• No results found

CM_1959_Gad_Fish_Com_12.pdf (2.171Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CM_1959_Gad_Fish_Com_12.pdf (2.171Mb)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

International Col.lllcil for the Exploration of the Sea

C.M. 1959

Gadoid Fish Committee No.12

Migrations of Coalfish (Gs.d1.ls virens L.) from Norway to Faroe Islands and Iceland

By

Steinar Olsen

As shown by Seanundsson (1929) and later by Schmidt (1955) the coalfish at Iceland are characterized by a fast growth compared with the same species in Norwegian waters. Bertelsen (1942) found the growth of coalfish in Faroe waters to be inter- mediate between that of the Icelandic and the Norwegian stock. Other characters, such as age at matnrity, otolith types, relative strength of year-classes etc. are also found to vary between the different areas. Consequently, the stocks of coalfish in these geographically separated areas have been regarded as independent populations between which little or no intermingling takes place.

However, in 1953 Schmidt (1955) observed the sudden disappearance of practically a complete year-class from Icelandic waters, for which the most likely

explanation given was emmigration to another, at that time unfished area. A similar peculiar phenomenon occurred in 1956 when the Icelandic stock showed a sudden loss of large fish. Subsequently to this Gerrran trawle~s got large catches of coalfish ona.new fishing ground off Faroe Islands, and from the otolith types, age distribution and growth pattern, these fish were, in all probability, of Icelandic origin

(Schmidt 1957).

During the winter of 1957 Norwegian tagged fish started to occur in catches from Faroe waters, and later in the year also from the SE and NW coasts of Iceland.

Schmidt was then able to demonstrate an anomaly in the age and length composition of the catches at Iceland caused by a sudden appearance of slow-growing fish, and he concluded that the Icelandic stock in 1957 included an element of Norwegian coalfish, which had migrated from the spawn~ng areas off the west coast of Norway, over Tampen and the Faroe banks to the SE coast of Iceland and later to the NW coast (Schmidt 1957).

We may now raise the question whether these are unique phenomenons resulting, for instance, from a rare environmental condition, and which would thus not render our previous concept of :.ndepe'.!'l.dent coal.:'ish populations invalid; or are such mass migrations frequent occurrences which have to be considered, for instance in population dynamics studies.

The further tagging results may throw some light on this question, hence a full account of all recoveries to date reported from Faroe and Icelandic waters is presented in Table 1, page 4, and on the chart in Figure l are plotted the positions of the recaptures.

It appears that the coalfish recaptured in 1958 and 1959 were derived from tagging experiments in 1957 and 1958, respectively, as well as from earlier

experiments, consequently an immigration into these areas has taken place each year since 1957.

It would also appear that of those fish recaptured in Icelandic waters, 11 were tagged as medium-sized fish in Eastern Finmark, 6 in Western Finnmark, 3 at Sveet near North Cape, and one at Gr:i.pta.ren on the west coast of Norway. The

taggings of large coalfish in Mid-Finnmark have given 4 recaptures at Faroe Islands but none at Iceland. At Faroe Islands the fish were large, over Bo cm when recaptured, whereas the mean length at recapture in Icelandic waters was about 77 cm. The age at

recapture for 12 fish at Iceland ranged from 6 to 9 years, and from 8 to 9 years for three fish in Faroe waters. We may thus assume that they had most likely reached sexual maturity when recaptured.

Considering the numbers recaptured from the various tagging localities and the difference in size, the lack of recaptures at Iceland of fish tagged as large mature fish in Mid-Finnmark, and vice versa in Faroe waters from some of the tagging

localities in Eastern and Western Fjnnr...n.rk, is hardly just a coincidence, and indicates different migratory patternG for various groups of fish.

(

(2)

- 2 -

The coalfish recapture data from the Norwegian waters give many

indications of migrations in groups, as two or more fish from the same tagging experiment are frequently recaptured a year or more afterwards on the very same date and locality, sometimes hundreds of miles away from where they were released.

A similar non-random distribution of tagged fish is indicated by the recaptures in Icelandic and Faroe waters, as already stated by Schmidt (1957).

It would thus appear that the group or groups of coalfish migrating from Norway to Iceland do not follow the route via Faroe Islands, and those travelling to Faroe waters do not proceed to Iceland. The material is inconclusive with regard to the exact migration routes. One possible route would be the one

suggested by Schmidt from the spawning areas off the Norwegian coast over Tampen and the Shetland area, but so far only two recaptures from Tam.pen and one from·

Shetland have been reported, in spite of a considerable fishery in these areas.

The mature coalfish tagged during the summer on the Finroark coast do not seem to reach the spawning grounds off the west coast of Norway until the month of February, and the distance from the Lofoten banks to Svin~y is covered in a time of not less than one month. Thus, if the two recaptures reported at Iceland in January 1956 and 1958 of fish tagged in the previous summer, are correct, the route along the Norwegian coast and across the ocean over Tam.pen and Faroe waters would seem very unlikely. Such a migration in the matter of five months only is particularly improbable considering the current system en route.

Another possibility is a pelagic transoceanic migration from North Norway or the Barents Sea. According to the latest current charts of the Norwegian Sea produced by Alexejev and Istoshin (1956) or Eggvin (private communication), SW- erly countercurrents in the areas east of Jan Mayen might provide a quick transport for part of the way from the Barents Sea to Iceland.

In this connexion it is noticed that in 1957 and 1958 a number of tagged coalfish were recaptured at Bear Island, a locality where previously no recoveries had been reported. This may be correlated with the general cooling of the Eastern Barents Sea which started in 1956, and seems to be paralleled by aggregations in

the Bear Island area of other species, for instance haddock (Sretersdal, private communication).

A third possibility, and probably the most likely one, is that the coalfish follow the Atlanto-Scandian herring on the return migration from the Norwegian coast. This is supported by the observations made by Norwegian fishermen of coalfish feeding pelagically on herring in the Norwegian Sea, and that coalfish are frequently taken with jiggers at the weather ship station 11M11 (65°00'N, 02°00tE). According to Devold (1959) the spawning areas of the Atlanto-Scandian herring have in recent years gradually been extended northwards, and the spawning time has been delayed. Thus, at the present time herring and coalfish are pretty well matched as regards both spawning time and areas. This would infer that a much larger proportion than previously of the coalfish stock is in contact with the herring when these leave the Norwegian coast after spawning, and may explain the recent mass migrations of Norwegian coalfish to Icelandic waters.

While the tagging material clearly shows a yearly migration since 1957 of Norwegian coalfish to Icelandic waters, it is inconclusive as regards the time prior to this year, because the taggings in those localities which have given recaptures at Iceland were not started until 1955. On the other hand, the immigration into Icelandic waters in 1957 resulted in a marked anomaly in the age and length distribution, and this would indicate an irregular or insignifican··:

immigration prior to 1957.

The previously mentioned non-random distribution of tagged fish would invalidate any calculations of the magnitude of the transoceanic migrations on the basis of tagging data alone. However, there oan be little doubt that over the past three years rather extensive migrations from Norway to Iceland have taken place, and unless compensated for by return migrations, the Norwegirui

stock of coalfish has thereby suffered a net loss of a significant number of fish.

(3)

- 3 -

A b s t r a c t

Since 1957 a number of coalfish tagged in Norwegian waters has been recaptured at ]celand and Faroe Islands. It thus appears that the stocks of coalfish in these areas, which previously were considered as independent

populations, receive a regular immigration of Norwegian fish, and unless compensated for by a return migration, the Norwegian stock suffers a net loss of a significant number of fish.

The tagging material is inconclusive with regard to the actual migration routes followed, but it would appear that the fish migrating to Iceland follow a different path from those travelling to the Faroe Islands.

Alexejev, A.P. and Istoshin, B. V.

Bertelsen, E.

Devold, F.

Schmidt, U.

Schmidt, U.

SSi!llundsson, B.

1956

1942

1959

1955

1957

1929

Literature

"A scheme of the permanent currents in the Norwegian and Greenland Seas!' PINRO, Vol.9, 1956. (In Russian).

"Contributions to the Biology of the Coalfish (Gadus virens L.) in Faroe Waters." Medd. Komm.

f.Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havunders~gelser, Ser.

Fiskeri, XI, 2.

"Otto Petterssons teori om de skandinaviske sildeperioder sett i sammenheng med de senere

~rs unders~kelser over den·Atlanto-Skandinaviske sild.11 Naturen, No.2, 1959.

"Bei trage zur Biologie des KO"hlers (Ga.dus virens L.) in den islandischen Gewassern."

Ber. Deutsch. Wiss. Komm. Meeresforsch., XIV, 1, pp.46-82.

"Die deuts chen K"cihleranlandi.m.gen 1946/47 - 1956/57 aus norwegischen i.m.d islandischen

Gewassern und ihre Abhangigkeit vom Fischbestand."

(Manuscript).

"On the Age and Growth of the Coalfish (Gadus

virens L.), the Norway Pout (Gadus esmarki

Nilsson) and the Poutassou (Gadus poutassou Risso) in Icelandic waters." Medd. Komm. f. Havunders., Ser. Fiskeri, VIII, 7.

(See Table 1 and Figure l on following pages).

(4)

( c

Table 1. Records of Coalfish Migrations from Norway to Faroe Islands and Iceland.

t'" L

~---===~~-. --=---====--- .

--Releas

e~~-======~===~~---.--- __ ---·- -·==~~~ap~urea----.

-----

---_--·--··---~==~

1----·_Qat~ ___________ 1=gca_li i'.Y _ _____________ Po_~iti~ Length Date Area Position Length Age Year-class Remarks

I

15/8-55 Tanasnaget 70°58'N, 29°10'E ________ 66---·abt·-.i-0/1-~6-- Ic~lan~--65°50'N,25°40'W--SgTY ___ -_---- ---~--,

1 14/8-56 Tubgen, Finnmark 70°59'N, 23°24'E 71 lo-18/6-57 Iceland 64°10'N,13°50'W 75 7+ 1950 a

I

I 15/8-55 Tanasnaget 70c58'N, 29°10'E 70 2/7-57 Iceland 66°53'N,24°45'W 80 7+ 1950

I

, 1/8-56 Sveet, Finnmark 71°06'N, 25°19'E 69 3-ll/7-67 Iceland 66°53'N,24°45'W 73 7+ 1950 a

I

26/5-55 Griptaren 63°17'N, 07°20'E 45 14-24/7-57 Iceland 66°53'N,24°45'W 67 6+ 1951 a

I

3/8-55 Off Kiberg, Finnm. 70°15'N, 31°0l'E 71 1-12/8-57 Iceland 66°53'N,24°45'W 82 8+ 1949 a !

14/8-56 Tubgen, Finnmark 70°59'N, 23°24'E 77 Sept. -57 Iceland 66°53'N,24°45'W 82;1.) - - a.

l ..

14/8-56 Tub&en, Finnmark 70°59'N, 23°24'E 71 abt.2/11-57 Iceland 66°15'N,l3°201W 771) - - a

I

23/7-55 Tub£en, Finnrnark 71°0l'N, 23°22'E 58 a.bt.5/1-58 Iceland 63°50'N,14°401W 85 ) 7 1951 j

26/7-57 Tubaen, Finnmark 70°58'N, 23°22'E 69 Jan. -58 Iceland - 711

- - a

3/8-55 Off Kiberg, Finnrn. 70°15'N, 31°0l'E 62 Febr./May-58 Iceland - 81 8 1950

6/8-57 Tanasnaget 70°56'N, 28°58'E 84 17/5-58 Iceland - 85

15/8-55 Tanasnaget 70°58'N, 29°10'E 57 21/5-2/6-58 Iceland 64°20'N,14°00'W 76 31/7-56 Sveet, Finnmark 71°06°N, 25°191E 68 14/7-58 Iceland 66°34'N,25°001W 75 3o/7-57 Off

S~r~y,

Finnmark 70°46°N, 22°08'E 61 15/8-58 Iceland 65°52tN,24°481W 681

) 13/8-58 Tanasnaget 71°00tN, 28°52:E 78 2/4-59 Iceland 64°00•N,14°001W

79

1

~

13/8-58 Tanasnaget 71°00'N, 28°52'E 70 25/4-4/5-59 Iceland - 72i)

13/8-58 Tanasnaget 71°00'N, 28°52'E 75 4/5-59 Iceland 63°50'N,14°001W 76 13/8-58 Tanasnaget 71°00'N, 28°52'E 81 abt.7/5-59 Iceland 64°20'N,14°00'W 81 31/7-56 Sveet, Finnmark 71°06'N, 25°19'E 67 28/5-59 Iceland SW-coast

7/8-58 Tanasnaget 71°0l'N, 28°50'E 77 2/6-59 Iceland 64°02'N,13°14'W 3/8-55 Off Kiberg, Finnm. 70°15'N, 31°0l'E 69 1-9/1-57 Faroes

17/8-54 Oksefjord, Fiill'lill. 71°05'N, 27°25'E 74 abt.1/7-57 Fa.roes 17/8-55 Laksefjord, Finnm. 70°48'N, 26°45'E 70 18/9-57 Fa.roes 17/8-55 Laksefjord, Finnm. 70°48'N, 26°45'E 69 17-30/9-57 Fa.roes 17/8-56 Oksefjord, Fillillll. 71°05'N, 27°25'E 76 20/9-57 Fa.roes 23/7-55 Tubaen, Finnmark 71°0l'N, 23°22'E 70 29/9-12/lo-58 Fa.roes

62°19'N,07°05'W 62°12'N,04°10'W 62°15'N ,04°13 'W

84 77 80 84 85 80 80 901 )

8+

6+

7+

9

7+

8

8+

9+

1950 1952 1952

1950 1952 1949

1949 1949

a a

a a.

a a a

--- --- ---· ---·-·--·---~ --- - -- - - -----·- --- --------·-- - --

l)

=

Estimated length.

a

=

Tag discovered in fish plant, hence position may be doubtful.

I I

! JP-

1 I I

!

i

I i

l

I

..

(5)

---- c-- ---- ---- --- ---c -- -- --- ---

'(, ·-~-.,~S\ r~\

,S

0 ~- - /

·;Bear Island

- 1

--..._I \ \ '\ - ,.,...~

. I' " ·-,11 y ....

t. ,_.-...., ··~ ,,,~ \ ,v'

.

~ / ....

t:··-•T.::\} B A R E N T S S E A '

-.::_

\ \

,.. -, '

·~:"'--·-., 'r

; .:_-- J

f, .. ,..J '-·

~:-·-: ~-.-;·i

, ___ --:_.: ,·- \ i

'1 I

~ ...

,

'\

" \ I ._, ·/

(v

'-"/

I (: / ',_,,1

Jan Mayen

,.--

...

"-- (~~

1y)'Vi -'...__;;.;

~

v , • ,.z.7\> "/..·'if- ' ' I v''l "!·

V<) ...

I . _.;<Y;-· ..-:,- ···-v ' J \ ~ .. ~,_ ·-· • /

~ I \ " / r ' ,,j.J \I

( / ' J '

... -.~

:.

~'

.... ... ---r -::..

\

;--,.,•

,''-1·.-z /~

I

-

_/.:,

l«"'"J

?·- -t..f' - ,. ,

I } . - r, -

. ' -:'.:--' .J) \ " ,- .i

/JI).~ t ·;

.. -. ,.-

----·

...

--::..,·--·-/

r - - J_ --

200

,..,,,,

__.. .. 5!

(--·-..i 5 ~--

·,.6 ~ ... i_,,. ...

1

--, , __ ... _ ... ,i_6 \ 7' •-=-> ·.: 5,., ... .:' -·17: ... ·

~,f64 ---4~

..

_)~ l _

. i {

~-v ,- . i

\;.;. - ,

\. \",..,,:

' I•; •

;;·vl

'.,I J , ,

~ \ : I I

l

_;.;· ?~

.

·-... ... I C E L A N D

, J ...

: .. s .'

... ·

,_

(

I -· -

~

,

~,

,., • - -. J-: .-.-..

'LI ----

- . . ,;,.,

., ~

... ,.- · ' 1·'· : 6" j 51

'-,.. 4' ' • - ~' f ..::._J

Ai\

r_7

i

;:-:.:::'. !Lft:,.1 ·51

~ ..

,

•.

Ji:-.

_

_,_.t'.. ~~\

1 __ 5

..iL

_ j

Faeroe Islands

NORWEGIAN , S EA

""'\151'

,5 . ·--

.I . . ,J .

pf\"I . ~ 41 ...

•• ),·--- ·1 5 i

~ ·-·~5 ... i·;::::'

._ ... -:..., \ 4.~

'-. ,,

,, ,_, 1

'/ (

-·'>

1

0(HJ 1.1,~~;;~

:;.1

.• \ r

,j , , ,(.._ · .• __ .

,, {".,,..

ii ~-:-

'-:,.-

.::~~-:;

r

...

\.: .J

"'!..1

. :. ;

.•. L

v

'.'. /

.:::: .•

/",

."1>

I

<

).i/. ,

r;J.~:

·~·· .. {

:. ~

·~, . ·'\.21\.

:~7-:,;

1,·;~

'\~~}."' r?"'--' 1-~

"I

0 ,__./ \. 6 '1

"-·' Tamp en /.::-· ·~ ,~~---

___, .. >

n ~

Shetland : ... ,

..

.,

~

~ Cl

(}

---]_~ 1.-/ ~<~ --- -~-\\ oo

.,. .

;r~ /; "'>1

?'" •'J, <- ~ f:.:...

" ~ t..., .. •.J ... ts.

.s /'

Q:;

"' 7

./,.., 0

{ / .

- ';: Z;

,, \'r , ,..~\)\l'r( ~(

... -->""

l ; l

.. / ' 1..i.,....,

"--\,- - ,,-=. \

Figure 1.

L__.=1

10°

'·,,,\ u

\,.;·1~~11

~ ·,_ ... • h j

,.,tY .. · ... -;.

\) b'.- .)

...

l

I !

I

\'

.-.(

J

/ 0 .-·:i

./

I .1

,.J c:/

'-rl (

\

A.,JI: ·r

~-1.~:_· .--. ... .. L-L..

Recaptures of Tagged Coalfish at Iceland and Faeroe Islands

()z; Tagging locality

· .... "

<)

Ree. 1956 i.··-··\

.

... ~"' ' Ree. 1957

r-·;

Ree. 1958 F Ree. 1959

1 .• J •_\

Number indicates year released

20°

J

I

I

I

I

I

____,

160

I I

"'

~

Cil

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

• Jordanian health officials and others in Jordan do not consider landmine victims a group needing attention or services other than those offered to other groups of patients with

Country Belgium Denmark Faroe Islands Finland France German Dem.Rep.. Iceland Netherlands Norway Poland Sweden UK (England) UK (Scotland) )

Denmarf 2 Norway Total Country Belgium Denmark Faroe Islands France.. German

h) Norway letter 14.12.2000: At their annual meeting in October 2000, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Russia, the European Community and Norway re-emphasised their commitment to

Analysis of raw material production (supply and demand), with the aim of identifying scarcity and vulnerability in the upper part of the value chain. Value chain and

This ~150,000 km 2 region is largely continental and likely continuous with the thick crust of the Greenland-Iceland- Faroe Ridge via the ~15,000 km 2 Iceland Plateau, seaward of

This report reviews the current cereal growing situation in five northern regions (Orkney, N-Norway, Iceland, Newfoundland and Faroe Islands) and the potential for using local

Genuine generic competition is here defined as a situation where a given drug package was on the substitution list at the time of prescription, and where there were actual