GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Thus, bearing in mind both the greater health needs, the extent of both general and specific (to disability) barriers, and existing evidence that persons with disabilities

The WHO-INTEGRATE framework comprises six criteria – balance of health benefits and harms; human rights and sociocultural acceptability; health equity, equality and

We have identified five questions that will help users evaluate the extent to which clinical guidelines impact on disadvantaged populations and health inequities. These criteria are

We thus revised the review question and conducted a systematic review of studies examining the effect of a specific system-level healthcare intervention, namely health equity

Objectives: This article introduces the rationale and methods for explicitly considering health equity in the Grading of Recommenda- tions Assessment, Development and Evaluation

A randomised trial is considered to provide health equi- ty-relevant evidence if it actually or potentially assesses the effects of an intervention on the health or its deter-

Thus, bearing in mind the greater health needs, the extent of both general and specific barriers to disability, and existing evidence that persons with disabilities receive less

When the degree of concavity is in an intermediate range, increased patient choice leads to quality dispersion but simultaneously reduces health inequalities within each severity