• No results found

d029p013.pdf (1.367Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "d029p013.pdf (1.367Mb)"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Vol. 29: 13-20, 1997 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS

Dis Aquat Org Published April 24

Experimental infection of turbot Scophthalmus maxim us and halibut

Hippoglossus hippoglossus yolk sac larvae with Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida

Oivind

B e r g h l , * ,

Brit

~ j e l t n e s ~ ,

Anne Berit Skiftesvikl

'Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll Aquaculture Research Station, N-5392 Storebe, Norway '~nstitute of Marine Research, Department of Aquaculture, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5024 Bergen, Norway

ABSTRACT: The suscept~bility of early l ~ f e stages of turbot Scophthalmus maximus a n d halibut Hippo- glossus h ~ p p o g l o s s u s to Atvomonas salmoniclda subsp. salrnonicida was studied in challenge experi- ments. Eggs of both fish specles ( a n d the larvae hatching from the eggs) were exposed to the bac- t e n u m . Larvae of both species experienced mortality during the yolk sac s t a g e , apparently a s a result of the challenge. Examination of histolog~cal se c t ~ o n s revealed degenerative c h a n g e s in the skeletal muscle of both species of larvae. The bactenum could not be recovered from the larvae by culture, but it was shown to be present in the intestinal lumen of some of the turbot larvae examined using a n imn~unohistochemical t e c h n ~ q u e known to be spec~fic for the bactenum. T h e results indicate that m a n n e fish larvae exposed to A salmonicida subsp salmonicida may become ~ n f e c t e d and that the b a c t e r ~ u m may persist In the larvae. Turbot larvae seemed to b e more susceptible than hahbut larvae K E Y WORDS: Aeromonas salmonicida subsp salrnonlcida . Fish larvae . Turbot . Halibut

INTRODUCTION

During outbreaks of typical furunculosis in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, Aeromonas salmonicida subsp.

salrnonicida may b e released in large numbers by infected fish (Enger et al. 1992). The bacterium can b e detected in surrounding seawater a n d in the sediment beneath the net pens containing fish (Enger & Thorsen 1992). Although A. salmonicida subsp. salrnonicida oc- casionally causes disease in marine species such as cod Gadus morhua a n d halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus and members of the wrasse family (Labridae), adult individuals of these species appear to b e more resistant to this disease than salmonids (Hjeltnes et al. 1995).

However, isolation of the bacterium from turbot Scoph- thalmus maximus experiencing significant mortality has been reported (Nougayrede e t al. 1990, Toranzo &

Barja 1992, Pedersen & Larsen 1996).

Marine fish larvae a r e susceptible to infection by opportunistic pathogenic bacteria (Bergh et al. 1992, Skiftesvik & Bergh 1993). No information is available concerning the susceptibility of these larvae residing in the vicinity of net pens containing infected salmon releasing Aeromonas s a h o n i c i d a subsp. salrnonicida to the environment. T h e bacterium has been isolated from marine zooplankton (Nese & Enger 1993), indi- cating that it can become associated with planktonic organisms, perhaps including yolk sac larvae of fish.

T h e purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which A . salrnonicida subsp, salrnonicida is able to become associated with, or even to infect a n d cause mortality of yolk sac larvae of 2 commercially impor- tant marine fish species, turbot and halibut.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source, cultivation, and preparation of the bacterium.

T h e strain of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmo- O Inter-Research 1997

Resale of full article not permitted

(2)

Dis Aquat Org 29: 13-20, 1997

nicida used in this study was isolated from a n outbreak of typical furunculosis in a stock of Atlantic salmon at the Institute of Marine Research, Matre Aquaculture Research Station, Matredal, Norway, in 1990. The strain is included in the culture collection of the Institute of Marine Research as strain number As 55 Matre. All incubation of the bacterium for the experi- ment with turbot was performed at 16°C in the climate- controlled room in which the experiment with turbot larvae was performed. For the experiment with halibut, all cultivation of bacteria was performed at 10°C.

The different suspensions of the bacterium that were used in the expenments were obtained from exponen- tially growing cultures of As 55 Matre in Difco Marine Broth (Difco, Detroit, USA). The concentration of bac- teria in the cultures was measured by plating on Tryp- tone Soya Broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England), 1.5%

agar (Difco), a n d 25%0 seawater. After 1 wk of incuba- tion, the concentration of bacteria was measured in terms of colony-forming units (CFU) per ml. Suspen- sions of washed bacteria and a suspension of heat- killed cells (turbot experiment only) were made immediately before infection of the fish eggs. The sus- pensions of washed bacterial cells were obtained by centrifugation of a volume of the culture a n d resuspen- sion of the cells in a n identical volume of 25%0 auto- claved seawater (SSW). The suspension of heat-killed cells was obtained by incubating a volume of the sus- pension of washed cells at 60°C for 30 min.

Infection of turbot. One female turbot from the broodstock at the Austevoll Aquaculture Research Station was stripped and the resulting eggs were fer- tilized with sperm from a single male. The entire ex- periment was carried out in a climate-controlled room a t 16°C. The fertilized eggs were incubated in the dark for 2 d in stagnant seawater which had been stored a n d aerated a t ambient temperature for at least 1 wk prior to the experiment. The eggs were trans- ferred to 24-well polystyrene multidishes (Nunc, Ros- kilde, Denmark) as described by Skiftesvik 8 Bergh (1993). O n e egg was transferred to each well. There- after, the entire experiment was carried out in white light with a n intensity of 117.4 lux. Approximately 24 h after transfer of the eggs to the multiwell dishes, the wells were inoculated with selected concentrations of the suspensions of the bacterium.

Three different amounts of the suspension of washed bacterial cells were added directly to the wells of 3 groups of eggs, 200 p1 (group As-A), 20 p1 (group As-B), and 2 yl (group As-C), equivalent to final con- centrations in the wells of 1.0 X 107, 1.0 X 106, and 1.0 X 105 CFU ml-l, respectively. Three groups of eggs were exposed to equivalent amounts of a suspension of heat- killed cells. These groups were designated DC-A, DC-B, and DC-C (equivalent to As-A, As-B, and As-C,

respectively). The last group of eggs served as a con- trol group and nothing was added to these wells.

From each group, 3 multiwell dishes (72 individual eggs) were randomly selected. These eggsAarvae were inspected for mortality daily until termination of the experiment at Day 5 after hatching. The 96 individual eggs/larvae in the remaining 4 multiwell dishes were sequentially sampled for fixation for histological ex- aminations, or attempts to re-isolate the pathogen.

Infection of halibut. One female of the halibut brood- stock of the Austevoll Aquaculture Research Station was stripped and the resulting eggs were fertilized with sperm from 1 male. The eggs were reared in 250-L upwelling incubators as described by Pittman et al. (1990) at approximately 6°C for 7 d.

From this stage onwards, the entire experiment was carried out in climate-controlled rooms at 6°C. The eggs were transferred to polystyrene multidishes (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) according to Bergh et al.

(1992). Each of these multiwell dishes had 6 separate identical wells, 35 mm in diameter and 18 mm deep.

Each well contained 11 m1 SSW. One egg was trans- ferred to each well. Two groups were included in this experiment. Group As was exposed to 100 p1 of the sus- pension of washed cells, equivalent to a concentration of bacteria in the wells of 106 CFU ml-l, approximately 24 h after transfer to the wells. In addition, there was a control group in which nothing was added to the wells.

One day after hatching, 10 m1 of water was removed from each well and 10 m1 SSW was immediately added in order to remove the remains of the egg and eggshell from the wells. The eggsAarvae were incubated in darkness. Handling of the multiwell dishes, including inspection for mortality, was carried out in red light with an intensity of 2.5 lux. From each group, 10 multi- well dishes (60 individual larvae) were randomly selected and checked for mortality every second day until termination of the experiment at Day 29 after hatching. The remaining 180 individual larvae were used for sequential samplings for histological examina- tion and attempts to re-isolate the pathogen.

Histological examinations. Apparently live samples of 6 to 8 larvae per group were fixed in 3.7 % (vol/vol) phosphate buffered formaldehyde at Days 1, 2, and 3 after hatching (turbot experiment) and at Days 1, 3, 7, 13, and 15 after hatching (halibut experiment). The larvae were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 3 pm, stained with Giemsa, and examined using a light microscope.

For immunohistochemical examinations of the sec- tions, a standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method was used (Hsu et al. 1981), modified as described by Evensen & Rimstad (1990). Aeromonas salmonicida was identified by using a monoclonal anti- body ( D - 5 , National Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Nor-

(3)

Bergh e t al.. Infection of turbot a n d hallbut Idrvae

changes, and in 4 of the lenged with A e r o m o n a s salmonjcida s u b s p s a l m o n i d d a . T h e groups a r e - As-A, As-B, a n d As-C (exposed to various levels of viable, w a s h e d cells);

other larvae from As-A' DC-A, DC-B, a n d DC-C (exposed to e q u v a l e n t a m o u n t s of heat-killed cells);

structures associated with bacteria were a n d control (nothlng a d d e d to the wells). Each g r o u p consisted of 7 2 indi- way), reactive with A. salmonicida lipopolysaccharide, (Fig. 3a, b ) . These cell-like structures w e r e associated diluted 1:100. Tris with 2.5% Bovine Serum Albumin with positive immunohistochemical staining in 3 of the (BSA) was used a s diluent. In the next 2 sequences, turbot larvae (Fig. 3c). T h e attempts to re-isolate the rabbit-anti-mouse immunoglobulins conjugated to pathogen from the larvae failed, a s no colonies resem- biotin (Dakopatts) were used. The sections were then bling those of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmoni- incubated with New Fuchsin substrate system, washed cida and producing pigment were found.

in tap water, and counterstained with Harris haema- In the halibut experiment, no mortality took place toxylin. Sections were mounted in a n aqueous mount- during the e g g stage, a n d the mortality of the larvae ing medium. Staining controls were performed on w a s low the first 3 d after hatching (Fig. 4 ) . Thereafter, tissue specimens from apparently healthy larvae the mortality increased in the challenged group, but it

Re-isolation of bacteria from larvae. In a n attempt w a s lower in the control group. The difference be- to re-isolate Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmoni- tween the control group a n d the challenged group was cida from the larvae, groups of 5 to 8 larvae were significant from Day 5 onwards ( p < 0.05). Three out washed 3 times in SSW a n d homogenized. A dilution of 9 of the halibut larvae from the challenged group series was made from the homogenate a n d plated out sampled at Day 13 w e r e characterized by degenerative on Tryptone Soya Broth a n d checked for growth of changes (pycnotic nuclei) in the skeletal muscle. How- colonies resembling those of A. salmonicida subsp. ever, similar changes w e r e also found in 3 out of 6 salmonicida in pigment production a n d colony mor- halibut larvae from the control group a t Days 13 a n d

phology. 15. No pathological changes w e r e found among hal-

Statistical analysis. For both experiments, differ- ibut larvae sampled earlier. As with the the case of ences between the experimental groups were tested turbot, Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida for statistical significance by

x 2

analysis, followed by w a s not re-isolated from the larvae, but unlike the comparison of groups with the Tukey-type multiple result from the turbot experiment, no halibut larvae comparison of proportions (Zar 1984). g a v e positive immunohistochemical reactions for A.

salmonicida subsp. salmonicida.

The results demonstrate a significantly increased RESULTS AND DISCUSSION mortality of both species of fish larvae following expo- sure to Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, In the turbot experiment, a dose-response in cumula- compared to the uninfected control groups. The tive mortality was found for the groups exposed to absence of increased mortality in the groups of turbot washed bacteria (Fig. 1 ) . No significant mortality took larvae that were exposed to heat-killed cells rules out place at the e g g stage, but after hatch-

ing, the mortality increased in group As-

A from Day 1 onwards. The difference - + - Control

-

As-A

between group As-A a n d the control

'

D - DC-A + A S - B

seen in the intestine and the oesophagus vldual eggs/larvae group was significant from Day 1 80

onwards ( p < 0.025). None of the remain-

5

-- - - - - A - o - . - DC-B DC-C --t AS-C

ing groups showed mortalities signifi-

.g

- 70 --

cantly different from the control group. 60 -- Pathological changes were found in 3 0

E

50 -- out of 11 turbot larvae from group As-A a, sampled on Days 2 a n d 3. The changes

2

40.- were evident as sloughing of the in-

testinal epithelium a n d degenerative changes in the skeletal muscle (Fig. 2 ) . No such changes were found in the 4

turbot larvae sampled from this group

--

on Day l . No changes were found in a -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

total of 5 larvae from the control group or Days after hatching in 7 larvae from group DC-A that were

checked. In 1 of the turbot larvae with Fig. 1 Cumulative mortality ( " , I ) in t h e experiment with turbot larvae chal-

(4)

v- ----

---., '<a* W-. I

,

.7.

/-- - -

,.. Fig. 2. Semi-thin sections of turbot larvae, stained with Giemsa, from (a, b) group As-A, challenged with Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida and (c, d) the control group. The sections from the infected larva (a, b) demonstrate the typical pathological changes found in turbot larvae: sloughing of the intestinal epithelium (arrows) and degenerative changes in the skeletal muscle (open arrows). Scale bars are (a, c) 80 pm and (b, d) 20 pm

(5)

Fig. 3. Semi-thin sections from a turbot larva of (a, b) group As-A, chal- lenged with Aerornonas salmonicida subsp. sal- monicida stained with Giemsa or (c) wlth the immunohistochemical stain to visualize this bacterium. The arrow in (a) points out the area of the oesophagus enlarged in (b) and (c).

Cell-like structures can be seen (b, c ) , associ- ated with positively red-stained [arrow in (c)]

bacteria-like structures [arrow in (b)]. Scale bars are (a) 40 pm or

(b, c) 10 pm

t

#?

- . -

.D L

J

h.

L!xder

I

;+ ;

7

-

p-: L P P

(6)

Dis Aquat Org 29: 13-20, 1997

100

-

-

90 8 0 - -

g

70 .- Y

-

-m- As 1992, Pedersen & Larsen 1996). Thus, it

-- - - .n - - Control seems that differences in host susceptibility

to a given pathogen could be present as early as the yolk sac stage.

-- The differences in rearing temperature

g

60 -- ments between undoubtedly the turbot also contributed and halibut experi- to the 50 --

results. In our experiments, both species of

0 > 40 --

.

-

larvae were reared close to the optimal

C

-

a 30 --

.*

temperature of the species. Halibut larvae,

3 which are commonly reared at 5 to 8"C,

.a.

.

BT

-

would not have been able to survive at the

.Iy - - iy.

- -

a - - m -

- * -

temperatures used in the experiment with

turbot (Pittman et al. 1990). This necessi- -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 g 11 13 75 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 tated a temperature lower than the temper- Days after hatching atures at which epizootics with Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida in salmon

Fig. 4 . Cumulative mortality (%) in the experiment with halibut larvae occur, typically 12 to 18°C ( ~ jet ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ challenged with Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. The groups

are As (exposed to viable, washed cells), and control (nothing added to 1995). Thus, turbot larvae have a greater the wells). Each group consisted of 60 individual eggsllarvae overlap in temperature range with A. sal- monicida subsp, salrnonicida than halibut larvae.

the possibility that the mortality was d u e to the in- Turbot also have greater overlap in spatial distribu- creased amount of organic matter that was added to tion with the bacterium than halibut, as they occur the wells. The low mortalities in the control groups naturally in the upper 10 m of the water column indicate that the eggs were healthy from the outset. (Nellen & Hempel 1970) as a result of their specific The histological data are more difficult to interpret. density. They may thus experience contact with the Turbot larvae showed degeneration of muscular tissue lipid microlayer found at the air-water interface in in response to infection by the bacterium. The marine systems (Norkrans 1980, Dahlback e t al. 1981, immunohistochemical analyses were positive only in 1982) where Aeromomas salmonicida subsp. salrnoni- the case of turbot, in which the bacterium was detected cida can occur in high numbers. It seems evident from in the gut of the larvae, but not in skeletal muscle. As buoyancy measurements in laboratory experiments the degenerative changes in skeletal muscle were (Skiftesvik & Bergh 1993) that halibut larvae have found in halibut larvae from the control group a s well higher specific density than turbot larvae. Due to its a s in challenged groups, and because no halibut larvae high hydrophobicity, A. salmonicida subsp. salmoni- were positive in the immunohistochemical analysis, w e cida aggregates in the surface layer, and a n average conclude that there was no cause-effect relationship of 4 . 3 X 103 A. salmonicida subsp, salmonicida X ml-' between the challenge a n d the histological alterations was reported by Enger & Thorsen (1992) for a sampling in the halibut. Reduced prevalence of degenerative station within a furunculosis-affected salmon farm.

changes in skeletal muscle of halibut larvae in re- This was 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than in the sponse to surface disinfection of the eggs has been water column immediately below the surface layer. In demonstrated by Bergh & Jelmert (1996), indicating samples from the sediment beneath, an average of that this condition may be related to microorganisms 2.2 X 106 A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida X ml-' was naturally present on halibut eggs. found. Although such microenvironments might pos- The apparent difference in susceptibility to infection sess relatively high concentrations of A. salmonicida by Aeromonas salrnonicida subsp. salmonicida between subsp. salmonicida, it should be noted that all con- turbot and halibut seems to correspond to similar dif- centrations measured by immunofluorescence counts ferences between adult stages of these fish species. In in the fleld study by Enger & Thorsen (1992) were an earlier experiment (Hjeltnes et al. 1995), we found lower than our measurements by viable counts in that halibut survived injection challenge with 3 X 103 or group As-A at the time of infection.

3 X 104 CFU A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida (4 indi- It is possible that the ability to occur in association viduals per group). In contrast, adult turbot appear to with fish larvae constitues a survival strategy for be relatively more susceptible to furunculosis, as Aeromonas salmonicjda subsp. salrnonicida. The bac- significant mortalities have been reported in farmed terium is highly hydrophobic and has been isolated specimens (Nougayrede et al. 1990, Toranzo & Barja from zooplankton and salmon lice (Nese & Enger

(7)

Bergh et al.: Infection of turbot and halibut larvae 19

1993). Effendi & Austin (1994) noted that the shortest survival (measured a s CFU) of starved cells of A. sal- monicida subsp. salmonicida was in seawater con- trols, whereas cells attached to wood, seaweeds or in- vertebrate animals survived for comparatively longer periods. A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida may also become associated with wild fish in the vicinity of fish farms affected by furunculosis. The bacterium has been isolated from wild cod Gadus morhua and coal- fish (Pollachius virens) captured within a range of 200 m from fish farms affected by furunculosis (Wil- lumsen 1990). Samuelsen et al. (1992) demonstrated the presence of the bacterium in the gut of wild salmon a n d coalfish in the vicinity of a fish farm. A special case is t h e outbreak of disease in goldsinny Ctenolabrus rupestris a n d rock cook C, exoletus used as cleaner fish for salmon infested with lice a n d furunculosis (Treasurer & Laidler 1994). These studies demonstrate the capability of the bacterium to persist, at least for some time, in the gastrointestinal tract of certain fish species. Adult a n d larval stages of several fish species may thus be vectors for the bacterium.

Our attempts to re-isolate the bacterium failed, a n d it is generally considered difficult to isolate Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida from planktonic or- ganisms (Nese & Enger 1993) or from samples con- taining other fast-growing bacteria

.

T h e immunohisto- chemical signal was relatively weak, indicating a low number of A . salmonicida subsp. salmonicida present in the infected larvae. In addition, a s evident by cul- ture, a variety of different bacteria were isolated from the larvae, probably originating from the gastrointesti- nal tract a n d the skin. It is possible that the use of more sophisticated diagnostic methods, like isolation of the bacterium by use of immunomagnetic beads would have detected the pathogen.

In conclusion, the results indicate that high concen- trations of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida during outbreaks of furunculosis in salmon farms might affect marine fish larvae in the vicinity of the farms. The turbot larvae seemed susceptible to infec- tion by A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. Although pathological changes a n d increased mortality w e r e found for both species, evidence implicating A. salmo- nicida subsp, salmonicida a s t h e cause was stronger for turbot than for halibut.

Acknowledgements. Funds for this study were provided by the Norwegian Research Council, Grant Nos. 1203-701 433 and 1401-701.424. Technical assistance by Laila Baardset and Ingrid Uglenes is highly appreaated. We also thank Dr 0 y s - tein Evensen of the National Veterinary Institute, who pro- vided the monoclonal antibody, and Dr Johan Glette for his comments on the manuscript.

LITERATURE ClTED

Bergh 0, Hansen GH. Taxt RE (1992) Experimental infection of eggs and yolk sac larvae of halibut, H~ppoglossus hippoglossus L J Fish Dis 15.379-391

Bergh 0, Jelmert A (1996) lodophor disinfection of eggs of Atlantic halibut. J Aquat Anim Health 8:135-145

Dahlback B, Gunnarson

LA,

Hermannsson M, Kjelleberg S (1982) Microbial investigations of surface microlayers, water column, Ice and sediment in the Arctic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:101-109

Dahlback B, Hermannsson M. Kjelleberg S, Norkrans B (1981) The hydrophobicity of bacteria-an important fac- tor in the initial addition at the air-water interface. Arch Mlcrobiol 128:267-270

Effendi I, Austin B (1994) Survival of the fish pathogen Aerornonas salmonicida in the marine environment. J Fish Dis 1?:375-385

Enger 0, Gunnlaugsdottir B, Thorsen BK, Hjeltnes B (1992) Infectious load of Aeromoas salmonicida subsp. saln~oni- c ~ d a during the initial phase of a cohabitant infection experiment wlth Atlantic salnlon (Salmo salar). J Fish DIS 15:425-430

Enger 0. Thorsen BK (1992) Possible ecological implica- tions of the high cell surface hydrophobicity of the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida. Can J M1crobiol38(10).

1048-1052

Evensen 0. Rimstad E (1990) Immunohistochernical identifi- cation of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in paraffin- embedded tissues of Atlantic salmon ( S a h o salar). J Vet Diagn Invest 2:288-293

Hjeltnes B, Bergh 0, Wergeland H, Holm J C (1995) Susceptl- bility of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus and wrasse (Labridae) to Aerornonas salrno- nicida subsp. salmonicida and the possibility of transmis- slon of furunculosis from farmed salmon Salnlo salar to manne fish. DIS Aquat Org 23:25-31

Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) Use of an avidin-biotin- peroxidase complex. (ABC) in immunoperoxidase tech- niques. A comparison between ABC a n d unlabelled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29:

577-580

Nellen W, Hempel G (1970) Beobachtungen am Icthyo- neuston der Nordsee. Ber Dt Wiss Komm Meeresforsch 21:311-348

Nese L , Enger 0 (1993) Isolation of Aeromonas salrnonicida from salmon llce Lepeophtheirus salmonis and m a n n e plankton. Dis Aquat Org 16.79-81

Norkrans B (1980) Surface mlcrolayers in aquatic environ- ments. Adv Microb Ecol4:51-85

Nougayrede P, Sochon E, Vuiiaume A (1990) Isolation of Aeromonas subspecies salmonicida in farmed turbot (Psetta maxima) In France. Bull Eur Ass Fish Pathol 10:

139-140

Pedersen K, Larsen JL (1996) First report on outbreak of furunculosis in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus caused by Aeromonas salmonjcida subsp. salrnonjcida in Denmark.

Bull Eur Ass Flsh Pathol 16(4)-129-133

Pittman K, Bergh 0, Opstad I, Skiftesvik AB, Skjolddal L, Strand H (1990) Development of eggs and yolk sac larvae of halibut (H~ppoglossus hjppoglossus L.). J Appl Ichthyol 6:142-160

Samuelsen OB, Lunestad BT, Husevdg B, H ~ l l e l a n d T, Ervik A (1992) Residues of oxolinic acld in wild fauna following medication in fish farms. DIS Aquat Org 12 111-119 Skiftesvik AB, Bergh 0 (1993) Changes in behaviour of

Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) and turbot

(8)

Dis Aquat O r g 29 13-20, 1997

(Scophthalmus maximus) yolk-sac larvae Induced by bacterial infections ( a n J Flsh Aquat Sci 50 2552-2557 Toranzo AE, Earja .TL (1992) First report of f u r u n c u l o s ~ s In

turbot reared In tlodtlng c a g e s In northwest of Spaln Bull Eur Ass Fish Pathol 12 147-149

Treasurer J W , Ladder LA (1994) Aeromonas salmonicida infection in wrasse ( L a b r ~ d a e ) used a s cleaner flsh, o n a n Responsible Subject Editor T P T Er n, hranalmo, Bntish Columbia, C a n a d a

Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., farm J Fish Dis 17 155-161

M'illumsen B (1990) A salmonicida subsp salmonicida ISO- ldted from atlantic cod a n d coalflsh Bull Eur Ass F ~ s h Pathol 10:62-64

Zar J H (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd e d n . Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

Manuscript first received. March 14, 1995 Revised verslon accepted: S e p t e m b e r 26, 1996

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Figure 1: Codium fragile: Sampling sites along the coast of Norway (excluding northern Norway), showing subspecies identity at each location (subsp. fragile in yellow;

The difference is illustrated in 4.23, and as we see, it is not that large. The effect of applying various wall treatments is of course most apparent in the proximity of the wall.

The novel figure-of-8 cable cerclage enhanced fixation stability and reduced re- displacement of the posteromedial-buttress in cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric

Typical annual fluctuation in temperature (°C) in the inlet water.. The fish were weighted ones a month and the larvae in each group were weighed live as

The increased ba~terial activity on surface of the light-group larvae compared with dark-group-larvae (Figure 2) 1 does indicate that the exposure to 60 lux

This rich dataset allows us to study local (km-scale) drivers of individual diet variation in a demer- sal predator, including horizontal and vertical overlap with pelagic prey.

Rosenberg and Haugen (1982) have examined otoliths from turbot larvae in the present basin study and back caiculated individual growth trajectories.. They verified that

The data consisted of a survey (N=251) and qualitative interviews (individual and focus group interviews) with 41 queer people with migrant backgrounds in