• No results found

Jack V. Tagart (1.265Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Jack V. Tagart (1.265Mb)"

Copied!
34
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

RED KING CRAB

In

Alaskan Waters

Jack V. Tagart

(2)

FOCUS

• Multiple species of king crab in Alaska, principle stocks include

– Bristol Bay red king crab (Paralithodes camtchaticus) – Pribolof Islands blue king crab (P. platypus), and

– Aleutian Islands golden or brown king crab (Lithodes aequispinus)

• This presentation will focus on the Bristol Bay stock of red king crab (BB RKC).

(3)

STOCK DISTRIBUTION

• Bristol Bay stock centered in the

southeastern portion of

Eastern Bering Sea

2002 Distribution: legal males

(4)

ABUNDANCE TRENDS

• Rapid increase in abundance in 1970s

• Population crash in 1980s

• Modest increase in abundance recently

• Mean number of legal males crab (>160 mm CW)

– 1973-1982: 24.5 million – 1983-1992: 6.0 million – 1993-2002: 7.5 million

(5)

POPULATION TRENDS

(6)

PROPORTION MATURE

BB RKC

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001

PROPORTION MATURE

(7)

RECRUITMENT TRENDS

(8)

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

• Joint Federal & State Management

• Federal Fisheries Management Plan (FMP)

– Separate authorities assigned to Federal and State governments

• Day to day management is conducted by the

State

(9)

CATCH MONITORING

• CATCH RECORDING:

– Mandatory pot registration

– Voluntary in-season production log – State Fish Receiving Tickets

– Observer data

• MANDATORY OBSERVER PROGRAM

– Randomly place observers on 10% of CV fleet for all vessels >75’ LOA

– 100% observer coverage for CPs, and shore-side processors

(10)

CATCH HISTORY

• 1953-1980: Increasing catch,

approximately within decadal cycles

• Peak Catch in 1980: 59 thousand mt

• Crash following 1980

• Mean catch in last 10 years (exclusive of closed seasons): ~4700 mt

• Fishery was closed to all fishing in 1983,

1994 and 1995

(11)

CATCH TREND

BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB

59

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998

CATCH (mt x 1000)

(12)

CPUE & MEAN WT

(13)

FISHING EFFORT 1980-2001

• Number of vessels has remained fairly stable following drop in mid-1980s

• Days fished dropped from 91 to 3

• Registered pots declined from 78,000 to 24,500

• Pots pulled dropped from 570,000 to 63,000

(14)

NUMBER OF VESSELS AND

POTS FISHED

(15)

REFERENCE POINTS

• Biomass estimated from survey and models

• MSST (Minimum Stock Size Threshold): 50% of total mean spawning biomass (mature males and females) 1983-1997

– Overfished: SB<MSST

• MFMT (Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold):

F=0.20

• SY (Sustainable Yield): 0.2(SB)

– Overfishing: Harvest>SY in any one year

• GHL (Guideline Harvest Level)

(16)

HISTORIC ALLOWABLE HARVEST RATES

• Pre-1990: GHL was 20-60% of legal male crab (165 mm CW or 135 mm CL)

• 1990: GHL changed to 20% mature male crab (120 mm CL), not to exceed 60% of legal male crab

– Constraint: fishery required a minimum of 8.4 million mature female crab (>90 mm CL)

(17)

CURRENT ALLOWABLE HARVEST RATES

• 1996 introduced stair-stepped system (coincident with LBA model abundance estimates)

– Constraints:

• Minimum Effective Spawning Biomass (ESB) of 6600 mt (male+female)

• Proposed GHL must be > 1,800 mt of legal male crab

– ESB > 6,600 mt & < 25,000 mt: GHL=10% legal males – ESB > 25,000 mt: GHL=15% of legal males

• Motive: promote rebuilding at low stock levels

(18)

FISHERY PERFORMANCE

• Following 1980 crash, CPUE is gradually

increasing

• Mean weight of legal crab:

increasing

• Season length is decreasing

• Frequency of exceeding the GHL is increasing (4 of last 6 years)

BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB

-1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

CATCH / GHL

(19)

FISHERY PERFORMANCE

TRENDS

(20)

ABUNDANCE / HARVEST

RATE

(21)

FISHERY MANAGEMENT

• Joint Federal/State Management System

• Three Categories of Assigned Responsibility

1) Management measures fixed in the Federal FMP

2) Frameworked management measures in the FMP

3) Measures discretionary to the State

(22)

FIXED IN THE FMP

• Gear

• Permits

• Limited Access

• Federal Observer Requirements

(23)

FRAMEWORKED

• Size Limits

• GHL

• In-season Adjustments

• Reporting Districts

• Seasons

• Pot Limits

• Registration Areas

• Sex Restrictions

(24)

DISCRETIONARY

• Reporting Requirements

• Gear Placement and Removal, Storage, or Modification

• Vessel Tank Inspections

• State Observer Requirements

• Bycatch Limits (in the directed crab fishery)

(25)

CURRENT FISHERY

• LIMITED ACCESS POT FISHERY

– Gear, species and area endorsements on limited access permit

– Super-exclusive registration zones

– Pot limits: function of stock abundance – Sex/Size limits: males >160 mm CW

– Specified Seasons: Start date is October 1, duration varies with abundance

(26)

SECTOR DISTRIBUTIONS

• CDQ

– Sixty-five communities – 7.5% of the GHL

• AFA

– Qualified AFA vessels (41 boats) receive limited fraction of GHL (11%).

• GENERAL FISHERY

(27)

BYCATCH

• Contentious issue between crab and non- crab fisheries

• Within Directed Crab Fishery

– Sub-legal males, females, non-target species

• Non-crab Fisheries

– All crab are prohibited species

(28)

BYCATCH ALLLOCATION

• Fishery and area specific bycatch caps

– Caps can be constraining to directed fishing

• CDQ and AFA bycatch allowances

– CDQ awarded Prohibited Species Reserve equal to 7.5% of Total PSC allowance

– AFA awarded % based on catch history

• RKCSS (special catch savings area)

– 35% of PSC cap for Rock sole/Flathead/Other Flatfish

(29)

2003 BB RKC BYCATCH

CAPS

(30)

RECENT BYCATCH TRENDS

(31)

PROTECTED HABITATS

(32)

EMERGENT ISSUES

• Over capitalization

• Fishery Rationalization Proposals

– Stricter License Limitations

– Harvester and Processor Allocations

– Binding Arbitration to facilitate ex-vessel price equity

– Incentives to form harvester cooperatives

(33)

SUMMARY

• Shared Federal/State Management

• Limited Access Fishery with multiple allocation controls

• Currently increasing population abundance

• Adequate catch/effort monitoring, but shrinking fishing season

• Over-capitalized harvesting and processing

sectors struggling to rationalize the fishery

(34)

The End

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

ABSTRACT: This study investigates the temporal and spatial patterns of larval stages of the inva- sive red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (RKC) and co-existing native

The amount of vessels attending both the Red King Crab fishery and the annual Norwegian study of fishing vessel profitability being 13 meters and above is therefore reduced to 3

The number of vessels taking part in the lucrative RKC harvest has increased steadily, and now includes vessels that do not harvest any other species (Norwegian Ministry of

Different rnethods can be used for sampling red king crab abundance, such as trawl, traps and underwater TV surveys (Hufthammer et al., 1996a).. Advantages and

Total red king crab stock index in the Russian economic zone (REZ) and Norwegian economic zone (NEZ), 2001 and 2002; swept area method... Stock index of

The norsel nets gave significantly less fish and more king crab than standard nets, while norsel nets with extra floats caught significantly less fish and king crab compared to

Both crabs (red king crab and the snow crab) are non-indigenous animals for the Barents Sea, playing quite important role in ecosystem and fishery. Brief history of crab

Main patterns in functional features and sediment reworking in soft bottom species communities in the Varanger area in relation to gradients in time (king crab invasion) and