• No results found

Monitoring of palsa mires in Norway

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Monitoring of palsa mires in Norway"

Copied!
23
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Monitoring of palsa mires in Norway

Mires and wetlands in the North Calotte Area Vadsø, 2-3 October 2019 Annika Hofgaard Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

(2)

Background and site selection

Study design Results

Ferdesmyra example Some general patterns

Future

Today

(3)

Scientific relevance

Carbon pools, GHG

Albedo, forest-tundra zone

Fresh water flow into the Arctic Ocean Lake disappearance

Lake appearance Biodiversity

Land use

(4)

Permafrost distribution

Source: Seppälä 1997; Sollid & Sørbel 1998

(5)

Given criteria

 National perspective

Long-term

 Build on consensus among national scientists

 Protected areas

 Limited funding

 Method development

 Start in 2004

 Annual reporting in Norwegian

(6)

Haukskardmyrin

Selected sites

Haugtjørnin

Leirpullan

Ferdesmyra

Goatheluoppal

Ostojeaggi

(7)

Study design

Non-destructive Line analyses

Photo documentation GPS

Air photos Climate data

air temperature

soil temperature

precipitation

snow depth

5-year intervals August; 1

st

week

Line analyses

Mire sections accessible by foot Total length per area: ca 800 m Study unit along lines: 1 metre Recorded factors:

land cover type (7 variables) bottom layer (6 variables) field layer (8 variables) shrub layer (3 variables) thaw depth

height above surrounding mire

(8)

Ostojeaggi linje F

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250

1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111

meter

høyde/dybde. cm

markhøyde storr molte lyng hvitlyng ull død torv lav mose

torvmose strø vann lagg myrflata pals palsring dam tele

Height Permafrost

height/depth, cm

metre

Land cover type Bottom layer Field layer

(9)

Ostojeaggi linje F

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250

1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111

meter

høyde/dybde. cm

markhøyde storr molte lyng hvitlyng ull død torv lav mose

torvmose strø vann lagg myrflata pals palsring dam tele

Use of photo points

metre

height/depth, cm

(10)

Results

Ferdesmyra, Eastern Finnmark

(11)

Ferdesmyra - example

Neiden

Kirkenes (45 km)

Protection status: Nature reserve (1972)

Latitude: 69°44’N

Longitude: 29°17’E

Altitude: 70 m a.s.l.

Vegetation section: north boreal slightly continental section (Moen, 1999)

Temperature data: Kirkenes

Precipitation data: Neiden

Monitoring years: 2008, 2013, 2018

Additional year: 2004

Black: palsa formations in the 1970s (source: Vorren 1972 & 1979); red: palsa disappeared between 2004 and 2008; green: palsas disappeared between 2013 and 2018; blue: palsa remains present in 2018

(12)

R² = 0,1428

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

Temperatur, Co

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

nedbør, mm

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0

1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018

cm

vinter vår sommer høst trend (vinter) trend (vår)

Temperature, C° Precipitation, mm Snow depth, cm

blue: 10 year running mean; green: 30 year running mean

Varanger region

Data source: www.met.no

Neiden Neiden

annual, winter, spring, summer, autumn

(13)

Ferdesmyra, area A

1972 2008 2015

(14)

2013

2018 2004

2008

(15)

2004

2008

2013

2018

(16)

1972 2008 2015

(17)
(18)

General pattern is decreasing palsa abundance, but that is not the full picture

Results after 5 years and 10 years show some variable-

dependent deviations

(19)

Ostojeaggi, Troms

495 m a.s.l.

2004

2009

xxxx

2004

2009

(20)

Haukskardmyrin Dovre

1050 m a.s.l.

2005

2010

(21)

1974

Haugtjørnin Dovre

1120 m a.s.l.

1996

2005 2010

(22)

Into the future

Long-term funding (?)

Annual applications for fieldwork and reporting costs No funding for scientific peer reviewed publications Additional fund raising for summary reports

Summary report for first 10 years

Pond colonisation rate and implications for biodiversity

Vegetation succession – functional group level vs. species level

(23)

Thanks!

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

To investigate the covari- ance structures in the data sets, data were decomposed by singular value decomposition (SVD) and the percent explained variation as a function of number

It is represented as intersection of multiple hyperplanes in the d-dimensional attribute space (the range) with a grid defined by the values of all scalar fields at each vertex of

It is represented as intersection of multiple hyperplanes in the d-dimensional attribute space (the range) with a grid defined by the values of all scalar fields at each vertex of

For financial distress, in the first step, demographic variables explain just 3% of variance, adding ideology variables contributes less than .5%,

X ijt is a vector of control variables (a set of dummy variables for hotels that are not affected by the sporting event, four dummy variables for the type of booking channel,

Related to the Bay of Biscay ecosystem, (Planque, Bellier et al. 2004) based their study on the relation between hydrological variables (surface temperature, mixed layer depth

Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) ordination diagrams of samples (A) and species (B) in relation to environmental variables (sample depth, bottom depth, temperature,

To carry out the analyses, the predictor variables were transformed into dummy variables; gender (women, men), position in executive management (CEO, other managers), country