a r r i v e d a t by a p p l y i n g t h e r e s p e c t i v e a g e / l e n g t h keys. T o t a l age cornpositions f o r l a n d i n g s i n West- and East-Finnmark were e s t f m a t e d by a p p l y i n g t h e r e s p e c t i v e a r e a m a t u r i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n s found i n t h e survey.
The mature fis%- in t h e Svalbard component was on m i g r a t i o n t o t h e spawning grounds d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d of t h e a c o u s t i c suuveys and t h u s i n c l u d e d
In
t h e a c s u s t i c d a t a . The t o t a l spawning s t o c k a t t h e beginning of L982 was found by s u m i n g t h e l a n d i n g s and t h e s t o c k e s t i m a t e s of t h e d i f f e r e n t c o w o n e n t s (Table 2 ) ; i r e s u l t i n g i n a spawnlng s t s c k l e v e 1 of 188 m i l l i o n f i s h , predominated by t h e 1 9 7 5 y e a r e l a s s ,D%SCUSSIQN
The s t o c k i n t h e Svalbard r e g i o n was a s s e s s e d by t h e swept a r e a method ( U N D A and
SMEDSTAD,
1 9 8 2 ) , assuming the f i s h i n g w i d t h of t h e t r a w l t o be 25 m , which i s h a l f t h e average rneasured d i s % a n c e between t h e o t t e r b o a r d s . For e s t å m a t i n g t h e shrimp s t o c k i n t h e B a r e n t s S e a , t h e f i s h i n g w i d t h of t h e t r a w l was taken t a be about 1 5 m (TEIGCMARK andOYNES
1981). The e f f e c t i v e w i d t h o f t h e trawb may t h u a be d i s c u s s e d , b u t a t t h e p r e s e n tlow s t o c k l e v e l in t h e b>u~a.%ba.-d r e g i o n t h e t o e a l s t o c k s i z e wou%d rnot be v e r y s e n s i e i v e %O elaanges %n thås parameter
(Table
l),
The i r a v e s t i g a t i o n s %n 1982 d f d not csvear t h e BesterALen a r e a s a t % s : f a e t o r å l y an t i m e , ThLs a r e a was surveyed i n l a t e J a n ~ ~ a x y , at a tfnae when t h e cod was p a s s i n g through on %he way $0 syawn- i n g ar.:as f t a r t h e r s o u t h . On the o t h e r hand mature fisgr 3,s caontå.r~~t::~i2s~",.y paseing k h i s a r e a from t h e n o r t h a t l e a a t up t o t h e end February. These f i s h e s a r e t h e b a s i s f o r the NomegLali fåshery i n t h e a r e a i n February and Marcb, a f f s h e r y which generally t a k e s p l a c e an t h e smie loucafitl.es t h r o u g h s u t t h e whole season. The a s s ~ m p t i s n made e h a t t h e fLsh was d i s t r i -
( b u t e d i n t h e same manxie:c i n . Februargr a s Pr1 l a t e January m+$.$:
t h u s h o l d good, b u t i t i s t h e most u n c e ~ ~ t a i n parameter i n t h e assessment of t h e s t s c k .
Less i n f o r m a t i o n on f i s h d i s t r i b u t t o n s and abundance waa a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e Helgeland r e g i a n , No s u r v e y s were c a r r i e d o u t and v e r y few b i o l o g i e a l d a t a from comnercfal landinga were ccsllected. We trave txsed f i s h e r y s t a t å s t i c a t o e s t i m a t e t h e s t o c k compoaaent and t h e figuaee arerived a t seerns o . A g r e a t number of fiskleranen a r e liuring i n % h a t p a r t o f Norway, and w i t h a s u f f i c i e n t h i g h fish derasi-ty i n t h a t regi-on t h e y would have p r e g e r r e d t o go f i a h i n g t h e r e . Pnstead most of them go f i s h i n g in Lofoten. O f c o u r s e , t h e e s t i m a t e d s t o e k coanponent, based on
l t h e c a t c h l e v e l c i n t h e t w s r e g i o n s (Helgeland and Mare) mfght be doubted, b u t on t h e o t h e r hand e r r o r s
in
t h e e s t i m a t e ofs t o c k l e v e l i n t h e Helgelarad r e g i o n woasld probably n o t be c r i t f c a l . f a r t h e assescments of t h e t o t a l s t o c k and t h e spawni.ng s t a c k .
Rased on a r e p r of t h e spawniaag
s t o c k a maturit- ed from t h e s t o c k
s i z e by age given Pn t h e Arctrc F i s h e r i e s Working Group Report
(ANQN,
1 9 8 2 ) .ROLLEFSEN
( 1 9 5 6 ) å n d i c a t e d t h a t age d i s t r i b u t i o n s from piurse seine cateohes in Lofoten were r e p r e s e n t a t i v e f o r t h e s t o c k %n t h e a r e a . However, due to d i f f e r e n t geographica1 d i s t r j - b u t i o n of f i s b s i z e a n d segregatåon with time(S&TERSDfi
1958), no age distr%bution
from apartåcular gear is represen- tative for the total spawning stock. In table
3are given maturity diatributions from several authsrs. It is seen that the mataa.i-ity
ratesestimated from the results in the present papeu are much
h i g h e rthan $hose given by previsus autksrs. For exaqle, absut
2 1 3of
the7 year old ffsh was mature in the beginnång
of1982, compared with an average of 13% f r the period 196&/47-197'7/78 given by P O N O W R E m B et al. (1980).
f 'Ehuc, the
queståon sf representative matuscity distributåons for
/ North-East Arctic
codseem to need further investigations.
I
ANOW 1982. Report
ofthe
k r c t l cFåsheries Workång Group.
(Copenhagen. 16-23 September 1981. Coun. Meet. int.
Sea, 1982(G:%)a 1-53. (Mimeo.)
P-
DALEN, J., HYLEN, A., NAKKEN; O., U N D A , K, and SMEDSTAD, O.M.
1982. Norwegian investågations on young cod and haddock in the Barents Sea during the winter 1982.
(G: 41)
:1- 22. (Mimeo.)
GAEIROD, D. J. 1967. Populatåon dyitamles of the Arcto-Norwegian Cod. J. Pisk. Res.
Bd,Can., 24: 3.45-190.
GODØ, o.R., NAKKEN, O., NES, A. and SUNNANW, K. 1982.
iAcsustic estiinates
ofspawning cod off Lofoten and Mare in
1 9 8 % . Coun.Meet.
i=1982
( G : 6 2 ) :1-16. (Mimeo.)
P
HYLEN, A. and DICUGESUND,
8 .1973. Reeruitment of young Arcto- Norwegian csd and
hadåsckin relation to garent stock
PONOIMARENKO,
V . B . , PONOmREmB,I.
Y a .and YAMGINA, N.A. 1980.
Growth and maturation of the Lofoten-Barents Sea Cod.
9
Coun.
Meet, mint.
Coun.- (G:25): 1-28.
(Mimeo.
)RANDA, M. and CMEDSTAD,
0 , M .1982. The Nomegian Groundfish Survey
atBear Isla11d and West-Spitsbergen. Coun.
Meet. bnt.
p---.-=v
(G:4%): 1-17,
(Mime0
e )RANDA, M,
1982.
Re~ruitmentirradiees
f o rthe Arctic-Nomegian
cc~d f o rthe period 1965-1979
b a s e do r r a the interna- tional O-group fish surveys, 9)-igkMeet. int. - Coean.
l
Rollefsen, G. 1954.
Observatibons on eksecsd and cod fisheries
\
36: 4 0 - 4 7 ,
-
ROLLEFSEN, G .
1956. InL~oductiora.
SÆTERSDAL, G. 1958.
Selectiveprocesses in the skrei fisher- les. --
Coian.Meet. in$. Coun.
9 . 5 8 ( 7 3 ) :1 - 4 .
(Mimeo.)
TEEGSMARK,
G . andOPNES, P, 1981. Results of a stratiffed bot-t-om
traw& smlevey forchråmps (Pandalus borealis)
I %n the Barents Sea in May-June 1981. Coun. Meet. int.
( K : 2 1 ) :
1-19. (Mimeo.)
r- hl
\8
-t..
cd
pl
4
O rl
O hl
\B a
ri
08
\B ri
Q m
\B P-
A
O Q d w
A
pl pl
*d
a
W A
hl Q J O B Nm .d ri
ul z-4
$5
.bi-V3
.b, Q)
c o k cti 9
w
4-Js s
k w Q Q
k Q) CA P
a S 3
Pi Z
% w 4
e 0 m e f-i
001: 9 ' 9 8 9 " 9 8 89 T9 11
001: Z'tJL C 0 € 9
C!,
Zf? O TZ6 9 ' 6 s Z'ZtJ 9t7 tJZ 6
I 1 8 $ * O G 0 '
O G
9 Z 01: 859
z
' €1: L " 9 L € L%'C
c
's
-I- 4- l- 901: 9 " Z S
C
C ' '9z
' €, --=
EL491 9561:
N3S632TQX
WeCI
0861:'Te
3a aNflSB3WQ 896T R q q e p uo pasEg 3 % ~LMXS3Xd O X N B X W O N O B CINV NBTWH Q m 3 X W O N O d
L96TUOXXV3
-
( j u a ~ a a d ) * a s e Xq ysrg
axnqsw.
aZe3ussxad "p03D=paxV q s ~ ~ - y ~ x s N
*% aTqeLi/
b
Z'I