Europaparlamentet - tilhøvet mellom EU og EFTA-landa. Komiteinnstilling.

70 The Court held that ‘the provisions of the EEA Agreement are to be interpreted in the light of fundamental rights’, and that ‘[t]he provisions of the ECHR and the judgments of

However, the EEA EFTA States recommend extending the possibility to derogate from the Directive to more areas compared to the current proposal, in order to maintain or

12 For the Court, the fact that the Icelandic citizen concerned “has the status as a national of an EFTA State, which is a party to the EEA Agreement, but also the fact that

3 The assessment in the Renewal Decision was based on the general compatibility criteria under Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement, but drew on the Temporary

(6) Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement reads as follows: “[…] any aid granted by EC Member States, EFTA States or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts

Norway’s association with the EU through the EEA Agreement is channeled through the organisation EFTA, which today has four member states, of which three are EEA/EFTA states

In addition of the allegations concerning breach of provisions in the main part of the EEA Agreement, the complainant has stated that the Norwegian legislation is also in breach of

 The EEA EFTA States welcome the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act, DSA), recognising the need to