• No results found

Densities of rectal peptide YY and somatostatin cells as biomarkers for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Densities of rectal peptide YY and somatostatin cells as biomarkers for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Peptides

jo u r n al h om ep age :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / p e p t i d e s

Densities of rectal peptide YY and somatostatin cells as biomarkers for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome

Magdy El-Salhy

a,b,c,∗

, Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk

b,c

, Odd Helge Gilja

b,c

, Trygve Hausken

b,c

aDivisionofGastroenterology,DepartmentofMedicine,StordHospital,Stord,Norway

bDivisionofGastroenterology,DepartmentofClinicalMedicine,UniversityofBergen,Bergen,Norway

cNationalCentreforFunctionalGastrointestinalDisorders,DepartmentofMedicine,HaukelandUniversityHospital,Bergen,Norway

a r t i c l e i n f o

Articlehistory:

Received24February2015 Accepted27February2015 Availableonline9March2015

Keywords:

Biomarkers Diagnosis

Irritablebowelsyndrome Immunohistochemistry PYY

Somatostatin

a b s t r a c t

Irritablebowelsyndrome(IBS)isacommonchronicdisorder.IBSdiagnosisisadiagnosisofexclusion sincetherearenobloodtests,radiologicalorendoscopicexaminationsforthisdisorder.Althoughseveral attemptshavebeenmadetodevelopasymptoms-baseddiagnosis,suchsystemsarenotwidelyusedin clinics.SeveraltestsandexaminationsmeasuringpathologicalfindingsinIBShavebeenconsidered forthediagnosisofIBS,butnoneofthemhasprovedusefulasabiomarker.Abnormalitiesinthecell densitiesofrectalpeptideYY(PYY)andsomatostatincellshavebeenreportedinIBSpatients.Theaim ofthepresentstudywastodeterminetheutilityoftheseabnormalitiesasbiomarkersforthediagnosis ofIBS.PatientswithIBSestablishedaccordingtoRomeIIIcriteria(n=101)wereincludedinthisstudy (71femalesand30maleswithameanageof35years;range18–61years),and62healthysubjects (38femalesand24maleswithameanageof41years;range18–65years)wererecruitedascontrols.

Boththepatientsandcontrolsunderwentcolonoscopyduringwhichrectalbiopsysamplesweretaken.

ThetissuesampleswereimmunostainedforPYYandsomatostatin,andthenumberofstainedcells wasquantifiedrelativetoboththeareaofepithelialcellsandpermicroscopicfield.ThedensityofPYY cellswassignificantlylowerinIBSpatientsthaninthehealthycontrols(P<0.0001);receiveroperator characteristic(ROC)analysisrevealedanareaundertheROCcurve(AUC)of0.99.Thesomatostatincell densityinIBSpatientswashigherthaninthecontrols(P<0.0001);ROCanalysisrevealedanAUCof0.86.

ThedensitiesoftherectalPYYandsomatostatincellsappeartobeclinicallyeffectivebiomarkersforIBS.

Furthermore,measurementoftheseparametersisinexpensive,rapidanddoesnotrequireconsiderable experienceorsophisticatedequipment.

©2015TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierInc.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Irritablebowelsyndrome(IBS)isacommonchronicdisorder thataffectsbetween5%and20%ofthepopulationoftheWestern world[1,2],andyettherearecurrentlynobloodtests,radiological orendoscopicexaminationsfordiagnosingthedisorder.Although severalattemptshavebeenmadetoobtainadiagnosisbasedon symptomassessments similar to those used in psychiatry and rheumatology[3–9],IBSdiagnosisinclinicalpracticeremains a processofexclusion[1,10–12].Thus,adiagnosisofIBScanonly

Correspondingauthorat:SectionforGastroenterology,DepartmentofMedicine, StordHospital,Box4000,5409Stord,Norway.Tel.:+4753491000;

fax:+475349100.

E-mailaddresses:[email protected](M.El-Salhy),

[email protected](J.G.Hatlebakk), [email protected] (O.H.Gilja),[email protected](T.Hausken).

bereachedbyconductingextensiveexpensiveexaminationsand teststoexcludeorganiccausesforthepatient’ssymptoms.

Severalabnormalities in the gastrointestinalendocrine cells have been described in IBSpatients [13–27].These abnormali- tiesarebelievedtoplayanimportantroleinthepathophysiology of IBS and represent a potentialtool for the treatment of this disorder[28,29].Apreviousstudy[30]foundthecelldensityof rectalpeptideYY(PYY)cellstobedecreased,andthatofsomato- statinto be increased relative to healthy subjects.It hasbeen suggestedthattheseabnormalitiescanbeusedinthediagnosis ofIBS[30].However,thatstudyincluded50patientsand27con- trols,andthesubtypesofIBSoftheincludedpatientswereonly those withdiarrhea or constipation as thepredominant symp- tom.Thepresentstudywasundertakentoinvestigatetheefficacy ofthedensitiesofrectalPYYandsomatostatincellsasbiomark- ersforthediagnosisofIBSinalargercohortofIBSpatientsand withalargergroupofhealthycontrolsforcomparisonthanwas usedin thepreviousstudy.Furthermore,IBS patientswithany http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2015.02.008

0196-9781/©2015TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierInc.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

oftheIBSsubtypes—constipation-predominant(IBS-C),diarrhea- predominant(IBS-D)ormixed(IBS-M)—wereincluded.

Materialandmethods

Patientsandcontrols

OnehundredandonepatientssufferingfromIBSaccordingto RomeIIIcriteria[9]wereincludedinthisstudy.Pregnantorlactat- ingwomen,patientswithclinicallysignificantsystemicdiseases, drugabuse,seriouspsychiatricdiseases,andabdominalsurgery, withtheexceptionofappendectomy,cesareansectionandhys- terectomywereexcluded.Thecohortcomprised71femalesand30 maleswithameanageof35years(range18–61years);45patients hadIBS-D,14hadIBS-Mand42hadIBS-C.Allofthepatientshada longdurationofIBSsymptomsi.e.greaterthan10years,andtheir onsetofIBSsymptomswasnotassociatedwithaboutofgastroen- teritis.Thepatientssubmittedtoaphysicalexaminationandblood teststoexcludeinflammation, liverand pancreasdiseases, and thyroiddysfunction.Celiacdiseasewasexcludedbyhistopatho- logicalexaminationofduodenalbiopsysamples.Forty-fiveofthese patientsusedproton-pumpinhibitorsondemand,18weremed- icatedwithangiotensinII-receptorantagonistagainsthypertonia, 15withstatinsagainsthighbloodcholesterollevels,and2with levothyroxineagainsthypothyroidosis.

The controls comprised 62 subjects (38 females and 24 males; mean age 41 years, range 18–65 years) who under- went colonoscopywithrectal biopsysampling.The reasonsfor colonoscopy in these subjects were gastrointestinal bleeding, wherethebleedingsourcewasidentifiedashemorrhoids(n=36), or angiodysplasia (n=4), and otherwise healthy subjects with healthworriescausedbyarelative(s)beingdiagnosedwithcolon carcinoma(n=22).Fiveofthesesubjectsweretreatedforhyper- toniawithangiotensinII-receptorantagonist,4withstatinsand2 withlevothyroxine.

ThestudywasperformedinaccordancewiththeDeclarationof HelsinkiandwasapprovedbytheRegionalCommitteeforMedi- calandHealthResearchEthicsWest,Bergen,Norway.Allsubjects providedverbalandwrittenconsenttoparticipate.

Colonoscopy,histopathologyandimmunohistochemistry

A standard colonoscopy procedurewas performed onall of thepatientsand controls, and four biopsysamples weretaken fromthedorsal wallofthe rectumabout 15cm fromtheanus ineach patient.Thebiopsysampleswerefixedovernightin4%

bufferedparaformaldehyde,embeddedinparaffinandthensec- tionedat5␮m.Thesectionswerestainedwithhematoxylin–eosin andimmunostainedwithultraViewuniversalDABdetectionkit (v1.02.0018, Venata Medical Systems, Basel,Switzerland) using theBenchMark Ultra IHC/ISHstaining module (Venata Medical Systems).Thesectionswereincubatedwiththeprimaryantibod- iesfor 32minat37C. Theprimaryantibodies werepolyclonal anti-porcinepeptideYY(PYY;codeno.PYY11A,AlphaDiagnostic, SanAntonio,TX,USA)andpolyclonalrabbitanti-synthetichuman somatostatin (codeno.A566, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Nega- tiveandpositivecontrolswereperformedasdescribedelsewhere [31,32].

Quantificationofimmunoreactivecelldensities

ThedensitiesofrectalPYYandsomatostatincellswerequan- tifiedbycomputerizedimageanalysisandcountingthenumber ofpositivecellsinamicroscopicfield.Measurementsusingcom- puterizedimageanalysiswereperformedona computerlinked toamicroscope(BX43,Olympus,Tokyo,Japan)equippedwitha

digitalcamera(DP26,Olympus),usingOlympuscellSensimaging (version1.7) software.The numbersof PYY- and somatostatin- immunoreactive cells were counted in ten randomly chosen microscopicfields,andtheareaofepithelialcellswasmeasured.

Thenumberofendocrinecellsineachfieldwascountedmanu- allybypointingandclickingthecomputermouse,andtheareaof theepitheliumcontainingthesecellswasdrawnmanuallyusing thecomputermouse.A×40objectivewasused,forwhicheach frame(field)onthemonitorrepresentedatissueareaof0.035mm2. Immunostainedsectionsfromthepatientsandcontrolswerecoded and mixed,and measurementsweremadeby thesameperson (M.E.)whowasblindtotheidentity ofthesections(i.e.,IBSor control).

Statisticalanalysis

Differences in gender between patients and controls were testedusingFisher’sexacttest.Differencesintheageprofilewere testedusingtheMann–Whitneynon-parametrictest.Differences betweencontrolsandallIBSpatients(IBS-total),andbetweenIBS- D,IBS-MandIBS-CpatientsweretestedusingtheKruskal–Wallis non-parametrictestwithDunn’spost-test.Thedataarepresented asmean±SEMvalues,anddifferenceswithP<0.05wereconsid- eredtobestatisticallysignificant.

Results

Patientsandcontrols

The genderand age distributions didnot differsignificantly betweenthepatientsandthecontrols(P=0.2and0.7,respectively).

Colonoscopy,histopathologyandimmunohistochemistry

Theendoscopicandhistopathologicalappearanceofthecolon andrectum wasnormalin boththepatientsandcontrols.PYY- andsomatostatin-immunoreactivecellswerefoundmostlyinthe cryptsofLieberkühninboththepatientsandthecontrols,andwere basket-orflask-shaped,sometimeswithalongbasalcytoplasmic process.

Quantificationofimmunoreactivecelldensity PYYcelldensity

ThedensitiesofPYYcellsasdeterminedbycomputerizedimage analysis and as counted per microscopic field are summarized inTables1and 2anddepictedgraphicallyinFigs.1and2.The Kruskal–Wallistestrevealedsignificantdifferencesbetweenthe IBSpatientsandthecontrols(P<0.0001).Dunn’spost-testrevealed thatPYYcelldensitywaslowerinIBS-totalandallthreeoftheIBS subgroupsrelativetothecontrols(P<0.0001forall).Theresults of receiver operator characteristic(ROC) analysiswith thearea under theROCcurve (AUC),95%confidence intervals (95%CIs) andPvaluesforPYYcelldensityareshowninFigs.3and4.The sensitivityandspecificityforcut-offvaluesof<188cells/mm2and

<6cells/microscopicfieldforadiagnosisofIBSaregiveninTable3.

Somatostatincelldensity

Thesomatostatincell densitywassignificantlyhigher in IBS patients than in the controls (Tables 1 and 2; Figs. 5 and 6;

Kruskal–Wallistest,P<0.0001).Dunn’spost-testrevealedthatthe increased somatostatin cell density was statistically significant inIBS-total andalloftheIBS-subgroupsrelative tothecontrols (P<0.0001 forall). ROC curves (Figs. 7and 8)for somatostatin celldensity,andthesensitivityandspecificityforcut-offvalues

(3)

Table1

DensitiesofPYYandsomatostatincellsincontrolsandpatients(measuredbycomputerizedimageanalysis),expressedasthenumberofcellsrelativetotheareaofepithelial cells.Dataaremean±SEMvalues.

Endocrinecelltype Controls IBS-total IBS-D IBS-M IBS-C

Cells/mm2 Cells/mm2 Cells/mm2 Cells/mm2 Cells/mm2

PYY 430±9 144±4*** 145±6*** 128±6*** 148±5***

Somatostatin 156±7 251±8*** 265±2*** 257±1*** 234±7***

***P<0.0001vs.controls.

Table2

DensitiesofPYYandsomatostatincellsincontrolsandIBSpatientsexpressedasthenumberofcellspermicroscopicfield.Dataaremean±SEMvalue.

Endocrinecelltype Controls IBS-total IBS-D IBS-M IBS-C

Cells/field Cells/field Cells/field Cells/field Cells/field

PYY 8.4±0.3 4.5±0.1*** 4.6±0.2*** 4.5±0.3*** 4.6±0.2***

Somatostatin 5.0±0.2 9.8±0.8*** 8.9±0.2*** 8.3±0.3*** 8.4±0.2***

***P<0.0001vs.controls.

Fig.1. RectalPYY-immunoreactivecellsin(A)acontrolsubjectand(B)apatientwithIBS.

A

Con trols

IBS-total IBS-D

IBS -M

IBS-C 0

200 400 600

*** *** *** ***

Number of cells/mm2 epithelium (mean + SE)

B

Controls IBS-total

IBS-D IBS-M

IBS-C 0

2 4 6 8 10

Number of cells/field (mean + SE)

*** *** *** ***

Fig.2. DensityofPYYcellsexpressedrelativetotheareaofepithelialcells(A)andasthenumberofcellspermicroscopicfield(B)in10randomlychosenfieldsintissue samplestakenfromthecontrolsandIBS-total,IBS-D,IBS-M,andIBS-Cpatients.***P<0.0001vs.controlgroup.

Table3

SensitivityandspecificityofthePYYcelldensityasabiomarkerforIBSatcut-offvaluesof<188cells/mm2epitheliumand<6cells/microscopicfield.

IBS-total IBS-D IBS-M IBS-C

Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field

Sensitivity(%) 89 90 87 87 100 100 88 88

Specificity(%) 87 95 87 89 87 89 87 89

(4)

ROC curve A

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

ROC c urve C

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

ROC curve D

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

ROC curve B

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

Fig.3.ResultsofROCanalysisforPYYcelldensityasmeasuredrelativetotheareaofepithelialcellsin(A)IBS-total(AUC=0.95,95%CI=0.92–0.98,P<0.0001),(B)IBS-D (AUC=0.94,95%CI=0.90–0.98,P<0.0001),(C)IBS-M(AUC=0.99,95%CI=0.97–1.00,P<0.0001)and(D)IBS-C(AUC=0.95,95%CI=0.91–0.98,P<0.0001).AUC=1represents aperfecttest,andAUC=0.5representsanon-discriminatingtest.

ROC curve A

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

ROC curve B

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

ROC c urve C

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

ROC curve D

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

Sensitivity%

Fig.4. ResultsofROCanalysisforPYYcelldensitymeasuredin10randomlychosenmicroscopicfieldsin(A)IBS-total(AUC=0.99,95%CI=0.98–1.00,P<0.0001),(B)IBS-D (AUC=0.99,95%CI=0.97–1.00,P<0.0001),(C)IBS–M(AUC=1.0,95%CI=1.00–1.00,P<0.0001)and(D)IBS-C(AUC=0.99,95%CI=0.98–1.00,P<0.0001).

(5)

Fig.5.Somatostatin-immunoreactivecellsinrectaltissuefromacontrolsubject(A)andapatientwithIBS(B).

A

Controls IBS-tota

l IBS

-D IBS

-M IBS-C 0

100 200 300

Number of cells/mm2 epithelium (mean + SE)

*** *** ***

***

B

Controls IBS-total

IBS-D IBS-M

IBS-C 0

5 10 15

Number of cells/field (mean + SE)

*** *** *** ***

Fig.6.Somatostatincelldensityexpressedrelativetotheareaofepithelialcells(A)and(B)asthenumberofcellspermicroscopicfieldinIBS-total,IBS-D,IBS-MandIBS-C patients.***P<0.0001vs.controlgroup.

Table4

SensitivityandspecificityofthesomatostatincelldensityasabiomarkerforIBSatcut-offvaluesof>182cells/mm2epitheliumand>6cells/microscopicfield.

IBS-total IBS-D IBS-M IBS-C

Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field Cells/mm2 Cells/field

Sensitivity(%) 91 97 87 96 100 93 93 92

Specificity(%) 81 90 81 90 81 90 81 90

of>182cells/mm2and>6cells/microscopicfieldforadiagnosisof IBSaregiveninTable4.

Discussion

Thediagnosisof IBSisperformedviaaprocessof exclusion, whereby extensive examinations and tests are conducted to exclude other organic diseases [1,10–12]. Attempts have been madetoachieve apositive symptom-baseddiagnosissimilarto thoseusedinpsychiatry[3–9,33],whichculminatedintheestab- lishmentofthesymptoms-basedRomeIdiagnosticcriteriaforIBS in1988byaninternationalgroupofgastroenterologists.Thesecri- teriaweresucceededbyrefinementsin1999(RomeIIcriteria)and 2006(RomeIIIcriteria).TheRomecriteriaarenotwidelyusedin currentclinicalpractice[9,11,34]becauseofthepotentialtomiss organicdiseases thatmimic IBSsymptoms buthave adifferent pathophysiologyandtreatments[10,11,34,35].Severaltestsand examinations measuring gut motility, visceral hypersensitivity,

autonomicreactivity,mucosalinflammation,fecalproteases,gut flora,serumantibodies,geneexpressionandfoodallergieshave beenconsidered for the diagnosisof IBS, but nonehas proven usefulasabiomarkerforIBSdiagnosis[10–13,36,37].

Apaneloftenserologicalbiomarkersthatarecommonlycon- sideredinthedifferentialdiagnosisforIBSpatients,suchasthose forinflammatoryboweldiseaseandcoeliacdisease,wereexam- inedbyLemboetal.asbiomarkersforthediagnosisofIBS[38].

TheseauthorsusedthesmartDiagnosticAlgorithmandfoundan AUCof0.763forthispanel.Jonesetal.addedafurther24sero- logicalbiomarkerstothatpanel(thustotalling34),andexamined themtogetherwith4psychologicalmarkers[39].Thecombination ofthese34markershasbeenreportedtobegoodfordifferenti- atingIBSfromhealth(AUC=0.81),andwasimprovedbyadding thefourpsychologicalmarkers(AUC=0.92)[39].However,theuse ofserologicalbiomarkerscommontoothergastrointestinaldis- easescannotbeconsideredasanIBS-specificbiomarker;rather,it isyetanothermethodofexclusiondiagnosis.Furthermore,com- biningtheseserologicalmarkerswithpsychologicalmarkers,with

(6)

A

0 50 100

150 0

50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

B

0 50 100

150 0

20 40 60 80 100

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

C

0 20 40 60 80

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

D

0 20 40 60 80

0 20 40 60 80 100

100% - Specificity%

100%- Sensitivity

Fig.7. ROCcurvesforsomatostatincelldensityexpressedrelativetotheareaofepithelialcellsin(A)IBS-total(AUC=0.86,95%CI=0.79–0.92,P<0.0001),(B)IBS-D(AUC=0.83, 95%CI=0.73–0.93,P<0.0001),(C)IBS-M(AUC=0.90,95%CI=0.83–0.97,P<0.0001)and(D)IBS-C(AUC=0.86,95%CI=0.78–0.94,P<0.0001).

A

0 20 40 60 80

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

B

0 20 40 60 80

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

C

0 20 40 60 80

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

D

0 20 40 60 80

0 50 100 150

100% - Specificity%

100%-Sensitivity %

Fig.8. ROCanalysisforsomatostatincelldensityexpressedasthenumberofcellspermicroscopicfieldin(A)IBS-total(AUC=0.93,95%CI=0.89–0.98,P<0.0001),(B)IBS-D (AUC=0.92,95%CI=0.86–0.98,P<0.0001),(C)IBS-M(AUC=0.94,95%CI=0.90–0.98,P<0.0001)and(D)IBS-C(AUC=0.93,95%CI=0.88–0.98,P<0.0001).

(7)

thehypothesisthatanxietyanddepressionaremorelikelytoresult fromthesymptomsofthedisorder[40],isnotlogical.Ultimately, thisapproachiscomplicated,timeconsuming,expensiveanddif- ficulttoapplyineverydayclinicalpractice.

Severalabnormalitiesin the gastrointestinalendocrine cells, includinginthestomachandthesmallandlargeintestines,have beenreportedinIBSpatients[1,29,41],andtheseabnormalities appeartoplay animportantrole inthepathophysiologyofthe disease[28,29].ThedensityofduodenalchromograninAcellshas beenproposedasabiomarkerforthediagnosisofIBS[42],andis reportedlyeffectiveatdifferentiatingIBSfromthehealthycondi- tion(AUC=97).Thefindingsofthepresentstudysuggesttwonew biomarkersforthediagnosisofIBS:thecelldensitiesofrectalPYY andsomatostatincells.

PYYcelldensityisagoodbiomarkerfordifferentiatingIBSfrom thehealthycondition,withAUCsof0.95and0.99whenexpressed relativetotheareaofepithelialcells andper microscopicfield, respectively.WhenanalyzedaccordingtothevariousIBSsubtypes, theAUCswere 0.94, 0.99 and0.95 for thedensity of PYYcells expressedrelativetotheareasofepithelialcellsinIBS-D,IBS-M andIBS-C,respectively,and0.99,1.0and0.99,respectively,when expressedpermicroscopic field.Thus, thedensity ofrectal PYY cellsappearstobeagoodbiomarkerforallIBSsubtypes.Can a blood-basedbiomarkerassayforcirculatingPYYandsomatostatin beused?PYYcellsoccurintheileum,colonandrectum[30,43,44].

SimilarlySomatostatincellsarelocalizedinthestomach,small-and largeintestine[15,30,43–46].Hencecirculatingsomatostatinand PYYwouldreflectthereleaseofthesehormonesfromthecellsin allthesesegments.TherewasnodifferencebetweenIBSpatients andcontrolsregardingfastingandpostprandialPYYplasmalev- els[47].Similarly,there wasnosignificantdifferenceinfasting somatostatinplasmalevelbetweenIBSpatientsandcontrols[48].

Thus,measuringthecirculatingPYYandsomatostatinisofnouse asamarkerforthediagnosisofIBS.

Similarly,thedensityofrectalsomatostatincellsappearstobe agoodbiomarkerfordifferentiatingbetweenIBSandthehealthy condition,withAUCsof0.86and0.93whenexpressedrelativeto theareaofepithelialcellsandpermicroscopicfield,respectively.

ThisparameterisequallygoodasabiomarkerforalloftheIBS subtypes,withAUCsof0.83,0.90and0.86forIBS-D,IBS-MandIBS- C,respectively,expressedrelativetotheareaofepithelialcells,and 0.93,0.92and0.93,respectively,whenexpressedpermicroscopic field.

ThesefindingsestablishthatPYYandsomatostatincelldensi- tiescanbeusedasbiomarkersforIBS,clearlydifferentiatingdisease fromthehealthycondition,butthequestionastowhethertheydif- ferentiateIBSfromothergastrointestinaldiseasesthatmimicIBS symptomshasyettobeanswereddefinitively.Themostcommonly missedgastrointestinaldiseasesduringsymptom-baseddiagnosis areceliacdisease,inflammatoryboweldiseasesincludingmicro- scopiccolitisandcolorectalcancer[49,50].Ithasbeenreported thatplasmalevelsofPYYareincreasedinceliacdisease[51],and thedensityoflarge-intestinalPYYcellsisincreasedinlymphocytic colitis,unchangedinulcerativecolitisandincolonandrectalcan- cers,anddecreasedinCrohn’sdisease[32,44,52,53].Ittherefore appearsthatwiththeexceptionofCrohn’sdisease,thedensityof rectalPYYcellscanpotentiallybeusedtodifferentiateIBSfrom thesegastrointestinaldiseases.Large-intestinalsomatostatincell densityisnotchangedinlymphocyticcolitisorulcerativecolitis, andisdecreasedincolonandrectalcancers[32,44,52,53].There- fore,aswithPYYcelldensity,thedensityofrectalsomatostatin cellsseemslikelytobeabletodifferentiateIBSfromsomeother gastrointestinaldiseases.

The rectum is easily accessible for biopsy sampling and is generallywelltoleratedbypatients,andimmunohistochemistry isinexpensive and usedroutinelyin all pathologylaboratories.

Furthermore,manuallycountingthePYYandsomatostatincellsin tenmicroscopicfieldsisrapidanddoesnotrequiresophisticated equipmentorconsiderableexperience.

Conclusion

Thisstudyhasrevealedtwonewbiomarkersforthediagnosisof IBS,namelythedensitiesoftherectalPYYandsomatostatincells.

Thesetwobiomarkersfulfilltherequirementsforclinically use- fulbiomarkersinthattheyhavebeenshowntopossess agood ability to differentiate IBS from the healthy condition, maybe abletodifferentiateIBSfromothergastrointestinaldiseasesthat mimicIBSsymptoms, andareinexpensive,simple, easytoper- formanddonotrequireconsiderableexperienceorsophisticated equipment.

Conflictsofinterest

Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttoreport.

Authorcontributions

M.E.plannedthestudy,recruitedthepatientsandcontrolsub- jects,performedthecolonoscopyandmorphometry,analyzedthe dataanddraftedthemanuscript.J.G.H.,O.H.G.andT.H.contributed equallytotheplanningofthestudyandevaluationoftheresults, andcommenteduponthemanuscript.

Acknowledgement

ThestudywassupportedbyagrantfromHelse-Fonna(grantno.

40415).

References

[1]El-SalhyM.Irritablebowelsyndrome:diagnosisandpathogenesis.WorldJ Gastroenterol2012;18:5151–63.

[2]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Irritablebowelsyndrome:

diagnosis,pathogenesisandtreatmentoptions.NewYork:NovaSciencePub- lishers,Inc.;2012.

[3]ManningAP,ThompsonWG,HeatonKW,MorrisAF.Towardspositivediagnosis oftheirritablebowel.BrMedJ1978;2:653–4.

[4]DrossmanDA.RomeIII:thenewcriteria.ChinJDigDis2006;7:181–5.

[5]DrossmanDA.ThefunctionalgastrointestinaldisordersandtheRomeIIpro- cess.Gut1999;45(Suppl.2):II1–5.

[6]KruisW,ThiemeC,WeinzierlM,SchusslerP,HollJ,PaulusW.Adiagnosticscore fortheirritablebowelsyndrome.Itsvalueintheexclusionoforganicdisease.

Gastroenterology1984;87:1–7.

[7]BellentaniS,BaldoniP,PetrellaS,TataC,ArmocidaC,MarchegianoP,etal.A simplescorefortheidentificationofpatientsathighriskoforganicdiseases ofthecoloninthefamilydoctorconsultingroom.TheLocalIBSStudyGroup.

FamPract1990;7:307–12.

[8]Mazumdar TN, Prasad KV, Bhat PV. Formulation of a scoring chart for irritablebowelsyndrome(IBS):aprospectivestudy.IndianJGastroenterol 1988;7:101–2.

[9]LongstrethGF,ThompsonWG,CheyWD,HoughtonLA,MearinF,SpillerRC.

Functionalboweldisorders.Gastroenterology2006;130:1480–91.

[10]CamilleriM.Dothesymptom-based,Romecriteriaofirritablebowelsyndrome leadtobetterdiagnosisandtreatmentoutcomes?Theconargument.ClinGas- troenterolHepatol2009;8:129.

[11]Quigley EM. The ‘con’ case. TheRome processand functional gastroin- testinaldisorders:thebarbariansareatthegate!NeurogastroenterolMotil 2007;19:793–7.

[12]JellemaP,vanderWindtDA,SchellevisFG,vanderHorstHE.Systematicreview:

accuracyofsymptom-basedcriteriafordiagnosisofirritablebowelsyndrome inprimarycare.AlimentPharmacolTher2009;30:695–706.

[13]Wendelbo I, Mazzawi T, El-Salhy M. Increased serotonin transporter immunoreactivityintensityintheileumofpatientswithirritableboweldis- ease.MolMedRep2013;9:180–4.

[14]El-SalhyM,WendelboIH,GundersenD.ReducedchromograninAcellden- sityintheileumofpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.MolMedRep 2013;7:1241–4.

[15]El-SalhyM,VaaliK,DizdarV,HauskenT.Abnormalsmall-intestinalendocrine cellsinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.DigDisSci2010;55:3508–13.

(8)

[16]El-SalhyM,MazzawiT,GundersenD,HauskenT.ChromograninAcellden- sityintherectumofpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.MolMedRep 2012;6:1223–5.

[17]El-SalhyM,Lomholt-BeckB,HauskenT.ChromograninAasapossibletoolinthe diagnosisofirritablebowelsyndrome.ScandJGastroenterol2010;45:1435–9.

[18]El-SalhyM,LilleboE,ReinemoA,SalmelidL.Ghrelininpatientswithirritable bowelsyndrome.IntJMolMed2009;23:703–7.

[19]El-SalhyM,HatlebakkJG,GundersenD,HauskenT.Endocrinecellsinthegastric oxynticmucosaofpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.WorldJGastrointest Endosc2014;6:176–85.

[20]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,OstgaardH,Lomholt-BeckB,HatlebakkJG,Hausken T.LowdensitiesofserotoninandpeptideYYcellsinthecolonofpatientswith irritablebowelsyndrome.DigDisSci2012;57:873–8.

[21]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Chromograninacelldensity asadiagnosticmarkerforlymphocyticcolitis.DigDisSci2012;57:3154–9.

[22]El-Salhy M, Gilja OH, Hausken T. Chromogranin A cells in the stom- ach of patients with sporadic irritable bowel syndrome. Mol Med Rep 2014;10:1753–7.

[23]SjolundK,EkmanR,WierupN.Covariationofplasmaghrelinandmotilinin irritablebowelsyndrome.Peptides2010;31:1109–12.

[24]WangSH,DongL,LuoJY,GongJ,LiL,LuXL,etal.Decreasedexpressionof serotonininthejejunumandincreasednumbersofmastcellsinthetermi- nalileuminpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.WorldJGastroenterol 2007;13:6041–7.

[25]Park JH, Rhee PL, Kim G, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim JJ, et al. Enteroen- docrinecellcountscorrelatewithvisceralhypersensitivityinpatientswith diarrhoea-predominantirritablebowelsyndrome.NeurogastroenterolMotil 2006;18:539–46.

[26]CoatesMD,MahoneyCR,LindenDR,SampsonJE,ChenJ,BlaszykH,etal.Molec- ulardefectsinmucosalserotonincontentanddecreasedserotoninreuptake transporterinulcerativecolitisandirritablebowelsyndrome.Gastroenter- ology2004;126:1657–64.

[27]El-SalhyM,WendelboI,GundersenD.Serotoninandserotonintransporterin therectumofpatientswithirritableboweldisease.MolMedRep2013;8:451–5.

[28]CamilleriM.Physiologicalunderpinningsofirritablebowelsyndrome:neuro- hormonalmechanisms.JPhysiol2014;592:2967–80.

[29]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,GiljaOH,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Isirritablebowel syndromeanorganicdisorder.WorldJGastroenterol2014;2:384–400.

[30]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Abnormalrectalendocrine cellsinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.RegulPept2014;188:60–5.

[31]el-SalhyM,StenlingR,GrimeliusL.Peptidergicinnervationandendocrinecells inthehumanliver.ScandJGastroenterol1993;28:809–15.

[32]El-SalhyM,DanielssonA,StenlingR,GrimeliusL.Colonicendocrinecellsin inflammatoryboweldisease.JInternMed1997;242:413–9.

[33]LinOS.Colonoscopyinirritablebowelsyndrome:whomarewereassuring.

GastrointestEndosc2005;62:900–2.

[34]Gladman LM,GorardDA.Generalpractitionerandhospitalspecialistatti- tudes to functional gastrointestinal disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:651–4.

[35]BarbaraG,StanghelliniV.BiomarkersinIBS:whenwilltheyreplacesymptoms fordiagnosisandmanagement.Gut2009;58:1571–5.

[36]CamilleriM,AndrewsCN,BharuchaAE, CarlsonPJ,Ferber I,StephensD, etal.Alterationsinexpressionofp11andSERTinmucosalbiopsyspeci- mensofpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.Gastroenterology2007;132:

17–25.

[37]AerssensJ,CamilleriM,TalloenW,ThielemansL,GohlmannHW,VanDen WyngaertI,etal.Alterationsinmucosalimmunityidentifiedinthecolonof patientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.ClinGastroenterolHepatol2008;6:

194–205.

[38]LemboAJ,NeriB,TolleyJ,BarkenD,CarrollS,PanH.Useofserumbiomark- ersinadiagnostictestforirritablebowelsyndrome.AlimentPharmacolTher 2009;29:834–42.

[39]JonesMP,CheyWD,SinghS,GongH,ShringarpureR,HoeN,etal.Abiomarker panelandpsychologicalmorbiditydifferentiatestheirritablebowelsyndrome fromhealthandprovidesnovelpathophysiologicalleads.AlimentPharmacol Ther2014;39:426–37.

[40]SpillerR,AzizQ,CreedF,EmmanuelA,HoughtonL,HunginP,etal.Guidelines ontheirritablebowelsyndrome:mechanismsandpracticalmanagement.Gut 2007;56:1770–98.

[41]El-SalhyM,HatlebakkJG,GiljaOH,HauskenT.Irritablebowelsyndrome:recent developmentsindiagnosis,pathophysiology,andtreatment.ExpertRevGas- troenterolHepatol2014;8:435–43.

[42]El-SalhyM,GiljaOH,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Duodenalchro- mograninacelldensityasabiomarkerforthediagnosisofirritablebowel syndrome.GastroenterolResPract2014;2014:462856.

[43]El-SalhyM,GiljaOH,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Endocrinecells intheileumofpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.WorldJGastroenterol 2014;20:2383–91.

[44]El-SalhyM,GundersenD,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Highdensitiesofserotonin andpeptideYYcellsinthecolonofpatientswithlymphocyticcolitis.WorldJ Gastroenterol2012;18:6070–5.

[45]El-SalhyM,GiljaOH,GundersenD,HauskenT.Endocrinecellsintheoxyntic mucosaofthestomachinpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.WorldJ GastrointestEndosc2014;6:176–85.

[46]El-SalhyM,GiljaOH,HatlebakkJG,HauskenT.Stomachantralendocrinecells inpatientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.IntJMolMed2014;34:967–74.

[47]VanDerVeekPP,BiemondI,MascleeAA.Proximalanddistalguthormone secretioninirritablebowelsyndrome.ScandJGastroenterol2006;41:170–7.

[48]ZhangH,YanY,ShiR,LinZ,WangM,LinL.Correlationofguthormoneswith irritablebowelsyndrome.Digestion2008;78:72–6.

[49]El-SalhyM,HalweJ,Lomholt-BeckB,GundersenD.Theprevalenceofinflam- matoryboweldiseases,microscopiccolitis,andcolorectalcancerinpatients withirritablebowelsyndrome.GastroenterolInsights2011;3:7–10.

[50]El-SalhyM,Lomholt-BeckB,GundersenD.Theprevalenceofceliacdiseasein patientswithirritablebowelsyndrome.MolMedRep2011;4:403–5.

[51]SjolundK,EkmanR.IncreasedplasmalevelsofpeptideYYincoeliacdisease.

ScandJGastroenterol1988;23:297–300.

[52]El-SalhyM,MahdaviJ,NorrgardO.Colonicendocrinecellsinpatientswith carcinomaofthecolon.EurJGastroenterolHepatol1998;10:517–22.

[53]El-SalhyM,NorrgårdO,FranzenL,ForsgrenS.Colonicendocrinecellsinrec- talcarcinoma,withparticularregardtopreoperativeirradiation.GICancer 1997;2:285–92.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Conclusion: In the presence of an IBS-subtype pattern consistent with post-infectious IBS (PI-IBS), and in the absence of any other plausible causes, we conclude that acute

But despite such replacement (instead of exclusion of food items) unguided IBS patients still had a significant lower intake of calcium than IBS patients that received guidance

AGA: Anti-gliadin antibodies; ARC: Arcuate nucleus; FODMAPs: Fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols; GFD: Gluten-free diet; IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-D:

Interaction between Diet, Microbiota, and Endocrine Cells in the Guts of Patients with IBS The food that we ingest acts as a substrate (prebiotics) for intestinal bacteria5. Our

Figure 1: CgA cell density expressed in relation to epithelial cells, measured (a) in ten randomly chosen fields, (b) as the number of cells per microscopic field in ten randomly

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The gastric endocrine cells in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) tend to normalize following dietary guidance.. The aim of the present study was

Rationale: Patients suffering from chronic radiation-induced small bowel disease (RISBD) after cancer treatment have similar symptoms as patients with IBS (irritable bowel..

In the rectum of patients with sporadic (nonspecific) IBS, the densities of PYY and enteroglucagon cells were significantly lower and that of somatostatin cells was