• No results found

Online Resources

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Online Resources"

Copied!
1
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Online Resources Online Resource 1.

Breast cancer risk associated with body mass index at screening according to age at screening and menopausal status

Mean (SD) No. of cases

No. of women

Age-adjusted HR 95% CI

<55 years at baseline

BMIat screening, kg/m2 25.7 (4.6)

Per unit increase a 2195 186,109 1.00 1.00-1.01

Categories a

Underweight <21 224 20,090 0.95 0.82-1.10

Normal weight 21-24.9 882 75,151 1

Overweight 25-29.9 762 63,063 1.05 0.95-1.16

Obese ≥30 327 27,805 1.06 0.93-1.20

<25 1,106 95,241 1

≥25 1,089 90,868 1.06 0.98-1.15

≥55 years at baseline

BMIat screening, kg/m2 25.9 (4.6)

Per unit increase a 4,405 236,396 1.02 1.01-1.03

Categories a

Underweight <21 324 23,085 0.80 0.71-0.90

Normal weight 21-24.9 1,596 88,752 1

Overweight 25-29.9 1,701 87,767 1.08 1.01-1.15

Obese ≥30 784 36,792 1.19 1.10-1.30

<25 1,920 111,837 1

≥25 2,485 124,559 1.16 1.09-1.23

Premenopausal b at baseline

BMIat screening, kg/m2 25.8 (4.6)

Per unit increase a 805 67,744 1.01 1.00-1.03

Categories a

Underweight <21 78 7,003 0.95 0.74-1.22

Normal weight 21-24.9 323 27,479 1

Overweight 25-29.9 261 22,948 0.99 0.84-1.17

Obese ≥30 143 10,314 1.25 1.03-1.52

<25 401 34,482 1

≥25 404 33,262 1.08 0.94-1.24

Postmenopausal b at baseline

BMIat screening, kg/m2 26.0 (4.7)

Per unit increase a 2,080 152,688 1.02 1.02-1.03

Categories a

Underweight <21 163 15,831 0.85 0.71-1.00

Normal weight 21-24.9 707 57,019 1

Overweight 25-29.9 809 54,745 1.18 1.07-1.31

Obese ≥30 401 25,093 1.29 1.14-1.46

<25 870 72,850 1

≥25 1,210 79,838 1.26 1.15-1.37

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2; CI = confidence interval

a We excluded women reporting body weight <30 kg and >299 kg or height <120 cm and >203 cm. b Restricted to women that had never used HT

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK, 42 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive

Among the women with subsequent breast cancer, the same nonparametric test for trend was applied to the detection mode of the subsequent breast cancer (screen- detected vs

A lot of factors have been found to influence women’s perceptions on breast cancer, such as perception of cancer as fatal (Powe, 1995), lack of awareness of breast cancer

questionnaire requested information about several topics, including demographic information, public and private screening, treatment, rehabilitation, breast reconstruction, use

The results also suggest that the effect of HT may be modified by body mass patterns through life; thus, the excess risk associated with HT use was substantially higher in women

Relative risk compared to women with height ,160 cm and stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, menopausal status/hysterectomy, body mass index, duration of oral

Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of smoking characteristics with invasive breast cancer risk by menopausal status and

Table 3 shows the risk of breast cancer strati fi ed by level of educa- tion among ever compared to never smokers according to birth cohort and menopausal status at diagnosis,