• No results found

Legacy effects of experimental environmental change on soil micro-arthropod communities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Legacy effects of experimental environmental change on soil micro-arthropod communities"

Copied!
17
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

micro-arthropod communities

RUBENERIKROOS ,1,  TONEBIRKEMOE ,1 JOHANASPLUND ,1 PETERL’UPTACIK,2 NATALIARASCHMANOVA ,2 JUHAM. ALATALO ,3,4 SIRILIEOLSEN ,5 ANDKARIKLANDERUD 1

1Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003,As, 1432 Norway

2Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol JozefSafarik University, Kosice, Slovakia

3Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

4Environmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

5Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalleen 21, Oslo, 0349 Norway

Citation: Roos, R. E., T. Birkemoe, J. Asplund, P. Luptacik, N. Raschmanova, J. M. Alatalo, S. L. Olsen, and K. Klanderud. 2020. Legacy effects of experimental environmental change on soil micro-arthropod communities.

Ecosphere 11(2):e03030. 10.1002/ecs2.3030

Abstract. Global change experiments such as experimental warming and nutrient addition strongly affect the structure and functioning of high latitude and altitude ecosystems. However, it is often unknown to what extend such effects are permanent or whether changes persist after environmental conditions return to pre-treatment levels. In this study, we assess the legacy effects of temperature manipulation and nutrient addition experiments on alpine soil micro-arthropod (i.e., Collembola and Oribatida) communities nine years after the treatments were discontinued. Treatment effects on the vegetation were still detectable six years after cessation, although grazing increased the recovery rate. Because micro-arthropods are often closely associated with vegetation, we expected tofind that treatment effects on Collembola and Oribatida abundance and species composition persisted to date, reflecting plant community dynamics. Also, we expected large-bodied, drought-resistant Collembola species that live on top of the soil to show less strong legacy effects. We did notfind legacy effects of environmental treatments on Collembola and Mesostig- mata in terms of abundance. However, we found persistent changes in community composition of Collem- bola and Oribatida, suggesting treatment effects persist to date. The generalistFolsomia quadrioculatawas the most responsive Collembola species to initial treatments, most likely due to its variable life-history strategy. Although its abundance recovered,F. quadrioculataremained dominant in Collembola communi- ties after cessation of the treatments. Grazing affected community composition of both Collembola and Oribatida, but we did notfind grazing to reduce legacy effects on micro-arthropod as it did for vegetation.

We therefore conclude that the environmental treatments had only temporary effects on micro-arthropods in terms of overall abundance, but that effects on individual species and therefore species composition may be long-lasting and less predictable.

Key words: Acari; alpine ecology; Collembola; community recovery; ecological resilience; ecosystem recovery;

experimental warming; herbivory; nutrient addition; Oribatida.

Received20 November 2019; accepted 3 December 2019. Corresponding Editor: Uffe N. Nielsen.

Copyright:©2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 E-mail:[email protected]

I

NTRODUCTION

Over the last decades, ecosystems at high lati- tude and altitude have experienced a significant

temperature increase (Isaksen et al. 2016, Rizzi et al. 2017) and this is expected to continue in the future (Stocker 2014). Simultaneously, nitrogen availability may increase due to increased

(2)

mineralization rates (Nadelhoffer et al. 1991, Hobbie 1996, Rustad et al. 2001, Aerts et al.

2006), and increased atmospheric nitrogen depo- sition related to increased precipitation (Hole and Engardt 2008) and human practices such as the combustion of fossil fuels and agriculture (Vitou- sek et al. 1997). To understand the effects of such environmental changes on alpine ecosystems, a substantial number of studies have implemented experimental environmental manipulations. For instance, Elmendorf et al. (2012) show that exper- imental warming can substantially alter alpine and Arctic tundra vegetation, and such effects can be further amplified when warming is com- bined with nutrient addition (Klanderud and Tot- land 2005). Although the responses to such environmental manipulations can be rapid (within a few growing seasons, e.g., Klanderud and Totland 2005), it is often unknown to what extend treatment effects on ecological communi- ties persist after they are discontinued.

While environmental conditions such as tem- perature and soil nutrient status often return rapidly to pre-treatment levels after cessation of experimental treatments (Boxman et al. 1998, Limpens and Heijmans 2008, O’Sullivan et al.

2011), the effects on community composition may be long-lasting (Strengbom et al. 2001). Very few studies have considered such legacy effects after cessation of environmental manipulations, but Street et al. (2015) found persistent effects on Arctic heathlands up to 18 yr after cessation of nitrogen addition. Similarly, Olsen and Klan- derud (2014) found incomplete recovery of alpine vegetation six years after warming and nutrient addition treatments are ceased, but that herbivory increased the recovery rate. In general, alpine plant communities may be slow to respond to environmental changes as the plants are long-lived and growing seasons are short.

However, the legacy effects of experimental drought events on alpine grasslands resembled the short-term responses of temperate grass- lands, but with persistent changes in community composition (De Boeck et al. 2018). Such persis- tent legacy of environmental treatments may indicate that the ecosystem has experienced a regime shift (Scheffer et al. 2001, Van Nes and Scheffer 2007), and thus that restoring pre-treat- ment conditions are not sufficient to allow the ecosystem to recover.

The majority of studies on the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to experimental environmental change, as well as the few studies on their legacy effects, have focused on vegeta- tion. Yet, aboveground vegetation is intricately linked to belowground processes and communi- ties (Wardle et al. 2004). As such, soil faunal communities, in addition to climate and leaf litter quality, play a role in the breakdown of plant lit- ter (Garcıa-Palacios et al. 2013, Bradford et al.

2017). In Arctic and alpine ecosystems, where soil macrofauna (e.g., earthworms) is often absent, micro-arthropods, such as Collembola (springtails) and Acari (mites), are a conspicuous and ubiquitous component of soil fauna. The responses of these micro-arthropods to environ- mental manipulations are complex (Coyle et al.

2017) because micro-arthropod communities are simultaneously linked to vegetation (Coulson et al. 2003, Mitchell et al. 2016, 2017), to food availability (many soil micro-arthropods are fun- givorous or bacterivorous species), and to micro- climatic conditions (Coulson et al. 1996, Hodkinson et al. 1998, Sjursen et al. 2005). On the species level, responses of micro-arthropods are likely to be trait-dependent. For example, Makkonen et al. (2011) found drought-tolerant, large-bodied, surface-living Collembola to be most tolerant to experimental warming, and Bokhorst et al. (2012) found small bodied fauna to be more sensitive to winter climate change than large-bodied species. For Acari, soft-bodied juvenile mites were found to be more susceptible to environmental changes than hard-bodied adults (Alatalo et al. 2017).

In this study, we revisited an environmental manipulation study in an alpine ecosystem in southern Norway nine years after the cessation of seven-year nutrient addition and warming treatments (Fig. 1a). The treatments, most nota- bly the combination of nutrient addition and warming, substantially altered vegetation from dominance by dwarf shrubs to graminoids (Klanderud and Totland 2005). Six years after cessation of the treatments, Olsen and Klanderud (2014) reported persistent treatment effects on the vegetation composition, but that grazing ameliorated legacy effects compared to when herbivores were fenced out. Similarly, the micro- arthropod communities, in particular Collembola and some Acari, responded strongly to nutrient

(3)

addition with and without warming (Hagvar and Klanderud 2009). We now use this experi- ment to test the hypothesis that the environmen- tal treatments have similar legacy effects on micro-arthropod communities as they have on vegetation. We expect treatment effects to persist, but that herbivory will have resulted in amelio- rated treatment effects. In addition, we expect that large-bodied, drought-resistant Collembola that live on top of the soil are better equipped to deal with variable environmental conditions.

Legacy effects on these animals will therefore be less pronounced, as their populations may already partially be in equilibrium with the new (i.e., similar to pre-treatment) conditions. We assess treatment legacy effects in terms of abun- dance, species richness, and species composition.

For abundance, we consider legacy effects pre- sent when increased abundances in treatment plots persist to date. For species composition, we compare treatment communities against those in control plots and interpret persistent differences compared to control plots as treatment legacy effects. The results of this study will help us

understand to what extent micro-arthropods can recover from environmentally induced changes in alpine ecosystems.

M

ATERIALS AND

M

ETHODS

Study system

This study was performed at the southwest-ex- posed slope of Mt. Sanddalsnuten in Southern Norway (60°36055″ N, 7°3108″ E) at approxi- mately 1500 m a.s.l. The site has calcareous phyl- lite bedrock and is dominated byDryas octopetala heath (see Klanderud and Totland 2004 for detailed site description and plant species lists).

The mean monthly summer temperature (June–

August) at the nearest meteorological station (Finse; located 2.5 km from the plots, at 1210 m a.s.l) is+6.3°C with an average monthly precipi- tation of 89 mm over 1969–1990 (Aune 1993, Førland 1993). In the month of sampling for this study (June 2016), the average temperature was +6.1°C and 67.6 mm of precipitation (Norwegian Meteorological Institute 2016). The area is mod- erately grazed by domestic sheep and wild Fig. 1. (a) A timeline of the experiment at Finse and measurements taken. Leaf symbols indicate years of vege- tation recording (2000, 2003, 2007, and 2012), and mite symbols indicate arthropod sampling (2004 and 2016).

From 2000 to 2007, plots received environmental treatments (nutrient addition and/or warming by open top chambers). In 2007, treatments were discontinued and herbivore exclosing fences were erected around half of the plots until sampling for this study in 2016. (b) Each block contained four plots that each received one of the envi- ronmental treatments or a control treatment. In 2007, two plots of each block were randomly selected to be fenced, ensuring that, overall, an equal number of plots for each treatments was fenced to exclude herbivores or left unfenced. In total, the study contained 10 blocks and 40 plots. (c) Soil micro-arthropods were sampled in between the two 60930 cm vegetation subplots (open circles) in 2004 and from the middle of each vegetation subplot in 2016 (closed circles).

(4)

reindeer (Rangifer tarandusLinnaeus, 1758). Lem- ming (Lemmus lemmus Linnaeus, 1758) popula- tions in Finse peaked in 2014, while other rodent species showed low abundances throughout the entire duration of the study (Framstad 2017).

In July 2000, 10 blocks of four 191 m plots were randomly established in the Dryas heath (Klanderud and Totland 2005). Within each block, plots received one of four treatments: warming by open top chambers, nutrient addition (slow-re- leased NPK fertilizer: 10 g N, 2 g P, and 8 g K/

m2at the start of each growing season), nutrient addition combined with warming, and control (no treatment). Open top chambers increased 5 cm soil temperatures by~1°C during growing seasons June–September (Klanderud and Totland 2005). Soil nutrient status showed few responses to nutrient addition treatments (K. Klan- derud,unpublished data), suggesting that nutrients were rapidly immobilized by the microbial com- munity and/or taken up by the vegetation, as sug- gested by the increased plant biomass.

Within each plot, two permanent 60930 cm vegetation-sampling subplots were established, separated by a 10 cm wide row. In these sub- plots, vegetation was recorded in 2000 and 2003 to assess vegetation responses to the treatments (Klanderud and Totland 2005, Klanderud 2008).

In 2004, Hagvar and Klanderud (2009) sampled soil micro-arthropods in the row between the subplots. The environmental treatments were discontinued in 2007, after seven years of treat- ment. In the same year, herbivore fences designed to exclude all mammalian herbivores were randomly erected around half the plots within each block, while ensuring that each treat- ment had the same number of fenced and unfenced plots overall (see Olsen and Klanderud 2014 for more details). Vegetation was again recorded in 2007 and 2012 to assess vegetation recovery under different grazing regimes (Olsen and Klanderud 2014). The herbivory treatment continued until the sampling for this study in June 2016. Fig. 1 illustrates the study and plot design in more detail.

Arthropod sampling and identification

We sampled micro-arthropods on 28 June 2016 by extracting eight soil cores from each plot (10- cm2surface area, 3 cm deep) which included the vegetation and litter on top of the soil. For

analyses, all samples from one plot were com- bined. The soils at this site are approximately 5–

15 cm deep. Our methodology followed Hagvar and Klanderud (2009), but to avoid sampling from disturbed soil (by the sampling in 2004), we took four soil cores from within each vegetation subplot, approximately 20 cm from the original sampling locations (Fig. 1c). Micro-arthropods were then extracted onto water saturated with benzoic acid with the same high-gradient appa- ratuses modified after Macfadyen (1961) as used in 2004. Extractions lasted for 10 d with a grad- ual increase in temperature from 30°C to 70°C during the first five days. After extraction, the animals were transferred into containers with 70% ethanol. Collembola and Acari were sorted under a binocular stereomicroscope and identi- fied under a phase-contrast microscope (Leica DM2500, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The identification of Collembola fol- lowed Fjellberg (1998), Bretfeld (1999), Potapov (2001), and Dunger and Schlitt (2011). Within Acari, Oribatida were identified to species fol- lowing Weigmann (2006). The order Oribatida presently also includes the cohort Astigmatina (after Krantz and Walter 2009), which were grouped separately and not identified to species level. Other, non-Oribatid, Acari were grouped into Prostigmata and Mesostigmata (including Gamasina and Uropodina). For analyses, species were grouped in accordance with the study with the lowest taxonomic detail (i.e., this one or Hagvar and Klanderud 2009). See Appendix S1:

Table S1 for Collembola and Appendix S1:

Table S2 for Acari identifications, abbreviations, and groupings.

Eco-morphological groups

Collembola were grouped into eco-morphologi- cal groups that describe their vertical distribution in the soil: Epi-edaphic species live above the sur- face of the soil, hemi-edaphics live near the soil surface, and eu-edaphic species live in deeper lay- ers of the soil. Classifications were based on Hop- kin (1997) and the personal database of Prof. Dr.

Matty Berg (unpublished data, but see Makkonen et al. 2011). Isotomasp. and other Symphypleona could contain species belonging to more than one eco-morphological group and were therefore excluded from statistical analysis on eco-morpho- logical groups (Appendix S1: Table S1).

(5)

Statistical analyses

We examined the effects of environmental treat- ment, sampling year, and herbivory on Collem- bola and Acari abundance and species richness with linear mixed-effect models using the lmerTest-package (Kuznetsova et al. 2015), lme4- package (Bates et al. 2014), and output via the sjPlot-package (L€udecke 2016) in R version 3.4.2 (R Core Team 2017). In these models, environmen- tal treatment (levels: warming, nutrient addition, both warming and nutrient addition, and control) and a combined variable of year and herbivory treatment (year+herbivory levels: 2004 herbivory;

2016 herbivory; 2016 no herbivory) were included as fixed factors and block (numbered 1 through 10) as random factor. To meet assumptions of nor- mality of the residuals, and heteroscedasticity, abundance data were natural log transformed.

For species richness, generalized mixed effects models from the Poisson family (log link) were used. Due to very low abundances, the epi- edaphic Collembola dataset only allowed for a binomial model on absence or presence in treat- ments, and Astigmatina were not analyzed sepa- rately. To test for a priori differences in abundance for all Collembola and Acari groups between her- bivory treatments, we performed separate mixed- model analysis on the 2004 data with environ- mental treatment and herbivory treatment (future herbivory, no future herbivory) as fixed factors, and block as random effect. To test whether treat- ment effects remained in 2016 and whether con- trols differed between years, we performed Tukey pairwise comparisons with the emmeans package (Lenth et al. 2017) for all treatments vs. the con- trol, for both grazed and ungrazed plots.

To examine how the species composition of Collembola and Oribatida in the treatment plots changed over time, we used unconstrained and constrained multivariate ordination techniques.

First, we used global non-metric multidimen- sional scaling (GNMDS) to examine the trajec- tory of the Collembola and Oribatida species composition of the different environmental treat- ments from 2004 to 2016. The GNMDS was run as specified in Olsen and Klanderud (2014).

Because no sampling prior to the start of the treatments was performed, we consider legacy effects absent if treated communities show a shift towards the composition of control communities.

Vice versa, legacy effects are present when

treated communities remain separated from con- trols in ordination space (Appendix S1: Fig. S1).

Second, to test for treatment effects on species composition in 2004 and 2016, we used redun- dancy analysis (RDA). In this analysis, environ- mental treatment and herbivore treatment, as well as their interactions, were used as explana- tory variables, and block was used as a condi- tioning variable. To assess variable significances, we used Monte Carlo permutation tests with 999 permutations. Then, to visualize the relative effects of treatments over time and the response of species of different edaphic groups (for Collembola), we used principal response curves (PRC). The environmental treatment with and without grazing exclosure and year were used as explanatory variables in the construction of the PRCs.

R

ESULTS

Abundance and species richness

Four years of nutrient addition and nutrient addition combined with warming led to an initial increase in the abundance of Collembola in 2004 (Table 1, Fig. 2, and see Hagvar and Klanderud 2009). However, there were no such differences in Collembola abundance between the environmen- tal treatments and controls in 2016 (Appendix S1:

Table S3). This shows that Collembola abun- dances in the treated plots were reduced to pre- treatment levels, and that these treatments thus did not have legacy effects on Collembola abun- dance nine years after the treatments were discon- tinued. The decrease in Collembola abundance was strongest for the combined nutrient addition and warming treatments that were grazed (P =0.05). Further, the abundance of Collembola across all treatments was reduced in 2016 com- pared to 2004, but only significantly so in ungrazed plots (P< 0.001). Although Collembola abundances were also lower in the ungrazed con- trol plots in 2016 compared to 2004 (Appendix S1:

Table S3), this effect was small compared to the responses in the plots that received environmental treatment, supporting the validity of the responses of Collembola abundance to nutrient addition and warming treatments.

The dynamics of Collembola abundances in response to nutrient addition and warming treat- ments were mainly driven by the abundance of

(6)

Table 1. Model parameter estimates from linear mixed-effect and binomial models examining the effects of treat- ment, the three year and herbivory treatments (year 2004: herbivory, year 2016: no herbivory, and year 2016:

herbivory), and their interactions on Collembola abundance.

Predictors Estimates CI P df Odds ratios

All Collembola†

(Intercept) 3.39 3.12 to 3.67 <0.001 66.00

N 1.42 1.05 to 1.80 <0.001 59.00

NW 1.34 0.97 to 1.72 <0.001 59.00

W 0.03 0.34 to 0.41 0.880 59.00

2016 no herbivory 1.10 1.57 to0.64 <0.001 63.00

2016 herbivory 0.39 0.86 to 0.07 0.170 63.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.66 1.32 to0.01 0.102 61.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 0.73 1.40 to0.06 0.076 65.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.69 0.02 to 1.36 0.095 66.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.76 1.42 to0.11 0.060 61.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.81 1.48 to0.14 0.050 65.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.06 0.73 to 0.61 0.886 66.00

Random effects

r2 0.26

s00 0.02Block

ICC 0.06Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.679/0.698 Epi-edaphic Collembola

(Intercept) 1.16–9.22 0.033 3.00

N 0.40–10.50 0.433 1.89

NW 0.234.30 1.000 1.00

W 0.40–10.50 0.433 1.89

Random effects r2

s00

ICC

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.016/0.025 Hemi-edaphic Collembola†

(Intercept) 2.79 2.44 to 3.14 <0.001 67.00

N 1.71 1.22 to 2.20 <0.001 59.00

NW 1.64 1.15 to 2.13 <0.001 59.00

W 0.36 0.85 to 0.13 0.227 59.00

2016 no herbivory 1.13 1.74 to0.52 0.003 63.00

2016 herbivory 0.48 1.09 to 0.12 0.195 63.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.86 1.71 to0.00 0.103 61.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 1.12 1.98 to0.25 0.038 65.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 1.28 0.41 to 2.15 0.018 66.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.54 1.40 to 0.31 0.298 61.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.70 1.56 to 0.17 0.191 65.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.58 0.29 to 1.45 0.278 66.00

Random effects

r2 0.44

s00 0.02Block

ICC 0.04Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.643/0.657

(7)

hemi-edaphic species (Table 1 and Fig. 2c).

Although eu-edaphic Collembola initially also responded to nutrient addition (P= 0.014), their tendency to decrease in abundance after cessa- tion of treatments was not significant (grazed P = 0.090, ungrazed P= 0.070). Hemi-edaphic Collembola were more abundant a priori in grazed than ungrazed plots (est.= 1.06, SE = 0.34, df= 31.92, t= 3.079, P= 0.004, Appendix S1: Fig. S2). Nevertheless, reductions in abundance were generally stronger in ungrazed plots (Table 1). We found no effects of environmental treatment, year, or herbivory on the species richness of Collembola communities (Appendix S1: Table S4).

The abundance of all Acari, as well as the sub- groups Oribatida, and Prostigmata was not affected by the initial environmental treatments (Table 2). In other words, these mites did not respond to environmental manipulations on the short term, nor on the long term. The abundance of Acari overall (P =0.001, Table 2; Appendix S1:

Fig. S3) and in the controls (Appendix S1:

Table S3) was lower in 2016 compared to 2004, suggesting some inter-annual variability in Acari

abundance. However, Mesostigmata showed a different pattern. These predatory mites initially responded positively to nutrient addition alone and in combination with warming. However, sim- ilar to Collembola, Mesostigmata abundance did not differ between control and environmental treatments in 2016, indicating that any treatment effects did not persist nine years after the treat- ments were discontinued (Table 2; Appendix S1:

Fig. S3d, Table S3). We found no effect of environ- mental treatment, not initially nor after cessation of the treatments, or herbivory on Oribatida spe- cies richness (Appendix S1: Table S5). Generally, responses in grazed and ungrazed plots were in similar directions, indicating that the treatments and/or the sampling year had greater effects than herbivory.

Legacy effects on community composition

Initially, the Collembola species composition was strongly affected by treatments with nutrient addition, as shown by a clear separation in ordi- nation space from warming treatments and con- trols in 2004 (Fig. 3a). This was driven by a shift in dominance structure in favor of certain (Table 1. Continued.)

Predictors Estimates CI P df Odds ratios

Eu-edaphic Collembola

(Intercept) 2.28 1.85 to 2.71 <0.001 51.00

N 0.83 0.29 to 1.37 0.014 59.00

NW 0.27 0.27 to 0.81 0.412 59.00

W 0.35 0.19 to 0.89 0.287 59.00

2016 no herbivory 1.15 1.82 to0.47 0.007 62.00

2016 herbivory 0.71 1.38 to0.03 0.090 62.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.24 1.18 to 0.70 0.671 60.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 0.70 0.26 to 1.67 0.236 63.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.21 0.76 to 1.19 0.719 64.00

N: 2016 herbivory 1.05 1.99 to0.11 0.070 60.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.09 0.88 to 1.06 0.879 63.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.39 1.37 to 0.59 0.513 64.00

Random effects

r2 0.53

s00 0.15Block

ICC 0.22Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.335/0.483

Notes: C, control; W, warming; N, nutrient addition; NW, nutrient addition+warming; CI, condence interval. Data for all, hemi-, and eu-edaphic Collembola were natural log transformed. The odds of presence of epi-edaphic Collembola were tested for treatments only. Model estimates from mixed-effect models are shown on the transformed scale.P-values were computed via Kenward-Roger approximation and signicant results (P<0.05) are printed in bold.

log transformed data.

Model run on binomial data.

(8)

Collembola species, most notably the two hemi- edaphic speciesFolsomia quadrioculataandPariso- toma notabilis (Appendix S1: Fig. S4; see Hagvar and Klanderud 2009). After cessation of the treat- ments, species composition in all environmental treatments and the controls was displaced along GNMDS axis 1 and to some extend along GNMDS axis 2. In general, Collembola

composition converged to one point in ordina- tion space, regardless of herbivory treatment.

However, control plots remained separated in ordination space from those that received treat- ments with nutrient addition, indicative of treat- ment legacy effects. For all environmental treatments except warming, displacement in ordination space was larger for ungrazed plots.

0 50 100 150 200

Collembola (thousandsm−2 ) a

0 2 4 6 8

Epi−edaphics (thousandsm2 ) b

0 40 80 120 160

Hemi−edaphics (thousandsm−2 ) c

0 10 20 30 40

Eu−edaphics (thousandsm−2 ) d

C N NW W

2004: herbivory 2016: no herbivory 2016: herbivory

C N NW W

Fig. 2. Mean abundances (in thousands m2) for (a) all Collembola, (b) epi-edaphic Collembola, (c) hemi- edaphic Collembola, and (d) eu-edaphic Collembola per treatment (C, control; N, nutrient addition; W, warming;

NW, nutrient addition + warming) per sampled year in Finse, southern Norway. Data are shown on the non- transformed scale, but error bars indicate exponentiated 95% confidence intervals calculated on natural log trans- formed data (but on square root data for epi-edaphic Collembola).

(9)

Table 2. Model parameter estimates from linear mixed-effect and binomial models examining the effects of treat- ment, the three year and herbivory treatments (year 2004: herbivory, year 2016: no herbivory, and year 2016:

herbivory), and their interactions on Acari abundance.

Predictors Estimates CI P df

All Acari†

(Intercept) 3.67 3.39 to 3.95 <0.001 65.00

N 0.38 0.01 to 0.75 0.100 59.00

NW 0.29 0.08 to 0.67 0.201 59.00

W 0.18 0.19 to 0.56 0.429 59.00

2016 no herbivory 1.34 1.81 to0.88 <0.001 63.00

2016 herbivory 1.56 2.03 to1.10 <0.001 63.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.51 0.14 to 1.16 0.206 60.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 0.38 1.04 to 0.29 0.357 65.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.27 0.40 to 0.94 0.509 65.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.45 1.10 to 0.20 0.263 60.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.22 0.88 to 0.45 0.593 65.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.39 0.28 to 1.06 0.346 65.00

Random effects

r2 0.26

s00 0.03Block

ICC 0.09Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.681/0.710 Oribatida

(Intercept) 2.66 2.27 to 3.04 <0.001 41.00

N 0.10 0.35 to 0.55 0.711 59.00

NW 0.00 0.45 to 0.45 0.991 59.00

W 0.00 0.45 to 0.45 0.998 59.00

2016 no herbivory 0.96 1.53 to0.39 0.007 61.00

2016 herbivory 1.15 1.71 to0.58 0.001 61.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.29 0.49 to 1.08 0.540 60.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 0.59 1.40 to 0.23 0.239 62.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.49 0.33 to 1.31 0.328 63.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.65 1.44 to 0.13 0.177 60.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.34 1.16 to 0.47 0.493 62.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.45 0.37 to 1.27 0.371 63.00

Random effects

r2 0.37

s00 0.17Block

ICC 0.32Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.424/0.607 Prostigmata

(Intercept) 2.75 to 3.42 <0.001 65.00

N 0.08 to 0.82 0.178 59.00

NW 0.15 to 0.76 0.270 59.00

W 0.15 to 0.75 0.279 59.00

2016 no herbivory 2.71 to1.59 <0.001 63.00

2016 herbivory 3.01 to1.88 <0.001 63.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.51 to 2.09 0.008 60.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 0.63 to 0.98 0.718 65.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.52 to 1.09 0.563 65.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.88 to 0.69 0.846 60.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.54 to 1.06 0.596 65.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.04 to 1.57 0.125 65.00

(10)

For Oribatida, the only Acari group identified to species in this study, species compositions were tightly clustered in ordination space in 2004, except for ungrazed nutrient addition and grazed nutrient addition with warming treat- ments (Fig. 3b). Nine years after cessation of the treatments (i.e., in 2016), all environmental treat- ments show similar amounts of displacement along GNMDS axis 1, and to some extent along axis 2. In contrast to Collembola, Oribatida spe- cies composition of the different environmental treatments diverged into ordination space, sug- gesting that community dynamics induced by environmental treatments are still ongoing.

In accordance with the GNMDS plot, the RDA analysis showed that the species composition of Collembola communities was significantly affected by all environmental treatments in 2004 (Table 3), but most strongly by treatments with nutrient addition, and that this was mainly driven by the hemi-edaphic F. quadrioculata and P. nota- bilis(Fig. 4a). In 2016, the effect of treatments with

nutrient addition on the Collembola community persisted, although less pronounced than in 2004.

In 2016, species composition differed significantly between grazed and ungrazed plots overall and for grazed and ungrazed plots within the nutrient addition treatment. This suggests that herbivore grazing affects the Collembola community com- position. For Oribatida, the RDA showed that community composition was significantly affected by nutrient addition in 2004, which was reduced to non-significant in 2016. While there was no notable effect of warming in 2004, there was in 2016 (Table 3, Fig. 4b). Similar to Collembola, Ori- batida community composition differed between grazed and ungrazed plots, specifically in the nutrient addition treatments.

D

ISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to assess the legacy effects of environmental manipulations, such as nutrient addition and warming on soil micro- (Table 2. Continued.)

Predictors Estimates CI P df

Random effects

r2 0.38

s00 0.04Block

ICC 0.09Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.736/0.760 Mesostigmata†

(Intercept) 0.81 0.45 to 1.18 0.001 41.00

N 1.05 0.62 to 1.47 <0.001 59.00

NW 0.98 0.55 to 1.40 <0.001 59.00

W 0.14 0.56 to 0.29 0.602 59.00

2016 no herbivory 0.84 1.38 to0.31 0.012 61.00

2016 herbivory 0.77 1.30 to0.23 0.022 61.00

N: 2016 no herbivory 0.35 1.09 to 0.39 0.443 60.00

NW: 2016 no herbivory 1.08 1.84 to0.31 0.025 62.00

W: 2016 no herbivory 0.49 0.28 to 1.27 0.299 63.00

N: 2016 herbivory 0.74 1.48 to0.00 0.105 60.00

NW: 2016 herbivory 0.64 1.41 to 0.13 0.174 62.00

W: 2016 herbivory 0.11 0.67 to 0.88 0.821 63.00

Random effects

r2 0.33

s00 0.15Block

ICC 0.32Block

Observations 80

MarginalR2/ConditionalR2 0.494/0.654

Notes: C, control; W, warming; N, nutrient addition; NW, nutrient addition+warming; CI, confidence interval. Data were natural log transformed and model estimates are shown on the log scale.P-values were computed via Kenward-Roger approxi- mation, and significant results (P<0.05) are printed in bold.

log transformed data.

(11)

arthropod communities (Collembola and Acari) nine years after cessation of the treatments. We hypothesized that dynamics in micro-arthropod communities would match those observed for the vegetation (Olsen and Klanderud 2014), that is, that effects on species abundance and compo- sition would persist to date. However, we found legacy effects on micro-arthropod communities in some respects, while not in others. Specifically, for the abundance of Collembola and Mesostig- mata (the groups most responsive to treatments), we found no legacy effects. Contrastingly, for Collembola and Oribatida species composition, we found differences in community composition between treatments and controls to persist nine years after cessation of the treatments. Although mammalian herbivory did influence community Fig. 3. Global non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination of the trajectories of mean Collembola (a) and Oribatida (b) community composition from 2004 (start of arrow) to 2016 (end of arrow) in control, warming, nutrient addition, and warming combined with nutrient addition treatments with herbivores present (solid line) and herbivores excluded (dashed line) in an alpine heath. Species names are shown only for the 12 most common Collembola and 13 most common Oribatida species, the remaining species are shown as open circles. Collembola species names and circles are colored according to edaphic group, but some species were grouped and therefore not assigned to a specific edaphic group (no group). A few species names were slightly adjusted to avoid overlap.

For species abbreviations, see Appendix S1: Tables S1, S2.

Table 3.F- andP-values of redundancy analysis test- ing the effects of nutrient addition (N), warming (W), and warming combined with nutrient addition (NW) and herbivore exclosures (E) on species com- position of the Collembola and mite communities, in 2004 and 2016.

Treatment

Collembola Oribatida

2004 2016 2004 2016

N 6.03** 3.79* 3.42* 1.39

NW 10.66*** 4.70* 1.60 0.30

W 3.96* 0.62 0.54 4.40*

E 0.50 5.25* 0.24 3.48*

N9E 0.94 3.21* 0.84 3.95*

NW9E 1.49 0.57 0.74 0.69

W9E 0.14 0.83 0.45 1.02

Note: Significant effects atP<0.05 are printed in bold.

*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

(12)

composition of both Collembola and Oribatida, it did not promote trajectories toward the original community composition as was found for the vegetation (Olsen and Klanderud 2014). Hemi- edaphic Collembola that live near the soil–sur- face interface, in particular F. quadrioculata, were most responsive to environmental treatments

and remained dominant in Collembola commu- nities nine years after treatments were discontin- ued.

We propose several mechanisms that can explain why Collembola abundances returned to pre-treatment levels, even though treatments are still visible in the vegetation composition (Olsen

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0123

Year

PRC1

Ori.juv Ori.tib Qua.gal Eup.pli Tec.vel Bra.sp.

Epi−edaphic Hemi−edaphic Eu−edaphic No group Herbivory No herbivory

control warming nutrient addition nutrient addition + warming

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0510

Year

PRC1

Mes.sp Fol.bre Iso.pus Lep.lig Iso.vir Pro.pse Par.not Fol.qua

a

b

Fig. 4. Principal response curve (PRC) ordination of (a) mean Collembola and (b) mean Oribatida community composition in 2004 and 2016 in control, warming, nutrient addition, and warming combined with nutrient addi- tion treatments with herbivores present (solid line) and herbivores excluded (dashed line) in an alpine heath. The horizontal gray line represents control plots with herbivores present, to which all other treatments are compared.

Species names are shown only for the eight most common Collembola, and six most common Oribatida species.

Collembola species names are colored according to their eco-morphological group (epi-edaphic, hemi-edaphic, eu-edaphic). For species abbreviations, see Appendix S1: Tables S1, S2.

(13)

and Klanderud 2014; K. Klanderud, S. L. Olsen, and R. E. Roos, personal observation). First, nutri- ent addition may have had a direct, stimulatory effect on the microbial and fungal community, which is an important part of the micro-arthro- pod diet (Mack et al. 2004, Nemergut et al. 2008, A’Bear et al. 2014). If this effect was reduced shortly after cessation of the treatments, there may not have been sufficient food available to sustain high Collembola abundances. However, the effects of nitrogen addition are reported to be long-lasting and recovery is often incomplete (Street et al. 2015, Bowman et al. 2018), so the availability of food to fungivorous micro-arthro- pods would have to be tested directly. Second, an increase in the abundance of predators could have controlled Collembola abundance. For example, we found predatory Mesostigmata to initially increase in parallel with Collembola and, together with other predators such as Lycosidae (Lawrence and Wise 2000, Wise 2004), they may have suppressed Collembola populations (Koeh- ler 1997, 1999, Schneider and Maraun 2009).

However, we found no legacy effects on Mesostigmata abundance nine years after cessa- tion of the treatments. In case Mesostigmata were indeed responsible for the decrease in Collembola abundance through predation, the temporal resolution of this studies’set-up may have been too coarse to capture such prey–

predator dynamics. Further, epi- and hemi- edaphic Collembola are considered to be oppor- tunistic, requiring higher food quality, and hav- ing higher fecundity and mobility, but also mortality (Petersen 2002) than eu-edaphic species and Oribatida. These life-history strategies can explain why hemi-edaphic Collembola were most responsive to our treatments as well as why their abundance decreased when conditions became less favorable. Finally, our plots are sur- rounded by a matrix of untreated terrain, which could have contributed to the formation of a source-sink like system (Bengtsson 2002) where animals move in and out of the plots in accor- dance to where they find most favorable condi- tions. For example, in a microcosm experiment, Shackelford et al. (2018) showed that isolated micro-arthropod communities recover at slower rates from a disturbance than those connected to other, disturbed or undisturbed, communities. It is therefore possible that, should we have

subjected the entire alpine landscape to warming and nutrient addition treatments, such as expected under real-world environmental change, legacy effects may have manifested stronger than was observed in our scale-limited experimental study. Such scaling up from experi- mental plot to landscape scale remains one of the major challenges in ecology (Levin 1992, Dunne et al. 2004, Jackson and Fahrig 2015).

While we found no legacy effects on Collem- bola and Mesostigmata abundances, we found that differences in Collembola species composi- tion for nutrient addition and nutrient addition with warming treatments compared to the con- trols, persisted throughout the nine-year recov- ery period. In contrast, the composition of the Oribatid mite community initially responded to nutrient addition, but this effect did not persist nine years after cessation of the treatment. How- ever, Oribatida community composition was dif- ferent in previously warmed treatments nine years after the treatment was ceased, although this treatment did not cause any initial responses.

This suggest that Oribatida communities may respond to environmental change given suffi- ciently long time. Similar to our findings, Lind- berg and Bengtsson (2005) found persistent effects of summer drought in boreal forests on Collembola and Oribatida community composi- tion, but not on their abundance.

The changes in Collembola community com- position in our study were mostly driven by F. quadrioculata, which dominated communities that received nutrient addition, and remained dominant after the nine-year recovery period, although its abundance did decrease. Folsomia quadrioculatais a common, generalist species that can be found in many different habitats, from forests at mid-latitudes to the high Arctic (Somme and Birkemoe 1999, Sengupta et al.

2016), and is able to colonize glacial forelands approximately 50–70 yr after glacial retreat (Hagvar 2010). In alpine ecosystems in Norway, F. quadrioculatahas one generation per year com- pared to species such as Folsomia brevicauda, which has a longer, two-year life cycle (Fjellberg 1975). Accordingly,F. brevicaudawas only abun- dant in the controls and the warming treatments in our study. Its opportunistic life-history strat- egy likely makes F. quadrioculata highly respon- sive to short-term environmental changes.

(14)

Grazing by herbivores can affect the structure and composition, competitive interactions, and chemistry of Arctic and alpine vegetation, although its impact is often time and site depen- dent (Bernes et al. 2015 and references therein).

In addition, herbivory can act as a buffer against the effects of climatic change (Olofsson et al.

2009) and can decrease legacy effects of environ- mental manipulations (Olsen and Klanderud 2014, Kaarlej€arvi et al. 2015). Although we did find effects of herbivory on Collembola and Orib- atida communities, these effects do not directly indicate that grazing shifts communities toward pre-treatment species composition. Further, the control communities showed some shifts in micro-arthropod community composition, which may be due to year-to-year variations in commu- nity composition. Alternatively, changes in spe- cies compositions in control treatments can be due to ongoing background environmental change, for example, rising temperature and altered dates of snow melt (Høye and Forchham- mer 2008), during the twelve years between sam- pling. Whatever the cause of changes in control community composition, treated communities were still significantly different from control spe- cies compositions, indicating that environmental treatment effects persist to date.

In conclusion, our results show that soil micro- arthropods are responsive to environmental treatments in terms of abundance and species composition and that the treatment effects on community composition persist long after the treatments were discontinued. An important next step is to understand how persistent changes in micro-arthropod decomposer communities trans- late into the functional composition of the decom- poser community (Handa et al. 2014) and thereby ecosystem processes such as decomposition, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem respiration.

A

CKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was designed by Johan Asplund, Juha M.

Alatalo, and Kari Klanderud. Field work was per- formed by Ruben Erik Roos, Johan Asplund, Kari Klanderud, and Tone Birkemoe. Peter L’uptacik and Natalia Raschmanova identified soil micro-arthropods for 2016. Statistical analyses were performed by Ruben Erik Roos and Siri Lie Olsen. All co-authors con- tributed to manuscript revisions and agree with the

final version. This study was funded by Carl Tryggers stiftelse f€or vetenskaplig forskning through a grant to Juha M. Alatalo and a grant from the Research Council of Norway (249902) to Johan Asplund. We thank Sig- mund Hagvar for sharing his original data, comments and feedback, Hans Cornelissen and Stef Bokhorst for useful discussions, and Matty Berg for sharing data from his personal Collembola database. Mari Steinert, Ross Wetherbee, Mahdieh Tourani, and Richard Bis- chof were of great help for discussions on the statistical analyses. We thank the Finse Alpine Research Center and Erika Leslie for hospitality duringfieldwork and Kristel van Zuijlen for assistance in thefield.

L

ITERATURE

C

ITED

A'Bear, A. D., T. H. Jones, and L. Boddy. 2014. Potential impacts of climate change on interactions among saprotrophic cord-forming fungal mycelia and grazing soil invertebrates. Fungal Ecology 10:34–

43.

Aerts, R., J. Cornelissen, and E. Dorrepaal. 2006. Plant performance in a warmer world: general responses of plants from cold, northern biomes and the importance of winter and spring events. Plant Ecol- ogy 182:65–77.

Alatalo, J. M., A. K. J€agerbrand, J. Juhanson, A.

Michelsen, and P. L’uptacik. 2017. Impacts of twenty years of experimental warming on soil car- bon, nitrogen, moisture and soil mites across alpine/subarctic tundra communities. Scientific Reports 7:44489.

Aune, B. 1993. Temperaturnormaler, normalperiode 1961–1990. DNMI-Rapport Klima 2:1–63.

Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker.

2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1:1-23. https://cra n.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html Bengtsson, J. 2002. Disturbance and resilience in soil

animal communities. European Journal of Soil Biol- ogy 38:119–125.

Bernes, C., K. A. Brathen, B. C. Forbes, J. D. Speed, and J. Moen. 2015. What are the impacts of rein- deer/caribou (Rangifer tarandus L.) on arctic and alpine vegetation? A systematic review. Environ- mental Evidence 4:4.

Bokhorst, S., G. Phoenix, J. Bjerke, T. Callaghan, F.

Huyer-Brugman, and M. Berg. 2012. Extreme win- ter warming events more negatively impact small rather than large soil fauna: Shift in community composition explained by traits not taxa. Global Change Biology 18:1152–1162.

Bowman, W. D., A. Ayyad, C. P. Bueno de Mesquita, N. Fierer, T. S. Potter, and S. Sternagel. 2018. Lim- ited ecosystem recovery from simulated chronic

(15)

nitrogen deposition. Ecological Applications 28:1762–1772.

Boxman, A. W., P. J. van der Ven, and J. G. Roelofs.

1998. Ecosystem recovery after a decrease in nitro- gen input to a Scots pine stand at Ysselsteyn, the Netherlands. Forest Ecology and Management 101:155–163.

Bradford, M. A., G. C. Veen, A. Bonis, E. M. Brad- ford, A. T. Classen, J. H. C. Cornelissen, T. W.

Crowther, R. Jonathan, G. T. Freschet, and P.

Kardol. 2017. A test of the hierarchical model of lit- ter decomposition. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:1836.

Bretfeld, G. 1999. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola:

Symphypleona. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Gorlitz 71:1–318.

Coulson, S., I. Hodkinson, and N. Webb. 2003. Micro- scale distribution patterns in high Arctic soil microarthropod communities: the influence of plant species within the vegetation mosaic. Ecogra- phy 26:801–809.

Coulson, S. J., I. D. Hodkinson, C. Wooley, N. R. Webb, W. Block, M. R. Worland, J. S. Bale, and A. T.

Strathdee. 1996. Effects of experimental tempera- ture elevation on high-arctic soil microarthropod populations. Polar Biology 16:147–153.

Coyle, D. R., U. J. Nagendra, M. K. Taylor, J. H. Camp- bell, C. E. Cunard, A. H. Joslin, A. Mundepi, C. A.

Phillips, and M. A. Callaham Jr. 2017. Soil fauna responses to natural disturbances, invasive species, and global climate change: current state of the science and a call to action. Soil Biology and Bio- chemistry 110:116–133.

De Boeck, H. J., E. Hiltbrunner, M. Verlinden, S. Bas- sin, and M. Zeiter. 2018. Legacy effects of climate extremes in alpine grassland. Frontiers Plant Science 9:1586.

Dunger, W., and B. Schlitt. 2011. Synopses on Palearc- tic Collembola: Tullbergiidae, soil organisms.

Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemu- seums Gorlitz 6/1:1–168.

Dunne, J. A., S. R. Saleska, M. L. Fischer, and J. Harte.

2004. Integrating experimental and gradient meth- ods in ecological climate change research. Ecology 85:904–916.

Elmendorf, S. C., G. H. Henry, R. D. Hollister, R. G.

Bj€ork, A. D. Bjorkman, T. V. Callaghan, L. S. Collier, E. J. Cooper, J. H. Cornelissen, and T. A. Day. 2012.

Global assessment of experimental climate warm- ing on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time. Ecology Letters 15:164–175.

Fjellberg, A. 1975. Organization and dynamics of Collembola populations on Hardangervidda.

Pages 73–79 inFennoscandian tundra ecosystems.

Springer, New York, New York, USA.

Fjellberg, A. 1998. The Collembola of Fennoscandia and Denmark, Part I: Poduromorpha. Fauna Ento- mologica Scandinavica. Volume 35. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Førland, E. 1993. Precipitation normals, normal period 1961–1990. The Norwegian Meteorological Insti- tute, Oslo, Norway.

Framstad, E. 2017. Terrestrisk naturovervaking i 2016:

Mark-vegetasjon, epifytter, smagnagere og fugl.

Sammenfatning av re-sultater. NINA Rapport 1376. Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA), Oslo, Norway.

Garcıa-Palacios, P., F. T. Maestre, J. Kattge, and D. H. J.

E. L. Wall. 2013. Climate and litter quality differ- ently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecology Letters 16:1045–1053.

Hagvar, S. 2010. Primary succession of springtails (Collembola) in a Norwegian glacier foreland. Arc- tic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 42:422–429.

Hagvar, S., and K. Klanderud. 2009. Effect of simu- lated environmental change on alpine soil arthro- pods. Global Change Biology 15:2972–2980.

Handa, I. T., R. Aerts, F. Berendse, M. P. Berg, A. Bru- der, O. Butenschoen, E. Chauvet, M. O. Gessner, J.

Jabiol, and M. Makkonen. 2014. Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature 509:218.

Hobbie, S. E. 1996. Temperature and plant species con- trol over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra.

Ecological Monographs 66:503–522.

Hodkinson, I. D., N. Webb, J. Bale, W. Block, S. Coul- son, and A. Strathdee. 1998. Global change and Arctic ecosystems: conclusions and predictions from experiments with terrestrial invertebrates on Spitsbergen. Arctic and Alpine Research 30:306–

313.

Hole, L., and M. Engardt. 2008. Climate change impact on atmospheric nitrogen deposition in northwest- ern Europe: a model study. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 37:9–17.

Hopkin, S. P. 1997. Biology of the springtails: (Insecta:

Collembola). OUP, Oxford, UK.

Høye, T. T., and M. C. Forchhammer. 2008. Phenology of high-arctic arthropods: effects of climate on spa- tial, seasonal, and inter-annual variation. Advances in Ecological Research 40:299–324.

Isaksen, K., Ø. Nordli, E. J. Førland, E.Łupikasza, S.

Eastwood, and T. Niedzwiedz. 2016. Recent warming on Spitsbergen—Influence of atmo- spheric circulation and sea ice cover. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 121:11–913.

Jackson, H. B., and L. Fahrig. 2015. Are ecologists con- ducting research at the optimal scale? Global Ecol- ogy and Biogeography 24:52–63.

(16)

Kaarlej€arvi, E., K. S. Hoset, and J. Olofsson. 2015.

Mammalian herbivores confer resilience of Arctic shrub-dominated ecosystems to changing climate.

Global Change Biology 21:3379–3388.

Klanderud, K. 2008. Species-specific responses of an alpine plant community under simulated environ- mental change. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:363–372.

Klanderud, K., and Ø. Totland. 2004. Habitat depen- dent nurse effects of the dwarf-shrubDryas octope- tala on alpine and arctic plant community structure. Ecoscience 11:410–420.

Klanderud, K., and Ø. Totland. 2005. Simulated cli- mate change altered dominance hierarchies and diversity of an alpine biodiversity hotspot. Ecology 86:2047–2054.

Koehler, H. H. 1997. Mesostigmata (Gamasina, Uropo- dina), efficient predators in agroecosystems. Agri- culture, Ecosystems & Environment 62:105–117.

Koehler, H. 1999. Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Pages 395–410inInvertebrate bio- diversity as bioindicators of sustainable land- scapes. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA.

Krantz, G., and D. Walter. 2009. A manual of acarol- ogy. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Chris- tensen. 2015. Package‘lmerTest’. R package version 2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTe st/index.html

Lawrence, K. L., and D. H. Wise. 2000. Spider preda- tion on forest-floor Collembola and evidence for indirect effects on decomposition. Pedobiologia 44:33–39.

Lenth, R., J. Love, and M. Herve. 2017. Package‘em- means’. Statistician 34:216–221.

Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture.

Ecology 73:1943–1967.

Limpens, J., and M. M. Heijmans. 2008. Swift recovery of Sphagnum nutrient concentrations after excess supply. Oecologia 157:153.

Lindberg, N., and J. Bengtsson. 2005. Population responses of oribatid mites and collembolans after drought. Applied Soil Ecology 28:163–174.

L€udecke, D. 2016. sjPlot: data visualization for statis- tics in social science. R package version 2. https://

cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sjPlot/index.html Macfadyen, A. 1961. Improved funnel-type extractors

for soil arthropods. Journal of Animal Ecology 30:171–184.

Mack, M. C., E. A. Schuur, M. S. Bret-Harte, G. R. Sha- ver, and F. S. Chapin. 2004. Ecosystem carbon stor- age in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431:440–443.

Makkonen, M., M. P. Berg, J. R. Van Hal, T. V. Cal- laghan, M. C. Press, and R. Aerts. 2011. Traits explain the responses of a sub-arctic Collembola community to climate manipulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43:377–384.

Mitchell, R. J., H. M. Urpeth, A. J. Britton, H. Black, and A. R. Taylor. 2016. Relative importance of local-and large-scale drivers of alpine soil microarthropod communities. Oecologia 182:913–

924.

Mitchell, R. J., H. M. Urpeth, A. J. Britton, and A. R.

Taylor. 2017. Soil microarthropod-plant commu- nity relationships in alpine moss-sedge heath.

Applied Soil Ecology 111:1–8.

Nadelhoffer, K., A. Giblin, G. Shaver, and J. Laundre.

1991. Effects of temperature and substrate quality on element mineralization in six arctic soils. Ecol- ogy 72:242–253.

Nemergut, D. R., A. R. Townsend, S. R. Sattin, K. R.

Freeman, N. Fierer, J. C. Neff, W. D. Bowman, C.

W. Schadt, M. N. Weintraub, and S. K. Schmidt.

2008. The effects of chronic nitrogen fertilization on alpine tundra soil microbial communities: implica- tions for carbon and nitrogen cycling. Environmen- tal Microbiology 10:3093–3105.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute. 2016, eKlima.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute Oslo, Norway.

http://sharki.oslo.dnmi.no/portal/page_pagexml:

id=73,39035,73_39049&_dad=portal&_schema=

PORTAL

Olofsson, J., L. Oksanen, T. Callaghan, P. E. Hulme, T.

Oksanen, and O. Suominen. 2009. Herbivores inhi- bit climate-driven shrub expansion on the tundra.

Global Change Biology 15:2681–2693.

Olsen, S. L., and K. Klanderud. 2014. Exclusion of her- bivores slows down recovery after experimental warming and nutrient addition in an alpine plant community. Journal of Ecology 102:1129–1137.

O'Sullivan, O. S., P. Horswill, G. K. Phoenix, J. A. Lee, and J. R. Leake. 2011. Recovery of soil nitrogen pools in species-rich grasslands after 12 years of simulated pollutant nitrogen deposition: a 6-year experimental analysis. Global Change Biology 17:2615–2628.

Petersen, H. 2002. General aspects of collembolan ecol- ogy at the turn of the millennium. Pedobiologia 46:246.

Potapov, M. 2001. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola:

Isotomidae. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Gorlitz 73:1–603.

R Core Team. 2017, R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna, Austria.

Rizzi, J., I. B. Nilsen, J. H. Stagge, K. Gisnas, and L. M.

Tallaksen. 2017. Five decades of warming: impacts

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

A UAV will reduce the hop count for long flows, increasing the efficiency of packet forwarding, allowing for improved network throughput. On the other hand, the potential for

This research has the following view on the three programmes: Libya had a clandestine nuclear weapons programme, without any ambitions for nuclear power; North Korea focused mainly on

This report presented effects of cultural differences in individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity/femininity, and long term/short

The two concentration fields shown in the figure have the largest overall statistical difference between two different release heights (for the same horizontal location) among all

Only by mirroring the potential utility of force envisioned in the perpetrator‟s strategy and matching the functions of force through which they use violence against civilians, can

This report contains the minutes of the annual meeting of the Anglo Netherlands Norwegian Cooperation Working Group III on Warheads (ANNC WGIII) held at FFI, Kjeller 23rd -

The total area (A) affected by a 1h sonar operation under different ramp-up schemes assuming simulated animals respond at fixed avoidance thresholds (SPL avoid ; sound pressure level

Fig. Modeling is done with the composite-roughness surface scattering kernel for the same type of bottom as in Fig. There are 10 dB between the thick marks on the vertical axes.