• No results found

By-catch criteria in the Barents Sea shrimp fishery (434.1Kb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "By-catch criteria in the Barents Sea shrimp fishery (434.1Kb)"

Copied!
14
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

By-catch criteria in the Barents Sea shrimp fishery

Bio-economic views from Norwegian industry Åge Remøy, shipowner

(2)

Norwegian northern shrimp fishery

Catches Barents Sea and Svalbard:

• 2001: 44.100 tons

• 2002: 50.800 tons

• 2003: 34.405 tons

• 2004: 32.649 tons

• 20-40 Norwegian vessels fishing for shrimp, of which 10 all year round, and rest for 3-6

months pr year. Part of activity in

Greenland, Jan Mayen, Flemish Cap

(3)
(4)

Shrimp fishery regulations

• Sorting grids with 19 mm. bar space, removes fish >17-18 cm (fish age 1-1,5 year)

• Minimum shrimp size

• Svalbard: National effort regulation (fishing days)

• Ship license scheme, including license reduction programme (fleet structuring)

• Nature! (ice-conditions and catches)

(5)

Shrimp fishery regulations

• Maximum bycatch limits of:

• 800 juveniles of cod and haddock combined pr ton of shrimp

• 300 juveniles of greenland halibut pr ton of shrimp

• 1.000 juveniles of redfish pr ton of shrimp

• Fishery prohibited and area closed if above any one of these. Very many and large

areas closed recent years, causing big problems for the shrimp fishery.

(6)

Current biological situation

0-group abundance index 1965 - 2004

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

196 6

1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978

198 0

198 2

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994

199 6

199 8

2000 2002

Abundance index

Haddock Cod

0-group abundance situation for haddock 2004 best since measurements started in 1965 Cod only 7 better years since 1965

(7)

Result 0-group abundance+juvenile bycatch limits

Roughly distribution area Closed february 2005

(8)

Endangered pleasures?

Norwegian Prawnparty

(9)

What is meant by bio-economic considerations?

• Management of fish and shrimp resources is not only a question of biology

• Must consider human activity, including economical aspects

• We feel that too much emphasis has been put on juvenile protection, without due

consideration to other biological and certainly economic factors

(10)

The bio-economic model for

calculating juvenile by-catch criteria

• Developed in early 1990s

• Attempts to assess the connection

between losses of shrimp catches and gains in juvenile protection

• Method: comparing present value of shrimp catches lost, compared to

future value of fish catches gained

(11)

The bio-economic model for

calculating juvenile by-catch criteria

• Considers factors such as:

• Prices cod, haddock, shrimp

• Expected future catch volume pr. ”saved”

juvenile (including natural mortality expectations)

• Developed for cod and haddock.

• Now also have redfish and greenland

halibut criteria. Model less useful for stocks outside safe biological limits (shrimp will

always ”win” as future value of little is little…

(12)

Using bio-economic model

• Calculations based on average cod, haddock and shrimp prices 2004 and using varying future catch expectancies from ”saved” juveniles, indicates following by-catch criteria:

• Cod 1.100-1.600 pr ton shrimp

• Haddock 2.500-4.400 pr ton shrimp (model calculates species by species)

• Future yield per recruit/saved juvenile optimistically estimated…

• Relative price-moves in 2005 may alter above

conclutions, but clear result towards more liberal juvenile by-catch criteria

(13)

Conclutions

• Juvenile by-catch criteria is not a strictly

biological issue, economic factors must be considered

• Support biological decision-making factors with economic by use of, or inspired by

ideas of the bio-economic model

• Take current 0-group stock assessments into consideration

• Need for annual juvenile by-catch criteria adjustments?

(14)

Conclutions

• Need to consider more liberal criteria the further north you go? (assuming less juvenile survival further north)

• Need a system of autmatic reopening of fishing areas after some time, unless new measurements indicates

continued closure

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Seismic shooting severely affected fish distribution, local abundance, and catch rates in the entire investigation area of 40 × 40 nautical miles.Trawl catches of cod and haddock

One device was a combined fish bycatch excluder and shrimp size selector (FASS), and the other was designed to reduce catch of small sized shrimp and small sized fish

There are two independent estimates of the abundance or relative abundance of Northeast Arctic cod; one based on commercial catch data and the other, a fishery independent

Total nominal catch (t) by fishing areas (Norwegian coastal cod not included)... (As officially reported to

Total nominal catch (tonnes) by fishing areas (landings of Norwegian coastal cod not included)... Data provided by Working Group

For the index of the remaining species (cod, haddock, whiting, Norway pout and mackerel), the catch at age per hour is averaged for all hauls within a rectangle, and

Al Kingston addressed the ways in which fishing effort data can be used in by-catch monitoring programmes for designing surveys and for raising by-catch observations to fishery

The mixed fishery approach may be of relevance for the main target species in commercial fishery cod, herring and sprat. They form about 95 % of the total catch. Pelagic fisheries