• No results found

Regional development in Norway –what are the challenges?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Regional development in Norway –what are the challenges?"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Norwegian Ministry

of Local Government and Modernisation

Anne-Merete Halpern 31stMay 2018

Regional development in Norway – what are the challenges?

What is a rural municipality?

• Municipalities that are remote (have small populations and markets, as well as long distances to other or larger centers)

• The Norwegian Centrality Index (Statistics Norway) classify municipalities, based on access to service functions and labour markets

• Centrality level 5 and 6 can be classified as rural areas

238 municipalities (out of 422)

72 percent of the land area

14 percent of the population

(2)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Other challenges follow on from the geographical challenges

• Demography

• Economic growth

• Less central areas typically experience lower growth, but some of these municipalities can also have significant growth

Hemsedal Finnøy Austevoll Hitra Frøya

Gamvik

R² = 0,5228

‐20%

‐10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Populationgrowtn, percent

Centrality Index

The Norwegian Centrality Index – population growth

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Employment growth is lower in rural areas

• Employment growth is used as an indicator for economic growth

• Significant variation between municipalities

• Lower growth or decreasing employment in less central

municipalities R² = 0,1994

‐30%

‐20%

‐10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Employmentgrowth, percent

Centrality Index

The Norwegian Centrality Index – employment growth

(3)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Demographic challenges in rural areas

• Low population growth or decline

• Birth deficit

• Domestic out-migration

• Gender imbalance, more men than women

• High proportion of elderly people

• But high levels of immigration

7,5

5,7 5,4

3,0

0,6

‐0,7

‐8,0

‐6,0

‐4,0

‐2,0 0,0 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0

1 ‐ most central 2 3 4 5 6 ‐ least central

Net domestic migation Net immigration Net birth rate Total population growth

Lower population growth in recent years due to reduced immigration and number of births

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000

Population growth per quarter,  national level

(4)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Reduced population growth in all levels of centrality

‐2000

‐1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

2000K1 2001K1 2002K1 2003K1 2004K1 2005K1 2006K1 2007K1 2008K1 2009K1 2010K1 2011K1 2012K1 2013K1 2014K1 2015K1 2016K1 2017K1 2018K1

Population growth, 1.quarter, by level of centrality

1 2 3 4 5 6

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Other challenges are not predominantly rural challenges

y = 3E‐05x + 0,6359 R² = 0,0088

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Centrality‐ levels of employment

y = 0,0043x + 71,011 R² = 0,0075

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Centrality – proportion of young adults who have at least  completed upper secondary education

(5)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Covaration of challenges

• Population growth, employment growth, old age dependency ratio

• Level of employment, education (proportion of young adults who have at least completed upper secondary education), life expectancy (males)

78 of 83 municipalities with low growth/high dependency ratio is at centrality level 5 and 6. 10 out of 84 with high growth/low dependency ratio

(6)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

60 of 81 municipalities with low utilisation of human resources and weaker health are at centrality level 5 and 6. 49 of 75 with higher utilisation of human resources and good health

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

General policy responses

• Growth-promoting tax cuts

• Development of infrastructure

• Public sector innovation and rationalization

• General transfers to local and regional level

(7)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

Regional structure

18 counties

• 11 from 2020

422 municipalities

• 356 from 2020

• Geographically differentiated employer tax

• Measures for innovation and entrepreneurship

• Loans and grants to promote business investments

• Measures for local community development Employer tax in % of salaries:

Regional and rural policy measures

(8)

Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet

More than 600 state jobs

58 1

70 65

10 23

43

15

20 6

55 27

60 123

8 35

Sykehusinnkjøp HF

Klageorgan for helse Nasjonal IKT HF Konkurranseklagenemda

Forbrukerrådet

Vernepliktsverket Norsk kulturråd

Sykehusbygg HF Kreativt Norge Statlige oppgaver,

Herunder Politiets Lønns- og regnskapssenter

Norsk helsearkiv Parkeringstilsynet

Vernepliktsverket

Regelrådet

Sivil klareringsmyndighet Valgdirektoratet

Skatteklagenemda Nye veier AS

Decided or established outside of Oslo

Partistøtte

Norwegian Ministry

of Local Government and Modernisation

Thank you

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Based on qualitative research with service providers in specialised social and health services in Norway, we examine access and barriers to services among female sex sellers as well

Models preceding the MOSART model at Statistics Norway Statistics Norway has since the sixties and seventies published long term projections of population, labour force, education

Table 5.1 presents summary statistics of our centrality measures for Norwegian board network by enterprise size, age and industry both in the initial and the final sample.. We can

Expected and experienced service performance might be compared and used in a process-oriented approach as an input to monitor the quality of services?. However, describing

ducted in Norway. Resources from counties and municipalities are not included in the budget analy- sis, but are registered as government sources in the R&D statistics.

In 1960, the Council of Europe took over responsibility for the work of the Universities Committee of the WEU and set up in its place a Com- mittee for Higher Education and

The ideas launched by the Beveridge Commission in 1942 set the pace for major reforms in post-war Britain, and inspired Norwegian welfare programmes as well, with gradual

Within the scope of the medical movement, the Permanent Medical Commision of the Ministry of Health in 1851, based on a hypothesis that leprosy was a hereditary disease, proposed