• No results found

CHARACTERS: Victor and Thomas Builds-the-Fire, around 20 years old

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CHARACTERS: Victor and Thomas Builds-the-Fire, around 20 years old"

Copied!
1
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

FRAMESTORY:

PLOT: “This Is What it Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona,” is about two young Native American men who live on the Spokane Reservation in Washington, U. S. The story is neatly structured around news of Victor's father's death in Arizona and the task of retrieving his ashes, and metaphorically the lost father for Victor, his old pickup truck and modest savings and returning north. It is this goal of the journey that drives the plot, but through the flashbacks are the stereotyped descriptions of Victor, the stoic warrior, and Thomas, the storytelling shaman who “was a storyteller that nobody wanted to listen to” (62) presented.

SETTING: Late 1900s Spokane Reservation, western Washington + Phoenix, Arizona.

CHARACTERS: Victor and Thomas Builds-the-Fire, around 20 years old.

THEME: “Personal hurricanes” is introduced in the very first paragraph: “Victor hadn’t seen his father in a few years, only talked to him on the telephone once or twice, but still there was a genetic pain, which was soon to be pain as real and immediate as a broken bone” (59). This is a story about a pain on a personal level but also personal pain in general and the conflict a person may have within him- or herself because of broken relationships and loss of important people in one’s life and the identity crisis this may cause. “Storytelling”:

Although Victor had a problematic relationship with his father, as well as with Thomas, part of their trip to Arizona involves Thomas recounting experiences with Victor's father and telling other stories. This creates a sort of modern storehouse of new tales, with one frame story in which there are many flashbacks, like memories or visions. The flashbacks serve to provide information of the characters history and explain their actions.

CONCLUSION: It is the journey that drives the

plot, but through the flashbacks we hear about how these characters’ struggle, both in relationships between each other and with themselves. Thomas continues to tell his stories throughout the story as both stereotype image of an old shamanistic tradition and an ironic commentator on it. Even though Thomas's mother died in childbirth, and he was raised by his grandmother, he knows the loss that Victor feels in losing even an absent father. The story concludes with the two young men back in Washington State. As they part after their long journey, Victor gives one-half of his father's ashes to Thomas, and both men plan to return the ashes to the river at Spokane Falls, continuing to add chapters to the stories which Thomas has already been telling and retelling.

1st Flashback → triggered by Victor’s memory of his relationship with Thomas as the one who ”always had something to say” (61): “Once, when they were seven” (61) and Victor’s father still lived with the family, Thomas anticipated how he would abandon his family → Explains the boys relationship + present them as stereotypes = social critique.

2nd Flashback → triggered by Thomas’ memory of Victor and his many stories when they were ten and still friends and Victor liked his stories: “Thomas Builds-the-Fire

sat on the bicycle, waited in Victor’s yard. He was ten years old and skinny” (62) → Explains the boy’s relationship and history + Native American history.

3rd Flashback → Thomas’

memory of ”two Indian boys” (63) who wanted to be warriors →Explains Native American history → is inside the 2nd flashback.

4th Flashback

→3rd person narrator – memory: “When they were fifteen and had long since stopped being friends, Victor and

Thomas got into a fistfight” (65) → Explains their relationship and Victor’s struggle with himself.

5th Flashback → 3rd person narrator – memory: “When Victor was twelve, he stepped into an underground wasp nest” (70) → Thomas rescued him and shows that he is a good friend + Victor’s shamefulness → Explains the boys’

relationship.

6th Flashback

→Thomas’

memory – Triggered by Victor’s question to Thomas about what he

remembers about Victor’s father (70) →Thomas had promised to look after Victor

→ Explains human relationships.

7th Flashback → 3rd person narrator – memory:

“Thomas Builds-the Fire could fly” (70)

→ Explains hope – how dreams can come true.

8th Flashback → 3rd person narrator – memory:

“Thomas Builds- the Fire walked through the corridors of the tribal school by himself. Nobody wanted to be anywhere near him because of all those stories.

Story after story”

(72) → Explains how hard it is for Victor and the others to accept Thomas and his stories and therefore part of the Native American tradition.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

In an impassioned speech, he argued that communal representation was a “poison which has entered into the body politic of our country” (CAD 1999, vol. 5, August 27, 1947, 225),

Qvigstad to adopt a slightly different emphasis in relation to the bank and monetary policy when he said that the criterion for a good decision by Norges Bank must be that the rule

To study how coronal minor element (in this case O) abun- dance enhancements are affected by He, we will use three H–He background solutions: (1) the exp100 solution, (2) a

Tove and Anders felt assured that Rolf Jacobsen knew what he was talking about and commissioned him to design their house. They deem him an important factor in how they

Since religious poetry expresses itself through the form of a poem as well as its theme (as I shall explain shortly), I will apply the methodology of close-reading

A quick keyword search with polycube maps in the Key papers field let him notice that there is an important paper he was missing (Efficient volumetric poly-cube.. Figure 3: In

‘Delegacias de Defesa da Mulher’ (Police Stations for the Defence of Women), more commonly referred to as ‘Delegacias da Mulher’ (Women’s Police Stations), were established

The nameless narrator of Knut Hamsun’s Hunger is highly unreliable, and finally unknowable (it helps that he is insane); Dostoevsky’s narrator in Notes from Underground is the model