• No results found

CentreforLandTenureStudies,27June2011 UMB,Ås,Norway WelfareEffectsofMarketFriendlyLandReformsinUganda

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CentreforLandTenureStudies,27June2011 UMB,Ås,Norway WelfareEffectsofMarketFriendlyLandReformsinUganda"

Copied!
38
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Welfare Effects of Market Friendly Land Reforms in Uganda

Alex. Tatwangire 1 Stein T. Holden 2

Department of Economics and Resource Management

Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O.Box 5003, 1432 Åas, Norway

Centre for Land Tenure Studies, 27 June 2011 , UMB, Ås,

Norway

(2)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(3)

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

(4)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Land Tenure Systems in Uganda

1

Mailo- Buganda region & parts of Bunyoro

2

Leasehold- period of 49 or 99 years

3

Freehold- parts of Western, Central & Eastern regions

4

Customary

Communal Customary Tenure-Northern & Eastern parts Individual/Family /Clan Customary Tenure- parts of Central, Western, North & South Western

5

Public Land- mainly in urban areas & owned by the Government

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(5)
(6)
(7)

Modes of Land Access and Welfare impacts in Uganda

Welfare effects for land access- market Vs non-market?

land access/mobilization of family assets- income gains for the poor (Finan et al. 2005)

land markets -transfers land from less able to more skilled land sales & concentration- landless poor

land rental & sales markets - active/not a more unequal distribution in Uganda in 1990s (Deininger and Mpunga 2008)

Objectives - marginal poverty reduction effects of land access:

inheritance

a combination of inheritance and other methods of acquisition

(8)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Modes of Land Access and Welfare impacts in Uganda

Welfare effects for land access- market Vs non-market?

land access/mobilization of family assets- income gains for the poor (Finan et al. 2005)

land markets -transfers land from less able to more skilled land sales & concentration- landless poor

land rental & sales markets - active/not a more unequal distribution in Uganda in 1990s (Deininger and Mpunga 2008)

Objectives - marginal poverty reduction effects of land access:

inheritance

a combination of inheritance and other methods of acquisition market access and borrowing

Discuss new policy interventions- new threats of global demand for land?

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(9)

The Role of Tenure Security and Land Markets

Historical circumstances in Uganda- land tenure insecurity & other uninteded cosequences

Tensions & competition - customary Vs legal regulations on land

Restrictions on land transfers - lack of legitimacy/consesus on outcomes

Low agricultural productivity - limited access to

land/credit & low investment on land

(10)
(11)

Land Reforms, Colonial Period (1900-1962)

The “ 1900 Buganda Agreement”

Mailo land tenure - 8,958 square miles-Buganda Kingdom

9000 square miles of land - protectorate as Crown land

Declared traditional occupants of the land - tenants

Freehold, leasehold, & customary - land tenure systems

Crown Land Ordinance of 1903 - tenants at the will of the Crown

Busulu (annual dues) and Envujo (levy per acre)

Law of 1928- rights of occupants on customary land

(12)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Land Reforms, Colonial Period (1900-1962)

The “ 1900 Buganda Agreement”

Mailo land tenure - 8,958 square miles-Buganda Kingdom

9000 square miles of land - protectorate as Crown land

Declared traditional occupants of the land - tenants

Freehold, leasehold, & customary - land tenure systems

Crown Land Ordinance of 1903 - tenants at the will of the Crown

Busulu (annual dues) and Envujo (levy per acre) Law of 1928- rights of occupants on customary land

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(13)

Land Reforms, Colonial Period (1900-1962)

The “ 1900 Buganda Agreement”

Mailo land tenure - 8,958 square miles-Buganda Kingdom

9000 square miles of land - protectorate as Crown land

Declared traditional occupants of the land - tenants

Freehold, leasehold, & customary - land tenure systems

Crown Land Ordinance of 1903 - tenants at the will of the Crown

Busulu (annual dues) and Envujo (levy per acre)

Law of 1928- rights of occupants on customary land

(14)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

From Independence (1962) to 1986

The 1969 Public Land Act - more protection for customary tenants against evictions

The 1975 Land Reform Decree

All land declared public- Uganda Land Commission Abolished mailo & freehold tenure- government leases Restrictions imposed- land transfers on customary land Compensations- terminated occupation on customary land

Uninteded cosequences- land grabbing, unlawful evictions, & disputes, resource dissipation

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(15)

Under the Museveni’s Government (1986 to present)

The 1995 Uganda constitution- all to belong to the citizens

Reinstated- customary, mailo, freehold, & leasehold tenure systems

Provides for- stronger land rights on customary land

The 1998 Land Act

Full land ownership, rights, and tenure security

Land use efficiency & better functioning land markets

Can acquire certificate of customary land ownership

Decentralized institutions of land administration

(16)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Under the Museveni’s Government (1986 to present)

The 1995 Uganda constitution- all to belong to the citizens

Reinstated- customary, mailo, freehold, & leasehold tenure systems

Provides for- stronger land rights on customary land

The 1998 Land Act

Full land ownership, rights, and tenure security Land use efficiency & better functioning land markets Can acquire certificate of customary land ownership Decentralized institutions of land administration

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(17)

Under the Museveni’s Government (Continued)

Occupants of mailo/freehold/public- certificates of occupancy

Holders of certificates of customary/lease - convert to freehold tenure

Establishment of a land fund

Land Sector Strategic Plan & new National Land policy- (2004-2010)

tenure security, land access- thru land markets

efficiency of the land administration- modernising

infrastructure/information

(18)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Under the Museveni’s Government (Continued)

Occupants of mailo/freehold/public- certificates of occupancy

Holders of certificates of customary/lease - convert to freehold tenure

Establishment of a land fund

Land Sector Strategic Plan & new National Land policy- (2004-2010)

tenure security, land access- thru land markets efficiency of the land administration- modernising infrastructure/information

The land amendment law passed in 2009- cultural dissent

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(19)

Under the Museveni’s Government (Continued)

Occupants of mailo/freehold/public- certificates of occupancy

Holders of certificates of customary/lease - convert to freehold tenure

Establishment of a land fund

Land Sector Strategic Plan & new National Land policy- (2004-2010)

tenure security, land access- thru land markets

efficiency of the land administration- modernising

infrastructure/information

(20)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Theoretical Framework

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(21)

Theoretical Framework

A household utility maximization problem- s.t. a set of constraints

access to land from different sources- constraint access to additional land- benefits exceed costs Farm size adjusted- mainly through the market Land access thru inheritance- influenced to a small extent

inherited land per adult-equivalent- changes over time.

constraints of cash, liquidity & labor endowment-

(22)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Data and Descriptive Statistics Econometric Model Specifications

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(23)

Data and Field Sampling

2001 IFPRI survey: 450 households in 107 communities.

2003 REPEAT survey: 94 out of 107 communities, 333 households out of the 450 2005 REPEAT survey: 20 households dropped out

dropped 4 households-contradicting land access values

balanced panel data of 309 households; 927 observations, 26

(24)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Data and Descriptive Statistics Econometric Model Specifications

Household Welfare Indicators, 2005 prices

Real income per adult equivalent, the sum of :

value of home crop production net of the cost of inputs value of home produced livestock that were consumed cash income from sale of livestock/livestock products net of livestock production costs

cash income from seasonal and monthly off-farm activities.

Real expenditure per adult equivalent

cash expenditure for consumption & value of consumption of home produced goods

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(25)

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

(26)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Data and Descriptive Statistics Econometric Model Specifications

Econometric Models Estimated

land owned, operated, and acquired through the market- endogenous

Main Method

residual component method- based on Holden et al. (2009; 2011)

residual component asset variable (=productive asset - predicted asset)

Method for Robustness Check

The standard IV two-stage least squares (2SLS) method

a linear combination of five instruments

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(27)

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

(32)
(33)

Outline

1 Introduction

Land Policy Reforms in Uganda Theoretical Framework

2 Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used Data and Descriptive Statistics

Econometric Model Specifications

3 Results and Discussion Prefered Results

Further Robustness Checks

Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

(34)

Introduction Data, Welfare Indicators, and Econometric Models Used

Results and Discussion Conclusions & Policy Recommendations

Summary

Increasing land scarcity has made land access an important poverty and welfare indicator in Uganda.

Land, whether accessed through the market or non-market ways plays an important role in enhancing household welfare.

Better land access through the market has a stronger welfare-improving effect than better land access through inheritance.

Can the recent land reforms ensure pro-poor land transfers?

(35)

Challenges of Land Reforms in the Face of Global Land Grab

Revise the land law- to protect land ownership & rights of the citizens

Re-establish customary law courts- ease access to justice Strengthen the customary regulations - land transfers without undermining cultural interests

Use state land fund- surveying & registering titles land owners/occupants

Regulate land grabbing & displacement of vulnerable land owners-powerful local elites

Restrict foreign investments on farmlands- out-grower schemes

Modernize service delivery in the land sector- inefficiency,

(36)

Promote land governance/administration

Define clear conditions on foreign land acquisitions- protect national interests

Hold foreign investors accountable- ensure food security, employment, & effecient use of land

Promote transparency on land deals on farmland- suspicions & exploitation

Consult with citizens and land owners/occupants - to ensure consensus, social legitimacy, and co-operation

Guarantee tenure security for forein investments on land- meet all the agreed conditions

Public education- land administration, access, registration

and distress sales

(37)
(38)

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

If LA for development of land is understood as simple transfer of ownership from passive to active owners the problems regarding trans- formation of ownership and lesser

This thesis investigates the customary land tenure systems in Malawi and how the tenure security they provide affect households’ decisions on land rental market

The study (i) reviews human rights that affect land tenure; (ii) develops a theoretical approach to rights, institutions and human capabilities; (iii) analyses recent

The Mozambican Land Law of 1997 intends to provide flexible rules of access to land, while securing local people’s customary rights, as well as equal rights for women and men..

This chapter provides an overview of what we know about the emerging land markets in Africa, the role of tenure systems, tenure reforms and land policies in shaping the distribution

We started by discussing a customary land tenure system with differential access to and control over land among women and men in a society where descent and inheritance are

According to the New Land Policy (2002) the Government will undertake Traditional Authority boundary demarcation “in order to protect the villagers’ land rights and promote better and

It introduces a basic structure including: (i) ownership and use of agricultural and non-agricultural land and immobile assets on the land, (ii) sources of land acquisition