• No results found

Paper D: Bottomhole Pressure Control During Pipe Connection in Gas-Dominant Wells

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Paper D: Bottomhole Pressure Control During Pipe Connection in Gas-Dominant Wells"

Copied!
2
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Paper D:

Bottomhole Pressure Control During Pipe Connection in Gas-Dominant Wells

Gerhard H. Nygaard, Telemark University College, Erlend H. Vefring, Kjell K˚ are Fjelde, Geir Nævdal, Rolf Johan Lorentzen, RF-Rogaland Research and Saba Mylvaganam, Telemark University College/Tel-Tek

This paper was presented at the conference and published in the Proceed- ings of the SPE/IADC Underbalanced Technology Conference and Exhibition held in Houston, Texas, U.S.A., 11 - 12 October 2004.

139

(2)

Copyright 2004, SPE/IADC Underbalanced Technology Conference and Exhibition This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2004 SPE/IADC Underbalanced Technology Conference and Exhibition held in Houston, Texas, U.S.A., 11–12 October 2004.

This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE/IADC Program Committee following review of information contained in a proposal submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers or the International Association of Drilling Contractors and are subject to correction by the author(s).

The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the International Association of Drilling Contractors, their officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers or the International Association of Drilling Contractors is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to a proposal of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The proposal must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.

Abstract

To obtain an underbalanced pressure condition, nitrogen gas can be injected into the drillstring. Simultaneous injection of liquids and gases leads to a highly dynamic flow system.

During pipe connections, pressure transients can cause the bottomhole pressure to rise above the pore pressure of the reservoir or fall below the reservoir collapse pressure.

Migration of gas during pipe connection and in-flow from the reservoir will also cause bottom-hole pressure changes.

This paper presents a methodology for controlling the bottom-hole pressure during pipe connection in gas dominant wells. The methodology incorporates a dynamic model of the well fluid flow and the well-reservoir dynamic interaction.

Available control actions during the drilling process are the gas injection rate prior to the pipe connection and choke valve settings during the pipe connection. Measurement of the pump rates, pump pressures, choke pressure and the bottomhole pressure are also available to support the control actions.

However, during pipe connections and in the event of transient signal failures, the bottomhole pressure measurements will be suppressed.

The control methodology used is based on a non-linear model predictive control system, which predicts the near- future behavior of the well, and uses these predictions to obtain the optimal choke settings and pump rates. The model parameters are calibrated using measurements from the well, to ensure that the model is suitable for the predictions.

A field based case with gas injection has been examined using this control methodology. The results indicate that model based control can be utilized in developing an automated and integrated pump rate and choke control system for underbalanced drilling operations.

SPE/IADC 91578

Bottomhole Pressure Control During Pipe Connection in Gas-Dominant Wells

Gerhard H. Nygaard, Telemark University College, Erlend H. Vefring, Kjell Kåre Fjelde, Geir Nævdal, Rolf Johan Lorentzen, RF-Rogaland Research and Saba Mylvaganam, Telemark University College/Tel-Tek

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Further, the dynamic fluid pressure loss is measured between the differential-pressure in the vertical pipe section dP ver and the differential-pressure in the horizontal pipe

In an underbalanced operation, the hydrostatic fluid pressure is set to be low than the reservoir pressure, with the intention of causing influx of formation fluids and

Figure 5.3 Measured time series of the pressure for HK 416 N at two different directions from the shooting direction, with and without flash suppressor, at 84 cm from the muzzle..

The monitored pressure transients and the pore pressure response in the rock mass during real-time operation at Roskrepp power plant have been used to develop a new method to

Figure 5-12 Pressure and pressure derivative from four Fall-off transients with time duration between 2 and 10 hours. Figure 5-13 Pressure and pressure derivative from five

The rig also has a stand pipe pressure sensor (RP403), shut in casing pressure sensor (RP406), Coriolis pressure sensor (RP407) and pump pressure sensor (RP401), in addition to

The pipe diameter has little effect on liquid slug formation, while the pipe pressure drop and liquid holdup change small. Keywords: gas-liquid two-phase flow, CFD,

A drive attached at the top of the pipe creates low frequency (typically in a range from 1 s -1 to 5 s -1 ) harmonical pressure oscillations in the gas cushion inside the