To cite:Apeland T, Danielsen T, Staal EM,et al.
Risk factors for exertional rhabdomyolysis with renal stress.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2017;3:e000241.
doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2017- 000241
Accepted 26 May 2017
1Department of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
2FSAN, Norwegian Armed Forces, Stavanger, Norway
3Birkenes Medical Centre, Birkeland, Norway
4Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital– Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
5Stavanger Emergency Medical Centre, Stavanger, Norway
6Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
Correspondence to Dr Terje Apeland; terje.
Risk factors for exertional
rhabdomyolysis with renal stress
Terje Apeland,1Tore Danielsen,2,3Eva M Staal,1Anders A˚sberg,4Inga S Thorsen,1 Tom Ole Dalsrud,2,5Stein Ørn6
ABSTRACT
Background Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis denotes the exertional damage of myocytes with leakage of sarcoplasmic content into the circulation.
The purpose of this study was to determine important risk factors for the development of exertional rhabdomyolysis in a temperate climate and to study the renal effects of myoglobinuria.
MethodsA cluster of eight military recruits was admitted to hospital due to exertional rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria. The patients were treated
according to current guidelines with isotonic saline and alkalinisation of the urine. The eight patients were compared with a randomly selected control group of 26 healthy fellow recruits. All subjects responded to a standardised questionnaire.
ResultsThere were little differences in baseline characteristics between patients and controls. In the present study, exercise intensity, duration and type were all significant determinants of exertional rhabdomyolysis in univariate models. However, in a multivariate model, high exercise intensity on day 1 was the only significant predictor of rhabdomyolysis (p=0.02). All patients had a stable serum creatinine and cystatin C. There was a significant increase in serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in the patients, suggesting renal stress.
ConclusionsSustained maximal intensity exercise is a crucial risk factor for rhabdomyolysis with gross pigmenturia. Elevated serum NGAL concentrations indicate the presence of renal stress. It appears to be possible to quantify the risk of rhabdomyolysis by means of a simple questionnaire. In the future, this may be used as a tool to prevent rhabdomyolysis.
INTRODUCTION
Rhabdomyolysis denotes the injurious breakdown of skeletal muscle cells. Clini- cally it is characterised by local pain, weakness and swelling, with leakage of sarcoplasmic content into the circulation, such as creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin and aspartate aminotransferase. The myocytes may be injured in many different ways, for example, by mechanical trauma, hypoxia, drugs, toxins or infections.1 Circu- lating myoglobin from injured muscles is filtered in the kidneys and may cause acute kidney damage. Therefore, subjects with
significant rhabdomyolysis are often hospi- talised and treated with saline infusion and bicarbonate.2
What is known about the subject?
"Exertional rhabdomyolysis is not uncommon and
has been best defined among military personnel, with incidences from 2.2 to 13.4 cases per 10 000 persons per year. The US armed forces reported a 17% increase in incidental rhabdomy- olysis between 2014 and 2015, with the highest incidence rates observed in subjects who were male, younger than 20 years of age, non- Hispanic, recruit trainees or in combat-specific occupations. Furthermore, there are a few civilian reports on clusters of rhabdomyolysis among athletes and students. The information on aetio- logical risk factors appears to be sparse and incomplete. Few publications have studied the risk factors for the development of this condition.
"It appears that the frequency of associated
kidney failure is low in otherwise healthy young subjects; a range of 0%–8% has been reported.
Previously, serum creatinine has been used as the main biomarker of kidney injury. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C are more sensitive and are early biomarkers of kidney injury; however, few reports have been published in this context.
What are the new findings?
"Sustained high-intensity physical activity,
exceeding muscular functional capacity, is a crucial risk factor for exertional rhabdomyolysis.
"The failure to recognise muscular pain as an
important alarm signal appears to be of impor- tance in this setting.
"A simple self-assessment questionnaire may be
employed to monitor risk of exertional rhabdomyolysis.
"Although traditional markers of renal function
often remain within normal limits in uncompli- cated rhabdomyolysis, elevated serum NGAL may indicate the presence of renal stress or subclinical renal injury.
Exertional rhabdomyolysis may be the most common form of rhabdomyolysis, particularly in a hot climate.1
3It may be caused either by direct mechanical injury of the sarcolemma or intracellular energy depletion with low ATP, leading to necrosis of muscle cells.4 5 The exact incidence is unknown, as many patients probably do not seek medical attention. Furthermore, the diag- nostic criteria may vary. CK concentrations commonly rise after strenuous exercise. There is a floating differ- ence between a normal postexercise rise in serum CK and a pathological CK rise due to rhabdomyolysis.6 Exertional rhabdomyolysis has been best defined among military personnel, with incidences from 2.2 to 13.4 cases per 10 000 persons per year.7 8 The US armed forces reported a 17% increase in incidental rhabdomyolysis between 2014 and 2015, with the highest incidence rates observed in subjects who were male, younger than 20 years of age, non-Hispanic, recruit trainees or in combat-specific occupations.8 9 There are a few civilian reports on clusters of rhabdo- myolysis among athletes and students.7 10 11It appears that the frequency of associated kidney failure is low in otherwise healthy young subjects; 0%–8% has been reported.3 6 7 10 12
Most previous studies have focused on the diagnosis and treatment of exertional rhabdomyolysis. Few publi- cations have studied the risk factors for the development of this condition.10Exertional rhabdomy- olysis attenuates physical performance, hampers progression of training and adds cost in terms of hospitalisations and sick leave. If risk factors are identi- fied, it may be possible to implement preventive measures. The primary aim of the present study was to determine the crucial risk factors for the development of exertional rhabdomyolysis in a temperate climate.
The secondary aim was to assess the renal effects of myoglobinuria by applying novel markers of glomer- ular filtration (cystatin C) and renal tubular stress (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)).
METHODS Subjects
This is a case–control study based on a cluster of eight military recruits who were admitted to the hospital due to exertional rhabdomyolysis with gross pigmenturia.
The incident occurred about 1 week after arrival in camp. All the new recruits had been divided into squads for their physical training. Importantly, the various squads had exercise programmes that differed somewhat in regard to duration, intensity and composition.
Day 0 was the day when the patients first got muscular symptoms with pigmenturia. Days 1 and 2 were before muscular injury, and days 1–24 in the time thereafter.
The control group consisted of 26 randomly selected healthy recruits from the same military camp. The
healthy subjects provided blood samples while the patients still were in the hospital (day 3).
Diagnostic criteria for rhabdomyolysis with pigmenturia There should be appropriate clinical findings and serum CK above 20 000 U/L. The urine should be posi- tive for blood on dipstick test, but without haematuria on urine microscopy.
Treatment
The patients were treated according to current guide- lines.13 On arrival, they were promptly volume- expanded with intravenous isotonic saline, combined with drinking water, causing a mean urine output of 5.0 L per day during the hospital stay. The urine was alkalinised with bicarbonate tablets and the mean urine pH was 6.9±0.8 during the stay. Patients were discharged when their condition had improved and myoglobinuria no longer could be detected with urine dipstick test. The mean duration of the hospital treat- ment was 4.9±0.8 days.
Clinical and demographic data collection
Both patients and controls responded to a question- naire about their current intake of drugs, tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical training level prior to entering military service. In the same way, information was obtained about exercise schedule and medical symptoms in the days before the rhabdomyolysis cluster occurrence. Data about body weight, height and conscription board examinations were extracted from the military medical record.
Prior to military service at conscription board exami- nation, aerobic capacity and muscular strength were assessed with a maximal treadmill running test and two maximum isometric tests for arms and legs.14 The results were expressed in a semiquantitative scale from 1 to 9, with 1 representing lowest and 9 best results.
In the period of muscular injury, the subjects reported their exercise type on the questionnaire: A:
aerobic training; S: strength training; M: mixed training; No: no exercise. Exercise duration was reported in minutes. Exercise intensity was reported on a subjective scale from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 the highest intensity.
Laboratory methods
All biochemical analyses were performed in serum.
Cystatin C was analysed with a particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay using reagents from Gentian (www.gentian.no) on a Modular P800 analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Coefficient of variation (CV) was 5%. Laboratory reference interval is 0.51–1.05 mg/L.
Myoglobin was analysed with the electrochemilumi- nescent immunoassay Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics) on a
Modular E analyser (CV 7%). Laboratory reference interval is 30–70mg/L for men.
NGAL was analysed by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) Quantikine (R&D Systems, Stillwater, Minne- sota, USA). The assay had been validated, and kit independent controls were run on every test plate. The interassay (n=5) and intra-assay (n=10) variation coef- ficients were 4.8% and 2.3%, respectively.
C reactive protein (CRP) was analysed by turbidi- metric immunoassay using a Roche Modular kit on a Modular analyser, with CV 7.5%. Laboratory refer- ence interval is 0–4 mg/L.
CK was analysed by a photometric assay using the Architect Creatine Kinase Reagent Kit (Abbott Labora- tories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) on an Architect c16000 analyser (Abbott Laboratories), with CV6.5%.
Laboratory reference interval is 50–400 U/L for men between 18 and 49 years.
Creatinine concentrations were obtained by an enzymatic method using the Multigent Creatinine Assay (Sentinel CH, Milan, Italy) on an Abbott Architect c16000 analyser, with CV 3.6%. Labora- tory reference interval is 60–105 mmol/L for men above 17 years.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was esti- mated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation.15
Statistical analysis
Age, body mass index (BMI), exercise duration, myoglobin, NGAL, CRP, creatinine, eGFR and cystatin C were normally distributed and analysed with appro- priate Student’s t-tests. Student’s t-tests were two-tailed.
The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed- rank test were applied for evaluating differences in preservice training level, muscular strength, aerobic capacity, exercise intensity and CK. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to explore the relation- ship between the duration of muscular pain and peak levels of CK and myoglobin. The c2 test was used for testing categorical differences such as gender, tobacco habit, dietary additives, alcohol use and exercise type.
Simple, multiple and logistic regression were employed for exploring the relationship between different risk factors and rhabdomyolysis or biochemical markers of tissue injury. p0.05 was considered significant. The statistical calculations were performed using StatView V.5.0.
RESULTS
On arrival to the hospital, all the patients were haemodynamically stable and with normal body temperature. They had mean systolic blood pressure of 140±7 mm Hg without evidence of dehydration.
All patients had swelling of their thigh muscles with local pain, tenderness and weakness. They had dark- coloured urine—positive for blood on urine dipstick test, but without haematuria on urine microscopy—
compatible with myoglobinuria. Serum potassium and calcium were within laboratory reference inter- vals. The patients were previously healthy and none reported any previous episodes of rhabdomyolysis.
All the subjects were asked if they had felt cold or hot during the exercise. The complaints about temperature were mild however, and no differences were detected between patients and controls. The mean outdoor temperature during this period was 17.3C (maximum 22.7C).
Demographics
The patients and the controls were of the same age.
One control subject was of Asian origin; the others were Caucasian. Two controls were female; the others were men (table 1). We found no significant differences between patients and controls in regard to age, diet, tobacco, alcohol and training level before entering military service (table 1). During the first 2 weeks of military service, the recruits were not allowed to leave the camp and their intake of alcoholic beverages was considered moderate.
Biochemical markers of muscular injury
The eight patients had a peak serum CK concentration of 126 788±66 649 U/L (mean±SD), range 48 861–
202 522 U/L. Their peak serum myoglobin concentra- tion was 8811±6360mg/L (mean±SD), range 1698–
21 298mg/L.
The patients had significantly higher concentrations of CK and myoglobin compared with the controls on day 3 (table 2, figure 1). There was a close correlation between CK and myoglobin concentrations (Spear- man’s r 0.93, p<0.0001). On day 24, the CK and myoglobin concentrations were significantly reduced from peak levels (table 2,figure 1).
On day 3, the 26 controls had a mean CK concentra- tion of 1553 U/L, which was above the laboratory reference interval, that is, 40–400 U/L (table 2). Of these, seven controls (27%) had CK below 400 U/L, and three had CK above 5000 U/L. The mean myoglobin concentration in controls was 133mg/L, which was above the laboratory reference interval, that is, 30–
80mg/L (table 2). Of these, 11 controls (42%) had myoglobin concentrations within the laboratory refer- ence interval.
Muscular pain
The patients reported muscular pain and tenderness for a duration of 7–9 days (mean 8.4±0.7 days), while the control subjects had significantly shorter duration of pain: 0–9 days (mean 2.1±3.4 days, p<0.0001).
Seventeen controls (65%) did not report muscular pain. Moreover, the patients reported higher pain intensity than controls. There was a significant, positive correlation between the peak concentrations of CK and myoglobin and the number of days with muscular pain
(Spearman’s r 0.5, p=0.004 and Spearman’s r 0.6, p=0.001, respectively).
Risk factors for rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria
Prior to military enrolment, patients and controls had similar aerobic capacity; however, the patients had less isometric muscular strength than the control subjects (table 1). The patients reported significantly higher exercise intensity during the 3 days before the injury cluster occurred—this was most evident on day 1 (Monday). Furthermore, the patients reported signifi- cantly longer exercise duration on day 1, and more strength training on day 0 (Tuesday) (table 3). The strength training involved a significant amount of eccentric exercises. Importantly, all patients reported
that they had kept on with the high-intensity exercises despite significant muscular pain.
On multivariate analysis (logistic multiple regres- sion), a maximal level of exercise intensity on day 1 was the only independent predictor of rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria (p=0.02).
Biochemical markers of kidney injury
The patients had stable and normal serum creatinine of 85±12, 77±7 and 82±8 mmol/L (mean±SD) on day 1, day 3 and day 24, respectively. There was no difference in creatinine, cystatin C and eGFR between patients and controls (table 2). On day 24, all patients had a normal albumin/creatinine ratio in their urine (mean 0.5±0.3 mg/mmol).
Table 1 Demographics for patients and controls (ie, healthy fellow military recruits)
Age (years)
Gender (M/F)
BMI (kg/m2)
Tobacco habit (yes/no)
Alcohol use (yes/
no)
Dietary additive (yes/no)
Preservice exercise level*
Conscription board;
muscular strength†
Conscription board; aerobic capacity†
Patients, n=8
19.8±1.1 8/0 24.2±4.0 3/5 6/2 4/4 2.5±0.54 5.1±1.6 3.4±0.9
Controls, n=26
19.5±1.0 24/2 24.5±3.4 16/10 22/4 9/17 2.1±0.71 6.5±2.0 3.4±1.4
n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. p=0.05 n.s.
Age, BMI, preservice exercise level, muscular strength and aerobic capacity are given as arithmetic mean±SD.
*Questionnaire: three levels—1, no regular exercise; 2, regular exercise on an individual basis; 3, exercise organised by sports club with/
without competitions.
†Assessed with a semiquantitative method at the conscription board examination; nine levels (1–9)—higher is better.14 BMI, body mass index.
Table 2 Serum concentrations of muscular and renal biomarkers in patients and healthy controls on day 3 and in patients on day 24 after debut of rhabdomyolysis with discoloured urine
p Difference:
patients versus controls on day 3
Control subjects on day 3, n=26
Patients on day 3, n=8
Patients on day 24, n=8
p Difference:
patients on day 3 versus day 24
CK U/L p<0.0001 1553±2094 97 595±60 054 1994±4297 p=0.01
Myoglobinmg/L p<0.0001 133±103 5223±2900 269±606 p=0.003
NGALmg/L p=0.05 198±59 246±54 186±40 p=0.006
CRP mg/L p=0.03 4.1±3.9 13.3±14.2 2.8±2.3 p=0.09
Creatininemmol/L p=0.14 84±11 77±9 82±8 p=0.12
eGFR mL/min p=0.14 114±14 123±10 117±11 p=0.10
Cystatin C mg/L p=0.83 0.82±0.11 0.83±0.12 0.91±0.10 p=0.07
Data are given as arithmetic mean±SD (range).
CK, creatine kinase, laboratory reference interval is 50–400 U/L (men 18–49 years); myoglobin, laboratory reference interval is 30–80mg/L (men); NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; CRP, C reactive protein, laboratory reference interval is 0–4 mg/L (both sexes); creatinine, laboratory reference interval is 60–105mmol/L for men above 17 years; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate, laboratory reference interval is 93–131 mL/min (men 17–24 years); cystatin C, laboratory reference interval is 0.51–1.05 mg/L (both sexes).
On day 3, the patients had significantly higher serum concentrations of NGAL than the controls. Three weeks later, NGAL concentrations had decreased significantly from peak levels (table 2,figure 1).
DISCUSSION
The present findings confirm that sustained high- intensity physical activity is a crucial risk factor for the development of exertional rhabdomyolysis. All the patients reported that they continued with their high- intensity exercise despite significant muscular pain.
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
2 3 4 5 24
Days after injury S-Myoglobin
ng/L
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000
2 3 4 6 24
S-Creatine kinase U/L
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
2 3 4 5 24
S-NGAL mg/L
Days after injury Days after injury
(a) (b)
(c)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2 3 4 5 24
eGFR mL/min
Days after injury (d)
Figure 1 Serial parameters of muscular and renal injury in eight patients. The mean serum concentrations (±SD) of (a) creatine kinase (CK), (b) myoglobin, (c) neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and (d) estimated glomerular filtration
rate (eGFR) during the days following exertional muscular injury. Laboratory reference intervals: CK 50–400 U/L, myoglobin 30–
80mg/L and eGFR 93–131 mL/min. Day 0, debut of severe muscular symptoms with discoloured urine in the afternoon.
Therefore, failure to identify individual physical performance limits—both at an individual and supervi- sory level—appears to play an important role.
However, at an early stage, it may be difficult to distin- guish between ordinary training soreness and pathological muscle pain of rhabdomyolysis before it is too late. Typically, rhabdomyolysis occurs in healthy people when exposed to unaccustomed exercise, as was the case for these new recruits.
Causes of exertional rhabdomyolysis
Previous reports have been somewhat conflicting on the relative importance of work intensity, duration and volume.16 In the present study, exercise intensity, duration and type were all significant determinants of exertional rhabdomyolysis in univariate models. The patients reported higher intensity at all time-points during the 3-day period prior to hospitalisation for rhabdomyolysis. However, in a multivariate model, exercise intensity on day 1 appeared as the only inde- pendent predictor of exertional rhabdomyolysis. At this time-point all of the patients reported an intensity score of 9 or 10. This may indicate that the risk of rhabdomyolysis is present primarily at the highest exercise intensity levels, whereas lower levels carry less risk of exertional rhabdomyolysis. Moreover, it appears to be possible to quantify the risk of rhabdomyolysis by a simple questionnaire.
Patients and controls had the same aerobic capacity at enrolment for military service, but patients had lower muscular strength. This finding suggests that patients were at a good fitness level, but had less expe- rience with muscular training, and therefore more prone to overuse injury. The present study provides no definite answers, but it is possible that a combination of personal ambition, external pressure and insufficient understanding of the risks paved the way for exertional muscular injury.
The findings need to be interpreted with caution due to small sample size. However, there are few confounding factors: Both patients and controls were previously healthy and had similar background in regard to age, gender, BMI, fitness and ethnicity. We did not test for the asymptomatic sickle cell trait or genetic muscle diseases that may predispose for rhab- domyolysis.17 18 However, the patients did not report previous episodes of rhabdomyolysis and had muscular strength within normal limits. Therefore, we think that underlying genetic disorders were of no importance in the present study. Furthermore, there was little nega- tive influence from ambient temperature, alcohol, legal or illicit drugs, toxins or metabolic disorders.13 Admit- tedly, recall bias may be possible.
Prevention of exertional rhabdomyolysis
The present findings suggest some possible targets for the prevention of exertional rhabdomyolysis. However, it is important to emphasise that these measures need to be tested in future prospective studies.
First, prevention of exertional rhabdomyolysis requires increased awareness and education, both directed against individuals who participate in physical exercise and others who supervise physical exercise.
Second, the use of a self-perceived muscular intensity scale may be a useful aid to guide the intensity level of physical exercise.
Third, complementary use of CK concentrations may be of help in case of uncertainty. A mildly elevated CK level in serum is common after physical exercise and may be regarded as a normal response. Mougios
19reported an adjusted laboratory reference interval for male athletes during training and competition: 82–
1083 U/L. Serum CK concentrations rising above 5000 U/L indicate significant muscle injury with risk of acute kidney injury.2 20 In the present study, the patients had peak CK levels 10–50 times higher than this limit.
Table 3 Self-reported physical activity during the last 3 days before debut of rhabdomyolysis with discoloured urine
Day 2 (Sunday) Day 1 (Monday) Day 0 (Tuesday)
Exercise type*
A/S/M/
No
Exercise duration† (min)
Exercise intensity‡
Exercise type*
A/S/M/
No
Exercise duration† (min)
Exercise intensity‡
Exercise type*
A/S/M/
No
Exercise duration† (min)
Exercise intensity‡
Patients, n=8
5/0/1/2 19±16 5.6±1.7 0/8/0/0 137±55 9.6±0.5 1/7/0/0 69±24 7.6±1.4
Controls, n=26
5/3/5/13 28±36 2.0±2.5 1/16/7/2 76±45 5.1±3.2 7/7/9/3 59±40 4.9±3.2
n.s. n.s. p=0.002 n.s. p=0.004 p=0.002 p=0.02 n.s. p=0.04
Day 0, debut of severe muscular symptoms with discoloured urine in the afternoon.
*Exercise type: four categories; A, aerobic training; S, strength training; M, mixed training; No, no exercise.
†Exercise duration: self-reported by questionnaire (min, mean±SD).
zExercise intensity: self-reported by questionnaire (10 levels (1–10) mean±SD).
Biomarkers of acute kidney injury
Myoglobin is released from injured muscle and filtered by the kidneys, imparting a dark red-brown colour to the urine.21 The iron-containing myoglobin has toxic effects in the kidney, such as vasoconstriction, cast formation and proximal tubular injury.1High levels of serum myoglobin appear to predict acute kidney injury, especially with concentrations over 15 000mg/
L.22
In the present study, the eight patients had high serum myoglobin levels with potential risk of kidney injury, but maintained a stable kidney function. It appears that myoglobinuria seldom causes acute kidney failure in patients without volume depletion.1
In clinical practice, kidney function is evaluated by means of serial creatinine levels. However, serum creat- inine may be regarded a slow and insensitive biomarker as concentrations do not rise above normal until a significant amount of kidney function has been lost.23Cystatin C may be somewhat better for detecting changes in glomerular filtration rate.24 In the present study, all the patients had stable and normal GFR, as estimated by both creatinine and cystatin C.
The new biomarker NGAL appears to be related to tubular injury or stress.25 After acute renal injury the tubular cells undergo a complex sequence of events. As a part of this, NGAL is rapidly upregulated and concentrations increase markedly in urine and plasma.26 Therefore, NGAL has been advocated as an early and more sensitive marker of acute kidney injury.27 28NGAL concentrations may be influenced by other factors such as pre-existing renal disease and infections. The best results for NGAL as a marker of acute kidney injury have been demonstrated in young populations without comorbidities and with a well- defined timing of the pathogenic event, such as in the present study.27 NGAL has diverse functions in the kidney; it may modulate cellular responses, have iron- binding properties and may serve to limit tubular damage.29We observed elevated serum levels of NGAL in our patients, and this probably indicates stress and/
or structural damage of the tubular cells. Three weeks after the injury, NGAL concentrations had decreased from peak levels and there was no evidence of perma- nent kidney injury.
In conclusion, sustained high-intensity physical activity, exceeding muscular functional capacity, is a crucial risk factor for exertional rhabdomyolysis.
During physical exercise it may be difficult to distin- guish between ordinary muscular training soreness and alarming muscular pain at the initial stages. However, the present findings indicate that it may be possible to quantify the risk of rhabdomyolysis by a simple questionnaire.
Although traditional markers of renal function often remain within normal limits in exertional rhabdomyol- ysis with gross pigmenturia, elevated serum NGAL may
indicate the presence of renal stress or subclinical injury.
In the future, measures should be taken to prevent exertional rhabdomyolysis by providing information and awareness of the condition to persons who partici- pate in or supervise physical exercise.
Limitations
A rhabdomyolysis questionnaire will need to be vali- dated in a larger prospective study with calculation of sensitivity and specificity and receiver operator charac- teristic analysis. Furthermore, specific questions should be added to exclude underlying genetic diseases.
Acknowledgements The authors want to thank the staff at the local military health service for their invaluable help. We thank the recruits for their interest and efforts. We are grateful for the support from The Joint Medical Service of The Norwegian Armed Forces.
Contributors TA and SØ designed the study. TA, TD, TOD, EMS and IST recruited subjects and obtained clinical data. TA, TD, TOD and AA° obtained and/or analysed blood samples. TA and SØ analysed data and drafted the manuscript. All authors actively contributed in reviewing, revising and approving the manuscript.
Funding Free research funding from the Research Group of Internal Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital.
Competing interests Two of the authors were employed by the Norwegian Armed Forces at the time. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Provided by The Regional Ethics Committee, REK west, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (2015/1509/REK vest).
Provenance and peer review The study was conducted without any interference from the Norwegian Armed Forces and is not commissioned;
externally peer reviewed. The Joint Medical Service played no role in design of the study, interpretation of data or preparation of the manuscript.
Data sharing statement All study data available from the authors. There are no additional unpublished data.
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
REFERENCES
1 Zager RA. Rhabdomyolysis and myohemoglobinuric acute renal failure.Kidney Int1996;49:314–26.
2 Huerta-Alardı´n AL, Varon J, Marik PE. Bench-to-bedside review:
Rhabdomyolysis – an overview for clinicians.Crit Care 2005;9:158–69.
3 Sinert R, Kohl L, Rainone T,et al. Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis.
Ann Emerg Med1994;23:1301–6.
4 Giannoglou GD, Chatzizisis YS, Misirli G. The syndrome of rhabdomyolysis: Pathophysiology and diagnosis.Eur J Intern Med 2007;18:90–100.
5 Wrogemann K, Pena SD. Mitochondrial calcium overload: a general mechanism for cell-necrosis in muscle diseases.Lancet
1976;1:672–4.
6 Lee G. Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis.R I Med J2014;97:22–4.
7 Smoot MK, Amendola A, Cramer E,et al. A cluster of exertional rhabdomyolysis affecting a Division I Football team.Clin J Sport Med 2013;23:365–72.
8 USAF. Update: Exertional rhabdomyolysis, active component, U.S.
Armed Forces, 2010-2014.MSMR2015;22:22–5.
9 Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Update: Exertional rhabdomyolysis, active component, U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, 2011-2015.MSMR2016;23:21–4.
10 Lin H, Chie W, Lien H,et al. Epidemiological analysis of factors influencing an episode of exertional rhabdomyolysis in high school students.Am J Sports Med2006;34:481–6.
11 Galvez R, Stacy J, Howley A,et al. Exertional rhabdomyolysis in seven division-1 swimming athletes.Clin J Sport Med2008;18:366–8.
12 Alpers JP, Jones LK. Natural history of exertional rhabdomyolysis: a population-based analysis.Muscle Nerve2010;42:487–91.
13 Bagley WH, Yang H, Shah KH,et al.Intern Emerg Med2007;2:210–8.
14 Aandstad A, Hageberg R. Reliability and validity of a New Treadmill Test for Screening prospective military recruits.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise2012;44(Suppl 2):204–5.
15 Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH,et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.Ann Intern Med2009;150:604–12.
16 Baird MF, Graham SM, Baker JS,et al. Creatine-kinase- and exercise-related muscle damage implications for muscle performance and recovery.J Nutr Metab2012;2012:1–13.
17 Scalco RS, Snoeck M, Quinlivan R,et al. Exertional rhabdomyolysis:
physiological response or manifestation of an underlying myopathy?
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2016;2:e000151.
18 Nelson DA, Deuster PA, Carter R,et al. Sickle Cell Trait,
Rhabdomyolysis, and Mortality among U.S. Army Soldiers.N Engl J Med2016;375:435–42.
19 Mougios V. Reference intervals for serum creatine kinase in athletes.
Br J Sports Med2007;41:674–8.
20 Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L,et al. Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?J Trauma2004;56:1191–6.
21 David WS. Myoglobinuria.Neurol Clin2000;18:215–43.
22 Premru V, KovacJ, Ponikvar R,et al. Use of myoglobin as a marker and predictor in myoglobinuric acute kidney injury.Ther Apher Dial 2013;17:391–5.
23 Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C. Defining acute renal failure:
physiological principles.Intensive Care Med2004;30:33–7.
24 Ahlstr€om A, Tallgren M, Peltonen S,et al. Evolution and predictive power of serum cystatin C in acute renal failure.Clin Nephrol 2004;62:344–50.
25 Devarajan P. Review: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a troponin-like biomarker for human acute kidney injury.Nephrology 2010;15:419–28.
26 Mishra J, Mori K, Ma Q,et al. Amelioration of ischemic acute renal injury by neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.J Am Soc Nephrol2004;15:3073–82.
27 Vanmassenhove J, Vanholder R, Nagler E,et al. Urinary and serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury: an in-depth review of the literature.Nephrol Dial Transplant2013;28:254–73.
28 Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Salvagno GL,et al. Variation of serum and urinary neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) after strenuous physical exercise.Clin Chem Lab Med
2012;50:1585–9.
29 Schmidt-Ott KM, Mori K, Li JY,et al. Dual action of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.J Am Soc Nephrol
2007;18:407–13.
with renal stress
Risk factors for exertional rhabdomyolysis
Thorsen, Tom Ole Dalsrud and Stein Ørn
Terje Apeland, Tore Danielsen, Eva M Staal, Anders Åsberg, Inga S
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000241
2017 3:
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
http://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000241 Updated information and services can be found at:
These include:
References
#BIBL http://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000241
This article cites 29 articles, 5 of which you can access for free at:
Open Access
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
non-commercial. See:
provided the original work is properly cited and the use is
non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work
Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative
service Email alerting
box at the top right corner of the online article.
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
Notes
http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions To request permissions go to:
http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To order reprints go to:
http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/
To subscribe to BMJ go to:
