• No results found

Supplementary Material Algal hot spots in a changing Arctic Ocean: Sea-ice ridges and the snow-ice interface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Supplementary Material Algal hot spots in a changing Arctic Ocean: Sea-ice ridges and the snow-ice interface"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Supplementary Material

Algal hot spots in a changing Arctic Ocean: Sea-ice ridges and the snow-ice interface

Mar Fernández-Méndez1*, Lasse Mork Olsen1, Hanna M. Kauko1, Amelie Meyer1, Anja Rösel1, Ioanna Merkouriadi1, Christopher J. Mundy2, Jens K. Ehn2, A. Malin Johansson3, Penelope M. Wagner4, Åse Ervik5,6, Brian K. Sorrell7, Pedro Duarte1, Anette Wold1, Haakon Hop1,8 and Philipp Assmy1.

* Correspondence: Corresponding Author: mar@npolar.no

1 Supplementary Video

The video file “Ridge_compilation.mp4” shows a compilation of under-water recordings of the FYI ridge studied during the N-ICE2015 expedition in May 2015.

https://figshare.com/s/d31c7742e889e31c6b32

2 Supplementary Figures and Tables

(2)

2.1 Supplementary Tables

Table S1: Percentage coverage of different ice types and open water based on the Radarsat-2 scene analysis.

Floe 3

Date Open water [%]

Young ice [%]

Smooth sea ice [%]

Deformed sea ice and ridges [%]

26 May 2 3.3 41.2 53.5

30 May 2.9 3.5 41.8 51.8

31 May 0.8 5 46.9 47.3

Mean 1.9 3.9 43.3 50.9

Floe 4

Date Open water [%]

Young ice [%]

Smooth sea ice [%]

Deformed sea ice and ridges [%]

13 June 6.5 5.4 43.3 44.9

15 June 4.6 4.8 43 47.6

Mean 5.6 5.1 43.2 46.3

(3)

Table S2: Ice fauna data collected below the ridge with a suction pump by divers. Units are individuals per sample.

Sample name IceFauna_01 IceFauna_02 IceFauna_03 IceFauna_04 IceFauna_05

Date (2015) 13 May 14 May 15 May 18 May 19 May

Species name

Calanus glacialis 2 2

Microcalanus spp. 1 1 5

Pseudocalanus spp. 1 2

Harpacticoida indet. 1 3 20

Oithona similis 8 44 8 19

Oncaea spp. 1

Triconia (=Oncaea) borealis

1

Copepoda nauplii 4 9 2 5

Themisto libellula 3 1

Apherusa glacialis 84 31 50 16

Eusirus holmi 2 1 2

Gammarus wilkitzkii 1

Onisimus glacialis 1

(4)

4.1 Supplementary Figures

Figure S1: A) Coincident Radarsat-2 satellite images over RV Lance during N-ICE2015. The images were acquired from 26 May to 15 June. B) Radarsat-2 satellite backscatter in decibels (dB) from 26 May is shown and C) segmented to distinguish various sea ice features.

(5)

Figure S2: Wind-rose plot of ocean current speeds at 23 m depth relative to the ice showing the direction in which the current flows (angle in degree), its frequency (%) and intensity (color in m s-1);

values refer to the period 23 April to 5 June 2015. The axis of the ridge is indicated with the black dashed line with the thin ice north to the north and thick ice to the south.

(6)

Supplementary Material Figure S3: Microscopy images from the ridge-bottom ledge Nitzschia frigida (A and B) top ledge Shionodiscus bioculatus dominated community (C and D) and the snow-ice interface community at SI1 (E and F). Images A, C and E were taken with normal light while images B, D and F show the UV fluorescence where red indicates Chl a and blue indicates areas where silicate from the fluorescent dye DMSPO has been incorporated in the cell wall of the diatom.

(7)

Figure S4: Snow pit from snow-infiltration community SI1 on 13 June 2015.

(8)

Supplementary Material Figure S5: Abundance of infiltration community at SI1 before and after 24 hours of snow removal.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Figure 1 shows the average surface refl ectance of sea ice covered by a 1 - 2 cm snow layer, normal- ized under-ice irradiance directly below the sea ice and normalized

In total 89 regular ice observations (every 3 hrs in areas with sea ice) with filling out a sheet with various sea ice parameters (ice types, floe sizes, snow cover, ridges,

p.Gly62Cys in KRT8 (Supplementary material online, Tables S10 and S11) and the missense variants in TTN/CCDC141 (Supplementary material online, Table S12) did not associate with

Under assumptions of perfect screening adherence, the minimum and maximum values across 50 parameter sets (i.e. representing the uncertainty bounds) for the primary analysis outcomes

S3 Comparison of S5P cloud height with Cloudnet: supplementary material This section contains extra material for

Figure 5 shows the reflection coefficient calculated using OASES for the water-ice interface with 2 m smooth sea-ice (Case b in Table III) and for a sea-ice layer with 0.6 m

The unilateralist turns in US foreign and security policy, the different interpretations of the fight against international terrorism, and a more self-confident and assertive

central Arctic Ocean sea-ice cover: new insights from biomarker proxy records.. Sea Ice Index, in: NSIDC: National