• No results found

Barents Sea drill cuttings BARCUT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Barents Sea drill cuttings BARCUT"

Copied!
34
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

BARCUT

Barents Sea drill cuttings research initiative

Multidisciplinary approach to effects linked to drill cuttings

2013-2019

(2)

BARCUT 2013-2019 supported by Eni Norge

Scope

• Identify local environmental impact of released drill cuttings and address relevant societal concerns

Applied sea floor research, Akvaplan-niva and UiT

• Impact of discharges on sediment conditions, microbiota and macro fauna

• Current calculations and distribution modelling of drill cuttings

Spreading and deposition of drill cuttings, UiT

• Spreading and thickness of drill cuttings

• Effect of drill cutting discharge on sediment quality and micro fauna

Economic and social aspects ,UiT and Norut

• Science-policy interface of waste management

• Comparison with the science-policy interface of waste management in mineral

industry

(3)

Barents Sea drill cuttings research initiative (BARCUT) -Spreading and deposition of drill cuttings (WP3)

Juho Junttila¹, Noortje Dijkstra¹, Steffen Aagaard Sørensen¹

¹Department of Geosciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway in Tromsø Contact: tel. 776 44460, email: [email protected]

More info: http://site.uit.no/ewma/barcut/

(4)

BARCUT WP3

Objectives

Site specific spreading of drill cuttings on the sea floor (<250m from wellhead) and their influence on marine environment.

TASK I

Sediment condition

a) baseline

b) impact and spreading c) recovery

Classification

of contaminants

(5)

Aagaard-Sørensen et al. 2018

(6)

TASK II

Foraminiferal response

Studying living (sediment core surface) and fossilized (deeper in the sediment core) foraminiferal assemblages allow reconstruction and/or monitoring of:

a) baseline b) impact c) recovery

BARCUT WP3

(7)

= unicellular organisms living on top of and in the first cm’s of the sediment 100 µm in size (salt grain size)

Benthic foraminifera

Specific habitat Preservation of test

Monitor environmental change Natural variability Fast reproduction

Photo by: Patrycja Jernas

(8)

Methods

• Grain-size analyses

• Heavy metal concentration

• Benthic foraminiferal analyses

• TOC

210

Pb-dating

• PAH-NPD

(9)

Environmental impact of exploration wells - BARCUT

5m 30m

60m 125m

250m

Same sample stations studied for microbiota and macrofauna

(10)

Wells drilled in Barents Sea 1980-2016

1993 Cuttings with

≤1% oil based allowed

Wells

sampled

(11)

(Junttila et al., 2018)

Well T – drilled 1987 Potential recovery time: 28 years

(12)

Junttila et al. 2018

Drilled 1987 3353 tons released

(13)

Well T (1987)

(Aagaard-Sørensenet al., submitted)

Benthic foraminiferal parameters

• 10 m from drill site:

- Smothering of foraminifera

- Low density foraminifera only observed at 0-5 cm core depth representing recovery

• ≥30-250m from drill site:

-No present day impact on the fauna even though elevated Ba levels

(Aagaard-Sørensen et al., 2018)

(14)

(Aagaaard-Sørensen et al., 2018)

Well G2006 – drilled 2006 Potential recovery time: 8 years

(15)

(Aagaaard-Sørensen et al., 2018)

Drilled 2006 412 tons released

(16)

Benthi c foraminiferal parameters

• 5-30 m from drill site: Smothered foraminiferal fauna

• 60 m from drill site: ca. 3 cm of drilling mud settled, resulting in survival of the foraminiferal fauna

• Natural foraminiferal species have recovered at all distances after ~8 years

Well G 2006 (2006)

(Aagaard-Sørensen et al., 2018)

(17)

Well S – drilled 2012 Potential recovery time: 3 years

(Junttila et al., 2018)

(18)

Junttila et al. 2018

Drilled 2012

(19)

S 2012

(Dijkstra et al., in prep.)

8 m:

• > 20 cm of DC resulted in smothering of fauna

• no recovery after 3 years, both live and dead fauna

• High Cu concentrations

• Coarse pebbles in DC 30-250 m:

• Faunal changes reflect natural variability

• warming after LIA + inflow Atlantic Water

>20 cm

4 cm

1 cm DC

2 cm

2 cm

Dijkstra et al. in prep.

(20)

Drill cutting spreading model

Bottom current direction =20cm

(21)

Drill cutting spreading model

Junttila et al. 2018

3353 tons released

Ba <500mg/kg 688 tons released

Bottom current direction =20cm

(22)

Drill cutting spreading model

Bottom current direction =20cm

(23)

Drill cutting spreading model

412 tons released 805 tons released

Aagaard-Sørensen et al. 2018

Bottom current direction =20cm

(24)

Outcome

- Sediment quality affected ≤ 10m from the wellheads

- Difference in sediment quality before and after legislation in 1993 - Spreading of the drill cuttings ≤125m from the wellheads

- Drill cutting impacted layer generally thickest closest to the wellhead - Sediment recovery in some wells but not in Ba content

- Smothering main effect on foraminifera - Recovery of foraminifera

- Impact site specific

(25)

References

Dijkstra, N., Junttila, J., Carroll, J., Husum, K., Hald, M., Elvebakk, G., Godtliebsen,. F., 2013. Baseline benthic foraminiferal assemblages and habitat conditions in a sub-Arctic region of increasing petroleum development. Marine Environmental Research, Vol. 92, pp. 178-196.

Junttila, J., Carroll, J., Husum, K., Dijkstra, N., 2014. Sediment transport and deposition in the Ingøydjupet trough, SW Barents Sea.

Continental Shelf Research, Vol. 76, pp. 53-63.

Dijkstra, N., Junttila, J., Husum, K., Carroll, J., Hald, M., 2015. Natural variability of benthic foraminiferal assemblages and metal concentrations during the last 150 years in the Ingøydjupet trough, SW Barents Sea. Marine Micropaleontology 121, 16-31.

Alve, E., Korsun, S., Schönfeld, J., Dijkstra, N., Golikova, E., Hess, S., Husum, K., Panieri, G., 2016. Foram-AMBI: A sensitivity index based on benthic foraminiferal faunas from North-East Atlantic and Arctic fjords, continental shelves and slopes. Marine Micropaleontology 122, 1- 22.

Junttila, J., Carroll, J., Dijkstra, N., 2015. Variability of present and past PAH concentrations in sediments of the SW Barents Sea.

Norwegian Journal of Geology 95, 191–210.

Dijkstra, N., Junttila, J., Skirbekk, K., Husum, K., Carroll, J., Hald, M., 2017. Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of chemical and physical stressors in Hammerfest harbor (Northern Norway). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 114, 384-396.

Dijkstra, N, Junttila, J., Aagaard-Sørensen, S., 2017. Environmental baselines and reconstruction of Atlantic Water inflow in Bjørnøyrenna, SW Barents Sea, since 1800 CE. Marine Environmental Research, 132, 117 - 131.

Aagaard-Sørensen, S., Junttila, J., Dijkstra, N., 2018. Impact of drill cutting release on marine environments and response of benthic foraminiferal faunal communities, Goliat Field, SW Barents Sea, Norway. Marine pollution Bulletin, 129, 592-608.

Junttila, J., Dijkstra, N., Aagaard-Sørensen, S., 2018. Spreading of the drill cuttings and recovery of the sediments on three different age exploration wells in the SW Barents, Norway. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 135, 224-238.

Aagaard-Sørensen, S., Berg, J., Junttila, J., Dijkstra, N., in review. Lingering effect from petroleum exploration related pollution on benthic foraminiferal fauna compositions in the Ingøydjupet, SW Barents Sea. Polar Research.

(26)

Microbiota effects of drill cuttings deposition

- Extent of change - Persistence

- Key environmental drivers?

- Key informative taxa?

(27)

The cultivation-independent approach

DNA extracts

PCR amplification of taxonomically informative gene (ssu-rRNA gene)

High-throughput sequencing

Bioinformatics/statistics

(28)

Sampling scheme at Goliat field

Microbial community composition linked to temporal, spatial and environmental variation by multivariate analysis

≤15m 30m 60m 125m 250m

1-2cm 0-1cm

2-5cm 5-10cm

Transects from wells drilled in 3 separate years: 2000, 2006, 2015

(29)

NMDS – all samples

(30)

Beyond 100 m_ insignificant age effect

2000

2006

2015

(31)

2-10 cm 0-2 cm Gamma-

proteobacteria

Delta-

proteobacteria

Beyond 100 m_ clear sediment depth effect

O 2

TOC Zn

Pb Cu

Ba

Hg Cd Cr

Ti

Grain size

(32)

Clearest impact of DC deposition: 2006 - 5 m distance

2006_5 m 2015_60 m O 2

TOC Zn Pb

Cu Ba

Hg Cd Cr

Ti

Grain size Gamma-

proteobacteria

Delta-

proteobacteria

Clostridia

Bacteroidia

Tenericutes

(33)

Conclusions

• Spatial extent and level of impact on microbiota coincided with patterns observed by visual inspection and chemical and macrobiological analyses

• Three taxonomic groups, Clostridia, Bacteroidia and

Tenericutes (mycoplasmas), showed unique presence in the most heavily impacted layers.

Interesting as indicator bacteria?

(34)

Microbial work at the Norwegian College of Fishery Science

Ida Øverleir

Tan Thi Nguyen

Bjarne Landfald

Cooperating partners in the project

• Akvaplan-niva

-Sabine Cochrane

• Department of Geology, UiT

-Juho Junttila, Noortje Dijkstra, Steffen Aa. Sørensen

• Eni Norge AS,

-John-Eirik Paulsen

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Keywords: benthic foraminifera, heavy metals, natural variability, sediments, Atlantic Water, Arctic 25.. Water, Anthropocene, Barents Sea, biomonitoring, cores

2013 AMGG Workshop, Tromsø, Norway, Alexandros Tasianas, CO 2 storage, fluid flow and assessment of the leakage potential at Snøhvit in the Barents Sea using P-Cable

Abstract: Palaeozoic–Mesozoic brittle normal faults onshore along the SW Barents Sea passive margin off northern Norway give valuable insight into fault and fluid flow processes

Comparison of aeromagnetic depth estimates and seismic lines showed that volcanic rocks probably occur within the sediments overlying the crystalline crust in the southwestern

Companies in the petroleum industry faces challenges related to security and preparedness of offshore installations in the Barents Sea such as: lack of resources, long respond

“The use of the diagenetic equations to predict impact on sediment due to discharges of drill cuttings and mud”, International Marine Environmental Modeling Seminar, Rio,

For constant cross section and short open channels, the effect of drill cuttings on flow depth and mean velocity was found to be small for particle sizes less than 5 mm and

The Middle to Upper Jurassic Fuglen and Hekkingen formations of the southwestern Barents Sea represents both important source rocks and seals in several petroleum plays in the