• No results found

Establishing the connection between successful disposal of public assets and sustainable public procurement practice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Establishing the connection between successful disposal of public assets and sustainable public procurement practice"

Copied!
8
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Sustainable Futures

journalhomepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/sftr

Establishing the connection between successful disposal of public assets and sustainable public procurement practice

Peter Adoko Obicci

a

, Godfrey Mugurusi

b,

, Pross Oluka Nagitta

c

aEconomics and Managerial Sciences Department, Uganda Management Institute, Kampala, Uganda

bDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

cEconomics and Managerial Sciences Department, Uganda Management Institute, Kampala, Uganda

a r t i c le i n f o

Keywords:

Disposal

Public assets disposal Sustainable public procurement Asset life cycle

Uganda

a b s t r a ct

Thedisposalofassetsaftertheirend-of-useisoftenconsideredtheend-stageintheprocurementcycle.Assets disposalinapublicorganizationisitscapacitytoattachreusablevaluetoitsassetsattheirendoflife.Itisanarea wherethefailureofthepublicprocurementprocessismostattributedyethasthemostpotentialforsustainable procurementpractice.Thispaperexaminesthefactorsforthesuccessfuldisposalofpublicassetsandthepublic purchasers’perceptionsofhowthesefactorscontributetoabetterunderstandingofsustainableprocurement practice.

Usingacross-sectionalsurveyamongkeyactorsinthepublicprocurementprocess,threekeysuccessfactors, namelystrategicassetsmanagement,strategicplanningforassetsdisposal,andassetsdisposalmechanismsare identified;theireffectonsuccessfulassetdisposalisexamined.

Theresultsindicatethatthethreebroadfactorsstudiedareallimportantaspectsforeffectiveassetsdisposal.

Yet,theireffectonthesuccessofthedisposalofpublicassetsprocessissomewhatvaried.Basedonthethree factors’statisticalsignificance,weconcludethatstrategicassets’planningisperhapsthemostdominantfactor forasuccessfulassetsdisposalprocessandprovidesthemostpromiseforsustainableprocurementinpublic organizations.

Thisstudyshowsthatstrategicassetsmanagement,strategicplanningforassetsdisposal,andthechoiceof assetsdisposalmechanismsareallcriticalenablersofsuccessfuldisposalofpublicassetsinpublicorganizations andaprecursorforsustainableprocurementpractice.Butatthemicrolevel,disposalplanningisbyfarthe mostsignificantenablerforsuccessfulassets’disposal,andthereforeadirectdriverforsustainableprocurement practice.

Introduction

Mostliteratureonpublicprocurementdescribesassets’disposalas thelastphaseofthepublicprocurementprocess[38,33].Thedisposal ofpublicassets,irrespectiveofthemethodused,ispurposedtomeet theentity’sneeds,promotethebenefitsofassetsvaluerecapture,and maintaintheentity’spathofefficiency,effectiveness,andefficacy[18]. Theurgetodisposeofnon-beneficialpublicassets1inpublicorgani- zationsisoverwhelmingandarguablyanecessaryactivitytoreducethe costofholdingunwantedpublicassetsandtobemoresustainable[12].

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:godfrey.mugurusi@ntnu.no(G.Mugurusi).

1 EndNotes:Publicassets-Theseareresourcesbetheytangibleandintangible witheconomicvaluesthatapublicentityownsorcontrolswiththeexpectation thattheywillprovidefuturebenefitstostakeholders.Wearespecificallyinter- estedontangibleassetsinthisstudy.Non-beneficialpublicassets-Theseareassets whosebenefitsarelongernecessarytoachieveorganizationalobjectives.This canbeduetodepreciation,wearandtear,obsolescesandsuchlike.

YetasAtigaetal.[5]suggest,thedisposalofnon-beneficialpublicas- setsisoftenfrustrating.Theyattributethefrustrationtothecontinued holdingofsuchassetsthathavenoimmediateusablevalue,affecting thetotalcostofownership(TCO)ofthatasset.Therefore,itisessential tounderstandhowpublicorganizationsmanagetheend-of-lifeprocess ofpublicassetsuse,particularlywhatkeyconsiderationsunderpinthe successfuldisposalofpublicassetsinpublicorganizations.

This paper’smainargumentisthatsuccessfulassetdisposaloften showsthelevelofadvancementtowardssustainableprocurementprac- ticeamongstpublicsectororganizations.Agbesietal.[2]showthatthe organizationalfactorsandtheregulatorystructureinpublicprocure- mentoftendeterminethedegreeofsustainableprocurementofpublic organizations.Zaidietal.[45]highlightseveralbarrierstoimplement- ingsustainableprocurement,someofwhichtheyattributetothestrate- gicmanagementofthatpublicorganization.So,thefocusofthispaper aretheorganizationalfactorsinthedisposalofpublicassets.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100049

Received18October2020;Receivedinrevisedform2March2021;Accepted8April2021

2666-1888/© 2021TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

(2)

Wedrawempiricalevidencefromthepublicprocurementsystemin Uganda.ThePublicProcurementandDisposalofPublicAssetsAuthority (PPDA)initsannualreportof2018,thatpublicorganizationsinUganda havemadelittleefforttowardsdisposalofnon-beneficialpublicassets, whichaddstremendouscoststotheGovernment[37].Thegovernment’s annualauditreportbytheAuditorGeneral’sofficecitesseveralcases ofnon-compliancetotheprocurementanddisposallawandneglectof publicassetsintheirpossession[34].

Thesereportsandothersconfirmthechallengesindisposingofout- of-usepublicassetsasaconsequenceofthefailureinrecordkeeping, wrongdisposalmethods,poordisposalplanning,andpoorexecutionof disposalplan[37,34].Thesefailuresareorganizationalattributes[40]. Theyaffecttheperformanceoftheseorganizationsandincreaseholding coststotheseorganizationsthatmustservice,maintain,store,andin- suretheassetson anannualbasis.This aloneis notsustainableand underminesgovernments’ capacitytorecapture fairvaluefrom non- beneficialpublicassets.

Theproblemofassets’dispositionisubiquitousandthereforenot uniquetoUgandaalone.Elsewhere,theliteraturereportsthelackofca- pacityatthestrategicandtacticallevelstopreparepublicassetsdisposal registers,thebasisofwhichdisposalplanningismade[8].InMalaysia, Abdullahetal.[1]citethelackofpropermanagementproceduresasone ofissuesaffectinggovernmentassets’useandmanagement.InKenyathe problemhasbeenattributedtothelackofrequireddocumentation,the failuretocreatecompetitioninthedisposalprocessanddisposingoffor selfishpurposes[41].InTanzania,thelackof,amongotherthings,po- licesandprocedures,amanagementplanandtraininghavebeencited inpublicassetdisposition[21].

Againstthisbackground,thepurposeofthisresearchistoexamine thefactorsforthesuccessfuldisposalofout-of-usepublicassetsinpub- licorganizations.Thisisanareaofstudywhereverylittleresearchhas venturedinto.Infact,weidentifiedonlyacoupleofscientificpapers (e.g.[5,8,21,23,41])andahostofnon-scientificliteratureonthissub- ject.Wehopethatthisstudy’sresultswillexplainthelinkbetweenthe disposalprocessandthebenefitsofsustainableprocurement,whichis anareaofsignificantimportanceinthepublicassetsmanagementde- bate[2,45].Inparticular,thedisposalbyauctionmethodorthesaleof out-of-useassetssalecontributestobetterassetsreusabilityandvalue capture:itsavesthetaxpayerlargeamountsofmoneyhencesustainable governance.

Therefore,this papercontributestoabetterunderstandingofthe publicassetsdisposalproblembydelineatingthefactorsforsuccessful publicassetsdisposal.Thepaper’sempiricalresultsareusedtogether withtheavailableliteraturetoarguefortheroleofsuccessfulpublic assetsdisposalprocessesinsustainablepublicprocurementpractice.

Thispaperisorganizedasfollows.First,areviewofrelevantlitera- tureonthesubjectispresented.Thisisfollowedbythemethodssection.

Thentheempiricalresultsofthestudyfollow.Atthetailend,thedis- cussionandconclusionofthestudyisprovidedwithsomelimitations anddirectionforfurtherresearch.

Areviewoftheliterature Assetdisposal

Thedisposalofout-of-usepublicassetsentailstheactofderecogniz- ingapublicassetthathasreachedtheendofusefullifeandhasnofuture economicbenefitorserviceexpectedfromitsuseforthatorganization [42].Thedisposaldisposalprocessis oftenpartofaprotractedpro- curementprocess.Theassetmanagementliteraturesuggeststwobroad areaswhosemisunderstandingoftenresultsinsub-optimalperformance ofanasset,whichdirectlyaffectsthatasset’sdisposition[23].Thesein- cludestrategicassetmanagementon onehandandoperationalasset management.Thestrategicassetmanagementconcernsthegovernance andlong-termutilizationofanasset.Incontrast,operationalassetman- agementinvolvestheasset’son-goingmaintenance

Theassets disposalliteraturefurtherdeconstructs theoperational assetsmanagementintotwophases.Theseinclude:thestrategicplan- ningforassetsdisposalandchoiceofassetsdisposalmechanism[23,41].

RefertoFig.1.Sothisstudyfocusesonthese3mainareas:(1)strate- gicassetsmanagementtoaddresstheon-goingutilityofanasset,(2) thestrategicplanningforassetsdisposaltoaddressthemonitoringand maintenanceofanasset,and(3)thechoiceofassetdisposalmechanism toaddressthevaluerecaptureaspectsofanasset.

Fromthisconceptualization,itappearssuccessfulassetsdisposalre- quiresonetounderstandtheliteratureonthelong-termgovernanceof anassetandtheshort-termviewofwhathappenstotheassetwhenit approachesitsend-of-use(seeFig.1).Thismultidisciplinaryapproach proposedbyAmadi-Echendu,etal.,[3]isusedinthisstudyandaligns withthesustainabilitythinkingthatwediscusslaterinthispaper.

This studyapproachesfactorsforsuccessful publicassets disposal throughtwolenses:theassetmanagementlensandthepublicprocure- mentlensasmentionedabove.Boththeselensesarerelevantforsustain- ableprocurementpractice.Ratherthaninvestigateparticularvariables likeratesofdisposalorcompliancetostatutoryrequirementsfromdis- parateliterature,thisstudyfocusesonthethreebroadareasfromthe twoliteraturestreamsasinFig.1,andtheninvestigatestheembedded factorsonthedisposalofpublicassetsasproposedbyLaueetal.,[23]. LikeWahomeandMarendi[42],wecouldnotfindasinglecomprehen- sivetheoreticalframeworkexplainingsuccessfactorsforpublicassets disposalinpublicorganizations.So,thisconceptualizationprovidesa goodstartingpointtothischallenge.

Publicassetsdisposalandsustainableprocurementpractice

Dispositionofassetsorassetsdisposalasusedinthisstudy,refers totheactofsellingordisposingofassetswhoseusageandvaluehas depreciatedovertheirusefullife.Itisofteninthepublicinterestfor publicorganizationstoconductthisprocessinasafeandecologically responsiblemanner[22,45].AccordingtoMihajuetal.[28],publicas- sets disposalis conductedin ordertofree upresources thatapublic entityneedstoperform efficientlybyholding cashin assetsdeemed beneficial toitsoperation.Suchperformancecanbegaugedinterms ofefficiency,effectivenessandefficacytopublicentity[41].Insupport Mensah[46]contendsthatdisposalofnon-beneficialpublicassetscan leadtolowercostofproduction,deploymentofassetsintheproperuse, reductioninnon-beneficialassets,employeemotivationandincreased productivity.Thispaperaddstothisargumentthatthedisposalofassets shouldalsobeseentoadvancethesustainabilitygoalattheorganiza- tionallevel.

Becauseassetmanagementiscloselyassociatedwithanasset’slifecy- cle,thenotionofsustainabilitybecomesvitalinthisdiscussion[7,25].

MaslennikovaandFoley[26]demonstratewithanexampleof Xerox corporationwhereproductsaredesignedwithamechanismforvaluere- captureforusers– throughrecoveryandendoflifeplans.Theysuggest thatsustainabilityandassetsdisposalcanbecloselylinkedconcepts.

Norum[32]showsthatuserbehaviortowardsdisposalofanitem,in thiscaseclothing,dependsonthelevelofknowledgetheyhaveofthat item’sentirevaluechainandwhatdisposalalternativestheyhave.Bab- bitt etal., [7]arguethatdisposalmethodsareoftenpriceandvalue focusedandthereforetendtoincreaseinstitutionalriskbecauseofthe unknownassetusageonceoutoftheirsystem.Inthissense,assetdis- positioncanalsobeseenasreturn-to-lifeofanasset,ratherthanthe end-of-lifeofanasset[39].

Thisdiscussionthereforesuggeststhatassetdisposaliscloselyre- lated tosustainableprocurementpractice, wheredisposalofanasset inherentlyprovidesbotheconomicandenvironmentalbenefitsforthe publicorganization.

Successfuldisposalofpublicassetsfocusesmostonthelastendof theprocurementprocess.Itisarticulatedthroughexecutionofadis- posalplan(e.g.end-of-lifeassessment),definingthemethodtobeused fordisposal(e.g.auction,recycling,donating)andthenimplementing

(3)

Strategic asset management

Operational asset management

Plan for end-of-life of an asset Choice of asset disposal method Asset management literature

Procurement and asset disposal literature

Fig.1. Assetsdisposalatconceptualjunctionofassetmanagement literatureandprocurementprocessliterature.

thatmethod (e.g.valueaudit andrecovery).This gray areaisnot a straightforwardprocessandvaries fromorganizationtoorganization [31].SusanandNamusonge[41]reportthatpublicofficersbelievethe disposalprocessisriskerandtakesalongperiodoftimecomparedto doing“nothingaboutthoseassets”.KrentandZeppos[22]agreethat incidencesofabuseandgraftarehighestintheassetdisposalprocess duetothefuzzinessaroundtheprocess.Intheirstudyofthestatutory complianceinassetsdisposalpracticesinGhana,Atigaetal.[5]found legalandmanagementimpedimentsasthemainchallengeinthedis- posalofpublicassets.Yet,asMensah[46]claims,thedisposalprocess’s coherencyiskeytotheeffectivedisposalofpublicassets.Azzietal.

[6]indicatethehighertheconsistencythepublicentityappliesinthe disposalprocess,themorelikelytheentitycansucceedinthedisposal ofpublicassets.However,leftunattendedto,publicassetdisposalcould leadtounsustainableprocurement

Strategicassetsmanagement

Strategic assets managementrefersto anend-to-endprocess that combinesdifferentwaysofefficientlyintegratingtheassetoperations, assetsinformation,theentity’senvironment,andskillsinthelong-term useandmanagementofthatassets[10].Apartfromincreasinglong- termperformanceof anasset,strategicassetsmanagementdrawson thecharacteristicsofanassetinachievinganentity’sobjective.

MunyaoandMoroonge[30]arguethatanorganizationmustcon- siderstrategicassetsmanagementasacoreactivitybecausethefunc- tions inherent in strategic assets management areoften essential in successfully disposingof publicassets.They concludedthat thesuc- cessof publicassets’ disposalis mostly dependenton payingpartic- ularattentiontomanaginglong-termutilityofthoseassets,develop- ingmaintenanceplansfortheassets,settingassetsperformancestan- dards,andcarefulmanagementofriskinstrategicassetsportfolio.Laue etal.,[23]listthefollowingprocessactivitiesofstrategicassetmanage- ment:assetmanagement,assetmanagementpolicy,assetmanagement strategy,assetmanagementplans,assetperformancemeasurement,and managementreview,andaudit andreporting. Kaganova,[19]found thattherightmixofthestrategicassetmanagementactivitiesiscritical tosuccessfullyimplementingpublicassetsdisposaloutcomes.[15]con- tendthatstrategicassetsmanagementisthesureststrategythathelps improveavailability,safety,reliability,andlongevityofassets,which maintainsthequalityoftheasset.Therefore,itisevidentthatthesuc- cessfuldisposalofpublicassetsdependsonthequalityofthatasset’s management over its lifetime which infers a higher asset recapture value.Basedonthisview,wehypothesizethat:

H1. Strategic assetsmanagement is significantlyassociated withthe successofthepublicassetsdisposalprocess.

Strategicplanningforassetsdisposal

Strategicplanningforassetsdisposalreferstoastructuredprocess thatensuresanorganization’sassetsportfoliocomprisesonlythoseas- setsthatcaneffectivelymeetitscurrentneedsandservicedeliveryre- quirements[16].Itinvolvestheoperationalimplementationoftheor- ganization’sstrategyonassets.Whileassetsdisposalinitselfrefersto themeansthroughwhichnon-beneficialassetsaredisposedof,thegoal ofstrategicplanningforthedisposalofanassetistoprovideadequate andequalopportunitytoachievebestreturntothepublicorganization throughproperidentificationofnon-beneficialassetswithadoptionof appropriatestrategiesfortheirdisposal[14].

Strategicplanningforassetsinitselfentailsdefiningpolicies(com- mitment and principles to do), strategies (approach to be taken to achievetheobjectivesinthelongterm),goal(whatistobeachieved), andaspecificplan(determiningwhoshoulddowhat,whenandwhere) [24].However,problemsinassetsdisposalhaveemergedasaresultof poorplanningandinsufficientfinances,extendingtoalackofqualified personnelandinadequateresourcesthatderailtheplanningcomponent of thedisposalprocesses [16].Someotherproblemsnotedinearlier studiesincludeincreasedplanningcosts,incorrectandinadequatedis- posalneedsidentification,reducedscrutiny,andtimelinessinreviewing [41].Thus,severalmistakesarecitedintheassetsdisposalplanningpro- cessesthatthreatenpublicassetsdisposal’slong-termsuccessinpublic organizations[42].SusanandNamusonge[41]showinthecaseofthe Kenyanpublicsector,thatlowlevelofstrategicassetsdisposalplanning inpublicorganizationscreateslittlesuccessduetocontradictoryassets managementobjectives,lackofinformationonpublicassets,thelackof disposalplan,andthelackofskilledpersonnel.

Assuch,itappearsthatthesuccessofassetsdisposalprocessesde- creaseswhentheplanningprocessesforthoseassetsinthefirstplaceare notrobust.Alternatively,whenthedisposal-planningprocessmissesthe keyplanningcomponents,thedisposalprocessesbecomeproblematic.

We,therefore,proposethat;

H2. Thesuccessofpublicassetsdisposalprocessissignificantlyassoci- atedwithrobuststrategicassetsdisposalplanning.

Choiceofanappropriateassets’disposalmechanism

Organizationshavemanymethodstheyusetodisposeofassetsthat no longergenerate utility value.Theliterature mentionsformssuch as donations, sale,reuse, redeploy,partexchange,refurbish, return, or destroy/discard as some of the most popular methods out there [17,20,27,43].XiongandXiang[43]haveargued thatthechoiceof methodsusedfordisposalhasapositivecorrelationwithdisposaleffi- ciency.Thechoiceofanasset’sdisposalmechanismallowsanorgani- zationtoadequatelyselectadisposalmethodthatsuitsthegoalthey seektoattain[14].UsingtheTanzania’sprocurementsystemasanex- ample,Kamili[20]suggeststhatthechoiceofanassetdisposalmethod

(4)

canresultinlossofrevenues,theft,anddevaluationofpublicproperty.

InUganda,forexample,therelevantdisposalauthorities(e.g.,account- ingofficers,userdepartments,contractscommittees,andprocurement units)needtimetodefinethedisposalmechanismanddevelopaplan withcostestimates[9].Theuserdepartmentsmustbuildtheirstrategy forperformingtheworkofpublicassetsdisposalina favorableway toalleligiblebiddersandthenmustestimatethecoststoperformthe tasks.Theprocurementdepartmentneedstimetoconductmarketre- search,developanappropriatedisposalstrategy,andgeneraterequests foroffers.Suchacomprehensiveprocesssuggeststhattheassetdisposal mechanisms,oftentargetedtowardsthebestvalueoutofanasset,are suchanimportantcontributortothedisposalprocess’sefficacy.Relating tothisclaim,weproposethat;

H3. Thechoiceofanappropriateassetdisposalmechanismormethod issignificantlyassociatedwiththesuccessofthepublicassets’disposal process

Methods Studydesign

Thecross-sectionalsurveydesignwasdeployedamongactorsinthe publicprocurementsysteminUganda.Thedatacollectiontargetedtheir perceptionofstrategicassetsmanagement,strategicplanningforassets disposal,andchoiceofassetsdisposalmechanism.Wetargetedall221 employeesoftheMinistryofPublicServiceaccordingtotheMinistry’s departmentaldatabases.Wespecificallyselected125employeeswithin thesalaryscalesofU1–U4workingintheMinistry.Theselectedem- ployeesaretheonesinvolvedininitiatingandexecutingcriticalpublic assetdisposaldecisions.Equally,theyhavethetechnicalknowledgeand skillsofpublicassetsdisposallegislationandprocesses.Wesampleda totalof120employeesusingconveniencesampling.

Datacollection

Wedistributedaself-administeredquestionnairetoallthesampled employees.Onehundred eighteenwerereturned:twoquestionnaires werepartiallyfilled,soonehundredsixteenwereusedforanalysis.The collecteddataconstitutedasizablesamplesizeandthereforerecom- mendedforfactoranalysis[11].

Validityandreliabilityoftheinstrument

We derived questionnaire items from previous studies published injournalswithin thepublicprocurementdomain,includingAmadi- Echenduetal.,[3],SusanandNamusonge,[41],Kamili,[20]andWa- homeandMarendi,[42].Wepretestedthequestionnaireitemstodeter- minetheirvalidityandreliabilityusingcontentvalidityindex(CVI)and Cronbachalpha,respectively.Resultsfromthepreteststudyrevealed thattheCVIratedbythefiveexpertswasat0.95,higherthantherecom- mended0.70percentforaninstrumenttobevalid[35].Thetestresults forthereliabilityofeachofthevariableswereat0.756forstrategic assetmanagement(12items),at0.743forstrategicplanningforasset disposal(12items),at 0.707for choiceofassetdisposalmechanism (11items),andat0.860forpublicassetsdisposal(11items).Allthe obtainedCronbachalphavaluesforthevariableswereeachabovethe recommended0.70.Bothvalidityandreliabilitytestresultsindicatethe instrumentwasvalidandreliableforwhichweusedinthestudy.

Considerableemphasisinquantitativeresearchisgiventothecodi- ficationandclassificationofthedatatomakeitmorereliableandvalid.

Soweputalotofeffortintopresentingtheresultsclearlyandsystemat- ically.WeanalyzedthecollecteddatawiththeaidofSPSSver.17.The analysesfocusedondescriptivestatistics,normalitytest,factoranalysis andChi-squaretest,andregressionanalysiswhichwepresentedinthe nextsection.

Table1 Normalitytest.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov a

Public assets disposal Statistic Df Sig.

1.994 116 .001

Results

Thissectionhassetoutourfindingsinfoursectionsrelatedtothe dataanalysiscomponentsidentifiedinthesectionabove.Theobjective istoprovideanswerstothepaper’sresearchquestionoutlinedearlier thepurposeofthispaper.

Normalitytest

AccordingtoGhasemiandZahedias[13],tofitalinearmodelto somegivendata,thedependentvariablehastobenormallydistributed.

Here,thepurposeofthenormalitytestwastoevaluatethedatatode- terminewhethertheywerenormallydistributedandthatthesample wasdrawnfromanormalpopulation.Itaimedtoremoveoutlieritems tohaveonlyfactorsrelevanttothestudy[13].Fordatatobenormally distributed,theobservedvaluesshouldbespreadalongthestraightdi- agonalline.Wethenusedthequantile-quantile(Q-Q)plottesttospecify modelsthatresembleddatacollectedorobservedfromtheprocessesas presentedinFig.2.

Since most of the observed values are spread very close to the straightline,thereisahighlikelihoodthatthedataarenormallydis- tributed. This finding is confirmed by the Kolgomorov-Smirnov test whichteststheunderlyingdistributionofagivenrandomvariable.The Kolgomorov-Smirnovtestisanon-parametrictestthatcanbeusedto testtheunderlyingdistributionofagivenrandomvariable.Itwasused toconfirmwhetherthedependentvariablefollowedanormaldistribu- tion.ResultsarepresentedinTable1.

FromTable1,theKolgomorov-Smirnovstatistic1.994hasap-value of0.001,whichislessthan0.05with95%confidence.Thestudycon- cludedthatthedependentvariable(i.e.successofpublicassetsdisposal) followedanormaldistribution.Fittingalinearmodeltothedatawas thusjustified.

Factoranalysisandchi-squaretest

Thestudyadoptedfactoranalysistoreducethenumberofindicators orfactorsundereachresearchvariable.Thepurposewastoretainin- dicatorscapableofexplainingthesuccessfuldisposalofpublicassetsin publicorganizationsinUganda.Afactorloadingabove0.5isconsidered acceptable,irrespectiveofsamplesizeforinterpretativepurposes[44]. Table2displaysthefactoranalysisresultsofthestudy,whereresults fortheChi-squareisalsopresented.

AsshownintheTable2,alltheexaminedfactorscouldberetained forfurtheranalysis.Thisisbecauseallofthemhavefactorloadingval- uesofabove0.5andthereforeconsideredgoodforinterpretivepurposes [44].Thus,theresultindicatesacceptablefit.Also,theresultsofChi- squaretestwassignificantforthemeasurementmodel.Thisisshownby (x2=25.852,x2=22.304,andx2=34.011)forStrategicAssetsManage- ment,StrategicPlanningforAssetsDisposalandChoiceofAssetsdis- posalMechanism,respectively.Thisindicatesthatsuccessfactorsand publicassetsdisposalwereassociated.

Regressionanalysis

RegressionanalysiswasdonewiththeaidofSPSSver.17.Itspurpose wastotestpropositionsearlieronidentified.Thefollowingresultswere producedaspresentedinTable3.

Table3showstheCoefficientsaoftheregressionresultsofthestudy variables.Forthefirstvariableofstrategicassetsmanagement,withthe

(5)

Fig.2. NormalQ-QPlotofdatafromthequestionnaire.

Table2

Factoranalysisresults.

Success factors Sub Success Factors Analysis N Factor loadings Cronbach’s alpha Chi square Sig.

Strategic As- sets management

Trained assets managers 116 .728 .756 25.852 .361

Adequate funds for assets management 116 .742 Transparent assets information 116 .686 Easy access to information 116 .765

Single data base 116 .662

Cost of valuation 116 .575

Supervision and monitoring 116 .515 Clear assets management objectives 116 .579 Specialization in assets management 116 .701

Functional audit unit 116 .651

Strategic Plan- ning for As- sets Disposal

Annual disposal plan 116 .606 .743 22.304 .561

Adequate funds for disposal planning 116 .674 Independent valuation of stores 116 .626 Budget for disposal proceedings 116 .553 Resource availability for disposal plans 116 .542

Increasing assets value 116 .750

Stakeholders involvement 116 .638

Statutory disposal options 116 .588

Market survey 116 .728

Choice of As- sets Dis- posal Mechanism

Reserve price 116 .541

Disposal methods 116 .603 .707 34.011 .419

Disposal cycle 116 .642

Nature of assets 116 .558

Location of assets 116 .596

Approval of disposal award 116 .515

Operational policies 116 .703

Selection of Right assets 116 .763

Supervision cost 116 .643

Records of money received 116 .695 Remittance of revenue to treasury 116 .581

Average Cronbach Alpha .735

ExtractionMethod:PrincipalComponentAnalysis.

Goodness-of-fittest:MaximumLikelihood.

Table3

Regressionresults.

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B

B Std. Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound

1 (Constant) 47.367 6.080 7.790 .000 35.322 59.411

Strategic assets management 1.850 .137 .784 13.487 .000 1.578 2.122

1 (Constant) strategic planning for assets disposal 42.021 4.937 8.511 .000 32.240 51.801

1.979 .112 .857 17.718 .000 1.758 2.200

1 (Constant) Choice of assets disposal mechanism 42.155 6.261 6.733 .000 29.751 54.599

2.098 .151 .794 13.924 .000 1.800 2.397

aDependentVariable:Publicassetsdisposal.

(6)

What is it that users want?

What can the market provide?

Select the procurement

strategy

Make the purchase

Manage the contract

Delivery or Installation Commission

the asset Dispose of

asset Maintain Operate

asset

Donate Sale or

Auction

Trade-in or

upgrade Recycle Destruction

Procurement process

Asset disposal methods

Asset utility

& disposal process

Fig.3. AssetsdisposalprocessandMethods.

tvalueofthestatisticsof13.487,usingthe0.05levelofsignificance, becauset=13.487˃2.122andabetacoefficientof0.784,H1:Strategic assetsmanagementissignificantlyassociatedwiththesuccessofpublicas- setsdisposalprocesswasaccepted.Likewise,forthesecondvariableof strategicplanningforassetsdisposal,giventhetvalueof17.718˃2.200 withbetacoefficientof0.857,weacceptedH2:Thesuccesspublicassets disposalprocessissignificantlyassociatedwithstrategicassetsdisposalplan- ning.Lastly,onthevariableofassetsdisposalmechanism,thetvalue obtainedwas 13.924˃2.397showingapositive relationshipwiththe dependentvariableandwithabetacoefficientof0.794,weaccepted H3:Thechoiceofanappropriateassetdisposalmechanismormethodissig- nificantlyassociatedwiththesuccessfulofthepublicassets’disposalprocess.

Discussionandconclusion

Thisstudysoughttoexaminethekeyfactorsforsuccessfuldisposal ofpublicassetsinUganda,andfurthermakesenseofthesefactorswith regardtounderstandingassetsdispositionasanenablerofsustainable procurementpractice.Theliteratureprovideduswiththreebroadar- eas:(1)strategicassetsmanagement,(2)strategicplanningforassets disposaland(3)choiceofanappropriateassets’disposalmechanism.

Fromthefindings ofthis study,itwasfoundthatstrategicassets management(p=.784,x2=25.852),strategicplanningforassetsdis- posal(p=.857,x2=22.304)andassetsdisposalmechanism(p=.794, x2=34.011)arepositivelyassociated.Thesefindingseventhoughposi- tivedosuggestthatstrategicplanningforassetsdisposalisperhapsthe strongestdimensionofthisstudy.Twothingscanexplainthis.

Firstly,unlikemost traditionalprocurement processes,thepublic procurementprocessfocusesonplanninganddefiningusers’needsfirst [29].Itthefirstinitialstep,planningmustcascadeintotheassetdisposal processshowninFig.3.Therein,thelong-termutilityoftheasset,i.e.

strategicassetmanagement, isconsideredatuserlevelandtherefore aspectsofsustainabilityandhowtheassetwillbedisposedofarecon- sideredtoo[7,9].AccordingtoPPDA(DisposalofPublicAssets)Regu- lations(2014),whenthepotentialusersoftheassetinitiateaprocure- ment,theymustideallyreflectonthatasset’sentirelifecycleoverits lifetime.This includes,amongotherthings – thegovernanceof that asset(strategicassetmanagement)aswellastheoperationalusageof thatasset.Thisstudydemonstratesthatthepublicpurchasersbelieve thisisimportant,butwecouldn’tclearlyestablishiftheyunderstood thisislinkwell.Partlybecausethelegislationthatguidesusageanddis- posalofpublicassetsisoftenthesameasthepublicprocurementlaws:

theserarelychange[41,42,20].AstheTCOliteraturehasarguedover theyears,strategicassetsplanningconsidersboththeassetsacquisition assetsprocessandtheoperationalusageprocessofthatassetasshown

in Fig.3,wherethemeasureofsuccessofthosetwoprocesses isthe totalcostimpacttheassetutilityhashadontheorganization[23].

Secondly,withinstrategicassetsplanning,themechanismsfordis- posalof anassetareplanned – even ifnot in detail[23].Although thisstudy,asaguidedbytheliteraturedistinguishedstrategicassets planningfromthechoiceofmethodusedassuccessfactors,publicpur- chasersmustincorporatedisposalmethodsintheirprocurementplans [5].Typicalassetdisposalmethodsincludedonationtootherentities, saleorauctionoftheasset,trade-inorupgradeorrecycleanddestruc- tion[36,40,43].Theseareallcontractualdecisionsthatarepreplanned duringtheacquisitionoftheassetorduringtheasset’soperationaluse (seeFig.3).Thus,strategicassetsplanningisaprecursorforthepossible outcomeoftheassetdisposalprocessthroughthedefinitionofdisposal methods.Theexpectedoutcomeorvaluesignificantlydependsonthe asset’s condition;theearlier planningensures thatthefinaloutcome doesnotvarysignificantlyfromtheplan[10].

Therefore,theseresultssuggestthatwhilethethreekeysuccessfac- torsforassetsdisposalarebothindependentandcloselyinterconnected, onecanarguethatstrategicassetsplanningisbyfarthemostdominant factor.Strategicassetplanning,eventhoughalower-orderconceptthan strategicassetsmanagement,playsamoresignificantroleinthesuccess oftheassetdisposalprocess[23].Inaddition,strategicassetsplanning defines,evenifvaguely,thechoiceofmethodofassetdisposalbecause itprovidesthelong-termviewoftheassetoveritslifetime.Mostchal- lengesoftheassetsdisposalprocesscouldbetracedbacktowardsplan- ning[1,29,41].

Uncoveringthelinkbetweenassets’disposalandsustainableprocurement practice?

Thefindingsofthisstudysuggestthatthechoiceofdisposalmech- anism hasasignificantimpactontheassetdisposalprocess’ssuccess (p=.794,x2=34.011).Allthemethodsormechanismsofassetdisposal suchassale,recycle,destroyetc.haveimplicationsforsustainablepro- curementpractice.Sustainableprocurementinvolvesembeddingenvi- ronmental andsocialconsiderationsintheprocurementcontractsfor goodandservicesthatpublicorganizationsbuyanduse [2,4,12].As Marlowetal.,[25]explain,itentailsintegratingsustainabilityintoan asset’swholelife,whichmeansthatthedecisionsandactionsacrossthe entirelifecycleoftheassetfrompurchasetodisposalreflectthisgoal.

ThThus,thesuccessofassetdisposalprocessis translatabletobetter sustainableprocurementpractices.Forexample,thesalethroughauc- tionseekstorecaptureasmuch valueoftheassetaspossible,which canberedistributedtoothersocietyneeds[2,29].Thesameeffecton societycanbemadeaboutdonationasamethod,whichinaddition, enhancessocialinclusion.Eventhenon-price-baseddisposalmethods

(7)

suchasrecyclingandupgrademethodstargetensuringthatorganiza- tionsusetheleastamountofresourcesaspossibleforthesameneed [26].Thedestructionmethodispopularwhenpublicauthoritiesseek toprotectthepublicagainstharmfulafter-usehazards[7,32].Consis- tentwithZaidi[45],sustainableprocurementtranslatesintosustainable development.ChandimaRatnayake andMarkeset[10]showthatthe managementofanasset’sintegritytranslatestosustainablevalueinan organization’slongtermperformance.Theliteraturedemonstratesthat successfulassetsdisposalprocesscontributesdirectlytosustainablepro- curementpracticesforpublicorganizations.

Overall,itcanbeconcludedthatsuccessfulstrategicassetsmanage- ment,strategicplanningforassetsdisposalandthechoiceofanappro- priateassets’disposalmechanismarecriticalforsuccessfuldisposalof publicassetsdisposalinpublicorganizationsinUganda.Ofthethree broadfactors,strategicplanningforassetsdisposalhasthemostsignif- icantimpactontheassetsdisposalprocessandtopublicorganizations assetperformancedespiteonlybeinganoperationalconstruct.

Thechallengesinthedisposalofassetsasseenintheliterature(e.g.

[1,5,20,31,41)includingthelackoftraining,graftandprocessabuse, thelackofskillsandknowledgeaboutdisposal,andthelackofman- agementsupportormirrorthefindingsofthefactoranalysis– butina positiveway.Themostsignificantsuccessfulassetdisposalsub-factors inTable2mirrorthechallengeswefoundintheliterature.Theseinclude bettertrainingofassetmanagers,betterfundingtoassetmanagement, increasedaccesstoinformationontheconditionandvalueoftheassets, marketsurveystoknowthevalueoftheassets,andprofessionalismin assetmanagement.

Mostnotablythroughstrategicassetsplanning,successfulassetsdis- posalmanagementcontributesdirectlytopublicorganizations’sustain- ableprocurementpractices.

Managerialimplications

Thestudyfindingsprovidemanagerswithtwoareasofreflectionin thedisposalprocessofpublicassets.First,itappearspublicmanagers, especiallyintheeraofnewpublicmanagement,focusmostonstrategic assetsmanagement,i.e.long-termassetgovernancesuchasthelegaland complianceaspectsoftheassetsacquisitionprocess.Thefindingshere demonstratethatstrategicassetmanagementisimportant,butstrategic assetplanningisevenmorecriticalforassetsdisposal.Althoughopera- tional,strategicassetplanningforassetshasfarmoreimpactonvalue formoneyoutcomesbecausethemostvitaloperativeissuessuchasasset installation,usertraining,useoftherightconsumables,assetefficiency, andperformancearedefinedatthatlevel.Throughstrategicassetsplan- ning,publicorganizationscanablydefineuserandoperationalexpec- tationsoftheasset’sutilityongoalssuchastheasset’smaintenanceand obsolescence,whichsignificantlyimpacttheassetdisposaloutcomes.

Besides,strategicassetplanningprovidestheenvironmentalconsidera- tionsontheasset’simpactduringutilizationandthechoiceofasuitable environmentalmechanismofdisposal.

Secondly,thelinkbetweentheassetdisposalprocessandsustain- ableprocurementpractice,althoughdirectandapparent,hasnotbeen emphasizedduringthepublicprocurementprocesses.Wecould only speculatethatthisisbecausetheboundariesofthepublicprocurement processtendtobelimitedtotheacquisitionprocessonly,specifically, thefearthatanasset’swholelifecostperspectiveextendsprocurements roletowardstheassetengineeringandfacilitiesmanagementrole.Thus, thelimitedunderstandingofpublicpurchasers’assetlifecyclemanage- mentspaceisunfortunateandinhibitssustainableprocurementimple- mentation.Therefore,strengtheningpublicorganizations’capacityin assetdisposalmanagementandpublicassets’disposaltowardssustain- ableprocurementshouldbepublicorganizations’primarygoal.Wean- ticipatethatunderstandingthefactorsthatdrivepublicassetdisposal successwillbetterinformpublicassetdisposalprocesses,improveman- agement,assistservicedelivery,andenhancesustainableprocurement developmentofpublicorganizations.

Limitationsandfurtherstudies

Thisstudy’smainlimitationistheempiricaldatausedtodevelopthe linkbetweenassetdisposalandsustainableprocurementpractice.We conceptuallyuse thefindingsonsuccessfulassetdisposaltoestablish theargumentforsustainableprocurementpractice.

Ifasimilarstudywereconductedfromanempiricalperspective,we recommendthatthis“directandapparent” linkbetestedempirically, preferablywithquantitativedata.Besides,thefactthatparticipantsin thisstudyareemployeeswhoworkinonepublicentityinUgandacanbe alimitation.Thismaynotbesorepresentativeofallthepublicorgani- zationsinUganda.Therefore,furtherstudiesshouldfocusonempirical examinationandextendthestudytoabroaderpublicorganizationin Ugandaasawholeoreventotheregional,continentalandgloballevel.

DeclarationofCompetingInterest None

Supplementarymaterials

Supplementarymaterialassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100049.

References

[1] S. Abdullah , A.A. Razak , M.H. Hanafi, M.N. Salleh , Managing government property assets: the main issues from the Malaysian perspective, J. Techno. Soc. 3 (1) (2011) 35–52 .

[2] K. Agbesi , F.D. Fugar , T. Adjei-Kumi , Modeling the adoption of sustainable procure- ment in construction organizations, Built Environ. Proj. Asset. Manag. 8 (No. 5) (2018) 461–476 .

[3] J.E. Amadi-Echendu , K. Brown , R. Willett , J. Mathew , Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management, Springer, London, UK, 2010 .

[4] A. Appolloni , H. Sun , F. Jia , X. Li , Green Procurement in the private sector: a state-of-the-art review between 1996 and 2013, J. Clean. Prod. 85 (2014) 122–133 . [5] O. Atiga , C.J. Adafula , J.D. Nyeadi , Statutory compliance in assets disposal practices in the public sector: evidence from Ghana, J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 9 (1) (2015) 1–6 .

[6] A. Azzi , D. Battini , M. Faccio , A. Persona , F. Sgarbossa , Inventory holding costs measurement: a multi-case study, Int. J. Logist. Manag. 25 (1) (2012) 109–132 . [7] C.W. Babbitt , E. Williams , R. Kahhat , Institutional disposition and management of

end-of-life electronics, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (12) (2011) 5366–5372 . [8] Backer, M.A.M., & Yusoff, W.Z. (2015). A review of assets management prac-

tice in Malaysian local governments , retrieved on June 15th, 2017 from:

eprints.uthm.edu.my.

[9] B.C. Basheka , Procurement planning and local governance in Uganda: a factor anal- ysis approach, Int. J. Procur. Manag. 2 (2) (2009) 191–209 .

[10] R.M. Chandima Ratnayake , T. Markeset , Asset integrity management for sustainable industrial operations: measuring the performance, Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 5 (2) (2012) 145–158 .

[11] J.C. Coakes , C. Ong , SPSS Version 18.0 For Windows Analysis Without Anguish, 1st Ed, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd, Dougall Street, Milton, 2011 .

[12] D. Delmonico , C.J.C. Jabbour , S.C.F. Pereira , A.B.L. de Sousa Jabbour , D.W.S. Ren- wick , A.M.T Thomé, Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerg- ing economies: evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134 (2018) 70–79 .

[13] A. Ghasemi , S. Zahedias , Normality Test For Statistical Analysis, Pearson Publishers, New Jersey, 2012 .

[14] Giuntini, R. (2010). Cannibalizing equipment for parts: why and how. Retrieved on June 20th, 2017 from: http://slmhub.com/.../cannibalizing-equpipment -

[15] M.H. Hanis , B. Trigunarsyah , C. Susilawati , Elements of public asset management framework for local governments in developing countries, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management (ICCREM 2010), Brisbane, Royal on the Park Hotel, 2011 1-3 December 2010 .

[16] N.A.J Hastings , Public Assets Management, Springer-Verlag, London, 2010 . [17] L. Jinya , W. Hong , Problem & resolving methods of scrap assets disposal of colleges

and universities in the practice, China Mod. Educ. Equip. (13) (2014) 9 2014 . [18] S. Kaewunruen , P. Rungskunroch , A through-life evaluation of end-of-life rolling

stocks considering asset recycling, energy recovering, and financial benefit, J. Clean.

Prod. 212 (2019) 1008–1024 .

[19] Kaganova, O. (2012). Guidebook on real property assets management for local govern- ments . IDG Assets Management Toolkit, No. 1, accessed on June 25, 2017 from:

http://webarchive.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412531

[20] A.A. Kamili , Challenges facing management of disposal of assets in public procure- ment entities in Tanzania, Masters dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam, 2011 . [21] D. Koloseni , F. Shimba , Challenges associated with ICT assets disposal in Tanzania,

ICeND, CCIS 171 (2011) 298–308 .

(8)

[22] H.J. Krent , N.S. Zeppos , Monitoring governmental disposition of assets: fashioning regulatory substitutes for market controls, Vand. L. Rev. 52 (1999) 1703 . [23] M. Laue, K. Brown, P. Scherrer, R. Keast, Integrated Strategic Asset Management:

Frameworks and Dimensions, in: A. Gheorghe, M. Masera, P. Katina (Eds.), In- franomics. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Springer, Cham., 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02493-6_6 .

[24] J.A. Lukito , C. Susilawati , M.H. Hanis , Natural disaster risk-informed for a better public infrastructure assets planning in Indonesian Central Government, in: Pro- ceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure Renewal and Reconstruction: Risk-informed Disaster Management:

Planning for Response, Recovery and Resilience, Brisbane, QLD, Queensland Univer- sity of Technology, 2013 8-10 July 2013 .

[25] D. Marlow , D. Beale , S. Burn , Linking asset management with sustainability: views from the Australian sector, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 102 (1) (2010) 56–67 . [26] I. Maslennikova , D. Foley , Xerox’s approach to sustainability, Interfaces 30 (3)

(2000) 226–233 .

[27] D. Matthews , E. Gibson , in: Fixed Asset Disposal: Methods and Strategies for Dis- posing of Personal Property in the Public Sector, International Handbook of Public Procurement, 2009, p. 591 .

[28] D.M. Mihaiu , A. Opreana , M.P. Cristescu , Efficiency, effectiveness and performance of the public sector, Roman. J. Econ. Forecast. 4 (2010) 132–146 .

[29] G. Mugurusi , J.P. Ssetumba , P.A. Obicci , The value for money (VfM) illusion: an elusive principle in the public procurement system in uganda, in: In conference Pro- ceedings of the 7th International Public Procurement Conference , Bali Indonesia, 2016 –2016 .

[30] N.K. Munyao , M. Moroonge , Effect of public procurement framework on disposal of obsolete stock in the public sector in Kenya: a case of the judiciary of Kenya, Strateg.

J. Bus. Change Manag. 4 (37) (2017) 660–675 2 .

[31] K.E. Ndosi , Disposal of Assets in Government Executive agencies: the Case of Tan- zania Institute of Accountancy (TIA) –Dar Es Salaam, Unpublished Masters Disser- tation, Mzumbe University, Tanzania, 2013 .

[32] P.S. Norum , Towards sustainable clothing disposition: exploring the consumer choice to use trash as a disposal option, Sustainability 9 (7) (2017) 1187 . [33] E. Nsiah-Asare , K.B. Prempeh , Measures of ensuring value for money in public pro-

curement: a case of selected polytechnics in Ghana, J. Logist. Manag. 5 (1) (2016) 22–31 .

[34] OAG reportAnnual Financial Audit Report, UPPC Entebbe, Uganda, Entebbe, 2017 . [35] D.F. Polit , C.T. Beck , The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations, Res. Nurs. Health 29 (5) (2006) 489–497 . [36] PPDA (Disposal of Public Assets) Regulations (2014). Statutory instrument supplement

no.3 of 2014. The Uganda Gazette No. 9 Volume CVII dated 14th February 2014 [37] PPDA report. (2017). Annual Procurement Report. Entebbe: UPPC Entebbe, Uganda [38] Renda, A., Pelkmans,J., Egenhofer, C., Schrefler, L., Luchetta, G.,Selçuki, C., Balles- teros, J., & Zirnhelt, A. (2012). The uptake of green public procurement in the EU27.

Study prepared for DG Environment, European Commission, CEPS in collaboration with the College of Europe, Brussels.

[39] R.K. Singh , S. Agrawal , Analyzing disposition strategies in reverse supply chains:

fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J. 29 (No. 3) (2018) 427–443 . [40] T.P. Snyder , M.J. Luby , The sale and lease of public assets: fiscal savior or sacrilege?

Public Works Manag.Policy 18 (3) (2013) 204–228 .

[41] A.M. Susan , G.S. Namusonge , Factors affecting the rate of disposal of assets in public sector organizations: a case of Yatta Sub-County, Kenya, Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc.

Sci. 4 (5) (2014) 2222–6990 .

[42] E. Wahome , P. Marendi , The effects of unserviceable assets disposal on performance of government ministries in Kenya: a case of the national treasury, Strateg. J. Bus.

Change Manag.t 2 (11) (2015) 194–217 .

[43] J.G. Xiong , X.Y. Xiang , On the choice of disposal methods of commercial non-per- forming assets of assets management corporation, J. Hunan Univ. Commer. (6) (2010) 10 .

[44] A.G. Yong , S. Pearce , A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis, Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol 9 (2) (2013) 79–94 .

[45] S.A.H. Zaidi , F.M. Mirza , F. Hou , R.U Ashraf , Addressing the sustainable through sustainable procurement: what factors resist the implementation of sustainable pro- curement in Pakistan? Socioecon. Plan. Sci. 68 (2019) 100671 .

[46] M.K. Mensah , Strategies for effective disposal of goods and equipment in public in- stitutions, Kwame Nkrumah university of science and technology, Msc. dissertation, 2014 .

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Of the specific cutting pile handling techniques evaluated using environmental impact, energy use, safety, technical status and cost criteria, gravel dumping using a fall-pipe

(BV-Bio) is the book value of equity minus total reported biological assets, HC is biological assets at historical cost, meaning biological assets minus fair value adjustments

This finding suggests that (1) the economies of scope arising from the combination of the target’s technology assets with the assets of the acquiring firm are an important

This report analyses the political and economic mechanisms the Russian political and military leadership has at its disposal to positively impact the performance of the

As part of enhancing the EU’s role in both civilian and military crisis management operations, the EU therefore elaborated on the CMCO concept as an internal measure for

The four main areas of research in BAS 8 are support to the Armed Forces from the civil sector, critical infrastructure and critical societal assets, crisis management exercises

In the second period the downstream party will punish the upstream party by refusing to trade with him and instead buy the product in the alternative market at a price P.. In

Financial centers should recognize that victim countries are not familiar with the peculiarities of the laws of every recipient country, and therefore