• No results found

tiveperspectTheory pAgency TA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "tiveperspectTheory pAgency TA"

Copied!
21
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Concept Symposium 2010 Concept Symposium 2010

Oscarsborg, Norway 16 – 17 September 2010

Symposium web-site: http://www.conceptsymposium.no/

Concept Research Programme: http://www.concept.ntnu.no/english/

(2)

Project Governance

Procedural Staight Jacket or Procedural Staight Jacket or

Freedom of Arts?

Dr Ralf Müller Dr Ralf Müller

Umeå University

Norwegian School of Management BI SKEMA Business School

SKEMA Business School

CONCEPT Symposium, 16-17 September 2010, Oscarsborg, Norway

(3)

Corporation C t Project

Management

Corporation Corporate governance

Management

Projects Governance of project

Portfolio

project management

Program Project

Governance of

Project Project

projects, programs

and portfolios

(4)

Project governance – a definition

• Governance of portfolios, programs, projects, and project management, coexists within the corporate governance framework.

• It comprises the value system, responsibilities, processes and policies that allow projects to

p p p j

achieve organizational objectives and foster

implementation that is in the best interests of p

all the stakeholders, internal and external, and

the corporation itself. p

(5)

What does project governance do?

• Defines the objectives of an j organization / project.

P o ides the means to achie e those

• Provides the means to achieve those objectives.

• Controls progress.

(6)

Outcome

e.g.project outcome

St k h ld g p j

(Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997)

Shareholder Theory:

Companies

Stakeholder Theory:

Companies i i b fi

Flexible

Economist Versatile Artist

Companies maximize RoI for their shareholders

(Clarke, 2004)

maximize benefits for a wide set of

stakeholders

(Clarke 2004)

Conformist Agile pragmatist

(Clarke, 2004) (Clarke, 2004)

Compliance e.g.project process

(Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997)

(7)

Shareholder orientation Stakeholder orientation

Flexible Economist Versatile Artist Paradigm

Outcome control

Flexible Economist Paradigm

Highest possible Return on Investment (ROI)

Project management as core

Versatile Artist Paradigm

Balancing requirements of a wide range of stakeholders

Tailoring of methods

Project management a core

control focus

Project management as core competence

Professional project managers

Guided by tactical Project

Project management a core competence

Project management a profession

Management Offices (PMO) Guided by a strategic PMO

Conformist Paradigm

Maximizing shareholder return

Agile Pragmatist Paradigm

Balances the diverse

Compliance focus

(behavior

Maximizing shareholder return

Project management a subset of development processes for

technical products or services.

P j t t i

Balances the diverse

requirements of a variety of stakeholders by maximizing their collective benefits

M i i l b t i t

control) Project management is

understood as on-the-side task Maximize value by strict prioritization of user needs.

(8)

Institutions for project governance

P j t t

Project management governance

Board of Directors Project governance

• Sponsor & Steering Group

• Board of Directors

• Middle management PMO

• Program management

• Portfolio management

• PMO

(9)

Institutional setup for project governance

Customer

interface Board of Directors

Type of business Level of maturity

PM capacity

Customer Steering Group

Ultimate success responsibility Program Project

PROGRAM Strategic goals /

PM capacity PMO?

Project Management

Program

continue/ stop / hold, resources Project

continue/ stop /hold, resources

Framework of methods, tools and

processes to use Project Portfolio

Management

P j l i Best practice

Support

Project/

program

continue/

stop/hold, resources

Management Office

Project/program/

tf li t d hi

PROJECT

Project selection

Project priority Goal setting Program info

Support portfolio stewardship

Usually made up of top project

managers

PROJECT

Focus:

scope time

’Go’ decision for projects

& programs

Contribution to portfolio objectives Providing appropriate

j t Project info

g

Develops tools/

methods/policies /quality standards

Ad i S t

scope, time, cost, end results

and others

project managers Setting the framework

of skills, knowledge and resource PPM project /

Admin. Support Reviews, trains,

consults

Prepares project Middle Management

Provide resources

and resource availability PPM project /

program info transfer

Prepares project

/program info Middle Management

Nb. of PMs Skills profile Areas of specialization Centralized pool or distributed

(10)

Governance structure

• Governance defines the processes, roles, and bili i f h i h diff

accountabilities of the managers in the different

governance institutions

(11)

Very Strong Resistance

Governance of project management

Very strong technology

focus

Strong project control

focus

Resistance to change

existing practices Constraints

Methodology C tifi ti Advanced

Methodology

Steering

Certification

PMO

Training

Bench- Incremental

Project

Management Committee

Reviews &

PMO PSO

Mentoring

Bench marking

Maturity Management

Governance steps

e e s &

Audits Mentoring atu ty

Models

Better project results

Role and career for

project

Project management

as strategic

E bl results

needed project

managers as strategic

capability Enablers

(12)

Governance perspectives towards j

projects

• A transaction to be performed

– Goal: Minimize transaction costs

contract process method and output – contract, process, method and output

• An agency performing the transaction – Goal: Minimize agency costsGoal: Minimize agency costs

– Adverse selection problem – Moral hazard problem

• A legitimate piece of work

– Goal: a socially acceptable endeavor

conform with society’s and stakeholders values and – conform with society s and stakeholders values and

expectations

(13)

Legitimacy

Legitimacy is a generalized perception or

assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.

(Suchman 1995)

(14)

Legitimacy

• Morale legitimacy

– Ethical approval of actions. Congruency with broader norms of the society

• Cognitive legitimacy

– Comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness

• Pragmatic legitimacy

– Benefit in the eyes of stakeholders or society

(Suchman 1995)

(15)

tive Steering Group (legitimacy perspective)

perspect

Instance of governance

Theory p governance

Agency T

Project Manager (Agency) Project management

Implementation

A Initiation Planning Close-out

( g y)

TCE perspective Project process

TCE perspective

(16)

Project in governance context

Legitimacy

Project

Transaction Agency

(17)

Board of Directors

(legitimacy perspective) Strategic

Objectives

Portfolio Manager (Agent)

Portfolio management Strategic

PMO

Program Manager

Steering Group or Manager Project

(Agent)

g p

Program management Management

Office

Project Manager

(A t)

Project management (Agent) TacticalPMO

Project management PMO

(18)

Linking Governance of Project and Project

Governance of

g j j

Management Through the Organizational Governance Paradigm

Governance of

tf li Governance

project management portfolios,

programs and projects

paradigm

(19)

The four governance paradigms tie

h d i

th t h h

together and categorize:

• the corporate governance approach chosen, either primarily stakeholder or primarily

h h ld i t d shareholder oriented

• The ways of managing a project, given the implication stemming from TCE, agency

theory and legitimacy.

• the project management capabilities and

practices deemed appropriate for all projects

p pp p p j

throughout the organization

(20)

Thank You

(21)

References

• Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The Art of Continuous

Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time paced Evolution in Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science

Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.

• Clarke, T. (2004). The Stakeholder Corporation: A Business Philosophy for the Information Age Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate p p Governance (pp. 189-202). London, UK: Routledge.

• Müller, R. (2009). Project Governance. Aldershot, UK Gower Publishing

Publishing.

• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Sound governance and transparency processes facilitate delivery of the client’s climate and environmental ambitions laid out in the framework. Hence, the governance

Sound governance and transparency processes facilitate delivery of Stångåstaden’s climate and environmental ambitions laid out in the framework. Hence, the

Based on the overall assessment of the green and social project categories in this framework, and governance and transparency considerations, the Republic of Indonesia’s SDGs

Based on the overall assessment of the projects financed under this framework, governance and transparency considerations, SpareBank 1 Ringerike Hadeland’s green

a) The business system effect: The ‘strategic fit’ between parent corporate governance characteristics and human resource management practices, and subsidiary

This is most evident in the current attempt by the government to launch a coherent innovation policy plan (HIP). c) The Norwegian governance structure is ill fitted for the

It identifies three different governance regimes – traditional bureaucracy, new public management and networked governance – and uses the insights from innovation in urban

The stakeholder perspective is, according to O’Sullivan, much less theoretically groundes than the shareholder perspective, indeed, it is ‘more often expounded as a