• No results found

Smell, taste and trigeminal disorders in a 65-year-old population

In this study, chemosensory function (smell and taste) was investigated in 223 individuals (123 men, 100 women), randomly selected from study sample of the OsloMunn65 study.

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of smell, taste and burning mouth sensation in a 65-year-old population in Oslo, Norway, and to investigate associations between these disorders and gender, the presence of chronic diseases and use of medications, smoking, and salivary secretion rates.

According to results from the Sniffin´ Sticks test and Taste Strips test, 34% of the participants had smell disorders (28% hyposmia (reduced smell function) and 6% anosmia (total loss of smell)), 28% had taste disorders (21% hypogeusia (reduced taste function) and 7% ageusia (total loss of taste)) and burning mouth sensation was reported by 4% of the participants. A combination of both smell and taste disorders was present in 13% of the participants.

Regarding taste function, sweet taste was most often identified correctly, while sour taste was least often identified correctly in all four concentrations. In addition, the present study showed that women had more sensitive smell- and taste function than men. Self-reported smell perception was significantly lower in anosmic individuals than to hyposmic and

normosmic participants. Hyposmic individuals also scored their smell perception significantly lower compared to normosmic participants. However, the majority of affected individuals had low awareness of reduced smell and taste function, and no significant differences in self-reported taste perception were found between normogeusic, hypogeusic and ageusic participants. Furthermore, within this study population, some diseases and medications were associated with chemosensory disorders and burning mouth sensation.

33 Figure 2. Prevalence of chemosensory disorders

As mentioned, this study showed an overall low awareness of reduced smell and taste function among affected individuals. Furthermore, there was a low agreement between the results for self-reported smell and taste and the measured values. Since participants in this study represent the general population and not a selected group of people suffering from known chemosensory loss, participants with reduced smell perception may not have been aware of their condition. The visual analogue scale used in the present study has previously been used to investigate self-reported smell and taste perception in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome and healthy individuals (74, 75, 109, 110). Rusthen et al. found a significant positive correlation between measured and self-reported smell and taste ability in Sjögren’s patients (74). Landis et al. did not find a significant correlation between self-reported olfactory function prior to olfactory testing and measured olfactory function in healthy individuals (110). It might be speculated that the use of VAS for assessment of self-reported chemosensory function might be more suited when individuals with specific disorders are included rather than individuals from the general population. The fact that the present study showed low agreement between measured and self-reported smell and taste scores may indicate that smell and taste perception assessed by a VAS might be subject to individual interpretation. Considering this, the use of VAS for assessment for self-reported olfactory and gustatory function in a general population might be more suitable in longitudinal studies. They can be used to compare changes in VAS scores from start to follow up rather than comparing scores between individuals in a cross-sectional study.

34

Regarding the examination of gustatory (taste) function, taste strips (Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) can be used for both lateral testing of the tongue and whole mouth testing (81). The lateral test enables detection of function separately on both sides of the tongue. However, since the aim of this study was to investigate an overall prevalence of taste disorders and not disorders related to specific regions of the tongue or nerves, the whole mouth testing method was used. It can be speculated that this gives a more realistic picture of the taste perception and is more relevant for the participants who uses taste receptors throughout the oral cavity at the same time.

Olfactory function was tested using Sniffin` Sticks-Identification test (Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) consisting of 12 felt-tip odor pens. Ideally, a test including both threshold, discrimination and identification resulting in a TDI-score (threshold,

discrimination, identification), would give a more comprehensive assessment of the

olfactory function. However, due to time limitation in this study, only identification test for screening of olfactory function was performed.

In the present study, participants were asked if they had experienced a burning sensation in the mouth. They were also asked to specify the location of the burning sensation.

Disturbances in the trigeminal nerve may often lead to a burning mouth sensation. However, for diagnosing trigeminal disorders a more comprehensive examination and recording of symptoms would have been necessary. Because the burning mouth sensation was assessed through a few questions with no further examination, we decided to not use the term burning mouth syndrome that would have required a more strict assessment to diagnose (111).

The individuals included in the chemosensory examination also answered the OHIP-14 questionnaire. A significantly higher percentage of individuals with ageusia (27%) reported negative impact on OHRQoL (“Fairly often” or “Very often” to at least one of the OHIP-14 items) compared to normogeusic participants (6%). No significant association was found between hypogeusic (15%) and ageusic or normogeusic participants. Regarding smell function, a significant larger proportion of hyposmic participants (18%) reported negative impact on OHRQoL compared to normosmic participants (6%). No significant association was found between anosmic (7%) and hyposmic or normosmic participants. However, the power in these analyses can be discussed due to small samples of individuals with different severity of smell and taste disorders. In addition, the applicability of the OHIP-14 instrument in these analyses can be discussed. Even though the chemosensory function includes physiological processes that takes place in the oral cavity and adjacent tissues, some individuals might not

35

consider smell and taste function as a part of oral health when answering the oral health-related quality of life measure.

36

Discussion of major findings

The results indicated a substantial need for periodontal treatment among this population of 65-year-old Oslo citizens. By reporting the stages and grades of periodontitis in the

population, this work also provides information about the proportion of individuals that requires different levels of treatment complexity, and may help for planning the resources in dental services. To be able to prevent an increase of periodontal disease in the elderly population in the years to come, it will be of importance that dental health professionals are able to both detect periodontitis at early stages, and help in the prevention of this disease.

The risk indicators for severe periodontitis revealed in this study, i.e. non-western country of birth, diabetes type 2 and smoking, are important to highlight in order to ensure awareness among high risk individuals, but also among health authorities, and medical and dental professionals, so that the necessary preventive measures are initiated. Furthermore, the results from the present work indicating that periodontitis in early stages does not have a great impact on oral health-related quality of life in affected individuals, and highlights the importance of regular dental visits so that these stages of periodontitis can be discovered and necessary treatment be initiated. It is also important for dental professionals to be able to inform and advise patients about any necessary health behavior changes. Such preventive programs have shown to have a positive effect on reducing periodontitis (112-115).

The results showed that one-third of the participants had impaired smell function and more than one fourth had impaired taste function. However, the results also showed low

awareness of chemosensory disorders among affected individuals indicating that these disorders might not have a large impact on the life of individuals in the present sample.

Nevertheless, it is important to raise awareness of possible changes in these senses throughout life, for example as a result of diseases or medications more frequent used in older age, in order to prevent any harmful consequences such as negative changes in dietary composition or difficulties of detecting smoke or other dangerous situations. Therefore, this study indicates a need for attention towards detection, diagnostics and treatment of

chemosensory disorders in the Norwegian health sector.

37

Concluding remarks and future perspective

This thesis provides new knowledge about the prevalence of periodontitis and

chemosensory disorders among a large sample of 65-year-olds living in Oslo. In addition, the thesis highlights possible risk indicators for these conditions as well as the young elderly individuals´ awareness of these conditions and the possible effects on their oral health-related quality of life.

The present work showed that approximately half of the participants had periodontitis, and the majority of these had unstable, recurrent periodontitis. However, there was no

significant difference in the proportion of individuals reporting a negative impact on OHRQoL in non-periodontitis participants compared to individuals with periodontitis. The present work also indicated a low awareness of chemosensory disorders among the affected individuals. Lack of awareness in relation to diseases in general prevent individuals seeking health services until the disease has progressed to a state where more complex treatment is needed. Therefore, preventive measures and oral health advices to the population are important for preventing the progression and negative consequences of oral diseases. In addition, in order to prevent an increase in burden of diseases among the elderly in the years to come, information that strengthens the awareness of healthcare personnel,

including dentists, general physicians, and staff in nursing homes, etc., about conditions that can affect oral health will be increasingly important. Furthermore, appropriate knowledge about preventive measures that should be implemented for individuals at risk will be crucial.

In order to achieve this, interdisciplinary collaboration across different health disciplines will be important in the years to come.

At present, it can be expected that the participants in the OsloMunn65-study mostly use private dental services. According to the current subsidized scheme for dental services in Norway, patients can receive subsidized treatment in relation to certain diagnoses, e.g.

periodontitis – a diagnosis scheme. However, when individuals receive home care services or are living in a nursing home, they have the right to public dental services free of charge independent of diagnoses – a budget-based scheme. Therefore, as the proportion of elderly people in the population increases, the need for public dental services will most likely also increase. This trend will either require more funding of the public dental health services, or a change in the current system structure. Data from the present work contribute with

prevalence data, which may be of use for planning future health services.

38

References

1. Elderly populatiation (indicator). In: OECD Data. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEDC). 2022. https://data.oecd.org/pop/elderly-population.htm. Accessed 07 Sep 2022.

2. United Nations DoEaSA, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019 (ST/ESA/SER.A/444). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Afairs PD; 2020.

3. Strand BH, Berg CL, Syse A, Nielsen CS, Skirbekk VF, Totland TH, et al. Health among the elderly in Norway. In: Public health report. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. 2019.

https://www.fhi.no/en/op/hin/groups/health-and-ageing-in-norway/?term=&h=1#about-this-page.

Accessed 14 Sep 2022.

4. Hugoson A, Koch G, Göthberg C, Helkimo AN, Lundin SA, Norderyd O, et al. Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 30 years (1973-2003). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings. Swed Dent J. 2005;29:139-55.

5. Müller F, Shimazaki Y, Kahabuka F, Schimmel M. Oral health for an ageing population: the importance of a natural dentition in older adults. Int Dent J. 2017;67 Suppl 2:7-13.

6. Gooch BF, Eke PI, Malvitz DM. Public health and aging: retention of natural teeth among older adults--United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1226-9.

7. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization.

2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186463. Accessed 14 Sep 2022.

8. Buhlin K, Gustafsson A, Håkansson J, Klinge B. Oral health and cardiovascular disease in Sweden. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:254-9.

9. Strömberg E, Holmèn A, Hagman-Gustafsson ML, Gabre P, Wårdh I. Oral health-related quality-of-life in homebound elderly dependent on moderate and substantial supportive care for daily living. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:771-7.

10. Chávez EM, Kossioni A, Fukai K. Policies Supporting Oral Health in Ageing Populations Are Needed Worldwide. Int Dent J. 2022;72:S27-s38.

11. Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Eriksen HM, Hansen BF. Trends in periodontal health among 35-year-olds in Oslo, 1973-2003. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:867-72.

12. Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Eriksen HM. Changes in caries experience among 35-year-old Oslo citizens, 1973-2003. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65:72-7.

13. Holde GE, Oscarson N, Tillberg A, Marstrander P, Jonsson B. Methods and background characteristics of the TOHNN study: a population-based study of oral health conditions in northern Norway. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016;75:30169.

14. Holde GE, Oscarson N, Trovik TA, Tillberg A, Jonsson B. Periodontitis Prevalence and Severity in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Norwegian Circumpolar Communities. J Periodontol.

2017;88:1012-22.

15. Bongo AS, Brustad M, Oscarson N, Jönsson B. Periodontal health in an indigenous Sámi population in Northern Norway: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:104.

16. Stødle IH, Verket A, Høvik H, Sen A, Koldsland OC. Prevalence of periodontitis based on the 2017 classification in a Norwegian population. The HUNT Study. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:1189-1199.

17. Henriksen BM, Axéll T, Laake K. Geographic differences in tooth loss and denture-wearing among the elderly in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:403-11.

18. Helse og omsorgsdepartementet. Forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi på tannhelsefeltet (2017 -2027). In: Handlingsplan, Sammen om kunnskapsløft for oral helse. Helse og

omsorgsdepertamentet. 2017.

https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/a176427580234e5d818f446a7b66feb1/strategi_oral_hel se_170907.pdf. Accessed 01 Sep 2022.

39

19. Marcenes W, Bernabé E. Global Burden of Oral Conditions. In: Peres MA, Antunes JLF, Watt RG, editors. Oral Epidemiology: A Textbook on Oral Health Conditions, Research Topics and Methods.

Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 23-37.

20. Duffy VB, Backstrand JR, Ferris AM. Olfactory dysfunction and related nutritional risk in free-living, elderly women. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:879-84; quiz 85-6.

21. Last JM. Dictionary of epidemiology. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

22. Baelum V, López R. Epidemiology of Periodontal Diseases. In: Peres MA, Antunes JLF, Watt RG, editors. Oral Epidemiology: A Textbook on Oral Health Conditions, Research Topics and Methods.

Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 57-78.

23. Dicker RC. A Brief Review of the Basic Principles of Epidemiology. In: Gregg, M, editor. Field Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 16-37.

24. Torabi S, Soni A. Histology, Periodontium. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed 26 Aug 2022.

25. Nanci A, Bosshardt DD. Structure of periodontal tissues in health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2006;40:11-28.

26. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet. 2005;366:1809-20.

27. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45 Suppl 20:S68-s77.

28. Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM, Wen YF. Global, regional, and national burden of severe periodontitis, 1990-2019: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:1165-88.

29. Wahlin Å, Papias A, Jansson H, Norderyd O. Secular trends over 40 years of periodontal health and disease in individuals aged 20-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden: Repeated cross-sectional studies. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:1016-24.

30. The World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. The World Health Organization. 1946. https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution. Accessed 04 Sep 2022.

31. Sischo L, Broder HL. Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1264-70.

32. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403-9.

33. Inglehart MR. Oral Health and Quality of Life. In: Mostofsky DI, Fortune F, editors. Bahavioral Dentistry. Second ed. 2014: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 11-26.

34. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:284-90.

35. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569-85.

36. EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.

37. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. In: Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Dental Ecology 1997. p. 152-160.

38. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990;54:680-7.

39. Riva F, Seoane M, Reichenheim ME, Tsakos G, Celeste RK. Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021.

40. Dahl KE, Wang NJ, Skau I, Ohrn K. Oral health-related quality of life and associated factors in Norwegian adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69:208-14.

40

41. van de Rijt LJM, Stoop CC, Weijenberg RAF, de Vries R, Feast AR, Sampson EL, et al. The Influence of Oral Health Factors on the Quality of Life in Older People: A Systematic Review.

Gerontologist. 2020;60:e378-e94.

42. Kato T, Abrahamsson I, Wide U, Hakeberg M. Periodontal disease among older people and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. Gerodontology. 2018;35:382-90.

43. Menco BPM, Morrison EE. Morphology of the Mammalian Olfactory Epithelium: Form, Fine Structure, Function, and Pathology. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed.

New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 17-49.

44. Patel RM, Pinto JM. Olfaction: Anatomy, physiology, and disease. Clin Anat. 2014;27:54-60.

45. Kratskin IL, Belluzzi O. Anatomy and Neurochemistry of the Olfactory Bulb. In: R.L. D, editor.

Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p.

139-64.

46. Cleland TA, Linster C. Central Olfactory Structures. In: R.L. D, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 135-80.

47. Moon C, Ronnett GV. Molecular Neurobiology of Olfactory Transduction. In: L. DR, editor.

Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p.

75-6.

48. Witt M. RK, Miller I.J.Jr. Morphology of the Peripheral Taste System. In: R.L. D, editor.

Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p.

651-77.

49. Bradley RM, Beidler LM. Saliva: Its Role in Taste Function. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation 2nd ed ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 639 - 50.

50. Doty RL, Cometto-Muñiz JE. Trigeminal Chemosensation. In: L. DR, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 981-99.

51. Murphy C. DRL, Duncan H.J. Clinical disorders of Olfaction. In: R.L. D, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 461-78.

52. Bromley SM, Doty RL. Clinical Disorders Affecting Taste: Evaluation and Management. In: R.L.

D, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 935-57.

53. Fortuna G, Napenas J, Su N, Gruskha M, Klasser GD. Oral Dysesthesia. In: Farah C.S. BR, McCullough M.J., editor. Contemporary Oral Medicine A Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Cham; 2019. p. 2081 - 105.

54. McMillan R, Forssell H, Buchanan JA, Glenny AM, Weldon JC, Zakrzewska JM. Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:Cd002779.

55. Xu W, Sunavala-Dossabhoy G, Spielman AI. Chemosensory loss in COVID-19. Oral Dis. 2022 Jul 5:10.1111/odi.14300. doi: 10.1111/odi.14300. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35790059; PMCID:

PMC9349612.

56. Parma V, Ohla K, Veldhuizen MG, Niv MY, Kelly CE, Bakke AJ, et al. More than smell - COVID-19 is associated with severe impairment of smell, taste, and chemesthesis. Chemical senses.

2020;45:609-622.

57. Mullol J, Alobid I, Mariño-Sánchez F, Izquierdo-Domínguez A, Marin C, Klimek L, et al. The Loss of Smell and Taste in the COVID-19 Outbreak: a Tale of Many Countries. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020;20:61.

58. Brämerson A, Johansson L, Ek L, Nordin S, Bende M. Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction: the skövde population-based study. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:733-7.

59. Boesveldt S, Lindau ST, McClintock MK, Hummel T, Lundstrom JN. Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in older adults: a national probability study. Rhinology. 2011;49:324-30.

60. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L. Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science. 1984;226:1441-3.

61. Landis BN, Konnerth CG, Hummel T. A study on the frequency of olfactory dysfunction.

Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1764-9.

41

62. Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA. 2002;288:2307-12.

63. Haehner A, Masala C, Walter S, Reichmann H, Hummel T. Incidence of Parkinson's disease in a large patient cohort with idiopathic smell and taste loss. J Neurol. 2019;266:339-45.

64. Merkonidis C, Grosse F, Ninh T, Hummel C, Haehner A, Hummel T. Characteristics of chemosensory disorders--results from a survey. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:1403-16.

65. Tammiala-Salonen T, Hiidenkari T, Parvinen T. Burning mouth in a Finnish adult population.

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21:67-71.

66. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Burning mouth syndrome: prevalence and associated factors. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999;28:350-4.

67. Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG, Moore-Gillon V, Shaman P, Mester AF, et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:519-28.

68. Feng P, Huang L, Wang H. Taste bud homeostasis in health, disease, and aging. Chem Senses.

2014;39:3-16.

69. Watabe-Rudolph M, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Lechel A, Rolyan H, Scheithauer MO, Rettinger G, et al. Telomere shortening impairs regeneration of the olfactory epithelium in response to injury but not under homeostatic conditions. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27801.

70. Hoffman HJ, Ishii EK, MacTurk RH. Age-related changes in the prevalence of smell/taste problems among the United States adult population. Results of the 1994 disability supplement to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;855:716-22.

71. Vennemann MM, Hummel T, Berger K. The association between smoking and smell and taste impairment in the general population. J Neurol. 2008;255:1121-6.

72. Wehling E, Lundervold AJ, Espeset T, Reinvang I, Bramerson A, Nordin S. Even cognitively well-functioning adults are unaware of their olfactory dysfunction: Implications for ENT clinicians and researchers. Rhinology. 2015;53:89-94.

73. Heian IT, Helvik AS, Hummel T, Øie MR, Nordgård S, Bratt M, et al. Measured and self-reported olfactory function in voluntary Norwegian adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.

2022;279:4925-4933.

74. Rusthen S, Young A, Herlofson BB, Aqrawi LA, Rykke M, Hove LH, et al. Oral disorders, saliva secretion, and oral health-related quality of life in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125:265-71.

75. Singh PB, Young A, Homayouni A, Hove LH, Petrovski BE, Herlofson BB, et al. Distorted Taste and Impaired Oral Health in Patients with Sicca Complaints. Nutrients. 2019;11:264.

76. Solemdal K, Sandvik L, Willumsen T, Mowe M. Taste ability in hospitalised older people compared with healthy, age-matched controls. Gerodontology. 2014;31:42-8.

77. Statistics Norway (2019). Statistics retrieved from the Microdata database. Unpublished data.

https://www.ssb.no/en/data-til-forskning/utlan-av-data-til-forskere.

78. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold.

Chem Senses. 1997;22:39-52.

79. Eibenstein A, Fioretti AB, Lena C, Rosati N, Ottaviano I, Fusetti M. Olfactory screening test:

experience in 102 Italian subjects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005;25:18-22.

80. Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S. "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology. 1996;34:222-6.

81. Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, et al. "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers.

J Neurol. 2009;256:242-8.

82. Anttila SS, Knuuttila ML, Sakki TK. Depressive symptoms as an underlying factor of the sensation of dry mouth. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:215-8.