• No results found

EG MAM 2015 Eurographics 2015 Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling: Issues and Acquisition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "EG MAM 2015 Eurographics 2015 Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling: Issues and Acquisition"

Copied!
5
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

EG MAM 2015

Eurographics 2015 Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling:

Issues and Acquisition

Darmstadt, Germany 23 June 2015 Held in conjunction with

The 26th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering

Workshop Co-Chairs Reinhard Klein, University of Bonn

Holly Rushmeier, Yale University

Proceedings Production Editor

Dieter Fellner (TU Darmstadt & Fraunhofer IGD, Germany) Sponsored by EUROGRAPHICS Association

DOI: 10.2312/mam.20152017

(2)

Dieter W. Fellner, Werner Hansmann, Werner Purgathofer, François Sillion Series Editors

This work is subject to copyright.

All rights reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means, and storage in data banks.

Copyright c2015 by the Eurographics Association Postfach 2926, 38629 Goslar, Germany

Published by the Eurographics Association –Postfach 2926, 38629 Goslar, Germany–

in cooperation with

Institute of Computer Graphics & Knowledge Visualization at Graz University of Technology and

Fraunhofer IGD (Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research), Darmstadt

ISBN 978-3-905674-83-5 ISSN 2309-5059

The electronic version of the proceedings is available from the Eurographics Digital Library at http://diglib.eg.org

(3)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents . . . iii Preface . . . iv Author Index . . . v

Papers

The Material Definition Language . . . 1 L. Kettner, M. Raab, D. Seibert, J. Jordan, and A. Keller

Proposal for an Appearance Exchange Format . . . 5 Gero Mueller and Francis Lamy

In Praise of an Alternative BRDF Parametrization . . . 9 P. Barla, L. Belcour, and R. Pacanowski

Linear Models for Material BTFs and Possible Applications . . . 15 D. den Brok, M. Weinmann, and R. Klein

Quality Assurance Based on Descriptive and Parsimonious Appearance Models . . . 21 J. B. Nielsen, E. R. Eiriksson, R. L. Kristensen, J. Wilm, J. R. Frisvad, K. Conradsen, and H. Aanæs Geometric Accuracy Analysis of Stationary BTF Gonioreflectometers . . . 25 V. Havran

Identifying Diffraction Effects in Measured Reflectances . . . 31 N. Holzschuch and R. Pacanowski

A Short Survey on Optical Material Recognition . . . 35 M. Weinmann and R. Klein

(4)

Preface

This is the third edition of the workshop on Material Appearance Modeling. For the first time, the work- shop was scheduled for a full day. The format included 30% to 50% of each session for discussion.

There were over 50 participants, and a wide range of questions and comments were offered during each session.

There were four sessions for four broad topic areas. The first focussed on material descriptions for exchange. This included presentations from representatives of two industry sectors important to appear- ance modeling – the computing software/hardware industry for computing appearance, and physical appearance measurement industry that is tied to many traditional appearance applications. The second session considered mathematical formulations – both for bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs) and for bidirectional texture functions (BTFs). The third session had presentations about physi- cal measurements. Many non-traditional (for computer graphics) applications for material measurements were presented. An analysis of mechanical errors in BTF measurement systems was also given. The fi- nal session was about classification. The first paper gave observations on classifying optical effects in measured data. The final paper surveyed progress in recognizing materials.

Based on the success of this year’s workshop, the 4th edition is planned with the same format in con- junction with EGSR 2016 in Dublin.

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Fraunhofer IGD for the production of these proceedings.

Holly Rushmeier’s participation was partially supported by grant #1218515 from the US National Sci- ence Foundation.

Holly Rushmeier Reinhard Klein Workshop Co-Chairs

(5)

Author Index

Aanæs, H. . . 21

Barla, P. . . 9

Belcour, L. . . .9

Brok, D. den . . . 15

Conradsen, K. . . .21

Eiriksson, E. R. . . 21

Frisvad, J. R. . . 21

Havran, V. . . 25

Holzschuch, N. . . 31

Jordan, J. . . 1

Keller, A. . . 1

Kettner, L. . . 1

Klein, R. . . 15, 35 Kristensen, R. L. . . 21

Lamy, Francis . . . 5

Mueller, Gero . . . 5

Nielsen, J. B. . . 21

Pacanowski, R. . . 9, 31 Raab, M. . . 1

Seibert, D. . . 1

Weinmann, M. . . 15, 35 Wilm, J. . . 21

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Herzegovina. The three-day workshop included excursions to the Norwegian seafood industry and NTNU. The final results from all project partners were presented, and

Figure 4: Model and texture database: (a) an original im- age of the modeled object, (b) visualization of parameterized textures, in which each row of textures is captured from a

Urban spaces are difficult to model because the underlying structure is determined by a very large number of hard-to- quantify variables including land policies, market

Reducing the possible interaction (yellow) either with the viewer (varying view points) or the illumination motivates a construction of a display-type material appearance repro-

Bernhard Kainz, Imperial College London, UK Heike Leitte Universität Heidelberg, Germany Vincent Luboz, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, France Claes Lundström, Linköping University, Sweden

We demonstrated the feasibility of illumination multiplexing in the context of BTFs, supported by using linear models de- rived from an existing database of material BTFs as a prior

Acquiring, modeling, editing and rendering material appearance are active areas in computer graphics. In this workshop series we gather researchers and users of material

Under “Thermal infrared, SVB*F and benchmarking” in addition to the position papers Pieter Peers gave an update on the new benchmark he is developing for material models.