• No results found

Cooperatve Housing in Existing Structures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Cooperatve Housing in Existing Structures"

Copied!
27
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

CENSOR BOOKLET

Eva Bakke Negård

(2)

In this diploma, my aim is to study how to transform

former industrial buildings into housing collectives. To study a way of living collectively in existing structures, what possibilities and limitations this will have on such a program, and to suggest a form of living in the city that is more social and experimental.

Combining building preservation and collective living, I want to find a logical connection between the two. Collective ways of living demands a new way of shaping spaces, and the limits of the exiting situation can open up for

interesting spacial proposals.

Collective Transformation:

Cooperatve Housing in Existing Structures

(3)

Inhabitants

Access to playroom and outdoor area, private apartments.

Caregiver, space for wheelchair, access to cultural and social activities and spaces. Shared kitchen, private bathrooms.

Access to workspace and workshop, private room, shared kitchen and bathroom

Private studio space, access to workspace and workshop.

“Experimental” - given a space to build with access to bathrooms and kitchens as well as workshop.

Access to common functions as well as own private space. Work training with access to different functions such as gardening, workshop,

babysitting. Language training and integration through community

Suggested types of inhabitanst Their needs

(4)

Program

(5)

Values

Community:

participation, neighborhood, good living environment, collective

Preservation:

sustainability, environment, qualities, transformation

Innovation:

self building, affordability, experimntal housing

Diversity:

integration, work training, community

A group of people in different walks of life gather to form a cooperative, in this case by reusing existing structures and adding new on the site.

People can rent a private room or an apartment, and they get automatically access to a vide range of shared functions. The rent is low, however you are required to maintain and contribute to the common functions as a rule to be allowed to live there. You gain a sense of ownership because you are able to build and transform your own space, as well as contributing to the community by participating. This to create a way of living more social, affordable and sustainable in the city.

(6)

Site

The chosen site is Uelandsgate 85 Tåsen, Oslo.

Already existing on site is a vacated building from 1929. Next to it is a building from the late 1960- s. This building is today used as offices for a vet- erinary clinic. Next to it is a vacated storage hall, build in the same year. These two is regulated for demolition, but I want to keep the buildings in my diploma to challenge its value.

The site is centrally located in Oslo, in a residen- tial area with surrounding sports facilities

and green spaces.

(7)
(8)

The Old Factory, 1921

Concrete slabs, beams and columns, wood columns 1.th floor.

Used to be: tube factory and storage, clothing factory, milk and meat store, brewery, shoe maker, carpenter workshop.

Later: office, film studio for NRK.

Now: empty Listed building

Good: Listed building. Materials, high ceiling heights, light, some neoclassical facade elements. Large, industrial windows.

Bad: The condition, low ceiling ground floor, deep volume, not consistent facade rhythm.

(9)

Office building, 1967

Offices for concrete tube producing company.

Today: Veterinary and film studio.

Future: Up for demolition to be replaced by a sec- ondary school.

Materials: concrete and brick.

Good: Solid, from its time. In good condition.

Load-bearing facade, window grid. 12 meter depths. .

Bad: Low ceiling heights

(10)

Warehouse, 1967

Material: brick wall, concrete prefab structure.

Warehouse and production hall for concrete tubes.

Later for beer company (Ringnes)

Good: Large, spacious, tall ceiling heights. Solid.

Bad: Closed, walled facade with few windows.

(11)

Existing Subtracting

Adding 1

(12)

Sketches

(13)

Diagrams

(14)

1. Cafe 2. Workshop 3. Auditorium 4. Dining hall

5. Kitchen for everyone 6. Workspace

7. Gym

8. Green houses 9. Byscle room

10. Housing collectives 11. Guest rooms 1.

4.

2.

3. 5. 6. 7.

8.

9.

10.

10.

10.

10. 11.

11.

Section 1:200

Ground floor plan

(15)

1. floor plan

SPRINJK

1. “Build your own” - apartments

2. Tower with open flexible floors surrounding a core 3. Common rooms: playroom and laundry room 4. Apartments with gallery

5. Private apartments 6. Collectives

Plan 1:200

1. 2.

3.

3.

3.

4.

5.

5.

6..

(16)

Collectives

Spacious private rooms with bathrooms. Shares kitchen and living area. Possible to move between the common rooms.

Tower plan with a core with vertical communication, toi- lets and kitchens. Frees up space for the inhabitants to decide for them self how to build a floor. Outside terrace connecting the floors to- gether.

Collective with small private room. Shared bathroom, kitchen and living space.

Private small apartments with gallery for sleeping upstairs.

Access to common rooms form all the apartments.

(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)

Model photo

(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Chapter 2 gives relevant background information for this report, while Chapter 3 describes the meaning and content of Common Operational Picture.. Chapter 4 describes

Access to workspace and workshop, private room, shared kitchen and bathroom.. Private studio space, access to

WORKING COLLECTIVE - Living and workig togehter -Shared workshop and office space -

They share a kitchen and living room, and have semi-private areas, all connected by the sentral staircase which creates splitlevels, and a visual connection throughout

They share a kitchen and living room, and have semi-private areas, all connected by the sentral staircase which creates splitlevels, and a visual connection throughout

Rooted in mortality and morbidity figures related to unsafe abortion, the public health discourse on safe abortion gains legitimacy through the aim of reducing abortion-related

While the social and economic consequences of the private-to-private corruption tar- geted to the international financial industry is exceptionally serious, the legal need for it

The public health care systems in the Nordic countries provide high quality care almost free of charge to all citizens. However, social inequalities in health persist.