• No results found

CM_1984_H_41.pdf (1.824Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CM_1984_H_41.pdf (1.824Mb)"

Copied!
16
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

This paper. not to be cited without prior reference to the author

International.Council·for the Exploration of the Sea

C.M.l984/H:41

agic Fish Committee

ABSTRACT

SPRAT SPAWNING IN TWO FJORD AREAS OF WESTERN NORWAY IN 1982 AND 1983

by

Else Torstensen

Fl~devigen Biological Station N-4800 ARENDAL Norway

A southern and a northern fjord at Western Norway were surveyed for sprat spawning from the end of May until July, six times in 1982 and four times in 1983.

Sprat spawned in both areas and the surveys covered just a part of the spawning season.

It is allowed for the stage duration, using the mean tempera- ture for the sampling depths at each station and cruise. Thus the daily egg production was estimated for each station and for each of the fjord areas as a whole for each cruise. The spawning curves show peak spawning at the end of May - first part of

June. From the area underneath the egg production curves the total egg productions were estimated. Attempts are made to esti- mate the size of the spawning stocks from the egg productions and published data on fecundity.

(2)

- 2 -

INTRODUCTION

There is an annual sprat fishing in the fjords of Western Norway, in the period from July to the end of the year.

According to Sund (1911) the sprat in these fjords are recruited·

from spawning in Skagerrak-Kattegat. However, local spawning has been shown as well (Bjerkan 1930, Gundersen 1954, Bakken 1965).

Increased assessment of sprat in the Skagerrak-Kattegat and

North Sea area raised the question of consequences for the sprat stocks in the fjords. To obtain more information of local

spawning, spawning area and spawning time, preliminary egg surveys were started in 1982.

Two fjord systems were chosen for surveying. From the assumption that recruitment mainly takes place by drifting by the Norwegian Coastal Current, the southern (Ryfylke) and the northern (Nord- fjord) fjords were selected. The southern area has earlier been surveyed by Bjerkan (1930), Dannevig (1954) and Bakken (1965), while the northern fjord has never been surveyed for sprat eggs and larvae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The locations of the fjord areas are shown in Fig. 1. The two areas were surveyed from the end of May to the beginning of July (Tabell 1), with six cruises to both areas in 1982 and four

cruises in 1983.

Plankton was sampled with a modified Bongo sampler, 20 cm

0,

with 500 urn mesh in the nets. The volume of water filtered was measured by flowmeter.

The hauls were made as oblique tows. In 1982 the depth intervals were 50-25 and 25-0 m and in 1983 30-15 and 15-0 m, with 5 min tows at each 5 m depth. The travelling speed was 3 knots. The samples were preserved in 2-4% formalin in seawater.

(3)

- 3 -

The eggs were sorted out and the sprat eggs identified as egg without visible embryo (corresponding to stage IA and IB in Thompson et al. 1981) and egg with embryo. The number of eggs without visible embryo below 1 m2 surface was calculated for each station, and used for the estimations.

The temperature was measured on the surface and by a Bathy- thermograf recorded down to 50 m depth.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sprat spawned in Ryfylke and Nordfjord in 1982 and 1983. The distribution and abundance of the eggs are shown in Fig. 2-5.

The distribution pattern was essentially the same in the two years in both fjord areas. However, there were differences

between the fjords. In the northern fjord the eggs were more or less distributed throughout the fjord, with greatest abundance in the middle part. In Ryfylke the egg distribution was more restricted, and the number of eggs per m2 not as high as in Nordfjord.

From the mean temperatures for the upper 15 m given in Table 2 i t is difficult to see any relation between temperature and egg abundance.

86-96% of the mean numbers of the sprat eggs were sampled in the upper 25 m in 1982. Therefore the sampling depths were changed in 1983. The vertical distribution in 1983 is summarized in Fig.

6. Considering the individual stations in both areas, the

stations with the highest number of eggs had 90-95% of the eggs in the upper 15 m. As there is fresh water outflow in the

surface layer in both fjords, with a discontinuity layer within the upper 5 m in summer, the vertical distributions indicate a concentration of sprat eggs beneath this layer.

The daily egg production for the survey area as a whole for each cruise was estimated by multiplying the number of eggs per m2 for each station by the area represented by that station, and

(4)

- 4 -

plotted against the mid-day for each cruise in Fig. 7 and 8. It is allowed for the stage duration using the mean temperature for the sampling depths at each station and cruise, and according to development times given in Thompson et al. (1981) the eggs were from 1.1 to 2.1 days old. From Fig. 7 and 8 it is shown that t~­

spawning season for sprat in both areas exceeds the survey periods. The spawning pattern varied, but both in Ryfylke and Nordfjord there was an increased spawning activity in the end of May and first part of June. Two peaks in sprat spawning activity have been shown in fjords on the eastern coast of Norway, in April/May and June (Ellingsen 1979) and an earlier spawning in Ryfylke and Nordfjord seems to be confirmed by the occurrences of sprat larvae and their length distribution (Table 3).

The total egg production for the survey period is calculated from the area underneath the curves for daily egg production.

Using the fecundity data from Bailey and Pipe (1977), 971 eggs per g, and an assumed 1:1 sex ratio, the spawning stock in the two fjord areas have been estimated:

1982 1983

Ryfylke Tot. egg

productio~

190xl09 120x109

Tonn

392 248

Nordfjord Tot. egg

production

7lxl09 335xl09

Tonn

146 690

Stock size estimated from a restricted period of the total spawning season is inevitably underestimated. Apart from the exceeded spawning season, there are other factors of uncertainty connected with the estimation. To get more precise estimation of the size of the spawning stock, more effort should be put into:

- sampling method

- stage determination of preserved egg material - vertical distribution and temperature

- time of egg development

- the fecundity of sprat in Norwegian waters.

(5)

- 5 -

REFERENCES

BAILEY, R.S. & PIPE, R.K. 1977 Preliminary observations on the maturation cycle and fecundity of sprats-in the north- western North-Sea. ICES CM 1977/H:32.

BAKKEN, E. 1965. Brislingegg og brislingyngel i Vest-Norge og sammenheng mellom yngeldrift og hydrografi. Thesis, Univ.

i Bergen, 1965.

BJERKAN, P. 1930. Fluctuations in the stock of young sprat off the west coast of Norway and its relation to the sprat population as a whole. Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer 65: 173- 181.

DANNEVIG, G. 1954. Brislingens gyting. I. Unders~k~lser~i

Skagerak og Ryfylke. Fiskets Gang 1954: 207-208, 214.

ELLINGSEN, E. 1979. The abundance of sprat eggs and larvae in the Langesund and the Oslofjord areas, South Eastern Norway, 1974-1978. ICES CM 1979/H:60. 17 pp.

GUNDERSEN, K.R. 1954. Brislingens gyting. II. Unders~kelser i Hordaland og Sogn. Fiskets Gang 1954: 221-223.

SUND, 0. 1911. Unders~kelser over brisling i norske farvand.

Aarsberetn. Norg. Fisk. 1910: 357-474.

THOMPSON, B.M., MILLIGAN, S.P. & NICHOLS, J.M. 1981. The deve- lopment rates of sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.) eggs over a range of temperatures. ICES CM 1981/H:l5. 9 pp.

(6)

Tabe11 1. The coverage of Ryfy1ke and Nordfjord, 1982 and 1983

Coverage

Ryfy1ke NOrdfjord

no.

1982 l . 20-23 May 26-27 May

2. 29 May-1 June 3-4 June

3. 6-9 June 11-13 June

4. 14-17 June 18-20 June

5. 22-25 June 29-30 June

6. 2-5 July 6-8 July

1983 l . 25-28 May 31 May. 1 June

2. 3-6 June 8-11 June

3. 13-16 June 19-21 June

4. 23-26 June 28-29 June

Table 2. The·mean temperature of the water masses in the upper 15 m in Ryfylke and Nordfjord in 1982 and 1983

Temperature (OC) Cov·erage no.

1 2 3 4 5 6

1982

Ryfylke ·a.6 9.9 12.8 12.1 11.5 12.7 Nordfjord 9.4 11.1 10.1 10.9 10.2 1983

Ryfy1ke 7.5 8.4 8.3 12.0 Nordfjord 8.9 8.8 10.3 10.5

(7)

Table 3. Length distribution (%) of sprat larvae

Coverage> no <5 Length groups (mm) 5-10 11-15 >15 N T (mm)

Ryfy1ke

1982 1. 100.0 3 12.7

2. 66.6 3 3. 3 3 4.0

3. 92.3 7.7 13 7.5

4. 4. 3 91.3 4.3 23 8. 3

5. 33.3 66.6 3 12.3

6. 2.5 32.5 46.3 18.8 80 12.1

1983 1. 15.6 59.4 15.6 9.4 32 8.3

2. 0.3 57.6 27.3 12.1 29 10.1

3. 7.0 30.2 46.5 16.3 36 12.1

4. 5.5 48.4 32.0 14.2 219 10.5

Nordfjord

1982 1. 40.0 40.0 20.0 5 7.0

2. 33.3 50.0 16.7 6 4.8

3. 100.0 1 7.0

4.

5. 60.0 20.0 20.0 5 5.6

6. 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 10 11.3

1983 1. 13.6 36.4 31.8 18.2 22 10.0

2. 71.4 28.6 7 14.0

3. 20.0 46.7 26.7 6.7 15 8.1

4. 55.7 38.6 1.4 4.3 70 5. 6

NORWAY

BERGEN

Fig. 1. The location of the surveyed fjord areas on the West Coast of Norway, 1) Ryfylke, 2) Nordfjord

(8)

Do

§ 1-9

~ 10-99

s

RYFYLKE

20-23May '1982

RYFYLKE

I

\ 29M.ay-1June ' 1982

Fig. 2. The distribution and number of sprat eggs per m in 2

Ryfylke in 1982.

(9)

§ 1-9

~ 10-99

100-199

m

>200

BOKN FD •

BOKN FD •

Fig. 2. Continue

RYFYLKE

6-9.A.Jne 1982

RYFYLKE

14-17June 1982

(10)

: Do

I

I § t-9

f7!Ll1 0-99

Fig. 2 • Continue

RYFYLKE

22-25 June

\1982

I

RYFYLKE

) 2-SJuly

\ 1982

(11)

Do

§ 1-9

f7lJ

10-99

Si

100-199

s

RYFYLKE

25-28 May 1983

RYFYLKE

3-6 June 1983

Fig. 3. The distribution and number of sprat eggs per m in 2 Ryfylke in 1983

(12)

Do

§ 1-9

~ 10-99

~ 100-199

. g

>200

\

RYFYLKE

/ 13-16 June

\, 1983

1~--~~--~--~--~~----~

I

Fig. 3. Continue

RYFYLKE

\23-26June 1 1983

(13)

NOR OF JORD

6-8 July

1982

~ 1-9

~ 10-99

11

100-199

11

> 200

Fig. 4. The distribution and number of sprat eggs per m in 2

Nordfjord in 1982

(14)

NOR OF JORD

1983 28-29 June

~ 1-9

~ 10-99

m

100-199

m

>200

Fig. 5. The distribution and number of sprat eggs per m in 2

Nordfjord in 1983

(15)

EGGS/ M 3

10 ID 2.0 1.0 2D

0 I

/ /./

10 / - I

I

i

! 20

i

I

\

-

I

%

1-

\

i b

11..

~ 30

1 -

.

l

40

-

50 -

'

e 10 6 e 10

EGGS/M'

2D 4..0 6.0 2.0 l..O

0 I

I

, )

/ '

, ,

10 -

,.

,.

I

i

I

:J: 20 - ~ f

i

11

% I

I

1- I

11.. I

i b

w Q I

JO - : I

L

I I .I I

40 - I

j

I I

j r•c

I

50 -

I I I I I I

'

6 I 10 12 I

10 12 14

Fig. 6. The vertical distribution of sprat eggs without visible embryo in Ryfylke and Nordfjord in 1983. The numbers of eggs are the means of positive hauls. Alongside each distribution is a representative profile of temperature

I: Ryfylke, a) 25-28 May, b) 13-16 June

II: Nordfjord, a) 30 May - 1 June, b) 19-21 June

(16)

10

en 5

C>

: ,.

t; 3 ...

2

198:;l.

15 20 25 30 4 9 14 19 24 29 4

25 May

31

Jun~

10 Jut y

19 83

15 20 25

Fig. 7. Daily egg production in the southern fjord area (Ryfylke) in 1982 and 1983

~ ij

)0

20 I

15 May

)I

~o~a, I

20

."

./ ""'-

. / '

.,

I I I 1 I I I i I 1 i

25 30 4 9 11. 19 24 29 4 9

JUM

10 IS

Jun~

July

10

Fig. 8. Daily egg production in the northern fjord area (Nordfjord) in 1982 and 1983

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Taking into account the concentration of pigments ( S Chlns-a) in the surface (0—1 cm) sediment layer and sediment characteristics, including organic carbon and total nitrogen

The lifetime of the samples with a-Si:H surface passivating films of variable thickness, both with and without the a- SiN x :H capping layer, was measured in the as grown state

Although, particularly early in the 1920s, the cleanliness of the Cana- dian milk supply was uneven, public health professionals, the dairy indus- try, and the Federal Department

To investigate how turbulent vertical exchange processes in the Arctic boundary layer are represented by the model parameterization a simulation with high vertical resolution (90

By comparing data of dissolved inor- ganic carbon (DIC) and nutrients in the surface layer (up- per 100 m), and a sub-surface layer (100–200 m), we cal- culate monthly deficits in

Consequently, the converted RepVGG Block structure has only one single branch compositing with a 5× 5 Conv layer and a ReLU layer (Figure 1, top right), so the network architecture

Also a few other cases (see table 4.1) shows.. This supports the hypothesis that the mean stream wise velocity in the linear sub-layer is the appropriate velocity scale for

Upper mixed layer temperature was significantly (O.S-I.SOC) higher than previous year. This is associated with the favourable conditions of the summer