Transfer Potential of Plasmids Conferring Extended-Spectrum-Cephalosporin Resistance in Escherichia coli from Poultry

(1)

Transfer Potential of Plasmids Conferring Extended-Spectrum-Cephalosporin

Resistance in Escherichia coli from Poultry

Solveig Sølverød Mo,^aMarianne Sunde,^a,bHanna Karin Ilag,^c*Solveig Langsrud,^d Even Heir^d

Department of Diagnostic Services, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway^a; Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway^b; Department of Chemistry,

Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway^c; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Noﬁma, The Norwegian Institute for Food, Fishery and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway^d

ABSTRACT

Escherichia coli strains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC) are widely distributed in Norwegian broiler production, and the majority harbor transferable IncK or IncI1 plasmids carrying bla

_CMY-2

. Persistent occurrence in broiler farms may occur through the survival of ESC-resistant E. coli strains in the farm envi- ronment, or by transfer and maintenance of resistance plasmids within a population of environmental bacteria with high survival abilities. The aim of this study was to determine the transferability of two successful bla

CMY-2

-carrying plasmids belonging to the incompatibility groups IncK and IncI1 into E. coli and Serratia species recipi- ents. Initially, conjugative plasmid transfer from two E. coli donors to potential re- cipients was tested in an agar assay. Conjugation was further investigated for se- lected mating pairs in surface and planktonic assays at temperatures from 12°C to 37°C. Transfer of plasmids was observed on agar, in broth, and in bioﬁlm at temper- atures down to 25°C. The IncK plasmid was able to transfer into Serratia marcescens, and transconjugants were able to act as secondary plasmid donors to different E.

coli and Serratia species recipients. All transconjugants displayed an AmpC pheno- type corresponding to the acquisition of bla

_CMY-2

. In summary, the results indicate that the IncK plasmid may transfer between E. coli and Serratia spp. under condi- tions relevant for broiler production.

IMPORTANCE

Certain bla

_CMY-2

-carrying plasmids are successful and disseminated in European broiler production. Traditionally, plasmid transferability has been studied under conditions that are optimal for bacterial growth. Plasmid transfer has previ- ously been reported between E. coli bacteria in bioﬁlms at 37°C and in broth at tem- peratures ranging from 8 to 37°C. However, intergenus transfer of bla

_CMY-2

-carrying plasmids from E. coli to environmental bacteria in the food-processing chain has not been previously studied. We demonstrate that bla

_CMY-2

-carrying plasmids are capa- ble of conjugative transfer between different poultry-associated bacterial genera un- der conditions relevant for broiler production. Transfer to Serratia spp. and to hosts with good bioﬁlm-forming abilities and with the potential to act as secondary plas- mid donors to new hosts might contribute to the persistence of these resistance plasmids. These results contribute to increased knowledge of factors affecting the persistence of ESC resistance in broiler production and can provide a basis for im- provement of routines and preventive measures.

KEYWORDS

AmpC, bioﬁlms, cephalosporin, conjugation, plasmid-mediated resistance

Received28 March 2017Accepted6 April 2017

Accepted manuscript posted online14 April 2017

CitationMo SS, Sunde M, Ilag HK, Langsrud S, Heir E. 2017. Transfer potential of plasmids conferring extended-spectrum-cephalosporin resistance inEscherichia colifrom poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00654-17.https://doi .org/10.1128/AEM.00654-17.

EditorDonald W. Schaffner, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Address correspondence to Solveig Sølverød Mo, [email protected].

*Present address: Hanna Karin Ilag, Division for Medical Microbiology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

HEALTH MICROBIOLOGY

crossm

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(2)

D uring the course of the last decade, an increasing occurrence of Escherichia coli strains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC) has been observed in both human and veterinary medicine (1, 2). This is concerning, as ESC are considered critically important for the treatment of human infections (3), and a reduced number of antimicrobials are available for treatment of infections caused by ESC-resistant bacteria (4). Recently, the World Health Organization included ESC-resistant Enterobacteriaceae on the top of their list of bacteria for which new antimicrobials are urgently required (5). Broilers and broiler products have been reported to be highly associated with ESC-resistant E. coli strains worldwide (1, 6). Furthermore, they have been suggested as a potential source from which humans can acquire such bacteria and/or their resistance plasmids (6–9). The Norwegian monitoring program for antimicrobial resistance in the veterinary sector (NORM-VET) has documented that ESC-resistant E. coli strains are widely distributed in Norwegian broiler production. All isolates have displayed an AmpC phenotype, mainly mediated by plasmids carrying bla

_CMY-2

(10–13).

Conjugative plasmids of incompatibility (Inc) groups K and I1 carrying bla

_CMY-2

have been associated with ESC-resistant E. coli strains from the broiler production chain in several European countries, including Norway (14–19). Also, highly similar IncK plas- mids have been detected in E. coli strains of different multilocus sequence types (STs) (19). A high degree of similarity has been identiﬁed between IncK (19, 20) and IncI1 (S. S.

Mo and M. Sunde, unpublished data) plasmids with bla

_CMY-2

isolated from broiler production in Norway and other European countries (20, 21) (Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). The ﬁndings suggest that these plasmids may be common and successful and represent plasmids endemic in European broiler production.

Import of breeding animals has been suggested as the probable source of ESC- resistant E. coli into Norwegian broiler production (22, 23), as the use of antimicrobial agents is almost absent (24–26). The number of imported batches of breeding animals positive for ESC-resistant E. coli is currently low (24, 25). Also, it has been suggested that ESC-resistant E. coli persists on broiler farms, even between production cycles (27, 28), and that the epidemiology is also affected by the transfer of ESC resistance plasmids between bacteria (29).

In broiler production, bacteria are likely to be present in suspension, on surfaces, and occasionally in biofilms. Bacteria in biofilms will form multispecies or multigenus consortia where bacterial interaction can occur under different environmental condi- tions and temperatures (30). Both conjugative transfer of plasmids and transduction of bacteriophages between bacteria in biofilm have been reported (31, 32). In general, conjugal transfer of plasmids has often been studied under optimal growth conditions not reflecting the conditions encountered in food production. We performed conjugation experiments on agar, in broth, and in biofilm to mimic bacterial growth on surfaces, in suspension, and in biofilm. Furthermore, all experiments were per- formed at three different temperatures, mimicking different parts of broiler production in addition to optimal growth conditions.

E. coli strains harboring successful plasmids with bla

_CMY-2

at several levels of the broiler production pyramid may facilitate horizontal spread and dissemination to other bacterial hosts in the environment, including hosts with good survival abilities. This may also play an important role in the epidemiology and maintenance of ESC resistance in broiler production. Serratia spp. are environmental bacteria commonly occurring in broiler production (33–36). In addition, they can have the ability to survive and multiply in the presence of disinfectants (37) and to be good bioﬁlm producers (38–40). We therefore hypothesized that Serratia spp. may act as a reservoir for and secondary donor of ESC resistance plasmids. The aim of this study was to determine the trans- ferability of two well-characterized bla

_CMY-2

-carrying plasmids belonging to the IncK and IncI1 incompatibility groups. Transfer experiments were performed with other E.

coli and Serratia spp. as recipient strains at different temperatures and under both planktonic and bioﬁlm modes of growth, reﬂecting conditions relevant for the broiler production chain.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(3)

(Parts of the results of this study were presented at the 26th ECCMID conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 9 to 12 April 2016.)

RESULTS

In the initial conjugation experiments on agar, transfer of pNVI1292 carrying IncK (pNVI1292/IncK) from E. coli 1292 was observed to seven out of 14 E. coli recipients and four out of 18 Serratia species recipients (Table 1). In addition, the plasmid was transferred from Serratia marcescens and Serratia proteamaculans transconjugants to the same seven E. coli recipients. Furthermore, pNVI1292/IncK was transferred from S.

marcescens transconjugants to an S. proteamaculans recipient and from the S. pro- teamaculans transconjugant to an S. marcescens recipient. The pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid from E. coli 2798 was transferred to 12 out of 14 E. coli recipients. No transfer of pNVI2798/IncI1 to Serratia species recipients was observed in the initial conjugation experiment. In addition, we were unable to transform the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid into Serratia spp. by electroporation in subsequent control experiments. The pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli DH5

␣

, and the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid was transformed into all three electrocompetent recipients (S. marcescens 3306 and 3307 and DH5

␣

), conﬁrming that the method used was reliable.

PCR screening for the IncK and IncI1 replicons showed that none of the recipient strains carried IncK or IncI1 plasmids prior to the experiments.

Seven mating pairs were selected and subjected to extended conjugation experi- ments under various temperatures and modes of bacterial growth (Tables 2 and 3). In the extended conjugation experiments, plasmid transfer was observed on agar, in

TABLE 1Overview of results from initial conjugation experiments on agar

Recipient

Donor (strain, plasmid)^a E. coli1292,

IncK

E. coli2798, IncI1

S. marcescens3306 transconjugant, IncK

S. marcescens3307 transconjugant, IncK

S. proteamaculans5685 transconjugant, IncK

E. coli1553 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP NP

E. coli6154 ⫺ ⫹ NP NP NP

E. coli7079 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP NP

E. coli3460-5 ⫺ ⫹ NP NP NP

E. coli6927-5 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli1268 ⫹ ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli1450 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli1667 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli4922 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli5792 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli3064-2 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli4064-1 ⫺ ⫹ NP NP NP

S. marcescens2336 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP ⫺

S. marcescens3297 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP NP

S. marcescens3306 ⫹ ⫺ NP NP ⫺

S. marcescens3307 ⫹ ⫺ NP NP ⫹

S. marcescens3309 ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ ⫺

Serratiasp. 3612 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP NP

S. liquefaciens5676 ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺

S. proteamaculans5682 ⫺ ⫺ NP NP NP

S. proteamaculans5685 ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ NP

a⫹, conﬁrmed plasmid transfer;⫺, no observed plasmid transfer; NP, not performed.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(4)

broth, and in bioﬁlm at 25, 30, and 37°C (Tables 2 and 3). No plasmid transfer was observed at 12°C (data not shown).

When transfer of plasmids occurred in the bioﬁlm experiments, the transfer fre- quencies of the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid (T/R) ranged from 5

⫻

10

^⫺⁷

to 8

⫻

10

^⫺²

. The highest frequencies were observed between E. coli-E. coli mating pairs, ranging from 3

⫻

10

^⫺⁶

to 8

⫻

10

^⫺²

(Table 3). Furthermore, the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid was transferred from E. coli to S. marcescens, from the S. marcescens transconjugant to an E. coli recipient, and from the S. marcescens transconjugant to an S. proteamaculans recipient in biofilm. The confirmed routes for horizontal transfer of the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid in biofilm are illustrated in Fig. 1. The transfer frequencies observed for the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid ranged from 4

⫻

10

^⫺⁵

to 2

⫻

10

^⫺²

. The pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid was not subjected to conjugation experiments with S. marcescens as a recipient in bioﬁlm on steel coupons, as no transfer was observed after the initial conjugation experiments on agar. In general, the transfer frequencies were higher at 30°C/37°C than at 25°C.

None of the recipient strains were resistant to any beta-lactam antimicrobials prior to the conjugation experiments. All transconjugants displayed a beta-lactam resistance proﬁle corresponding to an AmpC phenotype after acquisition of either the pNVI1292/

IncK or pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid (Table 4). No additional determinants conferring resis- tance to the antimicrobials tested were transferred with the plasmids (Table S2).

DISCUSSION

Conjugative IncK and IncI1 plasmids harboring bla

_CMY-2

are commonly occurring in ESC-resistant E. coli strains in European broiler production (14–19). To our knowledge, this is the ﬁrst description of the transfer of these plasmids between E. coli and Serratia spp. under conditions relevant in the broiler production chain. In food-processing environments, bacteria will be present and grow on the surfaces of equipment and

TABLE 2Overview of results from extended conjugation experiments on agar and in broth

Mating pair (donor¡recipient) Mating time (h)

Conjugation result at/in^a:

25°C 30/37°C^b

Agar Broth^c Agar Broth^c

E. coli1292(IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli2798(IncI1)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

E. coli1292(IncK)¡S. marcescens3306 4 NA NA ⫺ ⫹

24 ⫹ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹

48 ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹

E. coli1292(IncK)¡S. marcescens3307 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

S. marcescens3306 transconjugant (IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

S. marcescens3307 transconjugant (IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

S. marcescens3307 transconjugant (IncK)¡S. proteamaculans5685 4 NA NA ⫹ ⫹

24 ⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹

48 ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹

a⫹, conﬁrmed transfer of plasmid carryingblaCMY-2;⫺, no observed transfer ofblaCMY-2-carrying plasmid; NA, not applicable.

b30°C was applied for all matings involvingSerratiaspp., while 37°C was applied for matings involvingE. colionly.

cTransconjugant detection limit, 10 CFU/ml.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(5)

environments where bioﬁlm formation and interaction between organisms are likely to occur. Likewise, the present bacteria will also be suspended in liquids, both during process and postprocess cleaning and disinfection. Conjugation experiments were therefore performed on surfaces, in bioﬁlms on stainless steel, and in suspension at

TABLE 3Overview of maximum transfer frequencies for different mating pairs and incubation times for conjugation experiments in bioﬁlm

Mating pair (donor¡recipient) Mating time (h)

Transfer frequency at^a:

25°C 30/37°C^b

E. coli1292(IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA NTD

24 3⫻10^⫺6 5⫻10^⫺4

48 3⫻10^⫺6 8⫻10^⫺2

E. coli2798(IncI1)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA 4⫻10^⫺5

24 NTD 4⫻10^⫺3

48 NTD 2⫻10^⫺2

E. coli1292(IncK)¡S. marcescens3306 4 NA NTD

24 NTD NTD

48 NTD NTD

E. coli1292(IncK)¡S. marcescens3307 4 NA NTD

24 NTD NTD

48 NTD 7⫻10^⫺6

S. marcescens3306 transconjugant (IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA 9⫻10^⫺6

24 2⫻10^⫺6 2⫻10^⫺5

48 NTD 3⫻10^⫺4

S. marcescens3307 transconjugant (IncK)¡E. coli6927-5 4 NA 1⫻10^⫺5

24 2⫻10^⫺5 6⫻10^⫺4

48 9⫻10^⫺5 2⫻10^⫺3

S. marcescens3307 transconjugant (IncK)¡S. proteamaculans5685 4 NA NTD

24 NTD NTD

48 NTD 5⫻10^⫺7

aThe transfer frequencies are calculated as the total number of transconjugants (T) divided by the total number of recipients (R). NTD, no transconjugants detected, transfer frequency of⬍5⫻10^⫺7; NA, not applicable.

b30°C was applied for all matings involvingSerratiaspp., while 37°C was applied for matings involvingE. colionly.

FIG 1Schematic overview of confirmed routes of conjugative transfer in biofilm for the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid harboringbla_CMY-2commonly found inE. colistrains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins isolated from retail chicken meat. The red circle symbolizes the IncK plasmid in the initialE. coli host. The arrows indicate the routes of transfer confirmed in this study.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(6)

various temperatures. Transfer of plasmids was observed in conjugation experiments on agar, in broth, and in bioﬁlm at 25°C and 30/37°C. In general, we observed higher transfer of plasmids at 30/37°C than at 25°C, which is in correspondence with previous ﬁndings (41). The fact that horizontal transfer of plasmids occurs at 25°C might indicate a possible relevance in parts of the production chain with higher temperatures, such as inside the broiler house. Low temperatures have been reported to decrease the conjugal transfer of plasmids in broth matings (41). No plasmid transfer was observed at 12°C. This indicates that conjugal transfer of resistance plasmids is a limited problem in the parts of food production where low temperatures are applied. Low temperatures in processing units may thus reduce or inhibit horizontal transfer of plasmids as well as hamper microbial growth. On the other hand, transfer of plasmids has previously been reported to take place at 8°C (41). Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the plasmids can be transferred to and maintained within hosts that can facilitate further dissemination under growth conditions that are suboptimal for mesophilic E. coli but more optimal for psychrophilic bacteria.

Bacteria in biofilm can have an increased ability to survive cleaning and disinfection (42–45), possibly serving as a reservoir for recontamination of environments and foods after disinfection. All recipients included in the biofilm experiments showed moderate to good biofilm-forming abilities on stainless steel coupons at 12°C and 25°C (data not shown). Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that survival of ESC-resistant bacteria in biofilm, together with conjugative transfer of plasmids, is also a part of the puzzle when it comes to the maintenance and dissemination of ESC-resistant bacteria and plasmids.

We have demonstrated the ability of the pNVI1292/IncK plasmid to transfer within and between genera in the Enterobacteriaceae family. In addition, we have shown that transconjugants can act as secondary plasmid donors. The relatively high transfer frequencies observed from S. marcescens transconjugants to E. coli recipients indicate the ability of environmental bacteria to be efﬁcient contributors in the dissemination of IncK resistance plasmids. The ability of Serratia spp. to acquire and harbor such resistance plasmids and act as secondary plasmid donors support the hypothesis that Serratia spp. can represent a reservoir for plasmid-mediated ESC resistance.

The pNVI1292/IncK and pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmids differed in their ability to transfer to or replicate within different Enterobacteriaceae hosts. Both plasmids were transferred to E. coli recipients, but no transfer of the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid to Serratia species recipients was observed in any of our conjugation or transformation experiments. None of the recipient strains were shown to harbor other IncI1 plasmids and should therefore be able to receive the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid. Based on these results, it was not possible to determine if the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid is unable to transfer into Serratia species hosts or if it is unable to replicate within Serratia species hosts. As only a limited number of strains and mating combinations were investigated, transfer of the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid or related plasmids to Serratia spp. cannot be excluded. Further

TABLE 4MICs of beta-lactam antimicrobials for recipient strains before acquisition of pNVI1292/IncK or pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid, and for transconjugants after acquisition of pNVI1292/IncK and pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmids

Recipient/transconjugant strain (plasmid)

MIC (epidemiological cutoff value for antimicrobial) (mg/liter)^a

FOX (8) ETP (0.06)

IMI (0.5)

MERO (0.12)

TAZ (0.5)

FEP (0.12)

F/C (0.25/4)

T/C (0.5/4)

FOT (0.25)

TRM (NA)

E. coli6927-5 4 ⱕ0.015 ⱕ0.12 ⱕ0.03 ⱕ0.25 ⱕ0.06 ⱕ0.06/4 ⱕ0.012/4 ⱕ0.25 4

E. coli6927-5(IncK) 32 0.03 ⱕ0.12 ⱕ0.03 8 0.12 4/4 4/4 4 4

E. coli6927-5(IncI1) 64 0.03 ⱕ0.12 ⱕ0.03 16 0.25 4/4 8/4 8 4

S. marcescens3306 16 ⱕ0.015 0.5 0.06 ⱕ0.25 ⱕ0.06 ⱕ0.06/4 0.5/4 ⱕ0.25 8

S. marcescens3306(IncK) 32 0.03 0.5 0.06 8 0.25 4/4 8/4 4 8

S. marcescens3307 8 ⱕ0.015 0.5 ⱕ0.03 ⱕ0.25 ⱕ0.06 ⱕ0.06/4 ⱕ0.12/4 ⱕ0.25 8

S. marcescens3307(IncK) 32 0.06 0.5 0.6 8 0.25 8/4 8/4 4 8

S. proteamaculans5685 4 ⱕ0.015 0.25 ⱕ0.03 ⱕ0.25 ⱕ0.06 ⱕ0.06/4 ⱕ0.12/4 ⱕ0.25 4

S. proteamaculans5685(IncK) 64 ⱕ0.015 0.25 ⱕ0.03 2 0.12 4/4 1/4 8 4

aFOX, cefoxitin; ETP, ertapenem; IMI, imipenem; MERO, meropenem; TAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; F/C, cefotaxime-clavulanic acid; T/C, ceftazidime-clavulanic acid;

FOT, cefotaxime; TRM, temocillin; NA, not available.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(7)

experiments should be performed in order to determine whether pNVI1292/IncK has a higher ability of transfer to and propagate in different bacterial hosts than pNVI2798/

IncI1.

In the bioﬁlm experiments, the number of transconjugants increased with time, which has also been described previously (46). However, with the method used here, it is not possible to determine if (i) this was due to an increased number of conjugative transfers from donor to recipient, (ii) transconjugants started to act as donors as well, (iii) transconjugant strains reproduced in the bioﬁlm, or (iv) a combination of the three.

Furthermore, it is not possible to exclude that the observed plasmid transfer in biofilm may actually have occurred in the broth in which the steel coupon with the biofilm was submerged. Recipient cells from the biofilm might have detached and entered the broth, received the plasmid from donor cells in the broth, and thereafter reattached to the biofilm. Surprisingly, transconjugants were observed after 24 h but not after 48 h for some mating pairs. This is probably due to methodological limitations, with the number of transconjugants being around the detection limit, causing inconsis- tent results for consecutive samplings. Another explanation could be that the plasmid was lost after 48 h. This seems less likely, as plasmid stability systems are present on both plasmids (19, 21).

In this study, we have demonstrated the ability of conjugative plasmids of poultry origin encoding ESC resistance to transfer into different E. coli and Serratia spp. both in suspension and on surfaces at different temperatures. Transfer occurred under subop- timal growth conditions and in bioﬁlm, underlining the potential for horizontal transfer of these resistance plasmids. In food production, vertical spread of antimicrobial resistance through clonal dissemination is likely to represent a higher burden than the horizontal spread of resistance determinants between bacterial clones and/or genera.

However, transfer to environmental Enterobacteriaceae or other residential bacteria with good survival abilities (e.g., growth at low temperature, bioﬁlm formation, and increased tolerance to environmental conditions, such as cleaning and disinfection) and with potential to act as secondary plasmid donors to new hosts may contribute to maintenance of the resistance plasmids through the food chain. The results also indicate that low temperatures may contribute to a decrease in plasmid transfer and hamper microbial growth. Further research on the occurrence of ESC resistance in environmental bacteria and transfer of plasmids in models simulating relevant conditions is necessary to determine the importance of the environmental microbiota and environmental conditions for maintenance and dissemination of ESC resistance in broiler production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates. Plasmid donor isolates used includedE. coli2012-01-1292 (designated E. coli 1292) carrying a recently characterized IncK plasmid (pNVI1292/IncK, accession no.KU312044, Fig. S1) (19) andE. coli2012-01-2798 (designatedE. coli2798) carrying an IncI1 plasmid (pNVI2798/IncI1, Fig. S2).

Both donor strains harboredbla_CMY-2and originated from domestically produced retail chicken meat collected in 2012 as part of the NORM-VET program (11). The plasmids did not harbor additional resistance genes. Potential recipient strains included a selection ofE. colifrom broiler feces and retail chicken meat (n⫽14) displaying resistance to nalidixic acid (Nal^r), andSerratiaspp. from food-processing units and retail chicken meat (n⫽18). TheSerratiaspecies isolates were rifampin resistant (Rif^r) (n⫽15) or made Rif^r(n⫽3) by subculturing in broth with increasing Rif concentration, as previously described (47). None of the recipient strains displayed resistance to any beta-lactam antimicrobials (data not shown). All included recipient strains were subjected to PCR targeting the IncI1 and IncK replicons to ensure that they did not harbor other plasmids of these incompatibility groups (48). An overview of the included isolates and their characteristics is given in Table 5.

Preculturing of donor and recipient strains.Precultures of donor and recipient strains used in the initial screening experiments were grown on tryptone soy agar (TSA) plates (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, England) at 30°C (Serratiaspp.) or 37°C (E. coli) overnight. In the extended conjugation experiments, precultures for strains used in conjugation on agar were grown on TSA at 25°C for 3 days. Before mating was performed, the agar plates were incubated at the temperature used in the subsequent experiment for 1 h. Precultures of donor and recipient strains used in experiments in broth and donor strains used in the biofilm experiments at 25°C, 30°C, and 37°C were grown separately in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Oxoid Ltd.) (broth mating) or LB without NaCl (biofilm experiments) at 25°C for 3 days. Thereafter, they were incubated at the temperature used in the subsequent experiment for 1 h before broth mating was performed. Precultures used in experiments at 12°C were incubated at 12°C for 3 days. Recipient strains used in the biofilm experiments were grown in LB without NaCl at 30°C overnight.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(8)

Conjugation experiments.We used a two-step strategy for investigation of plasmid transfer. This included an initial screening using a simple agar assay, followed by extended transfer experiments with selected mating pairs performed under various conditions.

In the initial experiments, the twoE. colidonor strains were mated with 32 recipient strains using conjugation experiments on agar to identify mating pairs where plasmids were transferred. In addition, we investigated if Serratiaspecies transconjugants could act as secondary plasmid donors. Two S.

marcescenstransconjugants were mated withE. coli(n⫽ 7) andSerratia spp. (n⫽3), and oneS.

proteamaculans transconjugant was mated withE. coli (n ⫽ 7) and Serratia spp. (n ⫽ 16). The conjugation experiments on agar were carried out as follows: one colony each of the recipient and the donor were mixed on a TSA plate and incubated at 30°C. Matings were sampled after 4, 24, and 48 h by swiping a loop through the colonies. Samples were plated directly on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with two different antimicrobials used to select for transconjugant strains. The antimicrobials and concentrations used to select for transconjugant strains are presented in Table S1.

Extended conjugation experiments were carried out with selected mating pairs on agar surface, in broth, and in bioﬁlm under various temperatures in order to mimic conditions relevant for broiler production. Mating pairs were selected on the basis of the recipients’ ability to receive the plasmid in the initial screening experiments. Conjugation experiments in bioﬁlm were performed in triplicate. All experiments were performed at 12°C, 25°C and 30°C (Serratiaspp.) or 37°C (E. coli), and sampling was performed after 4 h (30°C and 37°C), 24 h, and 48 h (all matings).

Conjugation on agar.Conjugation experiments on agar were performed as described above.

Conjugation in broth.Conjugation in broth was conducted as previously described (49). Brieﬂy, 1 ml of the donor preculture and 1 ml of the recipient preculture were mixed in 4 ml of fresh LB broth.

Sampling was performed by plating 100␮l of the broth on MH agar supplemented with two different antimicrobials used to select for transconjugant strains.

Conjugation in bioﬁlm.Bioﬁlms of each recipient strain were established on autoclaved coupons of stainless steel (AISI 304), as previously described (50). Thereafter, the tubes were incubated at 25°C, 30°C TABLE 5All isolates included in the study

Isolate ID (strain type)^a Origin Resistance proﬁle^b MIC (mg/liter) Phylotype^c

E. coli1292(IncK) (D) Retail chicken meat Ctx^r ⬎2 D

E. coli2798(IncI1) (D) Retail chicken meat Ctx^r ⬎2 A

E. coli1553 (R) Retail chicken meat Nal^r 128 ND

E. coli6154 (R) Retail chicken meat Nal^r ⬎128 ND

E. coli706 (R) Retail chicken meat Nal^r ⬎128 ND

E. coli7079 (R) Retail chicken meat Nal^r 32 ND

E. coli3460-5 (R) Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r ⬎128 ND

E. coli6927-5 (R)^d Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r ⬎128 B1

E. coli1268 (R) Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r 32 B1

E. coli1450 (R) Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r 64 D

E. coli3064-2 (R) Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r 128 A

E. coli4064-1 (R) Fecal ﬂora of healthy broiler Nal^r 128 ND

S. marcescens2336 (R) Disinfecting footbath on dairy plant Rif^r ⱖ16 NA

S. marcescens3306 (R)^d Disinfecting footbath on dairy plant Rif^r ⱖ16 NA

S. marcescens3307 (R)^d Disinfecting footbath on dairy plant Rif^r ⱖ16 NA

Serratiasp. 3612 (R) Slaughterhouse Rif^r ⱖ16 NA

Serratia liquefaciens5676 (R) Retail chicken meat Rif^r ⱖ100 NA

S. proteamaculans5682 (R) Retail chicken meat Rif^r ⱖ16 NA

S. proteamaculans5685 (R)^d Retail chicken meat Rif^r ⱖ100 NA

aID, identiﬁcation; D, donor strain; R, recipient strain.

bCtx^r, cefotaxime resistant; Nal^r, nalidixic acid resistant; Rif^r, rifampin resistant.

cND, not determined; NA, not applicable.

dIsolates included in extended conjugation experiment.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(9)

(S. marcescens), or 37°C (E. coli) for 3 days or at 12°C for 5 days. The steel coupons with established biofilms were washed with peptone water to remove loosely attached cells and then transferred to tubes with cultures of the donor strain (31). Sampling of biofilms included harvesting the whole biofilm. The steel coupon was rinsed in peptone water and transferred to a glass tube with 15 ml of peptone water.

The bioﬁlm was detached by scraping with a swab, followed by 15 min of sonication at 42 kHz at 25°C.

One milliliter of the samples was diluted 10-fold, and 100␮l of the dilution series was plated out on three different MH agar plates supplemented with different antimicrobials in order to quantify number of donors, recipients, and transconjugants in the sample. The transfer frequencies of plasmids in bioﬁlms were calculated as number of transconjugants/number of recipients (T/R) (49, 51).

All MH agar plates were incubated at 30°C (Serratiaspp.) or 37°C (E. coli) for 24 h.

Transformation experiments.Transformation was performed to investigate if it was possible to introduce the pNVI2798/IncI1 plasmid into electrocompetentS. marcescenshosts (3306 and 3307). In addition, transformation of the pNVI1298/IncK plasmid was included as a positive control under the experimental conditions applied. Plasmid DNA was purified as described by Engebrecht et al. (52), with some modifications. After completing step 5 in the original protocol, the tubes were centrifuged for five min at 14,000 rpm, and 270␮l of the supernatant was added to Eppendorf tubes containing 270␮l of 5 M LiCl. The mixture was vortexed and placed at⫺20°C for 10 min. Subsequently, the tubes were centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm, and 500␮l of the supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 1,000␮l of ethyl alcohol (EtOH). The mixture was left at⫺20°C for 10 min and subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 rpm before discarding the supernatant. Then, 200␮l of 70% EtOH was added, and the tubes were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. After discarding the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in 30␮l of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer.S. marcescens3306 and 3307 andE. coliDH5␣(CCUG 32825) were made electrocompetent, as previously described (53).

However, three washing steps were performed. Also, the pellet was resuspended in Milli Q water instead of transformation buffer or DnD solution and used immediately in transformation experiments. Electroporation was performed on 5␮l of plasmid DNA mixed with 50␮l of competent cells as follows: 1.25 kV/cm, 200⍀, 25 microfarad.

Transformants were selected on LB agar supplemented with 1 mg/liter cefotaxime. The transformation experiments were performed in triplicate.

Conﬁrmation of transconjugants and transformants.Donor and recipient strains of different genera and species (E. coli-S. marcescensmatings andS. marcescens-S. proteamaculansmatings) were differentiated by the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of ﬂight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Daltonics). Phylotyping (54) was used for differentiation of mating pairs withE.

colias both the donor and recipient (Table 5). Transconjugants and transformants were conﬁrmed by real-time PCR detection ofbla_CMY-2using previously published primers and probe (55). Positive and negative controls were included in each run.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Recipients and transconjugants were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine the MICs for a standard panel of antimicrobials and an extended panel of relevant beta-lactam antimicrobials by broth microdilution (EUVSEC and EUVSEC2, Sensititre TREK; Thermo Scientiﬁc).E. coliATCC 25922 was included as a quality control.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental material for this article may be found at

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM .00654-17.

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1,

PDF ﬁle, 0.5 MB.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Anette Wold Åsli for excellent technical assistance. Roger Simm is acknowledged for assistance during the transformation experiments.

This work was funded by the Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Agreement Research Fund (Matfondavtalen), grants 225165 and 224921, and Noﬁma strategic research program grant no. 262306. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. The support of the EU-funded COST action FA1202 BacFoodNet is acknowledged.

We declare no conﬂicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Ewers C, Bethe A, Semmler T, Guenther T, Wieler LH. 2012. Extended- spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and AmpC-producingEscherichia colifrom livestock and companion animals, and their putative impact on public health: a global perspective. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:646 – 655.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03850.x.

2. ECDC. 2015. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2014. An- nual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Net-

work (EARS-Net). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.

3. WHO-AGISAR. 2011. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 3rd revision, 2011. WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77376/1/9789241504485 _eng.pdf.

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(10)

4. Dziekan G, Jauregui IL, Mathai E. 2012. The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: options for action. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzer- land.http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241503181_eng.pdf.

5. WHO. 2017. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.http://www.who.int/medicines/

publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf?ua⫽1.

6. Overdevest I, Willemsen I, Rijnsburger M, Eustace A, Xu L, Hawkey P, Heck M, Savelkoul P, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, van der Zwaluw K, Hui- jsdens X, Kluytmans J. 2011. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes ofEscherichia coliin chicken meat and humans, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1216 –1222.https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1707.110209.

7. Kluytmans JA, Overdevest IT, Willemsen I, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MF, van der Zwaluw K, Heck M, Rijnsburger M, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Savelkoul PH, Johnston BD, Gordon D, Johnson JR. 2013. Extended- spectrum beta-lactamase-producingEscherichia colifrom retail chicken meat and humans: comparison of strains, plasmids, resistance genes, and virulence factors. Clin Infect Dis 56:478 – 487.https://doi.org/10 .1093/cid/cis929.

8. Lazarus B, Paterson DL, Mollinger JL, Rogers BA. 2015. Do human extraint- estinalEscherichia coliinfections resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins originate from food-producing animals? A systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 60:439 – 452.https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu785.

9. Berg ES, Wester AL, Ahrenfeldt J, Mo SS, Slettemeås JS, Steinbakk M, Samuelsen O, Grude N, Simonsen GS, Löhr IH, Jørgensen SB, Tofteland S, Lund O, Dahle UR, Sunde M. 2017. Norwegian patients and retail chicken meat share cephalosporin-resistantEscherichia coli and IncK/blaCMY-2

resistance plasmids. Clin Microbiol Infect, in press.https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.cmi.2016.12.035.

10. NORM/NORM-VET. 2012. Usage of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in Norway, 2011. NORM/NORM-VET, Tromsø/

Oslo, Norway.

13. Mo SS, Norström M, Slettemeås JS, Løvland A, Urdahl AM, Sunde M.

2014. Emergence of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in the broiler production chain in a country with a low antimicrobial usage proﬁle. Vet Microbiol 171:315–320.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.002.

14. Börjesson S, Jernberg C, Brolund A, Edquist P, Finn M, Landén A, Olsson-Liljequist B, Tegmark Wisell K, Bengtsson B, Englund S. 2013.

Characterization of plasmid-mediated AmpC-producing E. coli from Swedish broilers and association with human clinical isolates. Clin Mi- crobiol Infect 19:E309 –E311.https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12192.

15. Voets GM, Fluit AC, Scharringa J, Schapendonk C, van den Munckhof T, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Stuart JC. 2013. Identical plasmid AmpC beta- lactamase genes and plasmid types inE. coliisolates from patients and poultry meat in the Netherlands. Int J Food Microbiol 167:359 –362.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.10.001.

16. Agersø Y, Jensen JD, Hasman H, Pedersen K. 2014. Spread of extended spectrum cephalosporinase-producingEscherichia coliclones and plasmids from parent animals to broilers and to broiler meat in a production without use of cephalosporins. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:740 –746.

https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1742.

17. Börjesson S, Egervärn M, Lindblad M, Englund S. 2013. Frequent occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and transferable AmpC beta-lactamase-producingEscherichia colion domestic chicken meat in Sweden. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2463–2466.https://doi.org/10.1128/

AEM.03893-12.

18. Dierikx C, van der Goot J, Fabri T, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Smith H, Mevius D. 2013. Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase- and AmpC-beta- lactamase-producingEscherichia coliin Dutch broilers and broiler farm- ers. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:60 – 67.https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/

dks349.

19. Mo SS, Slettemeås JS, Berg ES, Norström M, Sunde M. 2016. Plasmid and host strain characteristics of Escherichia coli resistant to extended- spectrum cephalosporins in the Norwegian broiler production. PLoS One 11:e0154019.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154019.

20. Hansen KH, Bortolaia V, Nielsen CA, Nielsen JB, Schonning K, Agerso Y, Guardabassi L. 2016. Host-speciﬁc patterns of genetic diversity among IncI1-I␥ and IncK plasmids encoding CMY-2 beta-lactamase inEsche-

richia coliisolates from humans, poultry meat, poultry, and dogs in Denmark. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:4705– 4714. https://doi.org/10 .1128/AEM.00495-16.

21. Smith H, Bossers A, Harders F, Wu G, Woodford N, Schwarz S, Guerra B, Rodríguez I, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Brouwer M, Mevius D. 2015.

Characterization of epidemic IncI1-I␥plasmids harboring ambler class A and C genes inEscherichia coliandSalmonella entericafrom animals and humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5357–5365.https://doi.org/

10.1128/AAC.05006-14.

Oslo, Norway.

23. Sunde M, Tharaldsen H, Slettemeås JS, Norström M, Carattoli A, Bjorland J. 2009.Escherichia coliof animal origin in Norway contains ablaTEM-20- carrying plasmid closely related tobla_TEM-20andbla_TEM-52plasmids from other European countries. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:215–216.https://

doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn445.

24. Animalia. 2015. Actions to combat antimicrobial resistance works (in Norwegian: Tiltak mot antibiotikaresistens virker).https://www.animalia.no/

no/animalia/aktuelt/tiltak-mot-antibiotikaresistens-virker/. Accessed 4 May 2017.

25. Animalia. 2016. Continued decrease in the occurrence of resistant bacteria in poultry (in Norwegian: Fortsatt nedgang i forekomst av resistente bakterier hos fjørfe).https://www.animalia.no/no/animalia/aktuelt/

fortsatt-nedgang-i-forekomst-av-resistente-bakterier-hos-fjorfe/. Accessed 4 May 2017.

26. Refsum T. 2015. Antimicrobial use in Norwegian poultry production (in Norwegian: Antibiotikabehandling i norsk fjørfeproduksjon), p 17. In Go’mørning Animalia.https://www.animalia.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/

gm-4-15-web.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2017.

27. Mo SS, Kristoffersen AB, Sunde M, Nødtvedt A, Norström M. 2016. Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistantEscherichia coliin Nor- wegian broiler ﬂocks. Prev Vet Med 130:112–118.https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011.

28. Dierikx CM, van der Goot JA, Smith HE, Kant A, Mevius DJ. 2013. Presence of ESBL/AmpC-producingEscherichia coliin the broiler production pyramid: a descriptive study. PLoS One 8:e79005.https://doi.org/10 .1371/journal.pone.0079005.

29. Nilsson O, Börjesson S, Landén A, Bengtsson B. 2014. Vertical transmis- sion of Escherichia coli carrying plasmid-mediated AmpC (pAmpC) through the broiler production pyramid. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:

1497–1500.https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku030.

30. Davey ME, O’Toole GA. 2000. Microbial bioﬁlms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:847– 867.https://doi.org/10 .1128/MMBR.64.4.847-867.2000.

31. Król JE, Nguyen HD, Rogers LM, Beyenal H, Krone SM, Top EM. 2011.

Increased transfer of a multidrug resistance plasmid inEscherichia coli bioﬁlms at the air-liquid interface. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5079 –5088.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00090-11.

32. Solheim HT, Sekse C, Urdahl AM, Wasteson Y, Nesse LL. 2013. Bioﬁlm as an environment for dissemination ofstxgenes by transduction. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:896 –900.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03512-12.

33. Kilonzo-Nthenge A, Rotich E, Nahashon SN. 2013. Evaluation of drug- resistant Enterobacteriaceae in retail poultry and beef. Poult Sci 92:

1098 –1107.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02581.

34. Schwaiger K, Huther S, Hölzel C, Kämpf P, Bauer J. 2012. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistantEnterobacteriaceaeisolated from chicken and pork meat purchased at the slaughterhouse and at retail in Bavaria, Germany.

Int J Food Microbiol 154:206 –211.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro .2011.12.014.

35. Johnson JR, Sannes MR, Croy C, Johnston B, Clabots C, Kuskowski MA, Bender J, Smith KE, Winokur PL, Belongia EA. 2007. Antimicrobial drug- resistantEscherichia colifrom humans and poultry products, Minnesota and Wisconsin, 2002–2004. Emerg Infect Dis 13:838 – 846. https://doi .org/10.3201/eid1306.061576.

36. Säde E, Murros A, Björkroth J. 2013. Predominant enterobacteria on modiﬁed-atmosphere packaged meat and poultry. Food Microbiol 34:

252–258.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.007.

37. Langsrud S, Møretrø T, Sundheim G. 2003. Characterization ofSerratia marcescenssurviving in disinfecting footbaths. J Appl Microbiol 95:

186 –195.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01968.x.

38. Labbate M, Queck SY, Koh KS, Rice SA, Givskov M, Kjelleberg S. 2004.

Quorum sensing-controlled bioﬁlm development in Serratia liquefaciens

on June 26, 2017 by UIO NORWEGIAN INST OF PUBLIC http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

(11)

MG1. J Bacteriol 186:692– 698.https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.3.692-698 .2004.

39. Koh KS, Lam KW, Alhede M, Queck SY, Labbate M, Kjelleberg S, Rice SA.

2007. Phenotypic diversiﬁcation and adaptation of Serratia marcescens MG1 bioﬁlm-derived morphotypes. J Bacteriol 189:119 –130.https://doi .org/10.1128/JB.00930-06.

40. Rice SA, Koh KS, Queck SY, Labbate M, Lam KW, Kjelleberg S. 2005.

Bioﬁlm formation and sloughing in Serratia marcescens are controlled by quorum sensing and nutrient cues. J Bacteriol 187:3477–3485.

https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.10.3477-3485.2005.

41. Fernandez-Astorga A, Muela A, Cisterna R, Iriberri J, Barcina I. 1992. Biotic and abiotic factors affecting plasmid transfer inEscherichia colistrains.

Appl Environ Microbiol 58:392–398.

42. Kumar CG, Anand SK. 1998. Signiﬁcance of microbial bioﬁlms in food industry: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 42:9 –27.https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0168-1605(98)00060-9.

43. Shi XM, Zhu XN. 2009. Bioﬁlm formation and food safety in food industries. Trends Food Sci Technol 20:407– 413.https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.tifs.2009.01.054.

44. Srey S, Jahid IK, Ha SD. 2013. Bioﬁlm formation in food industries: a food safety concern. Food Control 31:572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .foodcont.2012.12.001.

45. Madsen JS, Burmølle M, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ. 2012. The intercon- nection between bioﬁlm formation and horizontal gene transfer. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574 -695X.2012.00960.x.

46. Król JE, Wojtowicz AJ, Rogers LM, Heuer H, Smalla K, Krone SM, Top EM.

2013. Invasion ofE. colibioﬁlms by antibiotic resistance plasmids. Plas- mid 70:110 –119.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.03.003.

47. Heir E, Holck AL, Omer MK, Alvseike O, Høy M, Måge I, Axelsson L. 2010.

Reduction of verotoxigenicEscherichia coliby process and recipe op- timisation in dry-fermented sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 141:195–202.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.017.

48. Carattoli A, Bertini A, Villa L, Falbo V, Hopkins KL, Threlfall EJ. 2005.

Identiﬁcation of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods 63:219 –228.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.018.

49. Sunde M, Sørum H. 2001. Self-transmissible multidrug resistance plasmids inEscherichia coliof the normal intestinal ﬂora of healthy swine. Microb Drug Resist 7:191–196.https://doi.org/10.1089/10766290152045075.

50. Nesse LL, Sekse C, Berg K, Johannesen KC, Solheim H, Vestby LK, Urdahl AM. 2014. Potentially pathogenicEscherichia colican form a bioﬁlm under conditions relevant to the food production chain. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2042–2049.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03331-13.

51. Kruse H, Sorum H. 1994. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4015– 4021.

52. Engebrecht J, Brent R, Kaderbhai MA. 2001. Minipreps of plasmid DNA.

Curr Protoc Mol Biol 15:1.6.1–1.6.10. https://doi.org/10.1002/

0471142727.mb0106s15.

53. Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed, p 1.1–1.70. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

54. Doumith M, Day MJ, Hope R, Wain J, Woodford N. 2012. Improved multiplex PCR strategy for rapid assignment of the four majorEscherichia coliphylogenetic groups. J Clin Microbiol 50:3108 –3110.https://doi.org/

10.1128/JCM.01468-12.

55. Schmidt GV, Mellerup A, Christiansen LE, Ståhl M, Olsen JE, Angen Ø.

2015. Sampling and pooling methods for capturing herd-level antibiotic resistance in swine feces using qPCR and CFU approaches. PLoS One 10:e0131672.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131672.