5. Comparing Classroom Activities. International Comparison of Qualitative Pedagogical Studies Berit H. Johnsen

The present study is a systematic review designed to identify, quality appraise, and synthesize the results of comparative studies (i.e. studies of experimental or

THE COMPARATIVE RESEARCH Pr o- gramme on Poverty (CROP) has as its major aim to facilitate comparative studies on pov- erty in countries in the North and the South and to create

These questions need consideration related to choice of theoretical and method- ological perspectives in each of the studies. Variation in predominant research discourses between

As discussed in both the general project description (WB 04/06) and joint research plan, a main challenge – and vital element – of international com- parative educational

In this study, the following frame factors with additional sub-factors are expected to be found: Legislation and policy – economy – professional quality – physical frame factors

The internal peer debriefing in the 8-step process of the joint research report’s compilation of Inclusive Practices (Johnsen et al., 2020) is possibly the most prominent exam- ple

b) pupils' own intentions; and c) the school's assessment and knowledge of pupils’level of mastery and learning potential (Johnsen, 2014b; Johnsen et al, 2020). Interviews with

Wertsch, 2007). In order to support individually adapted education, teaching methods need to be based on knowledge about the pupil’s level of mastery and zone of proximal