Downloaded from

(1)

The Slottsmøya marine reptile Lagersta¨tte: depositional environments, taphonomy and diagenesis

LENE L. DELSETT¹*, LINN K. NOVIS², AUBREY J. ROBERTS³, MAAYKE J. KOEVOETS¹, ØYVIND HAMMER¹,

PATRICK S. DRUCKENMILLER⁴& JØRN H. HURUM¹

1Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway

2Tromsø University Museum, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

3Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK

4University of Alaska Museum and Department of Geosciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA

*Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract: The Late Jurassic Slottsmøya MemberLagersta¨tteon Spitsbergen offers a unique opportunity to study the relationships between vertebrate fossil preservation, invertebrate occur- rences and depositional environment. In this study, 21 plesiosaurian and 17 ichthyosaur specimens are described with respect to articulation, landing mode, preservation, and possible predation and scavenging. The stratigraphic distribution of marine reptiles in the Slottsmøya Member is analysed, and a correlation between high total organic content, low oxygen levels, few benthic invertebrates and optimal reptile preservation is observed. A new model for 3D preservation of vertebrates in highly compacted organic shales is explained.

Supplementary material:A taphonomic description of each marine reptile specimen is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.2133549

Gold Open Access:This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license.

Mesozoic marine reptiles have been known from the Svalbard archipelago for more than 150 years, particularly from Triassic units (Maxwell & Kear 2013; Hurum et al. 2014). However, it was not until 1914 that Wiman described the first Jurassic marine reptile, a plesiosaur, from the island of Spits- bergen (Wiman 1914; Kear & Maxwell 2013).

Beginning in 2004, an extensive new field survey for Jurassic marine reptiles was undertaken by the Spitsbergen Jurassic Research Group (SJRG), an international team of palaeontologists and geolo- gists. During eight field seasons (2004 and 2006 – 12) on Spitsbergen, SJRG collected more than 40 marine reptile skeletons from the dark marine shales of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous Slottsmøya Member of the Agardhfjellet Formation (Fig. 1).

Given the sheer abundance of material and quality of preservation, we have characterized this unit as a Lagersta¨tte(Hurumet al.2012).

In the course of this work, detailed taphonomical data have been collected, permitting a rare insight into plesiosaur and ichthyosaur taphonomy. Previ- ous studies were limited primarily to two other

Jurassic units: the Oxford Clay and the Posidonien- schiefer Formation (Martill 1985, 1986, 1993). How- ever, the material upon which these studies were based was collected decades ago, and the specimens were not adequately stratigraphically constrained or contextualized geologically: thus, taphonomical interpretations presented in these studies are somewhat contentious. Efimov (2001) also analysed the taphonomy of a large number of Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous ichthyosaurs from two parts of the Ulyanovsk Section in the Volga Region.

Here, for the first time, we address plesiosaur and ichthyosaur taphonomy based on a large sam- ple size (n¼38) with many articulated specimens from a site where stratigraphic, sedimentological and palaeontological data were collected simulta- neously (Table 1; Figs 2 & 3). In this paper, we describe the preservational modes of the skeletons, and attempt to interpret the major physical and biotic factors affecting skeletal preservation. We incorporate new surface and well-log data to docu- ment the stratigraphic distribution of skeletons in the unit, especially in relation to the total organic From: Kear, B. P., Lindgren, J., Hurum, J. H., Mila` n, J. & Vajda, V. (eds) 2016.Mesozoic Biotas of

Scandinavia and its Arctic Territories. Geological Society, London, Special Publications,434, 165 – 188.

First published online December 16, 2015, updated December 17, 2015, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP434.2

#2016 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London.

Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics

by guest on April 25, 2022

http://sp.lyellcollection.org/

Downloaded from

(2)

content (TOC). The causes for the exceptional abundance of marine reptile skeletons found in the Slottsmøya Member compared to other members is beyond the scope of this paper.

Geological setting

The Svalbard archipelago is located between latitudes 74 – 818N and longitudes 10 – 358E, in the northwestern corner of the Barents Sea shelf.

The Middle Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous succession forming the Janusfjellet Subgroup comprises the Agardhfjellet and Rurikfjellet formations. The Agardhfjellet Formation consists of black shales and siltstones deposited in an open-marine, oxygen- deficient shelf setting (Dypvik et al. 1991; Col- lignon & Hammer 2012). The Myklagardfjellet bed, a distinct thin marker horizon of weathering clays, marks the boundary between the two formations (Birkenmajer 1980).

The marine reptiles and invertebrates discussed in this study occur in the Slottsmøya Member, the uppermost member of the Agardhfjellet Formation (Figs 1 & 2). The Slottsmøya Member rests on the Oppdalsa˚ta Member and is overlain by the Wimanf- jellet Member of the Rurikfjellet Formation (Mørk et al.1999). The Slottsmøya Member was deposited

in an open-marine shelf (Hammer et al. 2012).

The thickness ranges from 70 to 100 m, and consists of black to grey shales and siltstones with siderite interbeds (Dypvik et al. 1991). Shelf conditions were slightly dysoxic with periodical oxygenation of the bottom water, which might have been a result of influx of clastic sediments (Collignon & Hammer 2012). The shales of the mid-section show little alternation in mineralogy, suggesting a stable depositional environment, while the sediments in the silty intervals were transported into the basin by turbidity currents (Collignon & Hammer 2012).

This interpretation is supported by taphonomical and ecological evidence. Some crinoids and echi- noids were situated in the sediment as if they were transported, while other echinoderms like asteroids and ophiuroids were found in situ (Rousseau &

Nakrem 2012). TOC values of the Slottsmøya Mem- ber show considerable fluctuation, with the largest excursion reaching 9.7% (Hammeret al.2012).

In the uppermost part (39 – 49 m) of the Slotts- møya Member, several cold-seep communities have been discovered. From these, a diverse and low- dominance invertebrate fauna has been described (Hammer et al. 2011, 2013; Wierzbowski et al.

2011; Hryniewiczet al.2012, 2014). The non-seep fauna invertebrate diversity was probably also quite high. This assumption is based on a study of the Fig. 1. Geological map of the study area in central Spitsbergen, with the main marine reptile locations marked with red, brown and yellow circles. Redrawn and adapted from Dallmannet al.(2001).

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

166

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(3)

Slottsmøya Member from East Spitsbergen by Bir- kenmajer et al. (1982), the echinoderm fauna in the section (Rousseau & Nakrem 2012) and field observations in the area.

Abbreviations

PMO, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo (Palaeontological collection); SJRG, Spitsbergen Jurassic Research Group; SVB, Svalbard Museum, Longyearbyen.

Materials and methods

The 38 marine reptile skeletons used in this study were excavated during eight field seasons (2004 and 2006 – 12) by the SJRG. For each skeleton, the locality information, stratigraphic position and taphonomical data (e.g. orientation, nature and degree of articulation, and associated invertebrates) were recorded in the field at the time of collection (Table 1; Figs 2 & 3). During preparation, additional information was obtained concerning the articulation and association of skeletal elements, quality of preservation, completeness and bone modifi- cation. Field drawings and photographs before and during preparation were utilized in constructing skeletal maps of 28 of the specimens (Figs 4 – 8).

The remaining specimens were relatively incom- plete, poorly preserved or very disarticulated and, consequently, were not illustrated.

The marine-reptile-rich Jurassic deposits in the Oxford Clay Formation and the Posidonienschiefer Formation were used for comparative purposes in this study. The lowermost unit of the Oxford Clay Formation, the Peterborough Member, contains fos- siliferous, organic-rich mudstone (Tang 2002). The clay was deposited in a shallow epicontinental sea- way, and it is suggested that the seafloor substrate was soupy (Martillet al. 1994). The Posidonien- schiefer Formation of Holzmaden is known for its well-preserved marine reptiles and fish. The formation comprises finely laminated bituminous shale, and is regarded as the archetype for stagnant deposition (Seilacheret al.1985).

Martill (1985, 1986, 1993) collected vast amounts of information in his descriptions of marine reptiles from the Oxford Clay and the Posidonienschiefer Formation. In his studies of the preservation of the marine reptiles from the Peterborough Member (Martill 1985), he classified five preservation types based on the degree of skeletal articulation and the elements preserved: (1) articulated skeletons;

(2) disarticulated skeletons; (3) isolated bones and teeth; (4) rolled and worn skeletal elements; and (5) coprocoenosic accumulations. Two types of disarticulation were observed. In the first type,

bones were disarticulated but associated, and the disarticulation was caused by gravitational collapse of the skeleton. There were no scattered skeletal elements. In the second type, bones were scattered over a considerable distance, and the disarticulation could be a consequence of scavenging, current activity or both (Martill 1993). The five preservational modes of Martill (1985) form the basis for the categorization of the Slottsmøya Member marine reptile skeletons in this study, which we segregate into three different categories:

† Articulated skeleton: this definition (Martill 1985, p. 159) is used to describe a specimen with a true bone to bone relationship. However, parts of the skeleton can be missing due to surface erosion.

† Partly articulated skeleton: this is a new category based on the definition of the first type of disarticulated skeletons used by Martill (1985), which recognizes that some skeletons found in the Slottsmøya Member are intermediate between articulated and disarticulated (also observed by Martill 1993). A partly articulated specimen consists of two or more skeletal elements in articulation: for example, sections of associated vertebrae, ribs still articulated to vertebrae or partly articulated fins, along with disarticulated elements.

† Disarticulated skeleton: the definition (Martill 1985, p. 161) is used to describe a specimen lack- ing a bone to bone relationship and where the elements are scattered over a limited area. Mar- till (1985) also included specimens with some articulated elements in the definition, but here we include such specimens in the category of partly articulated skeletons.

To analyse the variation in three-dimensiona- lity of the bones, a computerized tomography (CT) scan of two vertebrae from an ichthyosaur (PMO 222.654: holotype of Janusaurus lundi Roberts, Druckenmiller, Sætre & Hurum, 2014) was conduc- ted. The two vertebrae were scanned with a Nikon Metrology XT 225 ST X-ray microtomograph at the Natural History Museum in Oslo, at a voltage of 210 kV, a current of 300mA and an exposure time of 500 ms (Fig. 9).

The invertebrate fossils analysed here were discovered while conducting detailed stratigraphic logging of two cores: DH2 and DH5R. These cores were obtained by the Longyearbyen CO2

Laboratory during a full-core drilling campaign (Larsen 2012). Approximately 70 m of the cores are assigned to be part of the Slottsmøya Member.

Invertebrate abundances represent qualitative esti- mates, as the area covered by the cores is minimal and fossils could only be observed on split surfaces

THE SLOTTSMØYALAGERSTA¨ TTE 167

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(4)

Table 1. Collected specimens Collection No. Stratigraphic

position (m)

Elements preserved

Articulation Landing mode

References Taxon Figure

reference

PMO 222.655 44.8 Almost complete Articulated Dorsal, then

lateral torsion

Under study I Figure 4a

PMO 222.658 39.1 Forefin, pectoral girdle, vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown Under study I Figure 8d

PMO 224.248 38.5 Skull, forefins, pectoral girdle, vertebrae Articulated Ventral Under study Pe Figure 5a

PMO 222.665 30.4 Vertebrae Partly articulated Unknown I

PMO 219.718 29.3 Almost complete Articulated Dorsal Knutsenet al.

(2012b)

Pe: Spitrasaurus wensaasi

Figures 3b and 4e PMO 212.662/

SVB 1452

27.0 Partial skull, phalanges, vertebrae Partly articulated Dorsal Pe Figures 3d

and 7c

PMO 222.671 22.5 Forefin, pectoral girdle, vertebrae Partly articulated Unknown Pe Figure 5b

PMO 214.578 20.8 Almost complete Articulated Anterior, then

twisted laterally

Druckenmiller et al.(2012)

I: Cryopterygius kristiansenae

Figures 3a and 4b

PMO 224.250 19 Forefins, pectoral girdle Partly articulated Ventral Under study I Figure 5d

PMO 224.251 19 Forefins, girdle elements, vertebrae, hindfin Partly articulated Dorsal I Figure 5c

SVB 1450 17.8 Partial skull, forefin, vertebrae Partly articulated Ventral Knutsenet al.

(2012b)

Pe: Spitrasaurus larseni

Figure 7d

PMO 222.672 17.5 Vertebra, pelvic girdle Disarticulated Unknown Pe Figure 8e

PMO 222.673 17 Vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown Pe

PMO 224.247 16.5 Forefins, girdle elements, vertebrae Partly articulated Ventral Pe Figure 6d

PMO 222.669 15.5 Skull, vertebrae, pectoral girdle, forefin Partly articulated Anterior, then twisted laterally

Under study I Figures 3c

and 7e

PMO 222.670 14.5 Hindfins, vertebrae, pelvic girdle Articulated Left lateral Under study I Figure 4c

PMO 222.663 14 Forefins, pectoral girdle, vertebrae, hindfins Partly articulated Ventral Under study Pe Figure 7f

PMO 214.135 14 Partial skull, vertebrae, humerus, phalanges, coracoid

Partly articulated Dorsal Knutsenet al.

(2012d)

Pi: Pliosaurus funkei Figure 6f

PMO 214.136 14 Partial skull, vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown Knutsenet al.

(2012d)

Pi: Pliosaurus funkei PMO 216.863 14 Forefin, pectoral girdle, vertebrae, pelvic

girdle, hindfin

Partly articulated Unknown Pe

L.L.DELSETTETAL.168

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(5)

PMO 216.838 14 Hindfins, vertebrae, pelvic girdle, phalanges Partly articulated Unknown Knutsenet al.

(2012a); Liebe

& Hurum (2012)

Pe: Colymbosaurus svalbardensis

Figure 6c

SVB 1451 11.8 Skull, ribs, vertebrae, phalanges, clavicle Partly articulated Dorsal Druckenmiller et al.(2012)

I: Palvennia hoybergeti Figure 6e

PMO 222.668 11.8 Vertebrae, pelvic girdle Disarticulated Unknown Pe Figure 8c

PMO 222.659 9.5 Skull Disarticulated Unknown I

PMO 216.839 7 Almost complete Partly articulated Ventral Knutsenet al.

(2012c); Liebe

& Hurum (2012)

Pe:Djupedalia engeri Figure 6a

PMO 224.252 7 Partial skull, ribs Partly articulated Dorsal Under study I Figure 5e

PMO 222.662 20.2 Pelvic girdle, femur, tail bend Partly articulated Unknown I Figure 7b

PMO 224.166 20.2 Humerus, vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown I Figures 3e

and 8a PMO 222.654 24 Partial skull, appendicular skeleton, vertebrae Partly articulated Right ventrolateral Robertset al.

(2014)

I:Janusaurus lundi Figure 6b

PMO 222.664 24.4 Propodial, vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown Pe Figure 8b

PMO 222.667 27 Partial skull, vertebrae, pectoral girdle, forefin Partly articulated Ventral Robertset al.

(2014); under study

I Figure 7a

PMO 214.452 28 Forefins, hindfins, pelvic girdle, vertebrae Disarticulated Ventral Under study Pe Figures 3f

and 8f

PMO 222.666 211 Vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown Pe

PMO 218.377 231 to222 or 215 to211

Propodial, hindfin Partly articulated Unknown Andreassen (2004);

Knutsenet al.

(2012a)

Pe:Colymbosaurus svalbardensis

PMO 224.249 251 Partial skull, vertebrae, partial fin Disarticulated Unknown I

PMO 222.657 Unknown Vertebrae Articulated Unknown Pe

PMO 222.660 Unknown Vertebrae Disarticulated Unknown I

PMO A27745 Unknown Hindfins, pelvic girdle, vertebrae Articulated Dorsal Persson (1962);

Andreassen (2004); Knutsen et al.(2012a)

Pe:Colymbosaurus svalbardensis

Figure 4d

Slottsmøya Member marine reptile specimens collected 2004 – 2012 in stratigraphic order. Stratigraphic position measured above or below (2) the yellow layer (see sedimentary log in Fig. 2). I, ichthyosaur;

Pe, plesiosauroid; Pi, pliosaurid. Figure references are to figures in this paper.

THESLOTTSMØYALAGERSTA¨TTE169

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(6)

Fig. 2. Composite log of the marine reptile interval in the Slottsmøya Member in the Janusfjellet – Knorringfjellet area. Lithology based on Collignon & Hammer (2012); isotope and TOC data from Hammeret al.(2012);

foraminiferal zones from Hjalmarsdottir (2012) and Nagy & Basov (1998); all from Janusfjellet sections.

Invertebrate abundance (qualitative) from the DH2 core, Longyearbyen.

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

170

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(7)

Fig. 2. Continued.

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(8)

that were unevenly distributed. TOC measurements were obtained from the DH2 core samples.

Results and discussion Articulation of marine reptile specimens

Articulated skeletons. There are seven articulated skeletons among the Slottsmøya marine reptiles:

ichthyosaurs (n¼3) and plesiosauroids (n¼4)

(Figs 3a, b, 4 & 5a). Two ichthyosaurs (PMO 214.578, holotype of Cryopterygius kristiansenae Druckenmiller et al., 2012: Figs 3a & 4b; PMO 222.655: Fig. 4a) and one plesiosauroid (PMO 219.718: holotype ofSpitrasaurus wensaasiKnut- senet al., 2012b: Figs 3b & 4e) are nearly complete.

PMO 214.578 lacks only the posterior portion of the tail, while PMO 219.718 lacks the skull in addition to the posterior portion of the skeleton lost to erosion. PMO 222.655 has only a few displaced vertebrae and neural arches, in addition Fig. 3. Field photographs of selected specimens with different articulation status: (a) PMO 214.578, articulated ichthyosaur; (b) PMO 219.718, articulated plesiosauroid; (c) PMO 222.669, partly articulated ichthyosaur; (d) PMO 212.662/SVB 1452, partly articulated plesiosauroid; (e) PMO 224.166, disarticulated ichthyosaur; and (f) PMO 214.452, disarticulated plesiosauroid. Photographs by the SJRG.

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

172

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(9)

to the pelvic girdle, which was moved anteriorly from its original position. The rostrum was divided from the body by a fault, and was found about 30 cm

deeper. The preservation of the specimen is poor in the anterior part and improves posteriorly.

PMO A27745 (Fig. 4d) is an articulated posterior Fig. 4. Outlines of articulated marine reptile specimens from the Slottsmøya Member, Agardhfjellet Formation, Svalbard. The specimens are drawn from the side stratigraphically up unless otherwise stated. See Table 1 for more information on each specimen. (a) PMO 222.655, ichthyosaur, drawn from the side stratigraphically down. (b) PMO 214.578, holotype of the ichthyosaurCryopterygius kristiansenae, drawn from the side stratigraphically down.

(c) PMO 222.670, ichthyosaur. (d) PMO A27745, holotype of the plesiosauroidColymbosaurus svalbardensis.

(e) PMO 219.718, holotype of the plesiosauroidSpitrasaurus wensaasi.

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(10)

portion of a plesiosauroid, collected in 1931 and described by Persson (1962) asTricleidus svalbar- densisand then later redescribed asColymbosaurus

svalbardensis by Knutsen et al. (2012a). PMO 224.248 (Fig. 5a) is the only plesiosauroid skeleton from the Slottsmøya Member that preserves a Fig. 5. Outlines of articulated and partly articulated marine reptile specimens from the Slottsmøya Member, Agardhfjellet Formation, Svalbard. The specimens are drawn from the side stratigraphically up unless otherwise stated. See Table 1 for more information on each specimen. (a) PMO 224.248, plesiosauroid. (b) PMO 222.671, plesiosauroid. (c) PMO 224.251, ichthyosaur. (d) PMO 224.250, ichthyosaur. (e) PMO 224.252, ichthyosaur.

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

174

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(11)

complete and articulated skull. It is slightly displaced from the neck. PMO 222.670 (Fig. 4c) is the posterior half of a large ichthyosaur, while PMO 222.657 is an unfigured articulated series of

cervical vertebrae from a plesiosauroid. For PMO 222.670, PMO 224.248 and PMO A27745, approximately half of the skeleton is missing, probably due to erosion of the hillside.

Fig. 6. Outlines of partly articulated marine reptile specimens from the Slottsmøya Member, Agardhfjellet Formation, Svalbard. The specimens are drawn from the side stratigraphically up unless otherwise stated. See Table 1 for more information on each specimen. (a) PMO 216.839, holotype of the plesiosauroidDjupedalia engeri.

(b) PMO 222.654, holotype of the ichthyosaurJanusaurus lundi. (c) PMO 216.838, plesiosauroid, referred to Colymbosaurus svalbardensis. (d) PMO 224.247, plesiosauroid. (e) SVB 1451, holotype of the ichthyosaur Palvennia hoybergeti. (f) PMO 214.135, holotype of the pliosauridPliosaurus funkei.

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(12)

Some elements of the articulated skeletons have also undergone other types of post-mortem taphonomical alteration. In the ichthyosaur PMO

214.578, the skull is dorsoflexed at an angle of 908 relative to the long axis of the skeleton. In the pelvic area, there are some crushed vertebrae; in the Fig. 7. Outlines of partly articulated marine reptile specimens from the Slottsmøya Member, Agardhfjellet

Formation, Svalbard. The specimens are drawn from the side stratigraphically up unless otherwise stated. See Table 1 for more information on each specimen. (a) PMO 222.667, ichthyosaur. (b) PMO 222.662, ichthyosaur.

(c) PMO 212.662/SVB 1452, plesiosauroid. (d) SVB 1450, holotype of the plesiosauroidSpitrasaurus larseni.

(e) PMO 222.669, ichthyosaur. (f) PMO 222.663, plesiosauroid.

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

176

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(13)

stomach area, the ribs on the right-hand side are bent inwards. The left forefin is completely articulated, while the right is partly disarticulated and displaced along the dorsal side of the skull. The left hindfin

is articulated, and is flipped posterodorsally on top of the sacral vertebral region. In the plesiosauroid PMO A27745, the right hindfin is articulated and lies parallel to the vertebral column, while the left Fig. 8. Outlines of disarticulated marine reptile specimens from the Slottsmøya Member, Agardhfjellet Formation, Svalbard. The specimens are drawn from the side stratigraphically up unless otherwise stated. See Table 1 for more information on each specimen. (a) PMO 224.166, ichthyosaur. (b) PMO 222.664, plesiosauroid. (c) PMO 222.668, plesiosauroid. (d) PMO 222.658, ichthyosaur. (e) PMO 222.672, plesiosauroid. (f) PMO 214.452, plesiosauroid.

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(14)

hindfin was rotated 1808and lies articulated in the opposite direction. The left forefin of the plesiosauroid PMO 219.718 is articulated with almost all of the phalanges in life position. In contrast, the right forefin is disarticulated, with the phalanges scattered along the left lateral part of the skeleton. The right femur is found at the posterior end of the specimen, close to the exposed surface, and the phalanges are scattered on top of the left lateral side.

Partly articulated skeletons.There are a total of 19 partly articulated skeletons including plesiosauroids (n¼9), pliosaurid (n¼1) and ichthyosaurs (n¼9) (Figs 3c, d, 5b – e, 6 & 7). The plesiosauroid PMO 216.839 (holotype of Djupedalia engeri Knutsen, Druckenmiller & Hurum, 2012c) (Fig. 6a) is nearly complete, but lacks the skull, left hindfin and caudal vertebral series. The ichthyosaur SVB 1451 (Fig. 6e) is the holotype of Palvennia hoybergeti Druckenmiller, Hurum, Knutsen & Nakrem, 2012, and consists of a skull articulated to cervical vertebrae and ribs, associated with a partial clavicle, a partial humerus and some phalanges. SVB 1450 (Fig. 7d) is a plesiosauroid, and the holotype of Spitrasaurus larseni Knutsen, Druckenmiller &

Hurum, 2012b. The specimen consists of an articulated fin, a partial vertebral series articulated to the neural arches, as well as the lower jaw, teeth and a few skull fragments.

Several of the skeletons were spread over large areas. PMO 222.654 (holotype of the ichthyosaur Janusaurus lundi) (Fig. 6b), with an estimated body length of 3 – 4 m (Roberts et al. 2014), had body elements scattered over an area of 2×2.5 m, in four distinct clusters. The plesiosauroid PMO 222.663 (Fig. 7f ), estimated body length of 6 – 7 m, was spread over an area of 2.5×3 m. PMO 214.135 (holotype of the pliosaurid Pliosaurus funkei Knutsen, Druckenmiller & Hurum, 2012d)

(Fig. 6f ), with an estimated body length of 10 – 13 m (Knutsenet al.2012d), had groups of elements scattered over an area of 4.6×2.7 m.

PMO 216.838 (Fig. 6c) is a plesiosauroid, referred toColymbosaurus svalbardensis(Persson, 1962) in Knutsenet al.(2012a). The specimen had an unusual preservation as it was found in a siderite concretion, and is partially deformed. The plesiosauroid PMO 216.863 (unfigured) was found in a slumped block and tilted nearly vertically.

Disarticulated skeletons. Twelve disarticulated skeletons were collected from the Slottsmøya Mem- ber, including ichthyosaurs (n¼5), a pliosaurid (n¼1) and plesiosauroids (n¼6) (Figs 3e, f &

8). Vertebrae, ribs and fins are the most frequently preserved body elements, while pelvic girdle elements, teeth and neural arches are less common.

The plesiosauroid PMO 214.452 (Figs 3f & 8f ) preserves both ischia closely associated with the right pubis, while elements from the body, particularly ribs and vertebrae, have been scattered around the pubis – ischia cluster. PMO 214.136, a referred specimen of Pliosaurus funkei, includes cranial remains that were probably articulated prior to burial, but were later displaced by slumping due to solifluction.

Currents

Bottom currents can be responsible for the disarticulation of skeletons and loss of skeletal elements (Beardmoreet al.2012a), and the position of skeletal elements can be used to evaluate water move- ment and direction of flow (Barnes & Hiller 2010). Small light bones have the highest potential to be moved by currents. For the partly articulated and disarticulated specimens in this study, there is no clear pattern of sorting. Some of the ribs seem Fig. 9. Compressed and uncompressed vertebrae from ichthyosaur PMO 222.654, CT scan: (a) compressed vertebra;

and (b) uncompressed vertebra. Colours show the X-ray density, with blue (pore-filling) denser than red (bone).

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

178

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(15)

to lie perpendicular to one another, which could indicate changes in current direction. In several of the skeletons, many of the distal phalanges lie scattered around the skeleton, although other phalanges in the same skeleton are articulated, possibly due to stronger ligaments in proximal parts of the fins. This is especially visible in the plesiosauroids PMO 216.839 (Fig. 6a) and PMO 222.663 (Fig. 7f ).

The phalanges of the plesiosauroid PMO 219.718 (Fig. 4e), all located in the body area of the animal, seem to have been orientated by a dominant current direction crossing the vertebral column. The torso of the plesiosauroid PMO 219.718 most probably hit the seafloor before the rest of the body, and sank down in the sediments. This left the lighter cervical vertebrae and skull on the sea bottom, and they were likely to have been exposed to current activity.

Teeth from the skull of the plesiosauroid PMO 224.248 (Fig. 5a) drifted from the skull over the cervical vertebrae in a similar direction, while distal phalanges from one of the forefins were disarticulated in a different direction. This could be indicative of a difference in current direction.

Distribution of the skeletons in the section In general terms, the sedimentary environment of the Slottsmøya Member shale is interpreted to be a dysoxic shelf with periods of oxygen influx to the sea bottom when coarser clastic sediments (silt and sand) were deposited as turbidites or by storm events (Collignon & Hammer 2012). TOC content is an important indicator of the environment near the seafloor. Hammeret al.(2012) found fluctuating TOC values in the Slottsmøya Member, with a distinct peak at the base of the member (225 m, TOC value 3.6%), followed by a second peak (12 m, TOC value 4.2%) and a third peak (42 m, TOC value 9.7%) (Fig. 2). The 12 m peak falls within the zone of highest marine reptile abundance in the section, from approximately 10 to 20 m. Two of the seven articulated skeletons are also found in this interval. Nickel – vanadium measurements indicate conditions at the seafloor varying within the dysoxic range throughout the section, with a minimum value at approximately 5 – 10 m in the section (Col- lignon & Hammer 2012). No articulated skeletons were found in the interval below 10 m, which is lower in organic carbon content. TOC levels remain relatively high (ranging from 2.7 to 4.4%) from 20 m to the top of the interval prospected for vertebrates. Four articulated skeletons are found in this upper interval, the uppermost (PMO 222.655) close to the maximum TOC value at 42 m.

Figure 2 presents qualitative invertebrate fossil abundance from cores drilled for the CO2storage project in Longyearbyen, Svalbard, approximately 12 and 19 km from the excavation sites at

Janusfjellet and Knorringfjellet, respectively. Cor- relation between outcrop and core is based on lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy and organic carbon isotope curves. The majority of the benthic fauna consists of bivalves, but gastropods, brachio- pods and scaphopods are also quite common in the Slottsmøya Member. There is a tendency for a neg- ative correlation between bivalve and marine reptile abundance, with relatively few bivalves but some skeletons below 0 m, followed by maximum bivalve abundance and a gap in the vertebrate record from 0 to 6 m, then a gradual reduction in bivalve abundance as the vertebrates become more common around the second TOC peak at 12 m. The benthic faunal record therefore supports the hypothesis of poor oxygenation contributing to the high preservational potential of skeletons.

Hjalmarsdottir (2012) identified foraminiferal morphogroups in the Slottsmøya Member according to the classification scheme of Nagyet al.(2009).

The main interval of vertebrate finds in the Slotts- møya Member is found between approximately 210 and 30 m in the sections. Hjalmarsdottir (2012) did not extend her study below 21.3 m, but from that level to 30 m she found a dominance of epifaunal species, with subordinate surficial/

shallow infauna and occasional deep infauna, indi- cating a generally dysoxic environment. However, there is considerable stratigraphic variation: for example, Hjalmarsdottir (2012) recorded practically no infauna (i.e. highly dysoxic to anoxic according to Nagyet al.2009) at21.3, 0.8 and 10.9 m, while at 8.4, 14 – 18 and 30 m the infauna ranges from 20 to 40% (dysoxic). Together with the stratigraphic variation in lithology and geochemistry (Collignon & Hammer 2012), this indicates that while the seafloor was dysoxic in the vertebrate interval, there was considerable variation throughout the member, with excursions into both highly dysoxic/

anoxic and low oxic conditions at the seafloor.

Floating and sinking

Whether the marine reptiles floated after death, or sank immediately, is a question under debate (Reis- dorfet al.2012). It is density that controls whether a carcass sinks or refloats, but refloating might also be prevented by increased hydrostatic pressure, if the water is sufficiently deep (Allisonet al.1991).

In modern cetaceans, the drift and refloating pattern varies with fat content: a whale carcass with a high fat content will drift in the surface waters immediately after death, while one with a low fat content will first sink, then possibly refloat as decay gases accumulate. Ichthyosaurs are regarded as sustained high-speed swimmers in the Mesozoic seas, and they were probably negatively buoyant (Holger 1992).

Data obtained from studies on Recent cetaceans

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(16)

show that a carcass may rise from water depths up to 50 m (Reisdorfet al.2012). The Slottsmøya Mem- ber is regarded as an open-marine shelf environment (Dallmann 1999), with water depths estimated at between 100 and 150 m (Collignon & Hammer 2012). Similar conditions are also observed in the Posidonienschiefer Formation, with a shelf depth of 50 – 100 m (Ro¨hlet al.2001). Thus, the ichthyosaur carcasses preserved in these twoLagersta¨tten probably did not resurface.

Scha¨fer (1972) argued that marine mammals that die by natural causes might, under some circum- stances, drift for weeks at the sea surface. When the connective tissue decayed, the skeletal elements would be spread over a large area by ocean currents and finally land on the seafloor as disarticulated bones or groups of bones (Scha¨fer 1972). Observa- tions of decaying dolphins show that the integument tears first where the mechanical stress is strongest.

These areas include the roof of the skull, the margins of the lower jaw, above the scapula and in the tail section. The trachea sometimes supports the connection between the skull and the body for a while (Scha¨fer 1972). The pliosaurid PMO 214.135 (Fig. 6f ) is thought to have been partly disarticulated before it landed on the seabed (Knutsen et al.

2012d), and probably decayed whilst floating in the ocean. The porous structure of its vertebrae suggests that they were oil-filled, similar to those of some cetaceans (Kihleet al.2012). This could explain the preservation of only parts of the skeleton, as a longer floating period would advance the decay. The disarticulated specimens PMO 224.166 (Figs 3e & 8a), PMO 222.664 (Fig. 8b), PMO 222.668 (Fig. 8c), PMO 222.658 (Fig. 8d), PMO 222.672 (Fig. 8e) and PMO 214.452 (Figs 3f &

8f ) might all represent parts from carcasses that floated for a prolonged period of time post mortem.

Most of the marine reptile skeletons in the Posi- donienschiefer Formation are complete but partially disarticulated. The slight disarticulation was for a long time explained by the expansion of internal gases in the gut region, causing the carcass to explode, ejecting bones and internal organs, and leaving a disarticulated carcass (Keller 1976; Mar- till 1993). However, Reisdorfet al.(2012) showed that it is unlikely that skeletal elements from a vertebrate could have been scattered in this way only by the release of putrefaction gases under hydrostatic or atmospheric pressures.

While the ichthyosaur neck and skull resemble those of dolphins, plesiosauroids possess a greatly elongated neck, which narrows towards the skull, so that less connective tissue supports the head.

The connection between the atlas – axis complex and the basioccipital was small, and the skull was probably one of the first elements to detach from a decaying animal floating in the water. The majority

of the plesiosauroid skeletons from Slottsmøya were found without cranial material, as is the case for several other localities, such as from the Upper Cretaceous Pembina and Sharon Spring members in the USA (Carpenter 2006). While some of the crania were likely to have been lost due to surface erosion prior to discovery, several skeletons appear to have lost the cranium prior to burial, during the ‘bloat and float’ decompositional phase described by Scha¨fer (1972). The plesiosauroid PMO 219.718 (Figs 3b & 4e) possesses an articulated skeleton, including all but the anteriormost cervical vertebrae, but lacks a skull. The skull must have been lost during early decay, either in the floating phase or just after settling at the seafloor. The specimen must have had a short post-mortem floating period, since most of the skeletal elements are present. A single plesiosauroid specimen, PMO 224.248 (Fig. 5a), has a complete, articulated skull, while PMO 212.662/SVB 1452 (Figs 3d &

7c) and SVB 1450 (Fig. 7d) retain some skull elements. The skull of PMO 224.248 has disarticulated from the atlas – axis and drifted 10 – 20 cm away from the anterior cervicals. This is highly unusual and could illustrate the earliest stage of post-mortem skull drifting. An Upper Cretaceous elasmosaurid plesiosauroid from North Canterbury, New Zealand described by Barnes & Hiller (2010) was discovered missing the skull. They suggested that it probably disarticulated prior to the carcass reaching the seafloor, either being removed by a predator or scav- enged shortly after death. It could have also been detached during the early stage of the ‘bloat and float’ phase, an interpretation also suggested for the Pembina and Sharon Spring plesiosaurs (Car- penter 2006) and the Triassic sauropterygian Ser- pianosaurus(Beardmore et al. 2012b). Barnes &

Hiller (2010) also suggested that the head and neck could be transported for a distance after it detached from the torso. This is true for sauropod dinosaurs, where articulated necks are often found without the rest of the skeleton (e.g. Wedelet al.

2000), but this is not observed in the Slottsmøya specimens, where the necks are usually associated with the body.

Landing

The original body shape and the decompositional state of the carcass upon hitting the seafloor affect the orientation of the preserved skeleton (Martill 1986). Complete or near-complete carcasses land in five different positions: dorsally, laterally, ventrally, anteriorly and posteriorly (Martill 1993).

Esperanteet al.(2002) studied fossil whales from the Miocene – Pliocene Pisco Formation in Peru, and found an equal number of dorsally and ventrally landed skeletons. Of more than 500 specimens, only L. L. DELSETTET AL.

180

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(17)

two skeletons were found in a lateral position, which could be related to the instability of the whale carcass on the seafloor (Esperanteet al.2009). Skele- tons may also land laterally and secondarily be moved into a dorsal or ventral position. Martill (1993) observed that ichthyosaurs from the Posido- nienschiefer Formation more often had lateral than dorsal landings, and suggested that specimens landing dorsally often rolled over to a lateral position.

Dorsal landings.Specimens landing dorsally often possess a perfectly articulated vertebral column (Martill 1993). Decaying whales floating in the water tend to rotate, leaving the heavier dorsal side down due to intestinal gas build-up in the abdominal cavity (Scha¨fer 1972), but whether this affects the final mode of deposition is difficult to predict. Three plesiosauroids (PMO 219.718: Figs 3b & 4e; PMO 212.662/SVB 1452: Figs 3d & 7c; PMO A27745:

Fig. 4d), one pliosaurid (PMO 214.135: Fig. 6f ), and four ichthyosaurs (PMO 222.655: Fig. 4a;

PMO 224.251: Fig. 5c; SVB 1451: Fig. 6e; PMO 224.252: Fig. 5e) from the Slottsmøya Member are interpreted to have landed dorsally. The ichthyosaur PMO 222.655 probably landed dorsally, and later experienced lateral torsion.

Lateral landings.Two ichthyosaur specimens (PMO 222.670: Fig. 4c; PMO 222.654: Fig. 6b) from the Slottsmøya Member are preserved laterally. PMO 222.654 had a ventrolateral landing. In a lateral landing, there is often a distinct preservation difference between the upper and lower surface of the skeleton, and the preservation of the limbs on the stratigraphically down side is usually better preserved than on the opposite side (Martill 1993). This is seen in the ichthyosaur PMO 222.654 (Fig. 10b – d).

Ventral landings.In a ventral landing, the skeleton often shows all four limbs articulated. Because of decomposition of the ligament of the vertebral column, the vertebral centra will drop to the seabed, often resulting in a partly or completely disarticulated vertebral column (Martill 1993). Six plesiosauroids (PMO 224.248: Fig. 5a; SVB 1450:

Fig. 7d; PMO 224.247: Fig. 6d; PMO 222.663:

Fig. 7f; PMO 216.839: Fig. 6a; PMO 214.452: Figs 3f & 8f ) and two ichthyosaurs (PMO 224.250:

Fig. 5d; PMO 222.667: Fig. 7a) from the Slottsmøya Member show this mode of preservation.

Anterior landings.In an anterior landing, the skull lands first and can penetrate into the sediment.

Two ichthyosaur specimens (PMO 214.578: Figs 3a & 4b; PMO 222.669: Figs 3c & 7e) in this study are interpreted to have had an anterior landing.

The anterior part of the rostrum of PMO 222.669 is damaged and filled with more than 50 teeth, most of which have been displaced. This specimen

probably experienced a head-first landing, where the rostrum penetrated the sediment and broke, and its pieces and teeth were pressed posteriorly into the remaining parts of the jaw. An anterior landing was also found in an Ophthalmosaurus specimen from the Redwater Shale Member, with its skull at a 908angle to the bedding. The rostrum was split open and broken (Wahl 2009), in contrast to the specimens in this study. In the Lower Jurassic of the Jura Mountains in Switzerland, a vertically emplaced skull was found connected to the post- cranial skeleton. The fins restricted further penetra- tion of the animal into the sediment (Wetzel &

Reisdorf 2007).

For most of the specimens collected from the Slotts- møya Member, the landing mode cannot be easily assessed owing to a high degree of disarticulation.

In specimens where this can be analysed, dorsal (n¼8) and ventral (n¼8) landings are the most common modes. For plesiosauroids, dorsal (n¼4) and ventral (n¼6) landings are the only types experienced. The reason for this is probably the plesiosauroid body shape, with large flat fins on the sides of the body, a torso that is broader than high and a small head. Ichthyosaurs, however, in addition to ventral and dorsal landings, experienced lateral (n¼2) and anterior (n¼2) landings. This is also thought to be related to a large head, taller body, fewer large fins and a dorsoventrally expanded tail. None of the specimens landed posteriorly, nor are such landings known for ichthyosaurs (Martill 1993), nor, to our knowledge, for plesiosaurians.

The cause for this, presumably, is the heavier anterior part in ichthyosaurs and the above-explained body shape for plesiosaurians.

Predation, scavengers and associated invertebrates

The cause of death of any fossil organism is often difficult to assess. Normal causes of death for whales and dolphins are related to predators, para- sites and hazards at birth. Death by old age or illness is rare (Scha¨fer 1972). Evident bite marks, scars on the bones or missing skeletal elements are observed in many of the Oxford Clay Formation specimens, and this could indicate predation or scavenging (Martill 1986). Evidence for predation or scavenging is also seen in whales: for example, in the occur- rence of bite marks on the skull of a baleen whale skeleton in the Lower Pliocene Huelva Sands For- mation (Corralet al.2004). Most ichthyosaurs and plesiosauroids were not predators of large-bodied vertebrates in the Mesozoic seas, and were cer- tainly a target for predation by pliosaurids and chondrichthyans (Martill 1996). In the Upper Juras- sic Kimmeridge Clay, ichthyosaur vertebrae are

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(18)

Fig. 10. Compaction and erosion of bones: (a) lateral view of the left femur of PMO 214.578; (b) lateral view of the left femur of PMO 222.654 with the outline of the eroded area; (c) anterior surface of the compressed vertebra of PMO 222.654; (d) ventral side of the compressed vertebra of PMO 222.654; (e) right lateral side of the eroded vertebra from PMO 214.578; and (f) anterior side of vertebra of PMO 214.578 with the outline of the eroded bone mass.

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

182

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(19)

frequently found with bite marks, some of which are thought to be from pliosaurids (Martill 1996), as is the case for one skull of the Early Cretaceous elas- mosaur Eromangasaurus australis (Sachs, 2005) (Thulborn & Turner 1993). Interestingly, chondrichthyans have not been found in the Slottsmøya Member.

To predict whether elements are missing as a result of scavenging or predation is difficult (Martill 1986). Most of theLagersta¨ttenwith marine vertebrates were deposited in anoxic seafloor environments, which potentially limit the ability for macro-organisms to scavenge carcasses (Allison 1988). Whether the carcass is floating or settled on the seabed, scavengers are often responsible for its disarticulation (Martill 1986). Fragmented remains found near articulated specimens are believed to be the result of scavenging, and some of the marine reptile specimens from the Oxford Clay are possible examples (Martill 1985).

Few of the Slottsmøya marine reptiles show traces of predation or scavenging. In the plesiosauroid PMO 222.663, a belemnite was observed beside its articulated vertebral column, and an ammonite was found in the stomach area of the ichthyosaur PMO 214.578. Both of these findings could indicate scavenging by invertebrates during the ‘mobile scavenger stage’ (Smith & Baco 2003). The plesiosauroid SVB 1450 had an ichthyosaur tooth lying on top of a neural arch in the cervical region. The plesiosauroid PMO 224.248 had several ichthyosaur teeth located on top of and next to the cervical vertebrae, but the vertebrae were not displaced in any way. In the ichthyosaur PMO 222.654, a gracile plesiosauroid tooth was found close to the disarticulated humerus, but no obvious bite marks are visible, and the observed tooth is more adapted for feeding on soft-bodied organisms such as cephalopods (Robertset al.2014).

The bivalveBuchiais by far the most common invertebrate found close to the skeletons. It is found on the plesiosauroids PMO 212.662/SVB 1452, PMO 224.248 and PMO 222.663, and the ichthyosaurs PMO 222.670 and PMO 222.669. On PMO 222.670, some serpulids were also found. In the plesiosauroid PMO 219.718 and in the pliosaurid PMO 214.135, segments of ophiuroids were lying close to the bones. These associations could indicate part of the enrichment/opportunist stage, which often involves smaller organisms such as invertebrates and bacteria (Smith & Baco 2003), but it is uncertain as we do not know whether the organisms used the bones as a substrate.

Oxygenation

When a carcass lands on the seabed, sediment firmness, sedimentation rate, presence of currents,

scavengers, epifauna and the oxygen level at the seafloor affect the preservation of the carcass.

Rapid burial and low oxygen levels are often regarded as key elements for excellent preservation of skeletons (Seilacheret al.1985; Brett & Baird 1986; Allison 1989).

The Posidonienschiefer Formation contains many well-preserved marine reptiles, together with more disarticulated specimens (Martill 1993). The sediment is described as a laminated organic-rich mud rock with a TOC ranging from 2 to 15% (Littke et al. 1991; Martill 1993). The marine reptiles preserved with soft tissue and body outlines are thought to have been exposed to rapid burial, either in soupy sediments or by episodic sedimentation followed by early diagenesis (Allison 1989; Martill 1993). Whether the Posidonienschiefer Formation was oxic or anoxic is debated. Kaufmann (1981) argued that the seafloor and the first few centimetres of the water column were anoxic, and only the part of the animal reaching above this anoxic level would be fed on. In contrast, Seilacher (1982) believed that the seafloor was occasionally oxic, with an anoxic water column.

The Oxford Clay Formation shows excellent preservation of marine reptiles. Most of the specimens were deposited in the Peterborough Mem- ber, described as an organic-rich mudstone (Tang 2002) with a TOC of 0.5 – 16% (Kenig et al.

1994). The Peterborough Member is thought to represent a soupy sediment, owing to the lack of bur- rowing organisms (Tang 2002), and this has been invoked to explain the preservation of soft parts (Martill 1985).

The Posidonienschiefer Formation and the Oxford Clay Formation in many ways resemble the Slottsmøya Member in being deposited on a dysoxic shelf with some beds consisting of reworked sediments such as siltstones to very-fine-grained sandstones with a low sedimentation rate (Collignon 2011). In the Oxford Clay Formation, a positive correlation between the articulation of marine reptiles and the TOC content in the sediments is observed, as in the Slottsmøya Member. It was suggested that high productivity in the water column and low oxygenation levels at depth in the Oxford Clay For- mation prevented scavenging and decay (Martill 1985). Except for a thin coal seam observed around some parts of the pliosaurid PMO 214.135, and possible stomach content in the plesiosauroids PMO 214.452 and PMO 222.663, no soft tissue or body outline has been observed on the Slottsmøya Mem- ber marine reptiles.

Bone preservation

The stratigraphic up and down sides of marine reptile specimens from the Posidonienschiefer

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(20)

Formation demonstrate two very different preservation styles. While the down side (typically the visible prepared surface) is well preserved, the upper side is comparatively eroded by sediment parti- cles in suspension and partly disarticulated by currents (Martill 1993; Reisdorf et al. 2012, 2014).

The same pattern is also shown in a mysticete ceta- cean carcass from the Lower Pliocene (Esperante et al.2009).

For the ichthyosaur PMO 222.654, a similar distinct difference in preservation can be seen. The lower side of the bones is better preserved than the upper surface. For example, the left femur is eroded with a flattened upper surface and, when comparing it to that of a well-preserved femur of the ichthyosaur PMO 214.578 (Fig. 10a), the dam- age is clearly evident. A vertebra from PMO 214.578 is eroded on its right lateral side, the one stratigraphically up (Fig. 10e, f ). These specimens indicate soupy sediment where the skeleton partly sank into the sea bottom, but the reason for the erosion is not known.

Burial, compaction and diagenesis

The deformation and flattening of the bones of marine reptiles from the Posidonienschiefer For- mation has been studied by several authors (e.g.

Martill 1993). This shale has a high organic content and a sedimentation rate of 4 mm ka²¹(compacted state: Reisdorfet al.2014). The specimens are usually severely flattened during the compaction of the sediment, but early formations of cal- careous concretions around fossils prevent the compaction in rare cases (Martill 1993; Reisdorf et al.2012).

Some compaction is observed in the skeletons from the Slottsmøya Member, but to a lesser extent than in the Posidonienschiefer. Within the same specimen, the skeletal elements range from some being almost completely flattened to others retain- ing their original 3D shape. This is clearly evident in the plesiosauroid PMO 219.718, in which the skeleton has undergone dorsoventral compression:

some neck vertebrae are flattened, whereas others are elongated to more than twice the normal length through brittle deformation and regrowth of barite in the cracks. Several of the compacted vertebrae of the ichthyosaur PMO 222.654 were deposited flat on the bedding plane, with one of their articular surfaces facing stratigraphically down, and experienced strong anteroposterior compaction (Figs 9 &

10c, d). This is also present in the plesiosauroid PMO 222.663, where areas of the pectoral girdle and vertebrae are significantly compacted, whereas other regions are completely uncompacted. CT scans of vertebrae from PMO 222.654 (Fig. 9) indicate that the 3D vertebrae contain early precipitated

minerals like calcite and barite in the pores, while the compressed vertebrae lack this.

A study of three-dimensionally preserved bones of Pliosaurus funkei (PMO 214.135 and PMO 214.136) in thin sections revealed that the pore structures of the bones are mineralized mainly by barite, and to a lesser extent by calcite (Kihle et al.2012). The earliest phase of permineralization is calcite followed by barite in these specimens.

The unusually large amount of early diagenetic barite in the pore structure of bones from Slottsmøya Member seems to be crucial for their 3D preservation. Barite in the ocean is known to precipitate in the water column, on the seafloor or within marine sediments. The barite solubility increases with pressure and temperature up to 1008C (Griffith

& Paytan 2012). Fluids enriched in barite may be driven out of the sediment and into the pore structure of the buried bones during compaction or tec- tonic processes. Large volumes of remobilized barite in highly reducing, organic-rich sediments are mostly related to cold fluid seepage (Torres et al. 2003). The presence of cold-seep carbonates in situat the top of Slottsmøya Member (Hryniewicz et al.2012) is evidence for methanogenesis, which could be the mechanism for the remobilization of barite by lowering of porewater sulphate concentration.

Collignon & Hammer (2012) published inducti- vely coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) results that revealed two stratigraphic levels with a high content of barium in the Slottsmøya Member.

The first one at the base level (0 m) occurs as a white to yellowish coating of barite on macroinver- tebrate fossils. The second is in the uppermost part of the section at approximately 48 m. Collignon &

Hammer (2012) interpreted this as either an indicator of a high influx of biogenic material into the sediments or, alternatively, due to cold-seep venting.

Evidence for a very early precipitation of barite in the bones of PMO 214.135 and PMO 214.136 are the major sections of recrystallization of the barite showing weak autofluorescence due to tension or stress from deep burial and tectonics on the skeleton after mineralization (Kihle et al. 2012). Aqueous and hydrocarbon-bearing fluid inclusions (HCFI) occur in both calcite and barite, and provide information on burial depth and temperature. Kihle et al.(2012) performed microthermometry on 115 inclusions, of which 65 were HCFI. Most primary aqueous inclusions in barite homogenize within a temperature of homogenization (Th) of 105 – 1078C, with Gaussian tails in the range of Th

101 – 1158C. This is exactly the temperature where barite solubility starts to decrease, following Griffith

& Paytan (2012). The secondary aqueous inclusions tend to homogenize at somewhat lower tem- peratures than their primary counterpart, at a Th

L. L. DELSETTET AL.

184

by guest on April 25, 2022

Downloaded from

(21)

range of 89 – 918C. Later trains of hydrocarbon- bearing fluid inclusions were found to homogenize within 47 – 718C (Kihleet al.2012) and are formed during the brittle deformation of the primary barite crystals during the uplift. The primary aqueous inclusions and the hydrocarbon-bearing fluid inclusions revealed a continuous lowering of the minimum trapping temperature, indicative of an uplift scenario with a maximum burial of 2800 – 3000 m (Kihleet al.2012).

Conclusions

This paper provides a description of the taphonomy of marine reptiles found in the Slottsmøya Member from the Upper Jurassic on Svalbard. The taphonomical descriptions of the specimens were divided into three preservation categories, where seven skeletons were categorized as articulated, 19 skeletons as partly articulated and 12 skeletons categorized as disarticulated. Eight of the marine reptiles landed dorsally, eight ventrally, two anteriorly and two laterally.

The distribution of marine reptiles in the section is analysed, and a correlation between high total organic content, low oxygen levels, few benthic invertebrates and good reptile preservation is observed. A TOC peak centred at 12 m (TOC value of 4.2%) correlates with the highest abundance of marine reptiles, from approximately 10 to 20 m in the section (Fig. 2).

The Slottsmøya Member preserves the marine vertebrates with a high degree of three-dimensiona- lity, in contrast to several otherLagersta¨tten. In this paper, we suggest a new explanatory model for vertebrates in shale with a high compaction rate under the influence of cold-seep venting:

(1) landing of marine reptiles at the dysoxic sea bottom at a water depth of about 150 m (Collignon & Hammer 2012);

(2) slow burial with a sedimentation rate of 11 mm ka²¹ (compacted state: Hammer et al. 2012), with erosion of exposed parts and partial disarticulation by currents;

(3) large accumulation of organic-rich mud lead- ing to microbial degradation of organic carbon and, hence, methanogenesis (Torres et al.2003). Cold seepage starts;

(4) porewater sulphate is consumed by oxidation of methane and organic carbon (Suess &

Whiticar 1989);

(5) barite dissolves owing to sulphate depletion;

(6) fluid migration and dissolution of calcite/

aragonite due to the early compaction of sediments, with some calcite precipitated in the pores of the bones;

(7) barite precipitated in the pore structure of the bones;

(8) the seepage ends;

(9) the formation of siderite nodules in layers with more sand (Collignon & Hammer 2012);

(10) large amounts of sediments from the Creta- ceous and Lower Cenozoic bury the skeletons to a maximum depth of 3000 m;

(11) secondary trains of fluid inclusions formed during the uplift state. Brittle deformation of the bones and recrystallization of the barite and calcite occurs.

May-Liss Knudsen Funke, Bjørn Lund, Lena Kristiansen and Victoria Engelschiøn Nash are thanked for their assis- tance in the preparation of the specimens. Sincere thanks are also due to the Spitsbergen Jurassic Research Group, which aided in the excavation of the specimens, with a special thanks to the volunteers Magne Høyberget, Øyvind Enger, Stig Larsen, Tommy Wensa˚s and Bjørn Funke.

Grants for the excavations were provided by the Polar Institute, the Norwegian Research Council, the Ministry of Education and Research, and National Geographic (EC-0435-9 and EC-0425-09). The sponsors for the excavations are thanked: Spitsbergen Travel, ExxonMobil, Fugro, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Statoil, Bautas, PowerShop, OMV, Helsport, Nexen, Bayerngas, Lividi, Telenor, Simula, forskning.no, Directconnect and livestream.com. This study is, in part, based on a Master thesis by Linn K. Novis. LLD and MJK are supported by PhD grants from the Ministry of Education and Research via the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo.

LKN is supported by a PhD grant from the University in Tromsø. AJR is supported by PhD grants from Tullow Oil, NERC and the University of Southampton. Two anon- ymous reviewers added valuable comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

References

Allison, P. A. 1988. The role of anoxia in decay and mineralization of proteinaceous macrofossils.Paleobiol- ogy,14, 139 – 154.

Allison, P. A. 1989. Konservat-Lagersta¨tten: cause and classification.Paleobiology,14, 331 – 334.

Allison, P. A.,Smith, C. R.,Kukert, H.,Deming, J. W.

&Bennett, B. A. 1991. Deep-water taphonomy of vertebrate carcasses: a whale skeleton in the bathyal Santa Catalina basin.Paleobiology,17, 78 – 89.

Andreassen, B. H. 2004. Plesiosaurs from Svalbard.

Master thesis, University of Oslo.

Barnes, K. M. &Hiller, N. 2010. The taphonomic attri- butes of a Late Cretaceous plesiosaur skeleton from New Zealand.Alcheringa,34, 333 – 344.

Beardmore, S. R.,Orr, P. J.,Manzocchi, T. &Furrer, H. 2012a. Float or sink: modelling the taphonomic pathway of marine crocodiles (Mesoeucroco- dylia, Thalattosuchia) during the death – burial interval.Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 92, 83 – 98.