• No results found

is an asymptotic expansion if for any

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "is an asymptotic expansion if for any"

Copied!
21
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Asymptotic sequence and expansions

Lesson 6

(2)

Definition of asymptotic expansion as x → ∞

The expansion

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + xa22 + . . . + xaNN + RN

is an asymptotic expansion if for any

N

RN = O( 1

xN+1) x → ∞

In this case we write

f(x) ∼

X

n=0

an

xn

as

x → ∞ (

not

n → ∞)

(3)

Finding the coefficients

How to find

a0, a1, a2, . . .

? Since

f(x) = a0 + O

1 x

, then

a0 = lim

x→∞

f(x)

From

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + O

1 x2

we get

x(f(x) − a0) = a1 + O

x1

. So

a1 = lim

x→∞

x(f(x) − a0)

(4)

Finding the coefficients

How to find

a0, a1, a2, . . .

? Since

f(x) = a0 + O

1 x

, then

a0 = lim

x→∞

f(x)

From

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + O

1 x2

we get

x(f(x) − a0) = a1 + O

x1

. So

a1 = lim

x→∞

x(f(x) − a0)

(5)

Finding the coefficients

Further, from

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + ax22 + O

x13

a2 = lim

x→∞

x2

f(x) − a0ax1

In general

aN = lim

x→∞

xN

f(x) −

N1

X

n=0

an xn

{1, x1, x12 , x13 , . . .}

is an asymptotic sequence

(6)

Finding the coefficients

Further, from

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + ax22 + O

x13

a2 = lim

x→∞

x2

f(x) − a0ax1

In general

aN = lim

x→∞

xN

f(x) −

N1

X

n=0

an xn

{1, x1, x12 , x13 , . . .}

is an asymptotic sequence

(7)

Finding the coefficients

Further, from

f(x) = a0 + ax1 + ax22 + O

x13

a2 = lim

x→∞

x2

f(x) − a0ax1

In general

aN = lim

x→∞

xN

f(x) −

N1

X

n=0

an xn

{1, x1, x12 , x13 , . . .}

is an asymptotic sequence

(8)

Asymptotic sequences

If we write

ε = x1

for

x ∼ ∞

, then

{1, ε, ε1, ε2, ε3, . . .}

{1, ε1/2, ε1, ε3/2, ε2, . . .}

en general if

δn(ε)

is a term of asymptotic sequence then

0(ε), δ1(ε), δ2(ε), . . .}

δn+1(ε) = o(δn(ε)) ε → 0

(9)

Examples of asymptotic sequences

{1, sin ε, sin2 ε, sin3 ε, . . . , sinn ε, . . .}

{1, ln(1 + ε), ln(1 + ε2), . . . ln(1 + εn), . . .}

{tan(ε1/2), tan(ε), tan(ε3/2), . . . , tan(εn/2), . . .}

{ln ε ε , 1

ε, ln ε, 1, ε ln ε, ε, ε2 ln ε, ε2, . . .}

(10)

Expansion in terms of δ

n

(ε)

f(ε) ∼ P

n=0 anδn(ε)

that means

f(ε) =

N

X

n=0

anδn(ε) + RN, RN = O(δn+1(ε)) ε → 0 aN = lim

ε0

f(ε) − PN1

n=0 anδn(ε) δN(ε)

(11)

Expansion in terms of δ

n

(ε)

f(ε) ∼ P

n=0 anδn(ε)

that means

f(ε) =

N

X

n=0

anδn(ε) + RN, RN = O(δn+1(ε)) ε → 0

aN = lim

ε0

f(ε) − PN1

n=0 anδn(ε) δN(ε)

(12)

Positive example

Let us decompose the function

eε

using

δn(ε) = ln(1 + εn)

, e. g.

eε ∼ a0 + a1 ln(1 + ε) + a2 ln(1 + ε2) + . . . a0 = 1

eε − 1 = a1 ln(1 + ε) + o(ln(1 + ε))

,

εlim0

eε − 1 ln(1 + ε)

= a1 + lim

ε0

o(ln(1 + ε)) ln(1 + ε)

(13)

Positive example

eε − 1 − ln(1 + ε) = a2 ln(1 + ε2) + o(ln(1 + ε2))

,

a2 = lim

ε0

eε − 1 − ln(1 + ε) ln(1 + ε2)

= lim

ε0

1 + ε + ε2/2 + O(ε3) − 1 − ε + ε2/2 ε2 + O(ε3)

= 1

eε = 1 + ln(1 + ε) + ln(1 + ε2) − 1

6 ln(1 + ε3) + o(ln(1 + ε3))

(14)

Negative example

Let us attempt to expand

cos(ε1/2 + ε)

using the same asymptotic equation

δn(ε) = ln(1 + εn)

cos(ε1/2 + ε) ∼ a0 + a1 ln(1 + ε) + a2 ln(1 + ε2) + . . . a0 = cos(ε1/2 + ε) = 1

a1 = lim

ε0

cos(ε1/2 + ε) − 1 ln(1 + ε)

= lim 1 − (ε1/2 + ε)2/2 + O(ε2) − 1

= −1

(15)

Negative example

a2 = lim

ε0

cos(ε1/2 + ε) − 1 ln(1 + ε)

= lim

ε0

1 − (ε + 2ε3/2 + ε2)/2 + O(ε2) − 1 + ε/2 − ε2/4 ε2 + O(ε4)

= lim

ε0

− ε3/2 + O(ε2) ε2 + O(ε4)

= −∞

What is the solution of the problem? Add the term

ln(1 + ε3/2)

and its subsequent powers.

(16)

Uniqueness of expansions

Any function

f(x)

produce unique expansion.

Let us consider

f1 = sin ε

and

f2 = sin ε + exp(−1/ε2)

. If

sinε + exp(−1/ε2) = a0 + a1ε + a2ε2 + a3ε3 + . . .

then

a0 = 0

,

a1 = lim

ε0

sin ε + exp(−1/ε2) ε

= lim

ε0

sinε ε

+ lim

ε0

+ exp(−1/ε2) ε

= 1 + 0 = 1

(17)

Uniqueness of expansions

Any function

f(x)

produce unique expansion.

Let us consider

f1 = sin ε

and

f2 = sin ε + exp(−1/ε2)

. If

sinε + exp(−1/ε2) = a0 + a1ε + a2ε2 + a3ε3 + . . .

then

a0 = 0

,

a1 = lim

ε0

sin ε + exp(−1/ε2) ε

= lim

ε0

sinε ε

+ exp(−1/ε2)

(18)

Uniqueness of expansions

a2 = lim

ε0

sin ε + exp(−1/ε2) − ε ε2

= 0

a3 = lim

ε0

sin ε + exp(−1/ε2) − ε ε3

= −1 6 exp(−1/ε2) = 0 · 1 + 0 · ε + 0 · ε2 + 0 · ε3 + . . .

(19)

Taylor series is asymptotic expansion

Why the Taylor series at

0

are asymptotic expansions?

f(x) = PN

n=0 anxn + RN

with

RN = xN+1

(N + 1)!f(N+1)(z).

So

RN = O(xN+1) x → 0.

xlim0

RN

xN+1 = 1

(N + 1)!f(N+1)(0) = 0

(20)

Taylor series is asymptotic expansion

Why the Taylor series at

0

are asymptotic expansions?

f(x) = PN

n=0 anxn + RN

with

RN = xN+1

(N + 1)!f(N+1)(z).

So

RN = O(xN+1) x → 0.

R 1

(21)

The end

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

We illustrate that marginal skewness and kurtosis are not sufficient to adequately specify a non-normal simulation condition by showing that asymptotic standard errors

c) Estimate the error in using the ”optimal asymptotic approximation” to extract a nu- merical value for y(x) from its asymptotic expansion, for some large value of x.. Determine

The ”optimal asymptotic approxi- mation” consists of summing all terms up to but not including the smallest term, which is an estimate of the error.. not

Zheng: Existence and uniqueness of solutions of an asymptotic equation arising from a variational wave equation with general data.. Zheng: Rarefactive solutions to a

Rossi, An asymptotic mean value characterization for a class of nonlinear parabolic equations related to tug-of-war games, SIAM J.. Rossi, On the definition and properties

Similarly, an asymptotic formula is given for the 2kth moment of a sum of multiplicative Rademacher variables, and the 2kth moment of the truncated characteristic polynomial of

In Tyssedal and Tjøstheim (1988) is given an asymptotic expression for the standard error of a,- , i=1,...,k , in the stationary Markov chain case where {6it } is known:.. varfa)

However, what we really want is to prove existence and uniqueness of a solution of equation (3.0.7) on the full unbounded domain, subject to an asymptotic upper boundary