Climate Change – Figures
Figure 1. Environmental protection most important issue (solid line) and support for environmental protection (dotted line). Percent. 1977-2013*
26
12
5
37
7
10 8 8
20
14 29
18
29
44
35
32 31 31
34
29
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013
*) Solid line: Percent mentioning environmental protection as most important issue (two issues
allowed). Dotted line: Percent who disagree with the statement: “To secure economic growth we need to develop our industry even if doing so conflicts with environmental protection”.
Figure 2a. Predicted probabilities for belonging to the environmentalist group rather than the climate-only group, for the range of values on the immigration index, all other values set at their mean. 2009 and 2013.
.2.4.6.81
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Attidudes Tow ards Immigration (2009)
Predicted Probabilities (0-1)
.2.4.6.81
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Attitudes Towards Immigration (2013)
Predicted Probabilities (0-1)
Figure 2b. Predicted probabilities for belonging to the environmentalist group rather than the climate-only group, for the range of values on the left-right index, all other values set at their mean. 2009.
.2.6.81.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Left-Right (2009)
Predicted Probabilities (0-1)
Figure 3. Position of political parties and environmental groups in a two-dimensional political space. Deviation from sample means on both dimensions by party voters and environmental and climate groups. Norway 2013.
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
-6,5 -4,5 -2,5 -0,5 1,5 3,5 5,5
Environmentalist
Climate only
Left Right
Conservative
Progress Liberal
Christian Centre
Green
Labour Soc. Left
Negative to immigration
Positive to immigration
Figure in Appendix
Figure A.2. Position of political parties and environmental groups in a two-
dimensional political space, using alternative classification of the environmentalist and climate-only group. Deviation from sample means on both dimensions by party voters and environmental and climate groups Norway 2013.
-7,0000 -5,0000 -3,0000 -1,0000 1,0000 3,0000 5,0000 7,0000
-7,0000 -5,0000 -3,0000 -1,0000 1,0000 3,0000 5,0000 7,0000 Conservative
Progress Soc.Left
Green Labour
Center
Environmentalist Liberal
Christian
Climate only
Left Right
Positive to immigration
Negative to immigration
