Communication in teaching
• Feedback skill
• Speaking in class
• Handling conflict
Pic 1 Pic 1
”–It´s something with the moon, gravitation”.
”– If this plate is Earth and my coffee cup is the Moon, then…”
”–Isn´t there a 6hr cycle? Any ideas why?”
”–I think the Sun is involved too..”
”–I remember when I visited the coast of X, …”
”– Anders’ idea with centrifugal/centripetal slingshot forces, really?”
What is tide? Which mechanisms are
Involved?
Identifying and handling
conflicts
-“ Well, that comes with some extra work for me, and you will not provide feedback to your group peers; have you considered that? Next peer feedback occasion is in 9
months, so you will not be able to finish the course until then”.
-”I figure I´ll be absent this week, after all, the Lund
carneval is only once in 4yrs. I guess it´s OK to catch up next week?”
Parent Parent
Adult Adult
Child Child Teacher
Berne (1978), transaction analysis
Student
-”..Right, time to load the ipod for ..”
-”Be onboard the excursion buss tomorrow 8 sharp! Boots on! I´ll compare number of signed out geo-hammers with signed participants in the
quarry, so don´t try to cheat”.
Parent Parent
Adult Adult
Child Child
Lärare Student
Berne (1978), transaction analysis
Really nasty behaviour..
• Mobbing techniques
– To ignore – To ridicule
– To withhold info
– ”Damn you if you do – damn you if you don´t” – Insinuate guilt
From interview of Berit Ås
Speaking in front of class
Stress & anxiety
Performance
Stress level
Heavy swetting, High pulse,
Shallow breathing Escape behaviour, etc..
Listeners attention depends on
• Recognition
• Experienced relevance
• Consequence
Leverl of attention
20 minutes
The talk..
vs everything else..
(cf. Hemlin 1960, Bligh 2000)
Feedback–
all you need is to:
1. Create the opportunity (time/space)..
2. ..communicate feedback criteria early..
3. ..let feedback come from you & others..
4. .. in a astructured way..
5. ..express it so that it will not be rejected
1 Opportunity
• Schedule/negotiate time & space
• Make the students produce ”X”
– Dialogue, experiment, problem,, etc
?
? ? !
2 Criteria
• Make them explicit.
• ”A first class answer/lab report report/thesis/
includes.., a weak report is typically..”
3 Design feedback from..
• You, the teacher
– (but, risk of the socratic bottle-neck)
• Peer students
• The performing student him/her-self
• The lab gear, etc
Overall coherence and focus
Logical flow of information between and within section Matching tables and graphs with text Links between
paragraphs
Headings Links between Sentences
Jargon Abstract words Grammar
Spelling Capitalization Page layout Punctuation
Most complex tasks
Least complex tasks
Suggested feedback order
Från Handal & Lauvås (2008). Urspr. Brown (1994)
4 Structured feedback,
example
Scenario:You have just got an envelope back from the editor of the high impact journal, Journal of Your Own Research (JoYOR). Both reviewers value the ms similarly (accepted after moderate revision), but expresses their feedback quite differently. Here´s just a copied sentence from their letters trying to state similar judgment;
Reviewer 1: “This text section on ABC is sloppy - not good enough – change. Logic is unclear!”.
Reviewer 2: “Ideas A and B seem congruent to me, but I could not follow how arguments A and B could lead to conclusion C. Could you please clarify this?”
Case: reviewers feedback skills.
Find at least 4 principal differences
5 Feedback that triggers performance change, not
rejection by the receiver
Efficient feedback is thus..
• me-message, i.e., represents your reaction
• Balanced, negative & positive
• Concrete for both –”-, not general
• Helpful, not judgmental
• Immediate, not “ bottled up irritation ”
• Questions, rather than statements
• You did great advances this yr!
• I see you already got three ms in press this yr!
• You ran that research group meeting really poorly; I´m disappointed.
• I found the meeting problematic. You seemed to make Jan-Ingvar loose face deliberately. Not typical for your normal meeting style in my view.
• Those calibration mistakes 2yrs ago will certainly be costly at your dissertation day.
• When I checked your data calibration last week I found errors in the range of a
magnitude. If you don’t deal with this now I guess there will be difficulties at your
dissertation.
• You are not convincing when you present your research so hesitantly, with a weak voice and unstable body language.
• I´ve noticed you tend to speak quietly and move back to the wall. I suggest you move 3m closer to the audience and start from
there with your most compelling research issue, and why it intrigues you!
Learning in lab/field
• Student
– Encounters problem/difficulty – Gathers useful facts
– Estimates approximate direction of solution – Erects a hypothesis based on the facts
– Sketches personal theory on how aspects relate to eachother – Experiments to verifiery/deny hypotheses and theories
John Dewey (1859-1956)
Typical intentions of lab/field learning activities
•
Illustrate/demonstrate theory•
Develop practical lab abilities•
Inspire and motivate•
Get feedback on currently developing knowledge•
Develop analytical critical thinking•
Facilitate the understanding of scientific work•
Develop collaborative skills•
Develop the language of the subject discipline(cf. Hult 1999)
” Observation X in the lab didn ´ t fit given theory Z from previous
lecture ”
• Guess and discuss possible student reactions and compare with your own conclusion
”There´s nothing as practical as a good theory” (Lewin 1952)
Observation Theory
Observation
Theory
P-E Ellström Integrating Learning and Work: Problems and Prospects
Adaptive and developmental
learning
Questionaire: Is there a gap between lectures and labs?
Students:
”Yes, this is typical”
TAs:
”Yes, this is typical”
Lecturers:
”If students and TAs say it is, yes..”
Barri et al 2006: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice on an Example of Chemical Laboratory (LTH course report, 20pp)
Lab/Field Lect
Lect Lect
Lect
Lab/Field
Lab/Field
Lab/Field Lect
Lect Lect
Lect
Lab/Field
Lab/Field
Lecturers view
Students’ view
OK, but is this gap a significant problem?
Students:
”Yes, this is typical”
TAs:
”Yes, this is typical”
Lecturers:
”Yes, if students and TAs say
so..”
”No, it´s ok, it´s normal!”
”It is a
frustrating problem!”
”I don´t think this is a big problem”
Barri et al 2006: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice on an Example of Chemical Laboratory (LTH course report, 20pp)
Bridging the gap
lecture lab lecture
Barri et al 2006: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice on an Example of Chemical Laboratory (LTH course report, 20pp)